Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
So, I was reading the Tao of Pooh today, and it talked about an old painting called The Vinegar Tasters.
It was 3 people tasting some vinegar. The first, Confucius, has a sour look on his face. The second, Buddha, had a bitter look on his face. The third, Lao-Tzu, had a happy look on his face. The look on each of their faces is supposed to represent each person's outlook on life.
What they were inferring is that the Buddha had a negative outlook on life. Do you agree or disagree?
I disagree, in the sense that Buddha did, in fact, state that life involved unsatisfactory situations. We get cut off in trafic, we stub a toe, our boss doesn't give us the raise we wanted, etc. Though, what the Buddha taught is that these things are NOT ultimately bad - we just give them a bad connotation in our minds. So, I'd assume Buddha would have an apathetic look (or even a smile) rather than a bitter look after tasting the vinegar.
0
Comments
Seriously I think buddhism is a hopeful religion. It doesn't brainwash to believe you are experience stress due to gain and loss and so forth. Instead it gives constructive skills to cope with this factual reality.
So I think a buddha would be thinking how he can use the vinegar to alleviate suffering. If it was poison he would make a bad face so nobody else would drink it. If it was conducive to liberation he would celebrate the vinegar.
...or a content smile, maybe even misterious like Da Vinci's smiles.
but then I was all: 'Ooo AAhhaa!'
(In the 21st centruty the vinegar tasters would be having chips with that!)