Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
According to the Madhyamaka explanation of liberation, the true path should be understood in terms of a direct realization of emptiness. This is because the intuitive realization of emptiness leads directly to the attainment of cessation. however, in order to have such a realization one must a basis in single pointed meditation, since this is what leads to an experiential knowledge of emptiness.
The point at which an individual attains that knowledge is said to be the beginning of what is known as the path of connection, or path of perception, and at the point he or she gains direct intuitive realization of emptiness is called the path of seeing. Before this (which relates to the 4 noble truths) there is the path of accumulation and also the shravakayana path where a great deal of preparation is necessary, training in morality, concentration and wisdom. Also the Mayayana path relates largely to compassion as it is key to buddhism as a whole.
So, does anybody have opinions or knowledge about these paths, are they all necessary in your opinion and are they meant to be conducted in order?
0
Comments
Eventually they all come into the Mahayana but it does not take away the beauty of the path of the solitary conqueors as Buddha taught different capacities of all sentient beings to free them from Samsara.
Some are not willing to be stirred by great compassion just yet but being stirred by metta and loving kindness is a great preliminary to accomplishment
The path was laid over 2,500 years ago, it has been modified a little by various people and schools, but like you said, in the end they all lead to a final destination if persues with right effort.
In the subconscious of my mind, I now see that ' Mahayana ' has always been there, almost without me knowing it was there all along.