Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Independence...

edited January 2006 in Buddhism Today
Is the idea of independence a myth? Can anyone be truly independent?

For example, you rely on some guy to take away your trash, we depend on someone to keep the waters clean, we depend on a grocery store for our food, and so on...

The Dalai Lama mentioned something along the lines of this in "Art of Happiness". He called it inter-dependence or something along those lines.

:smilec:

Comments

  • edited January 2006
    As long as you know how, and are capable of taking your own trash away you will be independent.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited January 2006
    No, in the sense the DL mentions it, you will never be independent... everything you do and react to, will be as a result of someone else's actions..... How can anyone ever be independent? even a lone spaceman, up in the galaxy, depend on people down here to keep him going....
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited January 2006
    All,

    Samsara = Interdepedence

    Interdependence + 8fldPth = Nibbana

    Nibbana = Independence

    :)

    Jason
  • edited January 2006
    When everything is a result of what came before it, what came first?
  • edited January 2006
    There is no first. Partly this is because time itself is a construct, a conceptual framework. From the relative standpoint, there is time, there is you and me as separate individuals and there is independance. From the Absolute standpoint as it were, there is no time, no separation. Both are true at the same time. We are both dependant and independant at the same time, but not in the way we generally think we are, and there is only now, past and future do not exist.
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited January 2006
    Also, simply put, humans are helpless when first born. Our existence is completely dependent on adults. Left to our own, we would die. (This does not apply to other sentient beings, however, it's a simple way to understand inter-dependence.)
  • edited January 2006
    In The Art of Happiness the DL gives the example of wearing a shirt. You are dependant on the people who sewed the shirt, the people who produced the material, delivered the shirt to the store where you bought it, etc. If you were the only person on Earth and were capable of coping by yourself then congratulations - you are independant. But would you be happy?
  • edited January 2006
    Yes, that struck me the other day while eating a sandwich - following the chain all the way back to the farmer that grew the grass, for the cow to eat, to give the milk, to make the butter, to spread on the sandwich. And the farmer that grew the grain, to make the flour, to make the bread, to make the sandwich. And the fisherman that caught the fish to make the filling to put in the sandwich. And the people who transported it all the way to the local shop for me to buy the stuff to make the sandwich.

    Knitwitch - founder of the Sandwich Appreciation Society!:wavey:
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited January 2006
    "If you were the only person on Earth and were capable of coping by yourself then congratulations - you are independant."

    Windwalker, you would still have been dependent on your mother for giving birth to you. And your mother or another adult for feeding and protecting you as an infant, right?

    Knitwitch, that's pretty cool thinking.
Sign In or Register to comment.