Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Intellectual aspect of emptiness may focus on clarity
Jeffrey
Veteran
I had an aha moment reading in my text. My thesis is that a lot of the so called intellectual presentation of emptiness relates to the 'clarity' aspect of emptiness. Because it is a seeing of what constitutes emptiness. In Tibetan Buddhism it is said that the mind is: clear, luminous, and unimpeded. Luminous refers to the feeling we get when we realize emptiness. So all of the body feeling perhaps although that is a skhanda and one of the four mindfulnesses of body, feeling, states, and a fourth I forgot, lol. Anyhow sensitivity tells us that we are doing good. If enlightenment path felt bad... boy that would not be happy. Unimpeded has to do with the spaciousness aspect. Karma can bring many ships to our shore and they just keep coming. Change and so forth.
Anyhow this text on clarity reminded me of the intellectual presentations such as the example of a carriage. A carriage isn't a wheel or a driver or a horse or connectors or the axle. It isn't all of the sum because if you changed drivers or pieces it could still be a carriage. Even abstracted as a definition that can still change as language and culture changes, which means it is merely labeled as such a carriage. If it were old and in a heap it could become part of a nest of an animal.
Here's the text that I thought was the clarity aspect of emptiness:
Anyhow this text on clarity reminded me of the intellectual presentations such as the example of a carriage. A carriage isn't a wheel or a driver or a horse or connectors or the axle. It isn't all of the sum because if you changed drivers or pieces it could still be a carriage. Even abstracted as a definition that can still change as language and culture changes, which means it is merely labeled as such a carriage. If it were old and in a heap it could become part of a nest of an animal.
Here's the text that I thought was the clarity aspect of emptiness:
The words clarity and awareness normally imply that there is an object of awareness or clarity. One aspect of the fundamental quality of clarity is its power to be clearly aware of vivid and precise details, qualities, relationships, connections, purpose, meaning and significance. Another is its power to be clearly aware of the dynamic, changing aspect of all experience and the spaciousness in which that dynamic takes place. For example, it is not just a matter of clearly appreciating a sound and knowing a meaning, it is also a matter of recognizing its impermanence and emptiness. You could think of it in terms of driving a car. It is not just a matter of appreciating the many things involved in driving, but also of recognising the speed of the car and the space it is moving in.Thanks for reading. I wonder if there will be a discussion?
Notice how much detail and significance is present simultaneously. For example, even though by the end of a word or sentence the beginning has gone, we can still clearly apprehend layer upon layer of meaning within a single utterance. There is the meaning of the tone, the voice, the person speaking, the direction from which it comes, the emotion it expresses, the meaning of the word, the context, the connotations and so on. All this is conveyed in an instant of clarity and fully integrated with awareness that precedes and follows it. You may want to say taht this is due to memory, but all this does is to call the moment of clarity 'memory'. It is still the same phenomenon. Can you imagine being able to fully isolate a single instant of awareness (or memory) in order to appreciate the richness of its qualities? All the qualities have to be present in a single instant, otherwise there would be no connection between them and they could not be known aspects of a single utterance. The clarity/awareness aspect of any experience is truly astounding and yet we are aware in this manner, to some degree, all the time. Such awareness is intrinsic to our being.
0
Comments
Things seem to be entities owing to the fallibility of our senses — our faculties of sight, hearing, touching, smelling and tasting, and even thinking. Science has accepted the position that our senses are not infallible guides to us. A permanent entity is only a concept, only a name. It does not exist in reality. In the famous dialogues between King Milinda and Thera Nagasena, the latter wishing to explain to the King this law of aggregates, enquired from the King how he came there, whether on foot or riding. The King replied that he came in a chariot.
Buddhist Reflections on Death
Section 3 [http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/gunaratna/wheel102.html]
In this appearance there is no hearer or heard. This is no arising, nor falling.
A contraction towards appearance is taking the world to be unreal or real.
Samsara is that simple. To cast away the world of fabrication, what freedom and what release.
No thing lost, no thing released, no thing there to begin with.
Yet intelligence/presence unfolds as this display, this mirage, this centerless apparition.
Emptiness isn't a special idea that we think about only on reflection. It is the nature of the cosmos. And OCS is the nature of mind and from the yogacara perspective it is also the nature of the universe as us beings are only concerned with our living experience.
Intellectual discussion happens, as well as a lot of sitting and living practise.