Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@newbuddhist.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take up to 48 hours. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

The Languages of Buddhism

SileSile Veteran
edited August 2012 in Buddhism for Beginners
Thought it might be worth starting with some observations edited from Peter Harvey, Buddhism, and several Wiki inserts (noted):

The languages in which the editions of the Buddhist canon are preserved fall into two categories. First, there are the languages and dialects in which the texts circulated in India. These include local Prakrits such as Magadhi [also Maghadi], Pali and the North-Western Prakrit as well as Sanskrit.

(Note: Prakrit can mean both "original language" and "natural language." We don't know today whether Prakrit is older or younger than Sanskrit, which means "refined language.")

The Buddha himself denied preference to any one language and adopted for his preaching the local dialects of the regions through which he travelled. Thus, it is incorrect to speak of an original language of Buddhism...however, it is probably true to say that the Buddha's discourses were based on an early variety of Old Maghadi. Except for a few archaic root forms, no traces of Old Maghadi have survived.

"Grammarian Kachchayano wrote of the importance of Magadhi: 'There is a language which is the root (of all languages); men and Brahmans spoke it at the commencement of the kalpa, who never before uttered a human accent, and even the supreme Buddhas spoke it: it is Magadhi.'" (Robert Spence Hardy,The legends and theories of the Buddhists compared with history and science...)

A variation of Old Maghadi is still preserved in the language of the Theravada Canon -- Pali. Pali was the language of Vidiśā, India, which sent Buddhist missionaries to Sri Lanka. These missionaries had memorized their sermons in Pali, and the language became accepted by the Sinhalese people of Sri Lanka as the 'language of the texts' (Pali-Bhasa). It is perhaps the closest approximation to the 'original' language of Buddhism.

With the beginning of the Christian era, Prakrits became increasingly rivalled by [and blended with] the use of Sanskrit--modern scholars refer to this cross-breed as Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit. Eventually, Prakrits and Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit wer replaced with a more correct form of Sankrit.

Of the numerous languages of translation which preserved the canon outside India, Tibetan and Chinese are the most important, as they constitute the only languages into which the Indian texts were directly transmitted. Most other languages are secondary, in that they are based on either Tibetan or Chinese. This privileged position is reinforced by the towering volume of Tibetan and Chinese Buddhist writings, for no other cultures have preserved nearly as many scriptures in their respective languages. Above all, Tibetan translations stand out for their great accuracy and consistency, achieved by adapting the Tibetan language in translation specifically to Buddhist terminology. [An example of this in English might be "triple gem," a new English phrase specific to Buddhism.]

In Buddhism, the concept of a sacred language has little immediate applicability. We saw that the Buddha himself refused to give preference to any speech. If belief in the power of sound is anything to go by, Buddhism clearly has in Pali and Sanskrit two tongues approaching the concept of a sacred language. However, since neither of them is accepted by all Buddhists they cannot be regarded unreservedly as such.





Comments

  • VastmindVastmind Memphis, TN Veteran
    edited August 2012
    Ahhhh, you had me at 'language', lolololol

    Gratitude. Nice post. :)
  • SileSile Veteran
    edited August 2012
    Vastminds said:

    Ahhhh, you had me at 'language', lolololol

    Gratitude. Nice post. :)

    I must confess to a weakness for language discussions :) But it's also helpful, to me anyway, in understanding the social issues involved in the history and spread of Buddhism.

  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    Sile said:

    In Buddhism, the concept of a sacred language has little immediate applicability. We saw that the Buddha himself refused to give preference to any speech. If belief in the power of sound is anything to go by, Buddhism clearly has in Pali and Sanskrit two tongues approaching the concept of a sacred language. However, since neither of them is accepted by all Buddhists they cannot be regarded unreservedly as such.

    I think it's an important point, i.e., that Pali, Sanskrit, etc. aren't sacred languages in the sense of being inherently better or more sacred than other languages. The main reason reason they're so important in Buddhism is that most of the teachings attributed to the Buddha, his immediate students, and his early followers throughout Asia are preserved in these languages, and it's important to understand them so that we can read them and/or translate them properly into our native languages.
  • SileSile Veteran
    edited August 2012
    Another analysis, and one I hadn't encountered until today:

    "In a sense the term Pali, like Sanskrit, does not refer to a language at all. Richard Gombrich pointed out that it actually means ‘sacred scripture’ and is a descriptive term for the Theravada scriptures and the language they are in. It is a standardised and consistent language based on earlier dialects.

    It is not exactly what the Buddha said, it is a standardised form of what the Buddha said. It is close to the Prakrit Magadhi languages that the Buddha probably spoke in, but it is not identical to them." (Peter Friedlander, "Buddhist Studies - Lecture Notes", School of Social Sciences, La Trobe University, Australia, http://www.latrobe.edu.au/asianstudies/Buddha/index.html)

    And:

    "At no time was Sanskrit a spoken language, much less during the Vedic period. It has always been the language of a few seeking sacred knowledge. All dialects--Magadhi, Ardha-Magadhi, Sauraseni, and Paisachi--are Prakrit, out of which was processed Sanskrit as a language of necessity--a scientific technical language to give expression to intellectual, moral and spiritual expansion...isolated from the broad masses.

    As their religion gained popularity and prominence, the Buddhist scholars endeavoured to create a new language easier than Sanskrit: Pali, using Sauraseni and Magadhi as the base, to write down their vast, flourishing literature...Like Sanskrit, Pali is not a spoken language, though it was used extensively by scholars for the study of Buddhist literature, and for intellectual transactions, especially communications of higher thought." (S. N. Sadasivan, A Social History of India)


  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited August 2012
    Interesting. That's more or less my understanding as well, which is that Pali, an early form of Prakrit related to Hindi and Sanskrit, is thought to be a composite of several dialectal forms and expressions most likely based on the language the Buddha himself taught in, which is generally held to be a dialect of Magadhi Prakrit; although there's still a great deal of debate among scholars as to the exact dates and place of origin of Pali itself.

    The commentarial tradition of Theravada holds that Pali is identical to Magadhi; but as the introduction to A New Course in Reading Pali: Entering the Word of the Buddha notes, it doesn't share many of the distinctive characteristics found in Magadhan inscriptions, primarily from the time of Asoka (approximately 300–232 BCE). Nevertheless, it's considered by many scholars, such as Wilhelm Geiger and Walpola Rahula, to at least be closely related to Magadhi, especially in the sense of being a type of popular speech.

    Whatever the case, it's believe that at the time of the Buddha (approximately 400 BCE), many of the great wandering ascetics (samana) in the northern area of India known as Magadha, like the Buddha and his contemporary Mahavira (Nigantha Nataputta), taught in the popular vernacular of the people used for general communication and commerce, as opposed to Vedic Sanskrit, the sacred language of Vedas used by brahmins. This was not only done because they rejected the authority of the Vedas, but because they wanted to make their teachings more widely available.
  • SileSile Veteran
    edited August 2012
    It seems to me that some confusion is the result of talking about the languages as if they occurred simultaneously--the Buddha's spoken languages, and the later liturgical languages.

    Unless new, codified sayings of the Buddha from the Buddha's own time period come to light, we probably have to continue to assume that the codified, Pali oral sermons and codified, Pali written scriptures came much later, and not necessarily in the same language (or even form) the Buddha used to deliver the information. This might prove to be wrong, but for now, we need more data to help prove otherwise, it seems.

    It's very much like the way information is preserved in any tradition, I suppose--some Original Sailor said something like,

    "The eeuenynge maad, ye seien, It shal be cleer, for the heuene is lijk to reed; and the morwe, To day tempest, for heuen shyneth heuy, or sorwful."
    (In the evening, ye say, it shall be clear, for the heaven is like to red; and in the morrow, today tempest, for heaven shineth then, or sorrowful.)

    Which is much easier to pass on to current generations as:

    Red sky at night, sailor's delight
    Red sky in morning, sailor take warning

    The modern version contains the same valuable information, but is shorter, in fixed form, designed to rhyme, and in a local (and/or modern) version of the language--all of which factors increase its likelihood of transmission and survival among a particular audience.

    I suppose the question of the day, though, is whether the codified Buddhist canon, or any part of it, was composed directly by the Buddha and adapted to different languages over time, or composed, as a way of preserving his teachings, by those who'd committed the gist of his teachings to memory.

    The Hocak people for example do not versify their teachings; a teaching is generally in long story form, without rhymes or poetry of any kind. Someone is considered to have correctly learned a teaching when he/she is able to repeat it concept for concept, rather than word for word. The Irish, on the other hand, versified much of their sacred pre-Christian teaching.

  • SileSile Veteran
    edited August 2012
    Some fascinating perspective and background here - can't find author's name, but assuming he/she is native speaker of modern Magadhi:

    http://ariseasia.blogspot.com/2011/11/raua-jana-tani-buddha-taught-in-magadhi.html

    Concludes with:

    "Imagine how Buddha would have actually stated to his five disciples the Four Noble Truth in Magadhi, pushing the Wheel of Dharma 2600 years ago.

    The Four Noble Truth in English rendition is as follows:

    1. Suffering does exist
    2. Suffering arises from attachment to desires
    3. Suffering ceases when attachment to desire ceases
    4. Freedom from suffering is possible by practicing the eightfold path.


    चार आर्य सत्य

    १. दु:ख है।
    २. दु:ख का कारण है ।
    ३. दु:ख का निदान है ।
    ४. वह मार्ग है , जिससे दु:ख का निदान होता है ।

    In Magadhi, the discourse would have been as follows:

    Raua jana tani:

    1. saunjhe jaga mein dukhe bani
    2. dukh ke karan dher iccha bate
    3. dukh ke nivaran lel rah bate
    4. okra khatir jey rah apnaval ja sakela; jekar athon hissa hum rauaa ke batavat bani.

    Speaking in Buddha’s tongue while celebrating 2600th anniversary of his first Preaching may invite ridicule. That’s the nature of wheel of existence. If Buddha would have again visited now, I would request him,”Raua jana tani; raur saunse batiya ulat pulat gael!" (Niraj, 24.11.2011)"

    http://ariseasia.blogspot.com/2011/11/raua-jana-tani-buddha-taught-in-magadhi.html
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited August 2012
    Sile said:

    It seems to me that some confusion is the result of talking about the languages as if they occurred simultaneously--the Buddha's spoken languages, and the later liturgical languages.

    Unless new, codified sayings of the Buddha from the Buddha's own time period come to light, we probably have to continue to assume that the codified, Pali oral sermons and codified, Pali written scriptures came much later, and not necessarily in the same language (or even form) the Buddha used to deliver the information. This might prove to be wrong, but for now, we need more data to help prove otherwise, it seems.

    There's really no way to know for sure since Buddhism at its earliest stages was an oral tradition, and textual evidence is scant. They could have arisen simultaneously, or one long after the other. I doubt we'll ever know for sure.
    Sile said:

    I suppose the question of the day, though, is whether the codified Buddhist canon, or any part of it, was composed directly by the Buddha and adapted to different languages over time, or composed, as a way of preserving his teachings, by those who'd committed the gist of his teachings to memory.

    Probably a bit of both, I'd say; although I suspect that the latter is responsible for most of what we have.
  • SileSile Veteran
    Part of a great article, Language Use in Buddhism, by M. S. Thirumalai, Ph.D.

    2. EMBRACING DIALECTS

    One of the most significant aspects of Buddhism is that it embraced dialects without any hesitation as fit vehicles for its scriptures. Gautama Buddha, thus, inaugurated a linguistic revolution. This position of Gautama Buddha was against the tradition of holding Sanskrit as the most sacred, if not the only sacred language, for Hindu Scriptures. Early Buddhist scriptures were all written in Pali, perhaps the dialect spoken by Gautama Buddha himself. Although Pali, thus, acquired an important place in Buddhism, the Buddhist monks and scholars were encouraged to use the dialects and languages of the people whom they were trying to lead to the Buddha Marga.

    3. PALI AND BUDDHISM

    Pali is considered to be one of the dialects of Middle Indo-Aryan. It appears that the Pali used in early Buddhist Scriptures, followed in Theravada Buddhism practiced in Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia, has many features common to other Indo-Aryan dialects as well. So, some scholars consider Pali to be a mixed language, rather than a distinct dialect. Some others consider it as the Avanti dialect spoken in Ujjain. Some consider Pali to be only a literary language, at least after it was used extensively in Buddhist Scriptures well beyond India.

    Over the centuries, Buddha's command that the Buddhist monks use the colloquial language of the people to communicate his teachings is not wholly practiced. In Buddhism Pali now occupies the position given to Sanskrit in Vedic Hinduism.

  • SileSile Veteran
    image

    Title page of Dhammacakkappavattanasuttaṁ, central text in the Catubhāṇavārapāḷi, written on Ola Leaf in Sinhala script.
  • VastmindVastmind Memphis, TN Veteran
    Gratitude for the teachings I received.

    @Sile .....Thanks so much for all this! Referencing and researching all
    the info/history really provided alot of study material for me.

    Yes, the topic was the 'languages', but the meat of the supper was/is
    our practice/path. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.