Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@newbuddhist.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take up to 48 hours. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

discomfort without aversion

blu3reeblu3ree Veteran
edited September 2013 in Buddhism Basics
http://buddhismnow.com/2013/09/15/discomfort-without-aversion-a-little-miracle-by-corrado-pensa/

tired of uneccesary suffering? be.

We say that mental activity is the problem. But this is certainly not the case! Many of you may be familiar with the famous Fire Sermon of the Buddha where basically he says, ‘The mind is not the problem; the senses are not the problem; the objects of the senses and of the mind are not the problem. The problem is the relationship between the mind and its objects, between the senses and their objects. And this relationship is charged with attachment, aversion and ignorance. So the problem is in the relationship; it is not in the mind or in the objects of the mind; it is not in the mental activity. And yet that mental activity is impregnated with what is called the kilesas, the toxins, attachments, fears, aversions, ignorance. This is the important thing in considering proliferation, in considering and reflecting on papanca.

The aggregates which make up our mind and body are called ‘aggregates of attachment’, upadanakkhandha. In other words, our mental activity is so impregnated by the afflictions, by the kilesas (attachment is just one word which includes all the kilesas in the classical Buddhist tradition) that the entire mental activity has that attachment as its main and fundamental mark. What happens through practising the dharma, through practising meditation, however, is that a gradual purification takes place so that the khandhas, the aggregates, become purer and purer, and in the end are called visuddhi-khandha, pure aggregates. No more aggregates of attachment, no more mind of attachment, but a pure mind, a mind which instead of generating attachment and suffering, now generates dharma.
42bodhiJeffrey

Comments

  • There is one thing that confuses me. Isn't that "relationship" (which is the main problem) a result of the mind? Therefore, shouldn't patterns in mental activity be recognized as factors of the problem?

    Great article, though.
  • blu3reeblu3ree Veteran
    edited September 2013
    42bodhi said:

    There is one thing that confuses me. Isn't that "relationship" (which is the main problem) a result of the mind? Therefore, shouldn't patterns in mental activity be recognized as factors of the problem?

    Great article, though.

    well the relationship could be passive as well as clingy. and yes the patterns in mental activity should be recognized as "possible" factors of the problem but, not in such a way that there is no mental activity as well as in such a way to not produce anxiety.
    42bodhi
  • @blu3ree

    Oh, okay.

    Thank you the clarification. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.