Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Do Enlightened Beings Still Experience Negative Emotions Arising?

edited May 2011 in General Banter
Has a Buddha or arhat eliminated the root causes of hatred, jealousy, fear, desire, and other afflictions, meaning they no longer arise? Or does an enlightened being still experience negative emotions arising, but doesn't become attached to them?

Comments

  • taiyakitaiyaki Veteran
    we won't know for sure until we ourselves are enlightened.

    but imho i do believe the buddha can embody anything. he/she can embody all the fear, anger, jealousy, hatred of the world
    and transform them through compassion, honesty, sincerity, patience.

    you need to embody the negative to have the positive. we all have the potential for negative states as well as positive ones.
  • we all have the potential for negative states as well as positive ones.
    Would this be different for ordinary people than for Enlightened beings? Did the Buddha eliminate that potential through his practice?

  • taiyakitaiyaki Veteran
    the only difference between a buddha and a normal ordinary person is that the buddha doesn't attach to anything.
    thus the normal ordinary person has the potential to become a buddha. one could assert that there really is no difference between the buddha and a normal person.

    we must realize for ourselves what is true and what is not. if the buddha is radically different from us normal humans, then we mine as well give up on the path. if the buddha is the same as us, then we might have a chance at realizing what he realized.

    what is a negative state when you don't attach to it. i believe the buddha has the willingness to go into hell to save all beings. isn't that true compassion?
  • zidanguszidangus Veteran
    edited May 2011
    In the Sutras, there are times where Buddha is show to have emotions such as anger. So I guess if these are right, then a Buddha can experience negative emotions.

    http://www.blia.org/english/publications/booklet/pages/08.htm
    (sorry long bit of text :-/ )
    First, did the Buddha ever get angry?

    We often get mad; is this also true of the Buddha? Of course, the Buddha certainly did get angry! It is just that the Buddha's "getting upset" is different from ours.

    We are incensed when others pick on us or get in our way. When our interests are compromised, we get irritated. This is not the case with the Buddha. The Buddha would not mind if you were not nice to him; however, the Buddha would become angry if you were to mistreat others. Let me illustrate this point with the following episode from the sutra.

    Once, the Buddha was traveling with his group of bhiksus to preach the Dharma at some neighboring cities. Among them, some bhiksus were impatient and quick-tempered, while others were of a calmer temperament. On the way, they stopped to rest for the night at a temple. As soon as they settled down, the impatient ones quickly took claim of the available beds. "This is mine!" "That is mine!" In this way, all the available beds were claimed in no time, and Sariputra, the Buddha's leading disciple, was left without a bed. So, he decided to practice walking meditation outdoors. When the Buddha saw Sariputra strolling outside, the Buddha went up to him and asked, "Sariputra, it is quite late now. Why are you not in bed and still wandering in the yard?" Sariputra then related to the Buddha what happened, "We have a lot of bhiksus and there are not enough beds to go around. Some of the new bhiksus wanted to find a bed to retire for the night, so I let them rest first." When the Buddha heard this, he was very angry. He immediately called everyone to a meeting in which the Buddha preached about what respect one should have for one's seniors and elders.

    When we do not respect our seniors and elders, the relationship between the seniors and the young is turned upside down and society becomes disorderly. In the past, parents would guide and remind their children, "Why is it that you do not listen to Mom and Dad?" Now, children complain to their parents, "Mom and Dad, how come you do not listen to me?" Even the very young children know how to negotiate for what they want, "If you do not buy this for me, I will not study hard for you!" In the past, students would humbly accept what their teachers had to teach them. Now, it is quite fashionable for students to criticize their teachers, "Teacher so-and-so is not very nice. Every time I make a suggestion, he or she turns it down." In the past, employers would give instructions to employees on what to do. Now, employees make demands of their employers, "The food in the company cafeteria has to improve," or "You have to pay us this much before we can make a living." In the military of the past, officers would give commands for subordinates to follow. Now, subordinates can openly criticize the officers. When there is no standard for our behavior, the fabric of social structure is weakened and social morals cannot be maintained. It is no wonder that disorderliness rules.

    The Buddha would get angry with those who were only concerned with their own welfare and had no regard for the hardships of others. The Buddha could also become displeased when a prank, even that of a youngster, ended up hurting others. Let me illustrate with the following example. Before the Buddha renounced his life of a prince, he had a son by the name of Rahula. When Rahula was still a young child, he followed the example of his father and renounced his household life to become a monk. As he was quite young, he was very mischievous and liked to tell little white lies. Once, someone asked Rahula, "Do you know where the Buddha is right now?" Although he knew full well that the Buddha was in the room to his left, he purposely pointed to the right and told the other person, "The Buddha is over there, over there." When the person came back empty-handed, Rahula was very pleased with himself. Later, the Buddha learned of this incident and called Rahula to come before him. When Rahula saw the stern look on the Buddha, he did not dare to say a word. Quietly, he went to fetch a basin of water for the Buddha to wash his feet, hoping that the Buddha would soon start to preach. After the Buddha washed his feet, the Buddha told Rahula, "Take this basin of water and drink it!" Rahula was shocked with what he just heard, and he replied, "Lord Buddha, the water used for washing the feet is very filthy and is not suitable for drinking!"

    The Buddha instructed, "When you tell lies, your mouth is as filthy as the dirty water in this basin. Nobody would want you, either!"

    Rahula then went to discard the water. Afterwards, the Buddha told him, "Use this basin to hold your food!"

    Rahula appeared very troubled and said, "Lord Buddha, this basin that was used for washing the feet is very dirty; I cannot put my food into it!"

    The Buddha reproached him, "When your mouth often tell lies, it is just as filthy as this basin. It cannot be used to store anything wholesome."

    As soon as he finished, the Buddha gave the basin a kick. The basin rolled noisily for quite a distance and Rahula was frightened. The Buddha asked Rahula, "Are you worried that I may ruin the basin?"

    "No, the basin is a cheap basin. If it is broken, I can buy a new one. It does not matter!"

    The Buddha again reprimanded Rahula, "Children who tell lies are just like this cheap basin; no one would feel sorry even if it is ruined."

    From this incidence, we learn that the Buddha does not put up with those who lie and deceive others. The manner the Buddha used to teach Rahula stems from the high hopes parents have for their children, which is why we say, "When the love is deep, the reprimand is severe." The Buddha's anger is out of compassion, not out of hatred. The love of parents for their children is very much like the love of the Buddha!
  • newtechnewtech Veteran
    Hello:

    Theorically, Buddha and arahants abandoned 10 "fetters".

    -identity view
    -doubt
    -ritual attachment
    -sensual desire
    -ill will
    -material-rebirth lust
    -immaterial-rebirth lust
    -conceit
    -restlessness
    -ignorance

    This means this 10 fetters never arise again.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    Why was this in "Modern Buddhism"...?

  • Would Advanced Ideas be more appropriate?
  • the only difference between a buddha and a normal ordinary person is that the buddha doesn't attach to anything.
    thus the normal ordinary person has the potential to become a buddha. one could assert that there really is no difference between the buddha and a normal person.

    we must realize for ourselves what is true and what is not. if the buddha is radically different from us normal humans, then we mine as well give up on the path. if the buddha is the same as us, then we might have a chance at realizing what he realized.

    what is a negative state when you don't attach to it. i believe the buddha has the willingness to go into hell to save all beings. isn't that true compassion?

    http://genkaku-again.blogspot.com/2011/05/enlightened-beings.html
  • taiyakitaiyaki Veteran
    nice read!
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    Great passage from the sutras, z! And Newtech, it looks like a Buddha could still experience sadness, judging by your list. But maybe not jealousy, which would be tied to conceit and/or identity view. What do you think?

    (Why is this in Gen'l Banter? It's not speculative, as it has a basis in scripture... It's more of a doctrinal question.)
Sign In or Register to comment.