Buddhism discussion forum  

Welcome to the NewBuddhist!
You need to login or register to post, but it's quick and then we can save you a seat in the Lotus Lounge.

Go Back   Buddhism discussion forum > Buddhism & You > Your Religion

Your Religion For Christians, Muslims, Jews and others to explore Buddhism

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2004, 10:33 PM   #1
datapoly
Seeker
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: singapore
Posts: 7
Amitabha Buddha Land of Ultimate Bliss = heaven?

i find it interesting that the Amitabha Sutra, mention that people who recite or call upon his name by the time of dying will be born in the Land of Ultimate Bliss with the reception by Amitabha buddha. (ref : http://web.singnet.com.sg/~alankhoo/Amitabha.htm)

i am not a christian, but i understand from my christian friend that all believer of God will be reborn in heaven upon dead.

this sound very similar isn't it?

is the pure land similar to the christian heaven?
is the western land pointing to the direction of jerusalem? (which is on the west side of india)
is Amitabha similar to God? (he who have faiths will be save)

any insightful comment?

happy metta
datapoly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2004, 11:21 PM   #2
Brian
The Duke of Nothingham
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 1,274
There are definitely similarities. I'd be very interested to educate myself on the history of the Pure Land sect. I personally feel that Pure Land is another pseudo-religion based on Buddhist principles (much like the Tibetan belief system). I consider orthodox buddhism (that is to say the actual dhamma as spoken by Gotama buddha himself) to be the foundation upon which these different sects are built. As we all know, as buddhism spread around asia and then the world, it was easily adapted to fit in comfortably with each culture that came in contact with it. Thus, the Tibetans have their mystical beliefs (oracles and animism) but are still considered to be Buddhists.

I think the bigger discussion would be the seperation between buddhist principles and buddhist spirituality/mysticism. I see them as seperate aspects of the same thing. I suppose with some effort, any religion on earth could be considered a buddhist religion with some bending here and there, due to the universal truth of the basic principles. Therefore, I regard Ch'an (Zen) as a religion more than a set of principles.

For new buddhists who may not know, Amitabha was a different Buddha. Followers of the pure land sect of Zen buddhism believe that chanting his name at the time of death is one sure way to enlightenment.

I think this may boil down into a discussion of Mahayana vs. Theravada (doesn't it always?).. The theravada teachings speak of no such things as "one sure way" to achieve enlightenment other than the only way - release from all attachment. One could argue that an attachment to Amitabha would actually hinder that progress.

This could be a very lively discussion!
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2004, 01:03 AM   #3
Lincoln
Administator
 
Lincoln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Next to Brian
Posts: 942
We were just discussing Pure Land Buddhism the other day in class and it didn't seem like it appealed to me much. It overlaps too much with parts of Christianity I'm not very keen on.
__________________
Matt Lincoln Russell
NewBuddhist administrator
Student of Zen Martial Arts
Lincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004, 12:29 PM   #4
Brian
The Duke of Nothingham
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 1,274
Yeah, as I said, "this could be a very lively discussion!"
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2005, 01:29 AM   #5
bodhi
Seeker
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6
Pure Land is very much different from Christienity.
Christien belief in going to heaven whereas Pure Land Buddhist goes to Buddha Amitabha Pure Land.

Buddhist belief in different level of heaven and that it is not permanent, that is when one uses up all the merits one will still encounter rebirth.

Buddha Amitabha Pure Land is not consider a heaven but a place where everything is pure but its still not the ultimate place but just a place where condition is perfect for achieving enlightenment without the all the suffering, distraction and desire found in this world.

Pure Land Buddhist vow to rebirth to this Pure Land so as to become a Buddha that is to achieve enlightenment. As achieving enlightenment in this world is too difficult as compare to Buddha Shakyamuni time.
bodhi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 02:35 AM   #6
kinlee
Old friend of the site
 
kinlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by datapoly
i find it interesting that the Amitabha Sutra, mention that people who recite or call upon his name by the time of dying will be born in the Land of Ultimate Bliss with the reception by Amitabha buddha. (ref : http://web.singnet.com.sg/~alankhoo/Amitabha.htm)

i am not a christian, but i understand from my christian friend that all believer of God will be reborn in heaven upon dead.

this sound very similar isn't it?

is the pure land similar to the christian heaven?
is the western land pointing to the direction of jerusalem? (which is on the west side of india)
is Amitabha similar to God? (he who have faiths will be save)

any insightful comment?

happy metta

Pure Land is a place where there all supreme living and education conditions are available for Buddhahood achievement (Enlightenment). The main aim off course for it's citizens to learn from Buddha Amititabi. It's really a cultivation development with best practices ever-known. No is it not Heaven.

Based from Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva Sutra(地藏菩薩本願經), it presents varies different levels of Heaven. There is a life-span for beings in these Heavens.

As far as I can understand, the state of true-self/nature is the concept of wholeness or oneness where there are no concept of polarity, distant and time. Everyting is just one, the diversity that we see today is the creation of our every wondering minds and ever-changing thoughts. Our minds created everything and our thoughts cause for things to change every moments (law of impermancy).

Amitabha is not similiar to God. God is a father and son relationship, whereas Amitabha is a teacher in helping others to gain Enlightenment, release free from all sufferings. Which includes the breaking away from reincarnation.
You can find interesting and valuable materials pertaining to God and Buddha at http://www.thubtenchodron.org/.

There is also an interesting writeup about God or NoGod at http://www.stanford.edu/~pj97/God.htm

Enjoy.

Kin Lee
kinlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2005, 10:21 AM   #7
pj.pilgrim
Seeker
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 18
Among Pure Land practitioners, there is a variance in understanding. Pure Land is taught as a literal truth to beginners, but advanced practioners will tell you that Pure Land exists in the mind only. The sixth Patriach, Hui Neng said in the Platform Sutra "If one's mind is not pure, how can you expect Amitabha to welcome you in his Pure Land?" Pure Land practitioners will repeat his name over and over again, (although accorsding to the Sukhavati Sutra, reciting it once will allow you rebirth there), because they take it as a samatha meditation exercise to calm the mind and make it receptive to the Dharma. Hence metaphorically, being born in the Pure Land where one can then work out one's liberation.
pj.pilgrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® from Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.