Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

As being an American. Why do I feel like a lot of Americans want a theocracy?

B5CB5C Veteran
edited March 2012 in General Banter
Dennis Terry Introduces Rick Santorum



"I don't care what the liberals say, I don't care what the naysayers say, this nation was founded as a Christian nation...There is only one God and his name is Jesus. I'm tired of people telling me that I can't say those words.. Listen to me, If you don't love America, If you don't like the way we do things I have one thing to say - GET OUT. We don't worship Buddha, we don't worship Mohammad, we don't worship Allah, we worship God, we worship God's son Jesus Christ."
«13

Comments

  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    The US wasn't founded as a Christian nation, was it? Someone posted some info last year about how the Founding Fathers did not intend to found a Christian nation. If they did, they probably wouldn't have required a separation of Church and State.

    One of the ways we do things is to protest action by government that we don't agree with. We do like that way of doing things, so here we are, still here. :) People who don't like the protest option, the option to voice our disagreement, go to Russia to live. Or Kazakhstan.
  • B5CB5C Veteran


    One of the ways we do things is to protest action by government that we don't agree with. We do like that way of doing things, so here we are, still here. :) People who don't like the protest option, the option to voice our disagreement, go to Russia to live. Or Kazakhstan.
    Not any more;
    Obama signs anti-protest Trespass Bill
    Only days after clearing Congress, US President Barack Obama signed his name to H.R. 347 on Thursday, officially making it a federal offense to cause a disturbance at certain political events — essentially criminalizing protest in the States.

    RT broke the news last month that H.R. 347, the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011, had overwhelmingly passed the US House of Representatives after only three lawmakers voted against it. On Thursday this week, President Obama inked his name to the legislation and authorized the government to start enforcing a law that has many Americans concerned over how the bill could bury the rights to assemble and protest as guaranteed in the US Constitution.

    Under H.R. 347, which has more commonly been labeled the Trespass Bill by Congress, knowingly entering a restricted area that is under the jurisdiction of Secret Service protection can garner an arrest. The law is actually only a slight change to earlier legislation that made it an offense to knowingly and willfully commit such a crime. Under the Trespass Bill’s latest language chance, however, someone could end up in law enforcement custody for entering an area that they don’t realize is Secret Service protected and “engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct” or “impede[s] or disrupt[s] the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions.”

    The Secret Service serves as the police that protects not just current and former American presidents, but are also dispatched to monitor special events of national significance, a category with a broad cast of qualifiers. In the past, sporting events, state funerals, inaugural addresses and NATO and G-8 Summits have been designated as such by the US Department of Homeland Security, the division that decides when and where the Secret Service are needed outside of their normal coverage.

    http://rt.com/usa/news/trespass-bill-obama-secret-227/
    Also states like Georgia and Arizona are creating laws to make Nonviolent resistance illegal:
    http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-macon/sb-469-georgia-republicans-target-non-violent-protests-first-amendment-rights

  • The US is not a Christian nation. The large majority may self identify as Christians but we are a secular nation, or atleast we try to be. I honestly have no idea how Santorum has made it this far and for some reason he can not understand the concept of separation of church and state.
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited March 2012
    Because some of them do, regardless of what the Constitution or the Treaty of Tripoli says.
  • B5CB5C Veteran
    The US is not a Christian nation. The large majority may self identify as Christians but we are a secular nation, or atleast we try to be. I honestly have no idea how Santorum has made it this far and for some reason he can not understand the concept of separation of church and state.
    That is because the United States is a very religious country and the Republican Party is very influenced by the Christian right.

  • GuiGui Veteran
    I wouldn't get too excited about Dennis Terry. We Americans love a spectacle and it is an election year.
  • ZaylZayl Veteran
    Sometimes politics makes me feel like lighting everything around me on fire and watch it all burn to ashes.
  • That is because the United States is a very religious country and the Republican Party is very influenced by the Christian right.
    Actually the US isn't that religious compared to a lot of other countries. The statistics don't bear out the common perception. Of course a lot depends on how you define "religious" also.

    It *is* true that a very, very tiny minority of very, very loud-mouthed pseudo-"Christians" on the far, far, far right exert a disproportionately gigantic influence over the GOP. That's clear. But they're a long way from representing even a sizable majority of self-described Republican voters.
  • B5CB5C Veteran


    It *is* true that a very, very tiny minority of very, very loud-mouthed pseudo-"Christians" on the far, far, far right exert a disproportionately gigantic influence over the GOP. That's clear. But they're a long way from representing even a sizable majority of self-described Republican voters.
    I was an Republican 10 years. I was a PCO, member of my County Party, Young Republicans, and volunteering. It was an Jesus club.
  • Is the speaker a "preacher "? He sounds like a non denominational Christian. And he's wrong, Muslims follow the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

    Sounds like a big asshole to me.

    Procreation is between a man and a woman...a marriage, which is a legal contract has nothing to do with the other.

    Yup, big asshole...hurry up November.
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    The Young Republicans are a Jesus club? Where do you live B5C? I wonder if that's true nation-wide, even on the Left Coast?
    Here's what the ACLU has to say about HR 347:

    https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill
    Hooray for Mountains, and his online research!

  • personperson Don't believe everything you think The liminal space Veteran


    ;)
  • B5CB5C Veteran
    edited March 2012
    Is the speaker a "preacher "? He sounds like a non denominational Christian. And he's wrong, Muslims follow the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

    Sounds like a big asshole to me.

    Procreation is between a man and a woman...a marriage, which is a legal contract has nothing to do with the other.

    Yup, big asshole...hurry up November.
    He is a Baptist Minister.

    http://www.gsbcla.com/meet-the-staff/

    A lot of pastors believe Muhammad was tricked to believe that Allah was the God of Abraham by the devil or just insane.
    The Young Republicans are a Jesus club? Where do you live B5C? I wonder if that's true nation-wide, even on the Left Coast?

    Even in Washington State, once you leave the city area and enter the rural areas of Washington. It's Jesus country.

    Heck even Seattle, Washington is home of the Creationist: Discovery Institute
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_Institute
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    edited March 2012
    Where were you with these references when someone recently maintained that intelligent design wasn't creationism and wasn't a religious doctrine, so it's ok to teach it in school? On one of our very own threads...

    Thanks for the tip about WA State. I had no idea. It seems that wherever you find the timber industry, you find strong conservatism. Northern CA is like that, too. They're still felling redwoods. :bawl:
  • B5CB5C Veteran
    Where were you with these references when someone recently maintained that intelligent design wasn't creationism and wasn't a religious doctrine, so it's ok to teach it in school? On one of our very own threads...
    I probably was one of those people who said that ID is creationism in a costume.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    Where were you with these references when someone recently maintained that intelligent design wasn't creationism and wasn't a religious doctrine, so it's ok to teach it in school? On one of our very own threads...
    My memory may be wrong, but wasn't the debate about what should be taught in science?

  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    Interesting. Mountains is quoted posting something that doesn't appear at all under his name. :scratch: I think you're right, Mts.
  • What is intelligent design and creationism?
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    Intelligent design is basically the idea that creation and evolution were directed by God.

    Creationism is the idea that God created Adam and Eve, and so forth. No science or evolution was involved. In its strictest form it would say that the 7 day scenario took place in 24 hour days, etc.
  • Thank you vinlyn.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    ;)
  • "Why do I feel Americans want a Theocracy?"
    In all honesty and seriousness, it is because you are a member of the Left. I am secular and non-Christian as well, but I have yet to meet a Christian interested in instituting canonical, Talmudic, or Catechismic law. But I have met Muslims, charming decent and nice ones, who would like to Sharia law of some sort imposed.

    You see danger on the Right, but it is the people on the Right by and large who want the government to have less power in the economy, less power over personal decisions, and less power over the things we buy.

    Most conservatives I know, religious and non-religious, want to see the government operate under its strict, enumerated powers, as stated in the Constitution. They don't care a whit for seeing a theocracy.
  • B5CB5C Veteran


    In all honesty and seriousness, it is because you are a member of the Left. I am secular and non-Christian as well, but I have yet to meet a Christian interested in instituting canonical, Talmudic, or Catechismic law. But I have met Muslims, charming decent and nice ones, who would like to Sharia law of some sort imposed.

    You see danger on the Right, but it is the people on the Right by and large who want the government to have less power in the economy, less power over personal decisions, and less power over the things we buy.

    Most conservatives I know, religious and non-religious, want to see the government operate under its strict, enumerated powers, as stated in the Constitution. They don't care a whit for seeing a theocracy.
    BS. Conservatives do want some government control. They want government to control who gets married, who gets abortion, and which nation to invade. They want government to push their Christian moral agenda.


  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    BS. Conservatives do want some government control. They want government to control who gets married, who gets abortion, and which nation to invade. They want government to push their Christian moral agenda.
    oooh, good point! You're on a roll, B5C

  • Not "control" who gets married. I take a slightly different position than other Republicans. I think we should have civil union, rather than state sanctioned mariages. It would relieve the whole silly argument.

    And not "control" who gets an abortion. But have nobody get an abortion. Think what you will of that.

    And war in America has never been the domain of one side. Republican and Democrat administrations have all engaged in warfare and invasions.


  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    edited March 2012
    There will always be abortions. Just not safe ones, if the safe ones are outlawed.

    Outlawing abortion (or anything) is a form of control.


  • In all honesty and seriousness, it is because you are a member of the Left. I am secular and non-Christian as well, but I have yet to meet a Christian interested in instituting canonical, Talmudic, or Catechismic law. But I have met Muslims, charming decent and nice ones, who would like to Sharia law of some sort imposed.

    You see danger on the Right, but it is the people on the Right by and large who want the government to have less power in the economy, less power over personal decisions, and less power over the things we buy.

    Most conservatives I know, religious and non-religious, want to see the government operate under its strict, enumerated powers, as stated in the Constitution. They don't care a whit for seeing a theocracy.
    BS. Conservatives do want some government control. They want government to control who gets married, who gets abortion, and which nation to invade. They want government to push their Christian moral agenda.


    Yes, but compared to Liberals, Socialists and Sharialawists (for lack of a proper ist) it would be much less government control, I think is his point.... As far as which nation to invade, the process doesn't change left or right
  • B5CB5C Veteran
    Not "control" who gets married. I take a slightly different position than other Republicans. I think we should have civil union, rather than state sanctioned mariages. It would relieve the whole silly argument.

    And not "control" who gets an abortion. But have nobody get an abortion. Think what you will of that.

    And war in America has never been the domain of one side. Republican and Democrat administrations have all engaged in warfare and invasions.


    Unfortunately Knight, you have an minority view on marriage within the GOP.

    Conservatives want to make abortion illegal again. If they can not. They put up jim crow style laws to fear and/or make it harder with red tape to get abortions.

    You have a point. Both sides have been dominate in making war, but yet I don't see Republicans (other than Ron Paul) demanding we pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan. I keep hearing from the GOP is to cut welfare and spend on defense.

    Also I don't see Obama calling for War with Iran.




  • B5CB5C Veteran
    Also Knight, The Christian Right in our nation has an major influence in the Republican Party.

    A great documentary from Al Jazeera:


  • Obama has threatened Iran with military action, and I found this very scary


    http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=72488&pageid=37&pagename=Page+One
  • And not "control" who gets an abortion. But have nobody get an abortion. Think what you will of that.
    At the extreme risk, and high probability of igniting something I'll probably regret, let me ask you a simple question:

    If abortion is outlawed in the US, can you sit there and honestly, truly tell me with a straight face that no woman in the US will ever get an abortion again?

    Because if you do, you're either unbelievably, profoundly ignorant, or you've got your head stuck so far down in the sand you can see China. Women have ****always**** had abortions, ever since the first medicine woman discovered the first herb that did the trick. And prior to 1973, LOTS of American women got abortions every single day. And prior to 1973 a LOT of them died from complications due to having to go to illicit places to get them illegally. I find it stupefying that any thinking person, let alone anyone with a scintilla of compassion for his fellow human beings, could wish that upon them. So whose life is worth more to you? An unborn embryo or a woman who could be your mother, your wife, your girlfriend, your sister, your cousin, or your neighbor? I lost a member of my family that way. I suspect you didn't. Otherwise I doubt you'd hold such a callous belief.

    I just don't get it. And it's highly likely I never will.
  • personperson Don't believe everything you think The liminal space Veteran
    edited March 2012
    The Republican party isn't a monolith there are several factions. The three main ones are the religious, the business and the libertarian. There is also hawk or dove, most go towards hawk but there are those in all the above that have their own reasons for being more dovish. Of course there is much overlap as well.

    IMO, KOB seems to fit mostly into the libertarian wing with a big cup of hawk thrown in. So I'm not that surprised to hear him say the people he knows are hands off.
  • B5CB5C Veteran
    Obama has threatened Iran with military action, and I found this very scary


    http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=72488&pageid=37&pagename=Page+One
    For the purpose of saber rattling. Yes, threats was called. I don't see Obama calling for military action as a high priority with Iran. Unlike, Bush & Co who said screw you to diplomacy. Also a majority of Americans don't want a war with Iran even if Iran gets a bomb.

    http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/americans-dont-want-war-6640

  • DaftChrisDaftChris Spiritually conflicted. Not of this world. Veteran
    Honestly, even though Santorum is crazy (I would honestly tolerate Gingrich or Romney if it meant Santorum wasn't the candidate), I think It's just a way of getting the right wing Christian vote. They hate Obama, they think that America is "lost", therefore play to their irrational beliefs and get the vote.

    There are more than enough level-headed people in the country to prevent a theocracy; even if Santorum was president...*shudder*

  • Obama has threatened Iran with military action, and I found this very scary


    http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=72488&pageid=37&pagename=Page+One
    For the purpose of saber rattling. Yes, threats was called. I don't see Obama calling for military action as a high priority with Iran. Unlike, Bush & Co who said screw you to diplomacy. Also a majority of Americans don't want a war with Iran even if Iran gets a bomb.

    http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/americans-dont-want-war-6640

    None of the Republican contenders, nor Bush has done anything more than saber rattling towards Iran as well... I agree that the majority of Americans left or right do not want a war with Iran
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran


    BS. Conservatives do want some government control. They want government to control who gets married, who gets abortion, and which nation to invade. They want government to push their Christian moral agenda.


    You're very right.

    When you stop to think about it, the conservatives want less government control, except when it's about an issue that is important to them (such as abortion and gay marriage).

    And, conversely, liberals prefer more government control, except when it's about an issue that's important to them (such as gay rights and abortion).

    Each side wants or doesn't want government control, depending on how it affects the issue in which they are interested.

  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    edited March 2012
    I honestly have no idea how Santorum has made it this far
    He probably thinks his time has come. :p Starting with the Republican takeover of Congress under Clinton, with Newt Gingrich and his fundie crowd. Those types are all supportive of each other, and probably egg each other on. He figures he's today's standard-bearer for their cause.
    Obama has threatened Iran with military action, and I found this very scary
    http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=72488&pageid=37&pagename=Page+One
    Interesting article. It keeps saying, "If Iran is struck by Israel or the West", "war between Israel, Iran and the West". Who in the West is going to strike Iran, other than the US? If they mean the US, they should say, the US. Is Germany planning to bomb or invade Iran? France? Sweden? The UK? Liechtenstein? I didn't think so.

  • edited March 2012
    @KnightofBuddha - You seem like an okay fellow. Although, I think you are branding yourself wrong by calling yourself a Republican. Republicans are not the small-government, less spending, fight for whats right kind of guys that they used to be. They just aren't. They've changed. Look at Santorum or Gingrich or hell, even Romney. Do you consider them representatives of your ideals? I wouldn't think so.

    I peg you as more of a libertarian, to be completely honest. I'd look into registering as a libertarian or something if I were you.
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    It's true, the Republicans have changed. It was Bush Jr.'s runaway spending on wars that got the economy into this mess. Well, that and more recently, the Wall Street debacle.
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    edited March 2012
    Aren't God and Allah the same thing? Just different names? Yahweh? Don't they all refer to the same deity, or not? :scratch:

    Who is this guy preaching to? Who is his audience? The republicans I know would be really put off by this. There are a lot of Republicans who aren't Holy Rollers, you know.
  • B5CB5C Veteran
    edited March 2012
    Aren't God and Allah the same thing? Just different names? Yahweh? Don't they all refer to the same deity, or not? :scratch:

    Who is this guy preaching to? Who is his audience? The republicans I know would be really put off by this. There are a lot of Republicans who aren't Holy Rollers, you know.
    Yes, Yahweh & Allah are the same god. All three faiths (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) trace themselves to Abraham. The differences is based on which sons of Abraham did each faith got their start from.

    Jews & Christians trace their linage from Isaac and Jacob.
    Muslims trace their linage from Ishmael.

    Also a nice fact: Yahweh is also a name for an Canaanite deity. The Canaanite god may have started Judaism.



  • I'll see if I can dig it out, but I was reading a big, USA survey which showed that far from wanting a theocracy, the vast majority of Americans were basically secularists who disapproved of this blurring of church and state. Most believe in the existence of 'god', but when you dig a little deeper, their definitions of god were basically woolly.

    The number of atheists has increased dramatically, as have the numbers of non-monotheists, including Buddhists, Hindus, Pagans etc.

    The conclusion of the survey was that whilst the majority of Americans pay lip service to the idea of USA being a 'Christian' country, it was more culturally Christian than religious Christian.

    I found it extremely encouraging, coming from the other side of the pond, to realise that most Americans were not bat-sh*t insane Santorum-fans. But in the USA and UK, the fundamentalist, Christian Taliban punch way above their weight and make a lot more noise than the saner people. Which is why I've decided to join the National Secular Society in UK, which is campaigning against this. The last thing any of us need is a bunch of Evangelicals running our countries, with ideas about putting democracy back 50 years and possibly starting WWIII in order to fulfil 'prophecy' (shudder)
  • It's true, the Republicans have changed. It was Bush Jr.'s runaway spending on wars that got the economy into this mess. Well, that and more recently, the Wall Street debacle.
    I agree... and Obama is creating as much debt in 4 years as Bush did in 8 years, though some of Obama's debt can also be pinned on Bush, but not all... The scary thing is that Obama doesn't have the answers to get a handle on the debt, and I'm not excited about what the Republicans are bringing to the table, so I'm thinking we are in serious trouble either way.

    I label myself as a Libertarian... I agree with the Tea Party only in their idea that if we can't afford something, like a huge defense budget or Liberal championed entitlements, then we simply can't afford it... Borrowing money we can't pay back will only make the crash more painful and certain... I dont like Liberals big government ideas and forcing their life style ideas on me, but also can't get behind all the church in state crap to make "moral" decisions for us, so I'm stuck in the middle with no candidate I can feel good about... I think I'll go vote with a blindfold on and leave it to chance so I don't feel like its my fault when I'm eating my crap sandwich.
  • If abortion is outlawed in the US, can you sit there and honestly, truly tell me with a straight face that no woman in the US will ever get an abortion again?
    That's as absurd as saying, "If murder was illegal, can you sit there and honestly say that no man in the US would ever murder again?!" Of course not. But that fact that well over 50 million babies have been ripped out of their mothers' wombs, necks snapped or sliced to pieces is a tragedy. Not to mention the devastation it has wrought on minorities, where blacks have a 72% illegitimacy rate.
    And prior to 1973, LOTS of American women got abortions every single day. And prior to 1973 a LOT of them died from complications due to having to go to illicit places to get them illegally. I find it stupefying that any thinking person, let alone anyone with a scintilla of compassion for his fellow human beings, could wish that upon them. So whose life is worth more to you? An unborn embryo or a woman who could be your mother, your wife, your girlfriend, your sister, your cousin, or your neighbor? I lost a member of my family that way. I suspect you didn't. Otherwise I doubt you'd hold such a callous belief.
    I have not lost anyone, correct. I told my wife while we were dating that should she ever become pregnant before marriage, I could do nothing to prevent her from getting an abortion. But I would walk away in an instant from the relationship if she did.

    I peg you as more of a libertarian, to be completely honest. I'd look into registering as a libertarian or something if I were you.
    Well I have no intention to. The big "L" Libertarian Party I find to be a joke and not particularly helpful since it's a spoiler. I have some libertarian positions yes, but the gap is too significant on defense.


  • @Ada_B
    But in the USA and UK, the fundamentalist, Christian Taliban punch way above their weight and make a lot more noise than the saner people.
    Wow, you are a deeply morally confused individual. While I was still left-leaning in high school, it was this sort of broken moral compass thinking from people I otherwise admired, that caused me to begin my drift rightwards.

    So how many women have US and UK Christian thrown acid into their faces? How many women have they cut off ears and noses? How many little girls' schools have the Christian Taliban blown up? How many Buddhist statues have the Christian Taliban dynamited? How many bodies have the Christian Taliban mutilated and hung on lampposts this year?

    What strange thinking.
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    edited March 2012


    BS. (Neo-)Conservatives do want some government control. They want government to control who gets married, who gets abortion, and which nation to invade. They want government to push their Christian moral agenda.


    Many people do not consider Neo-conservatives to be actual conservatives precisely for the reasons stated above, and many others. :)

  • cazcaz Veteran United Kingdom Veteran
    To the citizens of the United States of America from Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II:

    In light of your immediate failure to financially manage yourselves and also in recent years your tendency to elect incompetent Presidents of the USA and therefore not able to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your independence, effective immediately. (You should look up 'revocation' in the Oxford English Dictionary.)

    Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over all states, commonwealths, and territories (except Kansas , which she does not fancy).

    Your new Prime Minister, David Cameron, will appoint a Governor for America without the need for further elections.

    Congress and the Senate will be disbanded. A questionnaire may be circulated sometime next year to determine whether any of you noticed.

    To aid in the transition to a British Crown dependency, the following rules are introduced with immediate effect:

    1. The letter 'U' will be reinstated in words such as 'colour,' 'favour,' 'labour' and 'neighbour.' Likewise, you will learn to spell 'doughnut' without skipping half the letters, and the suffix '-ize' will be replaced by the suffix '-ise.'Generally, you will be expected to raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels. (look up 'vocabulary'). (I love that one)


    Using the same twenty-seven words interspersed with filler noises such as ''like' and 'you know' is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication. There is no such thing as U.S. English. We will let Microsoft know on your behalf. The Microsoft spell-checker will be adjusted to take into account the reinstated letter 'u'' and the elimination of '-ize.' ' (I love that one too)

    3. July 4th will no longer be celebrated as a holiday.

    4. You will learn to resolve personal issues without using guns, lawyers, or therapists. The fact that you need so many lawyers and therapists shows that you're not quite ready to be independent. Guns should only be used for shooting grouse. If you can't sort things out without suing someone or speaking to a therapist, then you're not ready to shoot grouse.

    5. Therefore, you will no longer be allowed to own or carry anything more dangerous than a vegetable peeler. Although a permit will be required if you wish to carry a vegetable peeler in public.

    6. All intersections will be replaced with roundabouts, and you will start driving on the left side with immediate effect. At the same time, you will go metric with immediate effect and without the benefit of conversion tables. Both roundabouts and metrication will help you understand the British sense of humour.

    7. The former USA will adopt UK prices on petrol (which you have been calling gasoline) of roughly $10/US gallon. Get used to it.)

    8.You will learn to make real chips. Those things you call French fries are not real chips, and those things you insist on calling potato chips are properly called crisps. Real chips are thick cut, fried in animal fat, and dressed not with catsup but with vinegar.

    9. The cold, tasteless stuff you insist on calling beer is not actually beer at all. Henceforth, only proper British Bitter will be referred to as beer, and European brews of known and accepted provenance will be referred to as Lager. New Zealand beer is also acceptable, as New Zealand is pound for pound the greatest sporting nation on earth and it can only be due to the beer. They are also part of the British Commonwealth - see what it did for them. American brands will be referred to as Near-Frozen Gnat's Urine, so that all can be sold without risk of further confusion.

    10. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as good guys. Hollywood will also be required to cast English actors to play English characters. Watching Andie Macdowell attempt English dialogue in Four Weddings and a Funeral was an experience akin to having one's ears removed with a cheese grater.

    11. You will cease playing American football. There are only two kinds of proper football; one you call soccer, and rugby (dominated by the New Zealanders). Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to play rugby (which has some similarities to American football, but does not involve stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour like a bunch of nancies).

    12. Further, you will stop playing baseball. It is not reasonable to host an event called the World Series for a game which is not played outside of America . Since only 2.1% of you are aware there is a world beyond your borders, your error is understandable. You will learn cricket, and we will let you face the Australians (World dominators) first to take the sting out of their deliveries.

    13. You must tell us who killed JFK. It's been driving us mad.

    14. An internal revenue agent (i.e. tax collector) from Her Majesty's Government will be with you shortly to ensure the acquisition of all monies due (backdated to 1776).

    15. Daily Tea Time begins promptly at 4 p.m. with proper cups, with saucers, and never mugs, with high quality biscuits (cookies) and cakes; plus strawberries (with cream) when in season.

    God Save the Queen!
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited March 2012
    The United States seems to be drifting away from other developed countries over religion in public life. A candidate for President, from either party, must be seen to be a church goer, and must profess to be a Christian. In most other western countries the religious life of elected politicians is seen as a private matter, and not a public measure of qualification. Mitt Romney is an interesting case... being a Mormon he isn't Christian enough for some. I imagine the millions of Americans who are not evangelical Christians, or sympathetic with the Evangelical agenda, must feel like their country is going down the rabbit hole...

    or maybe this is just the media lens? How much of the religiosity seen in the media do you live with in your daily life... your work, friends, community?
  • personperson Don't believe everything you think The liminal space Veteran
    I don't get any in your face type Christians in my life. Often though if I get into much detail about their specific religious or political beliefs the crazy comes out.
Sign In or Register to comment.