Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Anonymous hacks large intelligence company; Uses credit card information to donate to charities.
Comments
Robin hoodwink, springs to mind.
How 'real' are those claims ?
I wonder if you would feel the same if someone stole from you with intentions to help someone else
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2398049,00.asp
/Victor
the case of Hincks, (1966) excludes any possibility of ignorance of the facts, assumptions of facts and possible extenuating circumstances.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/08/nevada-lawsuit-shows-bank-of-americas-criminal-incompetent.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/01/us-goldman-robosigning-idUSTRE78010B20110901?feedType=RSS&feedName=businessNews&rpc=76
Banks have stolen more money from the American people by fraudulent the American public.
"Give a man a gun he can a rob a bank, give a man a bank he can rob the world." ~ Unknown
"Did you miss our entire recession and mortgage crisis? Also the Occupy Movement?"
No, I experienced the recession and am familiar with OWS
Unless you know something about the company STRATFOR that I don't know, that groups them in the irresponsible greedy Corp group, then I think you may have missed the point of my question.
The attitude that illegal attacks on corporations should be encouraged and celebrated, just on the basis that it is a corporation, worries me even more than the lack of regulation for the corporations that do not play by the rules. It's like approving attacks on a certain group of humans because some of those humans committed a crime?
However, in most cases, "greedy corporations" take the money we give them.
I'm not saying they don't underpay their workers, or engage in immoral tactics, etc.
I think it would have been more ethical to take from the corporations who hired the intelligence company, if one was looking to make a point.
But...okay, I can't deny it's satisfying to see a company which obviously misrepresents its skills, get called on it.