Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Greetings. I'm new to this forum and just wanted to take a moment to ask a question. I am fairly new to Buddhism. I practice Zen as it fits me the best. My wife fully supports my practicing Buddhism as it has helped me greatly in the area of anger management. However, my parents are very devout Christians. In fact the pastor of my mother's church routinely ridicules Buddhists and mocks the Dalai Lama. My problem is this, I want to share with my family how Buddhism has helped me with my anger, but I don't know how to approach the topic. Most conversations with my mother end with her lecturing me about God and how I need to pray and go to church etc.
0
Comments
i think if you really observe what you've learned, you will find that there is no need to say "the buddha said this" or "ajahn brahm said that" or whatever. a lot of it is simple psychology at the essence.
this is all, of course, step one. eventually you will probably just want to tell them, but it sounds as though your parents might be the type to hear the word "buddhist" and immediately assume that nothing good can come from it.
From that moment something had lets say changed the dynamics and there was a sudden need for her to ask me an odd question to maybe test me and how far committed I was. It got to the point where I needed to mention to her to back off and it was my interest in meditation and zen that lead me further nothing more.
The reason it put me off telling my family is that I dont want a inquistion from my family. Its something you need to think about will the reaction of others bother you too much.
The perfection of the Buddha's teaching is that you can completely remove the Buddha(ism) part and it still works PERFECTLY when applied. The Buddha was a GENIUS... he didn't go around preaching 'Buddhism' to people. he engaged them on an individual level without dogma, religion, ideology etc. Its a very successful method of instilling change.
About the bible quotes, I got that from my work colleague and I am very unlikely to talk about religion to anyone in a work scenario again!
Besides that they have a whole set of life experiences which has lead them to NOT seek out an alternate life style and my life experiences have led me to Buddhism. I would however not enter the god debate with anyone until I was at a stage that I felt I had not doubts about Buddhism as a belief system at the moment I feel its a lifestyle element.
my parents are both hardcore christians. i talk to them about how love is the most important thing.
i also talk about how we cannot conceptualize god, nor can we "understand" god.
also i don't identify as a buddhist or zen practitioner. thus i don't feel like there is a problem, thus it isn't worth mentioning. labels/identities divide.
think of it as another chance to practice mindfulness and patience. also engaging with those who are caught in their beliefs. they need the most compassion and empathy.
lol i'm reminded of a quote by ram dass about how if we think we're enlightened we should go spend time with our parents. our parents are a pain in the ass, but they are great teachers in that sense.
i wish you well!
I hear ya, I understand your path to keep peace. I'm very guilty of stirring the hornets nest with my opposing views, and probably not the best action, but also I have learned that I feel better about myself when I do speak up and endure the flames, and in the end, the flames die down and I'm no longer hiding anything. It's like a liberation you get from being honest when asked a tough question.
And if you ever find yourself in a position of defending your beliefs, what I found worked for me, is state that your exploring and learning with no preset boundaries... If your studying Buddhism, your not in the spot light to defend it as an expert, and I have found that this approach has actually led to discussions about what I have learned vs arguments about which belief is correct. Now if I can only learn how to use this tact in political discussions, I'll be golden )
I liken it to two seedling trees one buddhist and one christian. In the beginning you nourish the seedlings and make them strong with teachings. Then you question how these teachings fit into life which is the soil.
At this point each seedling is sharing the soil. They can relate on that commonality yet they have their differences, maybe different leaves and flowers.
So for you its important to nourish and protect your beliefs. At the same time you have the same end goal of happiness.
Just sayin'.
The answer is - you don't have to.
The Four Noble Truths - have nothing 'Buddhist' about them.
The Eightfold Path - has nothing specifically 'Buddhist' about it.
The Five Precepts - have nothing 'Buddhist' about them, either.
These 17 are all about life, how to best live it, and how to best live it well.
So do that, and your 'Buddhism' will speak for itself. Without ever being mentioned.
Where is the compassion and wisdom in that?
His dilemma is not the opinions of his parents. His concern is how to break it to them that he is Buddhist.
As I pointed out earlier, telling them is unnecessary.
Try not to put your own slant of 'me first above others', on every discussion you enter into.
That's not compassion for Self. That's egotism.
Because that kind of attitude is what makes people lonely, isolated and alienated, and if you think that's ok, then really, I'm not sure what kind of Buddhism you're following, but I'm telling you now, you really should review your PoV.....
What I did gradually discover though is that it helped-- not to talk about my own religious beliefs at the time AS MY religious beliefs, but sought out common ground with my in-laws instead. What would be the point of upsetting them with my own religious views? But there were things we did hold in common, though perhaps the reasons were different or the interpretations of them, but still, it helped smooth things over considerably. It doesn't matter what you call "it." You don't have to be explicit in identifying yourself as a Zen Buddhist sometimes. This might be one of those times!
Of course, it is different-- these aren't in-laws-- these are your very own parents. The beauty of Buddhism though is that the ultimate point is what you *do*, not what you believe. Perhaps this is overly optimistic, but maybe in time (years I mean) they might soften their views just by virtue of the fact that they've had direct exposure to *you* rather than some word-of-mouth rumour about the Dalai Lama or what have you.
Just keep practicing and give them more time.
That kind of attitude is self-defeating thinking; warped and mistaken.
so they don't come around to hurt others. You choose to perceive it as hurt.
That is flawed thinking.
Not sure how that is really true, when the harm is coming from another living being, and not myself. If I could choose not to be hurt by another living being, then surely I would opt out, there for it is not by my jurisdiction that I am inflicted pain by another.
"because their infliction of hurt is not deliberate"
Of course. I mean, the holocaust was not deliberate, all of the murders taking place in the middle east are not deliberate, all of the people being raped every day aren't being raped on purpose, it's all just part of my imagination. Some one must have slipped.
"They mean well, and as such, it follows they mean no harm and have your best interests at heart, because they love you."
*Some one stabs me*
Me: "Oh, cheers mate. I've been needing that."
``He abused me, he beat me, he defeated me, he robbed me,'' in those who harbour such thoughts hatred is not appeased.
``He abused me, he beat me, he defeated me, he robbed me,'' in those who do not harbour such thoughts hatred is appeased.
From Here:
http://www.pathofdhamma.com/pairs.html
And also this sutta:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn07/sn07.002.than.html
Whatever you accept, you share, and become. Whatever you decline to accept, cannot taint you. These are deliberate. of course they are. Deliberate, planned and executed.
A member of your family, wishing you to follow a course of action that they believe will help you, because they love you, is not the deliberate infliction of pain and suffering.
Your argument is fatuous and frankly, unintelligent. Show me where in the OP anybody has threatened him harm and deliberate pain,...
Now you're just being idiotic and argumentative.
if you really cannot see the difference between my point and yours, then I think you're just trolling.
So that clearly makes it my choice, right?
"These are deliberate. of course they are."
Your point being?
"Show me where in the OP anybody has threatened him harm and deliberate pain"
"However, my parents are very devout Christians. In fact the pastor of my mother's church routinely ridicules Buddhists and mocks the Dalai Lama."