Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
I'm just wondering.
0
Comments
Yes.
If it is a set up for an "out-zen each other" contest I choose to respectfully pass.
That's not merely a matter semantics-- I give that response bearing impermanence in mind: What I "am" changes from one moment to the next along with the world around me. It's bad enough to resort to the grammatical fiction, "I"? Why compound the confusion with the grammatical fiction "am" too?
Better at least to understand what we do rather than identify our selves with what we "are." If you really examine the matter of impermanence, "I am a Buddhist," "I am a Christian," "I am a bad person," "I am a patriot," "I am an atheist," "I am a ______" all become illusory cages that only cause all kinds of unnecessary suffering.
Of course in real life, we don't go around speaking in E-prime. But if we do resort to the word "am," we should use it lightly and provisionally. We "are" not any one unchanging thing. Nothing "is." Everything flows.
She wrote 'Buddhist' since if she died, she'd want a Buddhist Monk speaking at her funeral.
But, my teacher says, to be Buddhist, you have to hold the Four Seals, since this is in all Buddhist teachings. And because I don't understand the Four Seals in any great depth, for that reason, I'm not a Buddhist.
Among other things.
I tire of pedantry, sometimes.
I grow weary of discussions regarding labels, not-self, compartmentalising and specifics.
If it ever becomes relevant to mention it, or people ask, then yes, I am Buddhist.
So what?
Big deal.... :rolleyes: :grumble: