Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

concept of five aggregates?

edited April 2010 in Buddhism Basics
Wikipedia says the five aggregates consist of the following:

Buddhist doctrine describes five aggregates
"form" or "matter"
"sensation" or "feeling"
"perception", "conception", "apperception", "cognition", or "discrimination"
"mental formations", "impulses", "volition", or "compositional factors" (Skt.
"consciousness" or "discernment"

I can't really grasp the concept of it. is there an easy analogy to a real situation that explains it more clear?

Comments

  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited March 2010
    Have a look at this link.
    It's written by a very good friend of mine, and he won an Wikipedia award for how thorough and well-referenced his whole Opus was.
    It's an extraordinary piece of work and took him a lot of time and effort to put together.....

    Click on the 3.4 Five aggregates link.
    Then click on ' Main article 'Skanda'

    look at the piece called "Parts of a Chariot"....

    The skandas, or aggregates are very roughly, every system that goes to make up "Who" you are.....

    But because they are all impermanent, changing, in a state of flux, clinging to them as a form of security or identification, ultimately leads to attachment and suffering, which is unproductive and futile.....


    Any of this help?
  • pegembarapegembara Veteran
    edited March 2010
    Wikipedia says the five aggregates consist of the following:

    Buddhist doctrine describes five aggregates
    "form" or "matter"
    "sensation" or "feeling"
    "perception", "conception", "apperception", "cognition", or "discrimination"
    "mental formations", "impulses", "volition", or "compositional factors" (Skt.
    "consciousness" or "discernment"

    I can't really grasp the concept of it. is there an easy analogy to a real situation that explains it more clear?

    Rupa = Form

    Nama = Feelings/ Memories/ Thoughts/ Consciousness

    According to the Buddha, rupa not only refers to the physical body but also includes everything in the universe as one entity! Sights, sounds, smells, tastes and touch are received through the 5 sense organs. No matter how much we know about this cosmos, our solar system and earth including everything that is happening on the surface of this planet from domestic to global affairs – yes plus our precious education! – this entirety is referred to as a singular noun and is swept under the first grouping of rupa!

    Hence, it isn’t wrong to see yourself as the centre of the universe because without your senses, the cosmos does not exist to you. When you are in any of those events, sleeping, unconscious, in a coma, your senses cease to function due to the absence of your mental self. At that moment, your very own private universe disappears too although it very much exists for other people who are fully conscious.

    Once these vast diversities of sense objects walk over the bridges of perception and enter your inner world (mental world), the 5 sense objects have no choice but to abandon their material forms and turn into non-material entity (energy): memories, thoughts and feelings. In other words, sights, sounds, smells, tastes and tangible sensations carry exactly the same information and details but in different forms, that’s all.

    Say you are watching a football match. Those exciting events on the football field begin their journey into your inner world as sights, sounds, smell, tastes and touch. For clearer image, let’s turn these five sense objects into 5 young men. These 5 strong men would then sprint through the five bridges (eyes, ears), and instantaneously transform into the formless energy (memories, thoughts and feelings) who is greeted by your mental self. Only then, will the whole experience of the football match be completed.

    By using the five grouping approach, the Buddha has placed consciousness as an additional sense, the 6th sense! The Buddha always classes human as a life form with six senses, whereas intellectuals view it with five senses only. The 6th sense is indeed the mental eyes belonging to your mental self. If so, what then are the sense objects to our 6th sense? Memories, thoughts and feelings.

    Every sense must correspond to its own sense object or every metaphoric man crosses his own bridge. They cannot cross perceive. You cannot use eyes to perceive smells; neither can you use ears to perceive thoughts, memories and feelings. They must work together in pairs:
    • Eyes perceive sights
    • Ears perceive sounds
    • Nose perceives smells
    • Tongue perceives tastes
    • Skin perceives physical sensations
    • Mental eye perceives thoughts, memories and feelings


    • Physical self relates to the external world of sight, sounds, smells, tastes and
    touch (rupa)
    • Mental self relates to the inner world of thoughts, memories and
    feelings (nama)

    Supawan
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited March 2010
    Dear Sean

    Form is what is physical, like rock, skin, muscle, bones, food, air, water, fire, etc.

    Sensation is incorrect. It is feeling. Feeling refers to pleasant feeling & unpleasant feeling. Feeling is not emotion or thought. It is the basic quality of sense experience, of comfort or discomfort.

    For example, sunshine on one's body feels nice or pleasant. Looking at a flower is pleasant. Looking at a rotting corpse of an animal feels unpleasant.

    Perception is labelling or classifying, from our memory bank. We label 'green', 'blue', 'man', 'woman', 'tree', 'frog, 'good', 'bad', etc. This is perception.

    Mental formations is the creative process of mind. It includes intention or will (decision making). It includes urges or drives, such as love, greed, lust, hatred, anger, confusion, fear, etc. It includes thought, thinking & intelligence. It includes mind pictures or images, such as dreams. It includes emotion. It also includes ignorance & wisdom.

    Even when a human being gains enlightenment, it is the mental formations aggregate that gets enlightened due to its deep accumulation of wisdom.

    Consciousness is basic awareness. Mere knowing. Mere seeing, mere hearing, mere smelling, mere tasting, mere touching & mere experience of the other mental aggregates is the activity of consciousness.

    Consciousness functions through & dependant on the six sense organs. The Buddha taught there are six types of consciousness, each relating to the six sense organs.

    Kind regards

    DD

    :)
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited March 2010
    Dear Sean

    Consciousness is stated last because all aggregates can only be known & experienced via consciousness.

    But in our actual experience, it is not like that.

    In experience, the body (with sense organs) functions together with consciousness to create sense experience or sense contact.

    From sense contact there arises feeling.

    From feeling, there arises perception.

    From feeling & perception, there arises intention & craving.

    From intention & craving, there arises thinking & thought/emotion proliferation.

    For example, pleasant feeling & perception generates craving such as greed, love, lust and then the thoughts "I want it, I must have it" and all of the thinking that plans to obtain it.

    Unpleasant feeling & perception generates craving such as hatred, anger and then the thoughts "I want to destroy it, I want to avoid it" and all of the thinking that plans to attack it.

    Neither-pleasant-nor-unpleasant feeling gives rise to the craving of confusion or fear and the thoughts "what is it?" and the thinking that spins around in circles trying to understand it.

    The Buddha said:
    "Dependent on eye & forms, eye-consciousness arises. The meeting of the three is contact. With contact as a requisite condition, there is feeling. What one feels, one perceives (labels in the mind). What one perceives, one thinks about. What one thinks about, one complicates. Based on what a person complicates, the perceptions & categories of complication assail him/her with regard to past, present & future forms cognizable via the eye.

    "Dependent on ear & sounds, ear-consciousness arises...

    "Dependent on nose & aromas, nose-consciousness arises...

    "Dependent on tongue & flavors, tongue-consciousness arises...

    "Dependent on body & tactile sensations, body-consciousness arises...

    "Dependent on intellect & ideas, intellect-consciousness arises.

    Madhupindika Sutta: The Ball of Honey

    :)
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited March 2010
    "The ear... The nose... The tongue... The body... The intellect...

    "Forms... Sounds... Smells... Tastes... Tactile sensations... Ideas...

    "Eye-consciousness... Ear-consciousness... Nose-consciousness... Tongue-consciousness... Body-consciousness... Intellect-consciousness...

    "Eye-contact... Ear-contact... Nose-contact... Tongue-contact... Body-contact... Intellect-contact...

    "Feeling born of eye-contact... Feeling born of ear-contact... Feeling born of nose-contact... Feeling born of tongue-contact... Feeling born of body-contact... Feeling born of intellect-contact...

    "Perception of forms... Perception of sounds... Perception of smells... Perception of tastes... Perception of tactile sensations... Perception of ideas...

    "Intention for forms... Intention for sounds... Intention for smells... Intention for tastes... Intention for tactile sensations... Intention for ideas...

    "Craving for forms... Craving for sounds... Craving for smells... Craving for tastes... Craving for tactile sensations... Craving for ideas...

    "Thought directed at forms... Thought directed at sounds... Thought directed at smells... Thought directed at tastes... Thought directed at tactile sensations... Thought directed at ideas...

    "Evaluation of forms... Evaluation of sounds... Evaluation of smells... Evaluation of tastes... Evaluation of tactile sensations... Evaluation of ideas...

    Maha-satipatthana Sutta
  • edited March 2010
    is there an easy analogy to a real situation that explains it more clear?

    Hi
    • "There is no thinker only thoughts."
    • Mind is an emergent phenomenon when the five aggregates are present in the moment.
    • That point of experience that we see as a perspective in the now isn't really there, it is an illusion of a thinker created by the very aggregation of mind (thoughts).

    That's about as simple as I can express it:)

    Mat
  • edited March 2010
    In terms of an analogy, the pixels on a monitor screen are close.

    None of them are the screen. None of them are essential to the screen.

    None of them have any correlation to what could be shown on the screen, or what it could mean to differnt people.

    The layout of the screen is analogous to form or structure.

    The rest, to the other aggregates, but that's where the analogy falls:)

    There is no screen, only pixels:p
  • skydancerskydancer Veteran
    edited March 2010
    Wikipedia says the five aggregates consist of the following:

    Buddhist doctrine describes five aggregates
    "form" or "matter"
    "sensation" or "feeling"
    "perception", "conception", "apperception", "cognition", or "discrimination"
    "mental formations", "impulses", "volition", or "compositional factors" (Skt.
    "consciousness" or "discernment"

    I can't really grasp the concept of it. is there an easy analogy to a real situation that explains it more clear?
    I don't know if I can do it but I can tell you that any ordinary everyday experience can be broken down into the five aggregates.

    I'm sitting here typing into a computer. The form of the body types the words, feeling is pleasant, I hear the birds singing, the sound of my fingers tapping the keyboards. All the form in my perception is composed of parts that can ultimately be reduced from solidity.

    I can discern that I am grasping to convey a gist or sense of the five aggregates as I communicate. The impulse to reach out and try this is an act of will or volition. The thoughts or mental formations that arise are doubts that this method I'm attempting will work.

    Nonetheless, I wish you well. May you attain the depth of wisdom and understanding you seek.
  • edited March 2010
    Thank you guys for clarifying. I wanted to think of an analogy myself. Could you guys correct me if I'm wrong?

    so if i were to use "smelling an fruit" as an analogy would i say the form is our body, and we see the fruit with our eyes and smell the fruit with our nose? and then we perceive the fruit to be sweet driving us to take a bite of that fruit?

    what would be consciousness?
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited March 2010
    Thank you guys for clarifying. I wanted to think of an analogy myself. Could you guys correct me if I'm wrong?

    so if i were to use "smelling an fruit" as an analogy would i say the form is our body, and we see the fruit with our eyes and smell the fruit with our nose? and then we perceive the fruit to be sweet driving us to take a bite of that fruit?

    what would be consciousness?
    form = fruit

    consciousness = see the fruit with our eyes and smell the fruit with our nose

    perception = perceive the fruit to be sweet

    feeling = sweet

    mental formation = driving us to take a bite of that fruit

    driving = craving or desire = mental formation

    :)
  • pegembarapegembara Veteran
    edited March 2010
    Thank you guys for clarifying. I wanted to think of an analogy myself. Could you guys correct me if I'm wrong?

    so if i were to use "smelling an fruit" as an analogy would i say the form is our body, and we see the fruit with our eyes and smell the fruit with our nose? and then we perceive the fruit to be sweet driving us to take a bite of that fruit?

    what would be consciousness?

    form = fruit, smells, taste, texture(moisture, firmness), nose

    perception/memory = sweet, orange, associated memories

    feelings = nice, horrible, indifferent

    mental formations/thoughts = planning how to get the fruit, studying about the fruit

    consciousness/mental self is false identification with thoughts, memories and feelings leading to suffering.

    vipassana/insight leads to disidentification with above
  • edited April 2010
    so if i were to use "smelling an fruit" as an analogy would i say the form is our body,

    I would say in this case the form is your body AND its connections with the world that we don't normally think of as "you". Remember there are no boundaries. Those fruity aromas floating between your face and the fruit are part of the form of the moment. They are as much(?) a part of the experience of the moment as the synapses and the nerve cell firings.

    If you imagine a snapshot of the entire fruit sniffing experience frozen in time there would only be form, the rest just wouldn't be in the snapshot, they arise from the ever changing "snapshots" of form/structure.

    what would be consciousness?

    You are getting lots of different views on this in this thread, "conciousness":)

    Imagine the other aggravate mental events that go into your experice of smelling a fruit. The sensations, volition memories, everything. Each one of them isn't the experience, they dont become and experince without the others.


    You have all of the mental events right there in the moment, and those events together, are the conciousness.

    (Structure of the experience (form)>events of the experience(mental events)> experience of the experience (conciousness).)

    The Skahndas are not a check-list as much as a unified process:)


    :)

    Mat
Sign In or Register to comment.