Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Yeah, it seems to be a very deep game. I still suck after a few months of practice and a bit of reading but I think it's something I want to pursue. It seems to be a great compliment to reading and Buddhist practice. I never could quite get into Chess but Go somehow seems to fit me a bit better.
I have not read the novel... I might watch the movie. I'm sure the book is much better but I already have a lot on my reading list.
I didn't know there was a movie, but I just looked it up and that film is not based on Kawabata' novel (though it certainly looks interesting).
The novel is a bit different from Kawabata's other work (though all of his books are good). It's divided up into short chapters and has a peculiar "reportage" quality about it that is uncharacteristic of Kawabata's work.
I remember reading a couple years ago about chess, go and artificial intelligence that was very interesting. Computer programmers have been able to come up with a chess program as good as, if not better than, master chess players. But there is nothing comparable with go-- the programmers are light years behind. Even the best they've come up with can still be beat by average schoolchildren! The article(s) I read went on to talk about how go involves a deeper kind of intuitive thinking than chess.
Oh. I just assumed having pretty much the exact same name that the movie would have been based on the book.
I have heard a bit about the difficulty of making go programs. I believe one problem is that there are many more possible moves at most points in a go game than in chess.
Comments
Have you read Yasunari Kawabata's novel, The Master of Go? Its a really good novel, even though I didn't understand all the ins-and-outs of go.
I have not read the novel... I might watch the movie. I'm sure the book is much better but I already have a lot on my reading list.
The novel is a bit different from Kawabata's other work (though all of his books are good). It's divided up into short chapters and has a peculiar "reportage" quality about it that is uncharacteristic of Kawabata's work.
I remember reading a couple years ago about chess, go and artificial intelligence that was very interesting. Computer programmers have been able to come up with a chess program as good as, if not better than, master chess players. But there is nothing comparable with go-- the programmers are light years behind. Even the best they've come up with can still be beat by average schoolchildren! The article(s) I read went on to talk about how go involves a deeper kind of intuitive thinking than chess.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/ben_macintyre/article2002699.ece
I have heard a bit about the difficulty of making go programs. I believe one problem is that there are many more possible moves at most points in a go game than in chess.