Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

The final word on climate change.

Does anyone still have any doubts ?

blu3ree

Comments

  • jlljll Veteran
    No more doubts. I am totally convinced.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    I think the non-believers are really operating much like humans often do when they feel things are hopeless -- better to just adjust thinking and deny reality and move on. A concept that goes along very well with Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" mantra. After all, it is true that much climate change over earth's history had nothing to do with man since man was not even around yet. Yet, climate change occurred, and sometimes drastically. So it's easier for some to dismiss the inconvenient truth that the climate change being caused by man may very well tip the scientific balance.

    But I also think we need to look at what Bill Maher is doing about it. First, let me assure you that I'm somewhat of a Bill Maher fan. I watch most of his "Real Time" episodes, and have since they first began. And if I find one of his stand-up specials on cable, I always watch. He's a genuinely funny and witty man. But I'm not at all sure that making fun of the non-believers, making them look (and perhaps feel) like morons is a very realistic way to make them believers. In fact, if anything, it will just alienate them even more. Believing that climate change isn't man-made is no more ridiculous to some people than the idea that some chap could sit under a tree and divine all the workings of the universe. Maher is very funny, but he's not always very wise...or very nice.

    In fact, let's not forget what Maher said about Buddhism: "[Buddhism] really is outdated in some ways — the “Life sucks, and then you die” philosophy was useful when Buddha came up with it around 500 B.C., because back then life pretty much sucked, and then you died – but now we have medicine., and plenty of food...Tiger (Woods) said, “Buddhism teaches that a craving for things outside ourselves” makes us unhappy, which confirms something I’ve long suspected about Eastern religions: they’re a crock, too. Craving for things outside ourselves is what makes life life...I don’t want to learn to not want, that’s what people in prison have to do...And reincarnation? Really? If that were real, wouldn’t there be some proof by now? A raccoon spelling out in acorns, “My name is Herb Zoller and I’m an accountant.” …something?...People are always debating, is Buddhism a religion or a philosophy: it’s a religion. You’re a religion if you do something as weird as when the Buddhist monks scrutinize two-year-olds to find the reincarnation of the dude who just died, and then choose one of the toddlers as the sacred Lama: “His poop is royal!” Sorry, but thinking you can look at a babbling, barely-housebroken, uneducated being and say, “That’s our leader” doesn’t make you enlightened. It makes you a Sarah Palin supporter."

    Bill Maher is a very funny man, and I will continue watching his cable shows. But, he really is doing nothing more than what people like Sarah Palin do -- speaking in a way which I feel would be a perfect example of wrong speech...attempting to divide people based on whether or not they are enlightened (pardon the pun) based on his personal beliefs. And, he's doing it for the good of society and mankind...I mean, he's doing it for money and fame.

    He's a very funny man. And I like him. But I would hope that the last word on climate change might actually come from someone who can begin to convince the other side, rather than just alienate them more.

    New Rule: If we want to give Bill Maher last word status, then we ought to give him the same status on other things -- like his view on Buddhism -- not just on the things that we like him to say.







    MaryAnneThaiLotusBodhivakaJeffrey
  • MaryAnneMaryAnne Veteran
    edited November 2013
    I am also a fan of Bill's and have been for many years.... but just like any one we may consider a "good, old friend", we don't always agree with them 100% on everything. And many times we may not find the same things to be 'true' nor funny.

    Bill is a vocal PETA supporter. I abhor PETA. I'm completely in agreement with several animal rescues and wild life conservation organizations, (and have been a long time member of a few), but PETA?? No thanks. I believe they do more harm than good and frankly, their true agenda is outrageous.

    Last I heard, Bill is also a vegetarian (not a vegan), and he's a Fat-basher, too.
    Now as I've mentioned in this forum before in other contexts, I'm an active Size Acceptance advocate and a HAES (Health At Every Size) supporter, and I do what I can to make people aware of fat stigma, and the bullying and discrimination against fat kids and adults. Bill still makes up fat jokes like an 8th grader.
    I may have a thick skin, and yeah, sometimes even I chuckle a bit... but I really would rather he didn't make those kinds of jokes, because even if they are legitimately Funny, overall they are still hurtful and destructive to a cause I hold dear.

    So @vinlyn, I absolutely get where you are coming from; I respect Bill's enthusiasm for promoting the acceptance of climate change, etc... but sometimes he uses wrong speech and hurtful language to back himself up, and that turns way too many people OFF - instead of getting them to THINK.

    .... Catch more flies with honey and all that, right?
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    I agree with you totally about PETA and his support.

    Yes, he does tell fat jokes, as well as makes visual jabs at fat people. And while I am against making fun of fat people (I am one), I also know being fat is causing me lots of problems.

    It's part of media's way of getting ratings today. Don't tell the news...have commentators argue about the news. Create division. Funny though he is, he's also part of that problem. I personally have known conservatives who seethe over him.
  • mfranzdorfmfranzdorf Veteran
    edited November 2013
    Why is slightly warmer automatically bad?
    Honest question.
  • Because nature was not created by people.
    It took million of years to reach this equilibrium.

    Think of an island. Only animal and apes lived there.
    Population; 100,000 animals.

    100 years later, human has settled and build
    a huge city. Population 5 million, with 3 million cars, etc.

    It is not Just a question of warmer weather. We are destroying the natural environment and we are polluting it to the point of making it inhabitable.
    It is a question about the quality of air and water, etc.
    It is also about being far-sighted enough to realize that our children and grandchildren and their grandchildren will have to deal with the mess.

    It is about caring about the balance of nature.

    100 yrs ago, people were ignorant. Now we should know better.

    The population in China in 1600 was 60 million.
    Now, it is 1.3 billion.

    Experts say if Chinese live like Americans,
    we need another planet earth to provide all the resources they would consume.

    Why is slightly warmer automatically bad?
    Honest question.

    MaryAnne
  • You seem to be more concerned with pollution and over population. As far as global warming / climate change goes, I just don't believe man is necessarily causing any of it. I don't believe we are powerful enough to change the climate patterns on our tiny chunk of rock that is hurtling through an apparently infinite "space". You believe we do, and that is your option. Wasn't it prophesized in the 70's that we were headed to another ice age? There is always a crisis....

    Now, you mentioned the population of China, so you must think that the population of China is a problem. What is your solution?

    You say that humans didn't create nature. Ok. Who or what did? We just don't know. Balance that you mention has never existed as far back as we can measure. The climate is in constant flux if you take a big enough picture.

    What is the perfect temperature? Do we need to be colder? Hotter? Or is now just right? I guess it depends on if you live in Siberia or the Sahara.
  • I wished I thought like you.
    Well. let's see, my activities has no impact on the environment.
    Ok, the world population is 7 billion and is increasing rapidly.
    No problem.
    Wonderful.
    Let's party.
    I really wished you were right...

    You seem to be more concerned with pollution and over population. As far as global warming / climate change goes, I just don't believe man is necessarily causing any of it. I don't believe we are powerful enough to change the climate patterns on our tiny chunk of rock that is hurtling through an apparently infinite "space". You believe we do, and that is your option. Wasn't it prophesized in the 70's that we were headed to another ice age? There is always a crisis....

    Now, you mentioned the population of China, so you must think that the population of China is a problem. What is your solution?

    You say that humans didn't create nature. Ok. Who or what did? We just don't know. Balance that you mention has never existed as far back as we can measure. The climate is in constant flux if you take a big enough picture.

    What is the perfect temperature? Do we need to be colder? Hotter? Or is now just right? I guess it depends on if you live in Siberia or the Sahara.

  • MaryAnneMaryAnne Veteran
    edited November 2013

    You seem to be more concerned with pollution and over population. As far as global warming / climate change goes, I just don't believe man is necessarily causing any of it. I don't believe we are powerful enough to change the climate patterns on our tiny chunk of rock that is hurtling through an apparently infinite "space". You believe we do, and that is your option. Wasn't it prophesized in the 70's that we were headed to another ice age? There is always a crisis....

    Now, you mentioned the population of China, so you must think that the population of China is a problem. What is your solution?

    You say that humans didn't create nature. Ok. Who or what did? We just don't know. Balance that you mention has never existed as far back as we can measure. The climate is in constant flux if you take a big enough picture.

    What is the perfect temperature? Do we need to be colder? Hotter? Or is now just right? I guess it depends on if you live in Siberia or the Sahara.



    I am no scientist, nor climate change expert, but let me give this a layman's shot:

    Yes, everyone agrees that the Earth's climate, as a whole entity, does in fact cycle through its phases.
    However, what Climate Change Deniers (CCDs) refuse to admit is that for some reason, it appears that a cycle which in the past would have taken thousands of years - if not longer - to pass through, is now rushing at us at a phenomenal pace- like only a couple of centuries in duration, instead of thousands of years.
    That 'some reason' is one thing and one thing only: human interference/intervention/invasive action; which is speeding up the process like nobody's business. And yes! Pollution is a big factor in that equation as well! Pollution that is now, without a doubt -overwhelming the Earth's, and the atmosphere's, natural cleansing systems...

    As for Siberia vs Sahara and why can't we just get over it.... Well what happens in Siberia and beyond, (more melting ice, less snow fall, disappearing ice floes and habitat for wildlife who depend on it, etc) will directly affect every other area of the planet - eventually.
    When it starts to rain in the Sahara, instead of areas where rain has always been a constant, sure, maybe we can grow crops in the Sahara then, but what about the kazillion acres of 'rain forests' that will then begin drying out and dying off?

    You can't deny that what happens in one ecologically specific area of this Earth has a HUGE affect on the other areas. It does; it's fact. Climate change isn't about the average temperature going up (or down) a few degrees here and there, it's about throwing the Entire Earth's ecosystem out of balance.... maybe forever.

    Deniers who stick to their denial against these simple scientific facts; well, I will refrain from name calling or labeling such people. (practicing right speech) :D
    But they are dead wrong (pun intended) if they think rapid, human caused climate change is 'no big deal' in the long run.

  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    Mary Anne, as a trained scientist (even though I didn't ultimately go into the field), I'd say that's one of the better quick-summaries of the issue that I've seen.
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    edited November 2013
    hermitwin said:

    Does anyone still have any doubts ?

    Only the corporations, and they have an interest in sowing doubts. Beware of brainwashing.

    MaryAnne
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    Actually, we read one doubt right here in this short thread.
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited November 2013

    Why is slightly warmer automatically bad?
    Honest question.

    The raising of the global temperature by only a few degrees could have a number of negative consequences for us, from rising ocean levels that can devastate coastlines and islands to changing weather patterns that can seriously impact food production via increased/more serious droughts, etc. Some places may actually benefit; but the ecosystems of many will be altered, affecting a number of plant and animal species that may not be able to adapt, and who knows how well we'll deal with the projected food and water shortages this'll cause in places like Africa, southern Europe, the Middle East, most of the Americas, Australia, and Southeast Asia.
    MaryAnne
  • anatamananataman Who needs a title? Where am I? Veteran
    Now this really pisses me off! This guy whoever he is, 'canned laughter do I not hear here' a comedian - laugh - what a misogenistic, genderistic, racialist - laugh and then go back and really see what he has to say - nothing. He just wants you to do the above repeat - forced laugh - I am sorry yet again I cannot finish listening to this post!

    Don't drive don't fart don't breathe!, but smell the diesel, the exhaust and the breath. 'Brainwashed - yes you may be, but freedom you know it'
  • Still no answers to my basic questions though. What is the ideal temperature? What about the alarms that were sounded in the not so distant past about the coming ice age?

    Also, if you think there aren't people or corporations getting rich off of this latest scare you are deluded.

    Middle path, people. We are born here, we are gonna die here, and everything that happens around you in the mean time is gonna happen whether you enjoy life, try to do the right thing and be happy or if you wring you hands with worry about the friggin weather patterns, how many little buggers are living in China or if the temp went up .8 degrees in the last 20 years.

  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    It seems lot of people care about climate change and that it's a problem that humans are a least partially causing it, etc. But a lot of these same people don't really want to change their own lifestyle to do anything about it! Or, they change it in such a marginal way that it would have no effects. For example, they go buy a new hybrid vehicle to reduce their personal greenhouse gas emissions, not realizing that a new hybrid vehicle has a larger climate footprint than a buying a regular used gas car...Most people are completely unaware of their climate footprint of their diet style. Or maybe they do know but they just don't care about it enough to change? I don't know!

  • :whatever:
    He doesn't even know the difference between Britain and England. If he's going to take the piss he should at least get his terminology straight.
    Dennis1
  • I love Maher. He comes from a long tradition of satirists like Mark Twain who point out that not only does the Emperor have no clothes on, but that people who followed and applauded the naked idiot are probably idiots themselves. George Carlin is certainly the greatest satirist who ever lived, but each have their own style.

    People are stupid. Period. Not individuals. People collectively. We have an infinite capacity to ignore obvious truths and justify our own actions and listen to people who tell us what we want to hear. If not, there would be no need for the Dharma.

    As for Buddhism, he has a point.

    MaryAnne
  • This is not science. In the 1980's around Mexico city a volcano called Chacon erupted and spewed greenhouse gasses into the earth's atmosphere. How much? Well here is the surprising data: About 100 times (that is 10,000 percent) the total emissions of all men from man's beginning on this planet. 100 times as much. Man is a flea on the back of a giant and the sun composes 99% of the total solar system. When the sun glows we get hot and when it turns it's back we get fridgidized. The more likely scenario is that the earth will cool and there is nothing we can do about that either.
    Life on earth especially plant life, could do with a little more carbon dioxide and a little warming. Greenland used to be green. There is nothing man can do if the globe warms or cools.

    Some people have an agenda and that agenda is often passed along as gospel. Many Christians think Buddhists worship the Buddha and are Idolaters. Those closer to the subject know better but there is so much wrong information and ignorance that it is hard to inform a Christian otherwise. The earth is not particularly warming, the total ice mass is growing and we couldn't change anything even if that were not true. Please
    don't get sucked in by people with a hidden agenda or those like Maher who ignorantly go along with those who have a hidden agenda.

    This is also not Buddhism. Care for the earth, our home, is important. Care for each other is also important. Saying high minded things is not the same as knowing and certainly not the same as doing high minded activities. Buddhists can avoid delusion
    by following in the Buddha's footsteps and not getting distracted. Best, Dennis
    mfranzdorf
  • Gah, Bill Maher isn't funny at all. I'd rather watch Leno than his show. LENO.
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    Sorry Dennis, but you don't know science.

    I don't know what your connection is with global warming and Buddhism and Christianity.

    Yes, it appears that the ice mass in Antarctica is growing a bit, while the ice mass on Greenland is diminishing significantly. Inconclusive. But, either way, are you planning to live in Antarctica???
  • Dear Dennis, I dont wish to offend you in anyway.

    You are not a scientist, neither am I.

    Please listen to the scientists.


    Dennis1 said:

    This is not science. In the 1980's around Mexico city a volcano called Chacon erupted and spewed greenhouse gasses into the earth's atmosphere. How much? Well here is the surprising data: About 100 times (that is 10,000 percent) the total emissions of all men from man's beginning on this planet. 100 times as much. Man is a flea on the back of a giant and the sun composes 99% of the total solar system. When the sun glows we get hot and when it turns it's back we get fridgidized. The more likely scenario is that the earth will cool and there is nothing we can do about that either.
    Life on earth especially plant life, could do with a little more carbon dioxide and a little warming. Greenland used to be green. There is nothing man can do if the globe warms or cools.

    Some people have an agenda and that agenda is often passed along as gospel. Many Christians think Buddhists worship the Buddha and are Idolaters. Those closer to the subject know better but there is so much wrong information and ignorance that it is hard to inform a Christian otherwise. The earth is not particularly warming, the total ice mass is growing and we couldn't change anything even if that were not true. Please
    don't get sucked in by people with a hidden agenda or those like Maher who ignorantly go along with those who have a hidden agenda.

    This is also not Buddhism. Care for the earth, our home, is important. Care for each other is also important. Saying high minded things is not the same as knowing and certainly not the same as doing high minded activities. Buddhists can avoid delusion
    by following in the Buddha's footsteps and not getting distracted. Best, Dennis

  • Also, Dennis what is the hidden agenda?
  • BhikkhuJayasaraBhikkhuJayasara Bhikkhu Veteran
    edited November 2013
    what is needed in any topic of science, is complete objectivity. As with most things I take the middle ground agnostic view in terms of global warming/climate change, meaning I do not deny any possibilities nor do I accept every fear mongering claim.

    The ISSUE is that like with most things in the west, this topic has become attached to a political view, so those on the left accept anything thrown at them and expect the government to solve something that it can't, and those on the right are expected to totally deny it.

    as Ajahn Chah said, one is right, but not correct, and one is correct, but not right.


    of course the other issue now is due to grant monies and such science can be controlled and steered in whichever way both sides(or any side) wants it to be.
  • I just want a healthy environment for future generations.
    That is my hidden agenda.
    MaryAnne
  • I don't have any real doubts that we are responsible for greenhouse gas emissions and that those gasses are changing the atmosphere. I just don't see any way to turn it around.
    How do we cut emissions and defeat poverty in the world at the same time?
    Half the world gets around on motor scooters or bicycles or on foot. What happens if they are no longer poor and want to buy cars and speedboats and snowmobiles.
    Apparently there will soon be 100 million Chinese tourist trips made each year.
    What will 2 or 300 million be like? They want to fly everywhere like the rest of us.
    Travel to, and inside China is huge as well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_China
    In my view climate change is a done deal.
    We better just get used to it.
    Too bad so much of the US will turn into a tornado and hurricane ravaged wasteland. Good thing Alaska is so big.
  • BhikkhuJayasaraBhikkhuJayasara Bhikkhu Veteran
    edited November 2013
    hermitwin said:

    I just want a healthy environment for future generations.o
    That is my hidden agenda.

    Two quotes come to mind for me..

    "never ask from the world what it can never give you"

    And

    "the buddha did not change the world, he made peace with the conditions in it. "


    " a healthy environment" is something basically totally out of your control with the exception of some very local/personal actions.

    Personally i think overpopulation is/will do much more "damage" to the planet then carbon emissions.

    Now if enough people decided it was important enough they would take action locally and that would create change on a massive scale. Social change happens from the bottom up, not top down.

  • DairyLamaDairyLama Veteran Veteran
    edited November 2013
    They're talking about new flood defences where I live due to rising sea levels etc, so I'm convinced. Talking of which, does anyone have a second-hand boat they want to sell? :D
    David
  • DavidDavid A human residing in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Ancestral territory of the Erie, Haudenosaunee, Huron-Wendat, Mississauga and Neutral First Nations Veteran
    edited November 2013
    Jayantha said:

    hermitwin said:

    I just want a healthy environment for future generations.o
    That is my hidden agenda.

    Two quotes come to mind for me..

    "never ask from the world what it can never give you"

    And

    "the buddha did not change the world, he made peace with the conditions in it. "


    " a healthy environment" is something basically totally out of your control with the exception of some very local/personal actions.

    Personally i think overpopulation is/will do much more "damage" to the planet then carbon emissions.

    Now if enough people decided it was important enough they would take action locally and that would create change on a massive scale. Social change happens from the bottom up, not top down.

    This is why it's just as important to invest in space exploration as it is to invest in healing this planet.

    ExpedientMeans
  • I think its better to invest in birth-control.

    ourself said:

    Jayantha said:

    hermitwin said:

    I just want a healthy environment for future generations.o
    That is my hidden agenda.

    Two quotes come to mind for me..

    "never ask from the world what it can never give you"

    And

    "the buddha did not change the world, he made peace with the conditions in it. "


    " a healthy environment" is something basically totally out of your control with the exception of some very local/personal actions.

    Personally i think overpopulation is/will do much more "damage" to the planet then carbon emissions.

    Now if enough people decided it was important enough they would take action locally and that would create change on a massive scale. Social change happens from the bottom up, not top down.

    This is why it's just as important to invest in space exploration as it is to invest in healing this planet.

    how
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    Jayantha said:

    what is needed in any topic of science, is complete objectivity. As with most things I take the middle ground agnostic view in terms of global warming/climate change, meaning I do not deny any possibilities nor do I accept every fear mongering claim.
    ...

    The "middle ground" does not mean not making decisions.

  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    robot said:

    ...
    Too bad so much of the US will turn into a tornado and hurricane ravaged wasteland. ...

    The issue is not affecting just the US. It will affect all parts of the world.

  • BhikkhuJayasaraBhikkhuJayasara Bhikkhu Veteran
    edited November 2013
    ourself said:

    Jayantha said:

    hermitwin said:

    I just want a healthy environment for future generations.o
    That is my hidden agenda.

    Two quotes come to mind for me..

    "never ask from the world what it can never give you"

    And

    "the buddha did not change the world, he made peace with the conditions in it. "


    " a healthy environment" is something basically totally out of your control with the exception of some very local/personal actions.

    Personally i think overpopulation is/will do much more "damage" to the planet then carbon emissions.

    Now if enough people decided it was important enough they would take action locally and that would create change on a massive scale. Social change happens from the bottom up, not top down.

    This is why it's just as important to invest in space exploration as it is to invest in healing this planet.

    I am huge on space exploration... Even if we end up living in harmony with the planet, having all our eggs in one basket is always dangerous. There are tons of ways that humanity can be wiped out, along with most all other life, like has happend at least 5 times in the history of the planet. Then if we survive 5 billion years the earth will be gone with the sun.

    Like all things, not even the universe itself lasts forever, humanity is living on borrowed time, our actions other shorten or extend our lifespan. The dinosaurs lasted over 100 million years, lets see how long it is for us.
    ExpedientMeans
  • I don't have any doubt in global warming. It doesn't seem like scientists would have any hidden agenda in making it up- they'd probably get paid a lot more for saying "Let's keep using oil, let's keep the factories going, let's keep buying cars." But they aren't saying that because they know what the consequences will be.

    But, the one thing that bothers me is when people talk about how bad extreme weather is going to be. THAT is kind of brainwashing, because it's what scientists use to convince unintelligent, unimaginative people that something needs to be done.

    The real biggest threat of climate change is millions of people having to quickly change the place they live. It's hard to convey the idea of how rising temperatures will create rising sea levels, droughts and resulting famines, and unusual animal migrations and extinctions that will lead to people having to pick up and move somewhere else, which will lead to refugee crises, increased political and ethnic strife, crime, etc.

    Though that's a real possibility, it's a lot easier to scare a not-so-bright person into believing in global warming by telling them that a tornado is going to kill them. Or a tsunami will drown them. Or a wave of climate change will literally chase them down a hallway:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&persist_app=1&v=E87raPj9m0A

    I live in the heart of tornado-alley. I've seen a tornado. Yes, they are scary when they happen, and they can be destructive and kill people. But really, your odds of being killed in a car crash are probably astronomically higher than your odds of being killed by a tornado. I'm sure most people who live in hurricane country feel similarly about their extreme weather. Learn the warning signs, take precautions, but beyond that, what else can you do?

    I really can't believe that this stuff is becoming significantly more powerful or more common. Knowing the "dirty laundry" nature of the news media, it's gotta just be that they love to have scary disaster stories to cover. It caters right to the huge crowd of disaster and catastrophe enthusiasts out there. It goes beyond just extreme weather (like people who think war and crime are out of control when they're really not compared to other times in human history), but extreme weather is definitely a popular one.

    I listen to Coast to Coast AM, and I've listened to tapes of the show going back to 1991. According to all the "experts" who were going on the show, the entire world should have been completely destroyed about a hundred times already by earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanos, solar flares, asteroid impacts, gamma ray bursts, radiation, swarms of killer bees...all bunk. My BS meter tells me not to buy into this "tornados and hurricanes are going to get stronger, like extreme weather on steroids" stuff either. It's just too similar to all that other stuff.
    mfranzdorf
  • vinlynvinlyn Colorado...for now Veteran
    And another thing about "hidden agendas".

    Lots of "hidden agendas" are just beliefs a person has, with nothing "hidden" about it.

    A "hidden agenda" is more like (as an example) when an organization creates a title for itself that hides its real purpose.
Sign In or Register to comment.