During a recent discussion, I found an excellent link on Anapana Sati (mindfulness of breathing). I thought I'd share some good portions of its content, as it is very helpful.
Anapana Sati: Meditation on Breathing
by Ven. Mahathera Nauyane Ariyadhamma
*original source info deleted due copyright issue. Please reference the following:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/ariyadhamma/bl115.html
The Basic Text
Let us first examine the meaning of the text expounded by the Buddha on anapana sati. The text begins:
"Herein, monks, a monk who has gone to the forest, or to the foot of a tree, or to an empty place, sits down cross legged, holding his back erect, arousing mindfulness in front of him."
This means that any person belonging to the four types of individuals mentioned in this teaching--namely, bhikkhu (monk), bhikkhuni (nun), upasaka (layman) or upasika (laywoman)--desirous ofpractising this meditation, should go either to a forest, to the foot of a secluded tree, or to a solitary dwelling. There he should sit down cross-legged, and keeping his body in an erect position, fix his mindfulness at the tip of his nose, the locus for his object of meditation.
If he breathes in a long breath, he should comprehend this with full awareness. If he breathes out a long breath, he should comprehend this with full awareness. If he breathes in a short breath, he should comprehend this with full awareness. if he breathes out a short breath, he should comprehend this with full awareness.
"He breathes in experiencing the whole body, he breathes out experiencing the whole body": that is, with well-placed mindfulness, he sees the beginning, the middle and the end of the two phases, the in-breath and the out-breath. As he practises watching the in-breath and the out breath with mindfulness, he calms down and tranquilizes the two functions of in breathing and out-breathing.
The Buddha illustrates this with a simile. When a clever turner or his apprentice works an object on his lathe, he attends to his task with fixed attention: in making a long turn or a short turn, he knows that he is making a long turn or a short turn. In the same manner if the practitioner of meditation breathes in a long breath he comprehends it as such; and if he breathes out a long breath, he comprehends it as such; if he breathes in a short breath, he comprehends it as such; and if he breathes out a short breath, he comprehends it as such. He exercises his awareness so as to see the beginning, the middle and the end of these two functions of breathing in and breathing out. He comprehends with wisdom the calming down of these two aspects of in-breathing and out-breathing.
In this way he comprehends the two functions of in-breathing and out-breathing in himself, and the two functions of in breathing and out-breathing in other persons. He also comprehends the two functions of in-breathing and out-breathing in himself and in others in rapid alternation. He comprehends as well the cause for the arising of in-breathing and out-breathing, and the cause for the cessation of in breathing and out-breathing, and the moment-by-moment arising and cessation of in-breathing and out-breathing.
He then realizes that this body which exercises the two functions of in-breathing and out-breathing is only a body, not an ego or "I." This mindfulness and wisdom become helpful in developing greater and more profound mindfulness and wisdom, enabling him to discard the erroneous conceptions of things in terms of "I" and "mine." He then becomes skilled in living with wisdom in respect of this body and he does not grasp anything in the world with craving, conceit or false views. Living unattached, the meditator treads the path to Nibbana by contemplating the nature of the body.
This is an amplified paraphrase of the passage from the Maha Satipatthana Sutta on anapana sati. This meditation has been explained in sixteen different ways in various suttas. Of these sixteen, the first tetrad has been explained here. But these four are the foundation for all the sixteen ways in which anapana sati can be practised.
_/\_
metta
Comments
_/\_
_/\_
_/\_
I'm glad it's here for reference because I'm going to make a point of reading it every time I come online here so that it gets imprinted deeply.
Thank you!!
Brigid
_/\_
metta
This is the kind of thing I find the most helpful and will use on a regular and long term basis as my guide to meditation. It's the references to direct passages of the sutras that gives me so much confidence in it. I mean, who doesn't want to be taught how to meditate by the Buddha himself? LOL!
Thanks again, Not1. I need to ask you, do you think it would be O.K. to publish this in my blog on MySpace with all the proper references and links? I'm asking you because I'm too lazy to go to the website myself and see if it's public property so if you tell me to take a hike I'll understand. My blog is not commercial in any way. It's the simplest of the simple.
The reason why I want to put it there is because I've had system crashes in the past and I want to back up the most important info to the internet because it's just all much easier that way. Don't worry. I don't put any private info on the net. Just stuff that's important to me and of no interest to anybody else. I've sampled the Buddhist groups on MySpace and I think there may be only two or three people who would even understand this but I'm using my blog as my daily reminder and practice guide.
I'm talking a lot tonight. My DVD player's on the fritz and I just rented King Kong and Walk The Line today and now I can't watch them so I'm full of disappointed energy.
Brigid
I really don't know why they would have a problem with that. It's not like you are making any money off of it. Then again, some people can be pretty guarded about their published material. I looked around on their site a little and didn't see any copyright statements, though there's a decent chance I might have just missed them. So, if you are really concerned, you should e-mail them and ask if it's okay. If you find anything out let me know. I really hope I don't have to close this thread. As for now, I will claim ignorance/laziness & and a personal justification that I am not actually harming them in any conceivable way.
Sorry I couldn't be more informative.
_/\_
metta
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/ariyadhamma/bl115.html
It had this copyright statement:
That said, I went back to the original website and looked around a little more thoroughly (under their 'terms of service') and found this:
*So, to all, consider these quotes to be linked from Access to Insight as of now. If you are going to post to blogs, websites, or anything, then please use that as your reference, as the other website prohibits unauthorized redistribution.
*I have just deleted it as the source for this article and referenced the Access to Insight link.
_/\_
metta
http://www.newbuddhist.com/forum/showthread.php?t=152
_/\_
Brigid
It is interesting to scrutinize Mahathera's passage "fix his mindfulness at the tip of his nose" (parimukhasati). In the discourses it doesn't say this at all. The tip of the nose is only mentioned in commentarial literature. An alternative reading also found in the commentarial literature gives another rendering which you may find interesting. I am citing from Masefiled's translation of The Udana Commentary on page 476 (UdA 188).
This has nothing to do with the tip or the nose or "around the mouth" for parimukha. Noteworthy, also, is this passage from the PTS dictionary, "to surround oneself with watchefulness of mind."
Perhaps a key for our understanding is found in the protean term 'mukha' which has a number of different meanings. The Practical Sanskrit Dictionary defines 'mukha' by some of the following synonyms: mouth, jaws, snout, beak, opening, entrance, forepart, tip, point, upper side, chief, beginning, original cause, source, means, facing or looking towards, beginning with, etc. Mukha, in other words, carries a wide latitude of meaning.
I would argue that 'parimukhasati' doesn't suggest to us that we pay attention to the tip of our nose but rather find the 'presence' which allows us to 'exit' (mukham) the breaths going back to the 'source' (mukham) of our true being. The Buddha on occasion said that in and out breaths are things tied up with the body being, therefore, bodily fabrications (cf. M.i.301). How then is liberation from the pains of the body possible if we focus on mere breathing?
A typical passage we are familiar with I would translate this way for meditative clarity.
Having sat crosslegged and straightened his body, having brought forth the remembrance of the ultimate source (parimukha.m sati.m upa.t.thapetvâ) just remembering [it] he breaths in, remembering [it], he breaths out.
I do think it is possible to reach a state of Buddhist ecstasy meditating this way rather than focusing on the nose or counting breaths.
From a Christian standpoint, in trying to understand what is divine and deathless about our being we must understand that we are the 'breather'. This is God who breathed into Adam's nostrils the breath of life. But this idea is also found in the Gospel of John 20:22 where Lord Jesus “breathed into them and said to them, Receive the Holy Spirit.” I really think there is something to this. And if you have heard it from me before, I believe that early Christianity was Jewish Buddhism which contains valuable elements of Buddhism we may have lost.
Love ya all,
Bobby
This is gratifying for me... I always used to theorise...
Just what did Jesus do in all the intervening years...?
Between the time he stayed in Jerusalem during the Feast of Passover, causing his parents much angst regarding his teenage truculence and absence, right up to the time he started 'spreading the gospel' at around the age of thirty...the 18-odd years are unaccounted for...
I used to get into deep smelly, because I put forward the heretical and unthinkable opinion that perhaps he might have travelled... sen the world a bit, learnt about other cultures, absorbed the mysticism and wisdom of other faiths....then he came back and knuckled down to it....
It didn't make me popular, but few could argue the point....
Your thoughts on this subject are not in vain. The Christianity of Paul and for that matter, what is contained in the Gospel of Thomas, seem more Buddhist to me than the Christianity of the Gospels although I find elements of Buddhism in the Gospels, too.
At any rate, you might find this very interesting. I am citing from Sukumar Dutt's book, Buddhist Monks and Monasteries of India.
I think this serves to demonstrate that Buddhism under king Asoka was moving to the west. Jesus may have well been a Buddhist teacher accommodating Buddhism to Judaism. It is an intriguing subject and one that can enrich both Buddhism and Christianity.
Love ya all,
Bobby
Your comments on anapanasati approximate a very useful way of thinking about the means and goal of meditation as taught by the Buddha. I think we can really only approximate in words the intended meaning of the Buddha (and so could he), and "ways of thinking," through imagery, similes, words which carry a more valent than a precise meaning are aids for the practicioner to intuitively find the sense of the teaching and the way of practice. Meditation is not really communicable in any easy way like you would find in a time-life book on plumbing, or a recipe in Betty Crocker. I find that meditation is more of an effort than a technique. For me this is exactly the type of idea that parimukha communicates, in other words a word carrying a force or connotation moreso than a perfectly precise denotation such as carried by the idea of concentrating on the tip of the nose. Like an impressionist painter who, though often choosing not to fully delineate a form in hard-edge denotation, allows us to grasp the sense of the form and recognize what is being abstractly depicted, like Monet's haystacks or the scenes of Pissaro. Paradoxically enough, this makes it somewhat important to be aware of the range of meanings and application of the words the Buddha is told to have used (also the words he does not use in a given context).
Anyways, though I never was a Christian and have not studied very deeply Christian theology and am only culturally acquainted with the Bible, your comments on the relationship between Christianity and Buddhist meditation are very interesting.
I asked the Abbot at the temple about mindfullness, and he got me this book; Mindfulness In Plain English. by Bhante Gunaratana. It's a great explanation of Vipassana meditation, and more.
I can't do serious meditation around here very often, it's too crazy. "Bhante G" explained mindfulness as a way to continue meditation into, and practice meditation in my daily routine. It flipped a switch for me. It's an autographed copy, which Venerable Devananda tryed to explain to me, but we have a slight language barrier.
Not1Not2,
Venerable Devanda is teaching us meditators how to chant your signature, so we can do it for/with the laypeople at Buddha's birthday celebration. The Monks at the Temple chant beautifully, it's a wonderful part of meditation. Ven. Devananda even has a CD out, last week I got him to "autograph" my copy.
Excellent. I love listening to chanting. One of my favorites is "Namo tassa bhagavato, arahato, samma sambuddhasa." Oh and check out this thread for lot's of audio links:
http://www.newbuddhist.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1523
take care.
_/\_
metta
I'm going to download some tonight.
Also, I just today recieved the tapes I ordered from the Tibetan Cultural Center in Bloomington Indiana. Kalachakra Teachings. His Holiness the Dalai Lama's preliminary teachings: Shantideva's "Chapter 8: Meditation".
I know the past is gone, but it would have been nice to have been there in person in 1999.
The Dalai Lama in Indiana, how cool.
I plan to attend His Holiness' talk on world peace at UBNY this september.