Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Right speech.

I recently came across something a moto I wrote down about a year ago when I was working on right speech...
"Aware of the suffering caused by unmodified speech and the inability to listen to others, I am committed to cultivating loving speech and deep listening in order to bring joy and happiness to others and relieve others of their suffering..."
"...I will refrain from uttering words that cause division or discord, or that can cause the family or the community to break. I am determined to make all efforts to reconcile and resolve all conflicts, however small."
I've brought this practice into my forethought for the past week and am having difficulties. Mainly listening.

I find that lately I've put myself in the role of the "therapist" and once fishing out problems from people, then provide advice. I'm a little tired of listening to myself and it's usually when I am hunting to help other people when I myself am in need of help. I suppose I see people suffering in some way, much in the same suffering I've done with many of the same things before, and want them automatically to snap out of it once I share my experience.

It seems that practicing right speech to me translates into providing advice or discussing philosophy and even though people generally resist therapy, I persist in making people challenge themselves in this way although I don't feel that is necessarily my place.

Should I continue to ask uncomfortable questions (sometimes with people I barely know) when all someone wants to do is discuss something more superficial? Or should I shut up even if (or especially if) I think I know what to say to help the other person? Eh...I guess I'm looking for thoughts on my logic here.

Comments

  • taiyakitaiyaki Veteran
    If you want to help someone realize first that you cannot help them and that fundamentally there is no need to help them.

    Helping can become an ego trip.

    But if conditions are ripe then the dharma asserts itself. You do not help them.

    Sometimes its a smile. Sometimes its doing absolutely nothing at all.

    Spontaneous bodhisattva action only occurs when the unbearable is to bear yet the wind carries everything and there is nothing lost.

    The whole point is to have an open heart. Sometimes that involves giving advice, hearing them out, or just stupid idle chatter. Nothing contrived, just spontaneous actions of body, speech and mind.

    Hope this helps.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    Long shadow hunts over silver moon.

    The tiger is in the east.


    (just messing around I caught taiyaki's wind hehe)

  • Invincible_summerInvincible_summer Heavy Metal Dhamma We(s)t coast, Canada Veteran
    If you want to help someone realize first that you cannot help them and that fundamentally there is no need to help them.

    Helping can become an ego trip.

    But if conditions are ripe then the dharma asserts itself. You do not help them.

    Sometimes its a smile. Sometimes its doing absolutely nothing at all.

    Spontaneous bodhisattva action only occurs when the unbearable is to bear yet the wind carries everything and there is nothing lost.

    The whole point is to have an open heart. Sometimes that involves giving advice, hearing them out, or just stupid idle chatter. Nothing contrived, just spontaneous actions of body, speech and mind.

    Hope this helps.
    "... like reaching for a pillow in the night."
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited May 2012
    I find that lately I've put myself in the role of the "therapist" and once fishing out problems from people, then provide advice.
    This to my mind is inappropriate and unskilful and what's more, trivialises the training and qualifications achieved by people who have through hard work and study, earned the right to call themselves legitimate Therapists.
    I'm a little tired of listening to myself and it's usually when I am hunting to help other people when I myself am in need of help.
    One: Stop hunting.
    first of all, they may not be prepared to be helped. a good therapist is approached, a good therapist does not 'hunt'. your hunting may well come across as intrusive.

    Secondly - actually, it's none of your business - especially if you yourself are projecting from a point of weakness and need, yourself.
    If I'm going to use a hammer to drive in a nail, I'm not going to seek a rusty bent nail, and use a hammer with no handle to do the job - am I?
    I suppose I see people suffering in some way, much in the same suffering I've done with many of the same things before, and want them automatically to snap out of it once I share my experience.
    Did you manage to 'automatically snap out of it'? I very much doubt it. 'Healing' takes time.
    This is why I hate the phrase, "Time is a great healer"
    That's bull.
    Chronological time does nothing but pass.
    WE heal - and we take however long we individually need to get there.
    And some people never get there at all.
    So attempting to be a therapist to people, and expecting them to 'snap out of it' - while you yourself are in a position of needing help - is just a little bit screwy - isn't it?
    It seems that practicing right speech to me translates into providing advice or discussing philosophy and even though people generally resist therapy, I persist in making people challenge themselves in this way although I don't feel that is necessarily my place.
    You're damn right it isn't!
    Practising Right Speech also entails using all the other virtues in the 8Fold Path, including Right View and Right Intention, and you have to combine these matters and not attempt to practise them individually, in isolation from one another.
    Consider it 'Right Everything' - and unfortunately, your view of these matters shows, quite evidently, that you are not getting Everything - Right.
    Practising Right Speech does not ever translate into providing advice or discussing philosophy - when you yourself need advice, and need to study your philosophy introspectively.
    Right speech also contains Right Silence.
    Persisting in challenging people to challenge themselves is going to get you a bloody nose one of these days.
    You know what they say - 'No Good Deed goes unpunished.'
    Intrusion and challenge is definitely not Right Action, or Right Intention.
    Do you never consider these as you act as 'Therapist'?
    Should I continue to ask uncomfortable questions (sometimes with people I barely know) when all someone wants to do is discuss something more superficial?
    No, you most definitely should not, because it is an unskillful action.
    How many monks or priests do you see approaching people and getting them to discuss their negative kamma or go to confession because they feel that person needs help?
    I guarantee - it hardly ever happens.
    Or should I shut up even if (or especially if) I think I know what to say to help the other person? Eh...I guess I'm looking for thoughts on my logic here.
    definitely.
    unfortunately, I personally see no logic here.
    Because actually, you're not thinking it through thoroughly.

    I've tried to give you help - even if I've sounded a little harsh, believe me - it's there.

    Shush, and practice all 8.
    Together. ;)

  • I'm at a time in my life where it's tough remaining passive...
    I guess I forgot to mention that I don't necessarily accept Buddhism as the one and only truth to dealing with problems and due to western studies have integrated practices of psychology into my thought process...however negative that may be effecting it...which accepts a more (physically manifested) active participation.
    Practicing Right Speech does not ever translate into providing advice or discussing philosophy - when you yourself need advice, and need to study your philosophy introspectively.
    I like this. It does seem sometimes that when I am chattering the days away I'm distracting myself from myself.
    Persisting in challenging people to challenge themselves is going to get you a bloody nose one of these days.
    I reflect on my life up until this point and I have never grown one ounce without someone challenging my thought process and making me uncomfortable and I'm very grateful for those opportunities- that's exactly what you're doing as well. Of course I sought the advice.

    The whole point is to have an open heart. Sometimes that involves giving advice, hearing them out, or just stupid idle chatter. Nothing contrived, just spontaneous actions of body, speech and mind.
    It always comes back to this doesn't it...
    Thank you.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    I don't think it's wrong to try and help people out. That is a learning experience. But I think you are getting a sensitive SIGNAL that some aspect of what you are doing is not working correctly from ideal. I liked taiyaki's idea of the help being spontaneous and joyful rather than something that saps you are frustrates you.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    Did you manage to 'automatically snap out of it'? I very much doubt it. 'Healing' takes time.
    This is why I hate the phrase, "Time is a great healer"
    That's bull.
    Chronological time does nothing but pass.
    WE heal - and we take however long we individually need to get there.
    And some people never get there at all.
    So attempting to be a therapist to people, and expecting them to 'snap out of it' - while you yourself are in a position of needing help - is just a little bit screwy - isn't it?
    @federira, at the risking of brown nosing a moderator :P that was very beautiful to me to acknowledge that the emotional healing isn't just like a newt regrowing it's tail rather it is an emotional experience.
  • taiyakitaiyaki Veteran
    Helping can be joyful. It can also be torture.

    And sometimes we are forced to help and it sucks ass.

    Taking the bodhisattva vow one attracts a shit ton of annoying, arrogant, prideful, ignorant beings. You become a magnet.

    Thus to some its a living hell. But such hell is an invitation to grow compassion and to see the play of emptiness and our karma first hand.

    No escape.
  • DairyLamaDairyLama Veteran Veteran
    edited May 2012
    "Aware of the suffering caused by unmodified speech and the inability to listen to others, I am committed to cultivating loving speech and deep listening in order to bring joy and happiness to others and relieve others of their suffering..."
    "...I will refrain from uttering words that cause division or discord, or that can cause the family or the community to break. I am determined to make all efforts to reconcile and resolve all conflicts, however small."
    That sounds like one of Thich Nhat Hanh's mindfulness trainings? They are quite ambitious, IMO. ;)
  • edited May 2012
    I think it must have been Thich Nhat Hanh... Still Forest Pool?
    Thank you for your input everyone, now practice.
  • CinorjerCinorjer Veteran
    It's pretty standard Right Speech commentary at temples and Zen centers. The conflict resolution part "uttering words that cause division or discord" is aimed at the sangha group itself, and has been misapplied in some cases to excuse not speaking up when it's needed, such as when there is improper behavior by the Roshi.

    Listening is more important than giving advice.


  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    edited May 2012
    It's pretty standard Right Speech commentary at temples and Zen centers. The conflict resolution part "uttering words that cause division or discord" is aimed at the sangha group itself, and has been misapplied in some cases to excuse not speaking up when it's needed, such as when there is improper behavior by the Roshi.
    I agree with this. The not-sowing-discord part is only one side of the Buddha's teaching on Right Speech. The other side is that when wrongdoing is present, to remain silent is Wrong Speech. It's important to speak up against wrong doing, but one should choose the appropriate time to do so. The teachings on Right and Wrong Speech are to be guided by compassion. So if the sangha leader is causing harm to members, or behaving in a way that is causing division, our compassion and concern for those being harmed, and for the prevention of future harm, moves us to speak the truth. (This is Right Motivation, Right Intent.) If the sangha leader is behaving in a way that causes division and may lead members to become disillusioned with the Dharma, that's a root downfall. He or she needs to take responsibility for his/her actions, not try to pass the buck to members who would speak truthfully.

    http://newbuddhist.com/discussion/8869/do-speak-ill-of-the-three-treasures

  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    @Dakini, the thought occurred to me that compassion is important as a guide. If you are speaking out against wrong doing it is with a compassionate heart. Right? But if you are caught up in a juicy fight as we see on this forum even sometimes then it is clear that it is about craving (or anger) rather than compassion.
  • DakiniDakini Veteran
    @Dakini, the thought occurred to me that compassion is important as a guide. If you are speaking out against wrong doing it is with a compassionate heart. Right? But if you are caught up in a juicy fight as we see on this forum even sometimes then it is clear that it is about craving (or anger) rather than compassion.
    Right, I was thinking along those lines as I posted the above. A sangha member could speak out due to anger, like lashing out from hurt, or from the need to call attention to an important issue that's being swept under the rug, that might adversely affect new members. Motivation (intent) is everything, as they say.

Sign In or Register to comment.