Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Can a Buddha still get Alzheimers?
In another thread i asked if Buddha would have felt pain if he cut himself and would he even say 'ouch, that hurt'
Some people talk of him as if he was some sort of Robot who wouldnt feel pain.
So i have to ask and look foward to the comments and opinions of some; Can a Buddha get struck down with Alzheimers'
Imagin what would have happened if, 2500 years ago, buddha caught this disease, what would all his followers have thought?
#The reason i ask these kind of questions is just to get an 'understanding' of peoples opinion on what they think a Buddha is, and how they 'think' he'd react in certain situations etc etc#
[Plus, i just genuinly find some opinions hilarious and some interesting]
Cheers!
0
Comments
Or in sound
Walks the heterodox path
And cannot perceive the Tathagata
- The Buddha
If the Buddha can die then he can also get alzheimers. If his death does not remove his Buddhahood then alzheimers could not remove his Buddhahood.
You get all sorts of beliefs in these ancient traditions. For example Gampopa stated that bad breath is caused by lying. Personally I believe without karma there would be no consequence for mischief. There must be some negative consequence and where do you draw the line and say that is too insensitive to say was caused by negative karma? Obviously you wouldn't bring up karma to a sick friend unless you knew they were a believer in the sense of Buddhism, karma.
From my beliefs samsara has no beginning, but does have an end. Nirvana has no end but does have a beginning. Thus we have endless negative karma. That means just because you have alzheimers does not mean that you can't have some other calamity such as cutting your finger.
All of that message is to work hard to practice to get on the nirvana wavelength if it can be called that.
Enlightenment would not prevent the ravages of age.
He was apparently a seriously sick man when he died, and some research would indicate that had he been in prime health, his final meal would not have precipitated his death.
so if iy is not an unlikely probability that he was vulnerable to severe gastric disorder, there is nothing to negate any other affliction.
The question isn't so much could/would a Buddha get such afflictions. The question is, would he suffer from them, or would he stay focused on the positive and continue his mission in life to the extent possible, rather than ruminate on his aches and pains, thereby creating unnecessary suffering for himself. How would he handle the aches and pains, is the question, and what can we learn from his skillful handling of them?
Oh, gad, to hear that's there is such a thing as a true buddhist and that the poor bugger is still befouled by the seeking. I'm sending merit as I type.
I do agree with your point about attending to the business at hand.
Yes. Also cancer, diabetes, stroke, heart attack, ect...Those who become awake are human beings and as such are subject to the illnesses of the body and its eventual deterioration.
Interesting to note that people with neurodegenerative disorders will often revert their behaviours from life. Habits die hard. But if you've got good habits...