Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Does Anybody Here Consider Themselves An Arya?

ThailandTomThailandTom Veteran
edited April 2011 in Philosophy
Does anybody here in this board consider themselves to have had a complete realisation of emptiness, and now an Ayra?
Is it true once gaining brief insights into emptniness and you maintain effort, you will be able to remain in the subtle consciousness for longer and longer periods of time.

Comments

  • "When people advertise how good they are, they're really advertising how stupid they are."

    (Ajaan Fuang)

    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/thai/fuang/itself.html#vision

  • I don't consider myself anything.
  • ThailandTomThailandTom Veteran
    edited April 2011
    IT was just that I was reading the book by the dalai lama (the book of awakening) and he goes into great details about the dharma and how it is structured, also from the view of different schools.
    One thing he pointed out was that once one has found refuge in the triple gem, then they are considered a practicing buddhist. If one has any doubt about the dhrma, the buddha or the sangha, then one should reconsider it as their religion.

    He also pointed out that once you reach ayra, you have clear and perfect understanding on emptiness
  • SabreSabre Veteran
    Are you? That's the important question. ;)
  • hahahahahahaha, no, I am not. The only inisght I can consider to be emptiness is the time ibetween breaths in meditation as times where everything is still, nothing, silent. I can extend it sometimes, but I am not am Ayra, far from it. Was just curious on the people on this board and their path, how far what they have come across, if they have understanding of Ayra
  • Being nobody is also being somebody - Luang Por Sumedho

    Don't be an Arhat - Luang Por Chah (extended quote can be Googled)
  • aMattaMatt Veteran

    Is it true once gaining brief insights into emptniness and you maintain effort, you will be able to remain in the subtle consciousness for longer and longer periods of time.
    You seem to be pointing at something reasonable, be careful though. It sounds like you're looking at it as some form of attainment, which it is not. It doesn't matter much what we 'see' or where we 'remain', but what we do with the observations we have.
  • are you refering to the four stages of enlightenment? isn't that exclusive to theravada?
  • ZaylZayl Veteran
    Excuse my ignorance, but what is an Arya?
  • VincenziVincenzi Veteran
    edited April 2011
    @Zayl

    it simply means noble in pali/sanskrit, the exact meaning depends on the context.
  • ZaylZayl Veteran
    I see, than I am anything but. And I would question anyone who self-labels them an Arya.
  • I don't remember anyone using the Arya label, it is usually used only as Arya Sangha.
  • wow, I really misread that. At first I thought you said Aryan lol.
  • MindGateMindGate United States Veteran
    edited April 2011
    No - I am GOD.

    :rolleyes:

    /kidding/
  • I got it all from re-reading that book of awakening by the Dalai Lama. He describes the process of becoming enlightened, awoken, and to become a Ayra, you then fuly realise emptiness and the true nature of reality.
  • Excuse my ignorance, but what is an Arya?
    Theoretically the Aryan are the Noble Ones, those whom have realised the Full Truth of Lord Buddha's teachings and can also realise that.

    Best wishes,
    Abu
  • ThailandTomThailandTom Veteran
    edited April 2011
    They have attained right view and manged to reach a level of full awakening. They see the consciousness for what it really is, and are liberated from any attachment and so forth.
  • aren't they anyone on one of the four stages of enlightenment?
  • The 4 stages of enlightenment? I have never come across these, or maybe I have without realising, I mean in an intellectual sense, not a profound realization sense.
  • VincenziVincenzi Veteran
    edited April 2011
    @ThailandTom

    that's the only context I have read Arya in Buddhism.

    you can read it in wiki
  • ah, interesting read. Well it seems that once can have a profound realisation of emptiness and once dead move on to a realm higher than that of a the form realm. A kind of peaceful long lasting life, yet you still are conditioned to karma and will eventually be reborn yet again. Only an Arya escapes the process of rebirth as they are totally liberated and can transcend samsara
  • xabirxabir Veteran
    Does anybody here in this board consider themselves to have had a complete realisation of emptiness, and now an Ayra?
    Is it true once gaining brief insights into emptniness and you maintain effort, you will be able to remain in the subtle consciousness for longer and longer periods of time.
    If you realised emptiness, you will not need to remain in the subtle consciousness for longer and longer periods of time, as all states, so called gross or so called subtle, are equally empty and equal.

    "So experience of inner and outer, mind and its field, nirvana and samsara,
    Free of constructs differentiating the gross and the subtle,
    Is resolved in the sky-like utterly empty field of reality." - Longchenpa

    "Both inner and outer are the outer itself -
    There are no conceivable hidden depths
    And "subtle existence" is a false concept." - Vairotsana

    "Everything is up-front and in our faces and there are no complex subtle hidden structures of mind except those of delusive concoction. By elevating the subtle and demeaning the gross, creating comparative constructs, structures of varying subtlety, reality is still zero-dimensional, incapable of fragmentation. All experience is resolved in ineffability." - Keith Dowman
  • ah, interesting read. Well it seems that once can have a profound realisation of emptiness and once dead move on to a realm higher than that of a the form realm. A kind of peaceful long lasting life, yet you still are conditioned to karma and will eventually be reborn yet again. Only an Arya escapes the process of rebirth as they are totally liberated and can transcend samsara
    not really. the best rebirth isn't in arupa-dhatu (formless realm) but in the sudavasa abodes, were only anagamis go.
    there they become buddhas.

    I don't understand what aryas meant in your OP.
  • I consider myself chronically dukkhed.
  • Also called the doors to enlightenment.
    I consider myself chronically dukkhed.
    Also called the doors to enlightenment.
  • ^constant suffering is the door to enlightenment?
  • aMattaMatt Veteran
    ^constant suffering is the door to enlightenment?
    Its like being in kindergarten, surrounded by the alphabet on all the walls.
  • ^constant suffering is the door to enlightenment?
    Doctrinally, it's actually only one of the doors. Impermanence and nonself are the other two.
  • Okay, the three of you are losing me here. Completely. Explain it to me like if I was in kindergarten please :)

    As in, being the promotor of fundamental change or something?
  • fivebellsfivebells Veteran
    edited April 2011
    The Three Doors. (I don't buy the stuff at the end where he describes awakening through the three doors, but the earlier stuff about how they work is definitely pretty good. "When the suffering aspect predominates and is combined with the emptiness aspect, again, the toroid thing happens, except that it can be quite distorted or cone-like." Jesus Christ, give me a hit of that bong, dude.)
  • The last word on the article is fractal so...
  • He has a point there. There isn't just one awakening.
  • You acid heads .... :)
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited April 2011
    ^constant suffering is the door to enlightenment?
    The Buddha said there were five "doors" or "gates" to the Dhamma, namely:

    (1) sati: mindfulness
    (2) sampajanna: clear comprehension; applied or ready wisdom
    (3) samadhi: concentration
    (4) hiri: sense of shame or conscience
    (5) ottappa: fear of [the results of our own] evil [actions]

    :)
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited April 2011
    The dukkha of Epicurus is not the same as the "dukkha" of the Three Doors

    The mind of Epicurus is suffering from mental affliction

    Where as the experience of the Three Doors is insight knowledge & liberation

    If suffering, then the mind of Epicurus is affected by ignorance, craving & attachment that arises via Dependent Origination

    To end such afflicton, one method, if suitable, is for Epicurus to apply wisdom that leads to acceptance & letting go

    For example, the 2nd door means the wisdom of unsatisfactoriness or imperfection of impermanent things

    So if, for example, we have a physical illness or disfunction, the mind applies the wisdom of the 2nd door, namely, "the body like all impermanent things is subject to unsatisfactoriness and imperfection"

    the 2nd door is an insight knowledge or vipassana nana. it is not mental affliction

    best wishes

    :)
    So it is, householder. So it is. The body is afflicted, weak & encumbered. For who, looking after this body, would claim even a moment of true health, except through sheer foolishness?

    So you should train yourself: 'Even though I may be afflicted in body, my mind will be unafflicted.' That is how you should train yourself.

    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn22/sn22.001.than.html

    :)

    "All conditioned things are unsatisfactory" — when one sees this with wisdom, one turns away from suffering. This is the path to purification.

    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/kn/dhp/dhp.20.budd.html
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    ^constant suffering is the door to enlightenment?
    The scriptures and commentary on "transcendental dependent arising" speak to this very thing. Quite interesting really. Dependent arising or dependent origination is the chain of cause and effect that leads to suffering, but then there is another chain described that leads to enlightenment, which arises out of suffering. The chain of ""transcendental dependent arising".

    "Thus, monks, ignorance is the supporting condition for kamma formations, kamma formations are the supporting condition for consciousness, consciousness is the supporting condition for mentality-materiality, mentality-materiality is the supporting condition for the sixfold sense base, the sixfold sense base is the supporting condition for contact, contact is the supporting condition for feeling, feeling is the supporting condition for craving, craving is the supporting condition for clinging, clinging is the supporting condition for existence, existence is the supporting condition for birth, birth is the supporting condition for suffering,

    Begin part 2:

    suffering is the supporting condition for faith, faith is the supporting condition for joy, joy is the supporting condition for rapture, rapture is the supporting condition for tranquillity, tranquillity is the supporting condition for happiness, happiness is the supporting condition for concentration, concentration is the supporting condition for the knowledge and vision of things as they really are, the knowledge and vision of things as they really are is the supporting condition for disenchantment, disenchantment is the supporting condition for dispassion, dispassion is the supporting condition for emancipation, and emancipation is the supporting condition for the knowledge of the destruction (of the cankers).

    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/bodhi/wheel277.html

    Which makes sense because if there is no suffering that is being recognized, then there would be no need to go and seek relief from it.

  • Floating_AbuFloating_Abu Veteran
    edited April 2011
    ^constant suffering is the door to enlightenment?
    Hi Epicurus

    I did not say constant suffering is the door to enlightenment per se - but it is said in some traditions that the teachings point to dukkha, and what is called the cessation of dukkha.

    Dukkha refers to an axel out of keel - like a wheel out of balance. In this way it is unsatisfactory, wobbly and can generally be called "suffering" but maybe it is just that sense of unease and dissatisfaction also that people can have even when not overtly suffering.

    It is Lord Buddha's teaching called the Four Noble Truths (also called the Four Aryan Truths) where he expounded amongst other things that there is dukkha, and that there is a way to the cessation of dukkha. So there is some focus there in these teachings.

    The Way he taught towards the so called cessation of dukkha is called the Eightfold Path, which is a Path generally supported by all genuined Buddhist teachers and teachings.

    Suffering, when it happens, and with proper instruction and guidance, is a road to enlightenment because it is through, and with the experiences/insights from suffering that one is able to see some of the Buddha's Truths. I am not saying this is the case for everyone but what I am saying is there is an opportunity there. For example, when one sits down in meditation one is faced immediately with what could be called dukkha. But with some training and with some perseverence one is able to gradually learn to continue to sit still, and perhaps even garner what can be called insights from that meditation practice.

    Therefore, it is possible that dukkha is also the path or lighting on the path of Enlightenment.

    Hope that helps.

    Best wishes,
    Abu

  • Which makes sense because if there is no suffering that is being recognized, then there would be no need to go and seek relief from it.

    </blockquote

    Indeed.

    Gassho.

  • Suffering Should be Welcomed / Suffering has been welcomed - A talk of encouragement from the Venerable Ajahn (Luang Por) Sumedho:

    "Now the teachings of the Lord Buddha are teachings pointing to this. They're to awaken you rather than to condition you. We're not trying to grasp them as doctrinal positions to take, but expedient means to use to develop awakened awareness, mindfulness and intuition, to not fear sensitivity, to really open to it. Be fully sensitive rather than trying to protect yourself endlessly from possible pain or misfortune.
    Knowing the world as the world is not a resignation in a negative way - 'Oh, you know how the world is!' - as if it were bad, that there's something wrong with it. That's not knowing the world as the world. Rather it's studying and taking an interest, examining experience, and being willing to look at and feel the negative side. It's not just seeking pleasurable experiences, but seeing even your most disappointing ones, your worst failures as opportunities to learn, as a chance to awaken; as devadutas or 'messengers' that tap us on the shoulder and say, 'Wake up!'"

    Full teaching: http://www.what-buddha-taught.net/Books9/Ajahn_Sumedho_Suffering_Should_be_Welcomed.htm

    Audio file: http://www.dhammatalks.org.uk/index.php?id=40&file_id=851
Sign In or Register to comment.