Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Heart Sutra question

BonsaiDougBonsaiDoug Simply, on the path. Veteran
edited June 2012 in Philosophy
My readings/study are primarily Theravada. But I do like reading other traditions.

The Heart Sutra may be short, but it's a tough one to understand. For example, in all the things that are negated in that sutra, it seems to me that it also negates the Four Noble Truths and the Eight-fold Path.

This line is giving me problems:

There is no suffering, no cause of suffering,
no end to suffering, no path to follow.


Can someone either explain how this is not negating the 4 Truths and The Path, or perhaps point me to some reading material explaining this sutra?

TIA

Comments

  • howhow Veteran Veteran
    edited June 2012
    For me the Prajñāpāramitā makes the sense as the most perfect description/ instruction of meditation that I've found.
  • zenffzenff Veteran
    Nagarjuna is the guy to ask.

    http://www.myspace.com/shivatao/blog/283271465
    (Maybe chapter 24 is relevant)

    My simplified explanation is:
    The four noble truths do not exist from their own nature. If they did we would have a problem. Suffering – if it existed of its own nature – could not change or end.
    Only when emptiness is properly seen, there is room for liberation, for Dharma. But the whole thing gets slippery. Language suggests phenomena to be substantial; it moves around in the realm of conventional truth.

    The sublime meaning cannot be put in words adequately.
    I hope I didn’t add to the confusion.
    8. The Dharma taught by Buddhas perfectly relies on two truths: the ambiguous truths of the world and the truths of the sublime meaning.

    9. Those who do not understand the division into two truths, cannot understand the profound reality of the Buddha's teaching.

    10. Without relying on conventions, the sublime meaning cannot be taught. Without understanding the sublime meaning, one will not attain nirvana.

  • misecmisc1misecmisc1 I am a Hindu India Veteran
    edited June 2012
    there are 2 truths: conventional truth and ultimate truth. conventional truth is the truth of Samsara and ultimate truth is ultimate truth. for example, conventional truth - 'I' exists, but ultimate truth - there is no 'I'.

    So from conventional truth, 'I' exists, Samsara exists, suffering exists, so path exists.
    From ultimate truth, there is no 'I', no Samsara, no suffering, no path. it is all emptiness or it is nothingness everywhere.

    But to tell something about ultimate truth, conventional speaking is used - so even though words or language cannot describe ultimate truth as it truely is, still some sentences are formed to give a little idea of what ultimate truth can be like - because if ultimate truth is to be explained only through ultimate truth, then nobody can speak and nobody can hear, as it is emptiness everywhere. So ultimate truth can only be directly experienced to realize it.
  • DairyLamaDairyLama Veteran Veteran
    For me the Prajñāpāramitā makes the sense as the most perfect description/ instruction of meditation that I've found.
    Where is the instruction for meditation?
  • Can someone either explain how this is not negating the 4 Truths and The Path, or perhaps point me to some reading material explaining this sutra?

    TIA
    Related thread: http://newbuddhist.com/discussion/15450/sutra-studies-heart-sutra/p1
  • BonsaiDougBonsaiDoug Simply, on the path. Veteran
    Thanx all! I did try a forum search last night for "Heart Sutra," but got an error message telling me the words were too common (or something like that). Basically, try something else for the search.
  • Yeah the forum search is not too good :)
  • DairyLamaDairyLama Veteran Veteran
    So ultimate truth can only be directly experienced to realize it.
    And since the Heart Sutra is a description of ultimate truth, there is no way we'll understand it?
  • There is no one to understand your question, porpoise, yet answers arise.
  • misecmisc1misecmisc1 I am a Hindu India Veteran
    So ultimate truth can only be directly experienced to realize it.
    And since the Heart Sutra is a description of ultimate truth, there is no way we'll understand it?
    i think we can just think what that emptiness can be somewhat like after understanding Heart Sutra, but what that emptiness is exactly can only be directly experienced to realize it.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    I think it means the path is a concept. A buddhist dreams they are a buddhist. A buddha is no longer dreaming.
  • So ultimate truth can only be directly experienced to realize it.
    And since the Heart Sutra is a description of ultimate truth, there is no way we'll understand it?
    People can understand it in all sorts of intellectual ways - and do, but that understanding is not yet the genuine one.

    Well wishes,
    Abu
  • howhow Veteran Veteran
    For me the Prajñāpāramitā makes the sense as the most perfect description/ instruction of meditation that I've found.
    Where is the instruction for meditation?

    On both gross and increasingly subtle levels, it lists the sticking points to watch on ones meditative journey. It is not about negation, but balance & freedom.
    The prajnaparamita is not so much a description of truth, as a meditative roadmap.
    I can seldom meditatively run through it without it illuminating the next ego pothole
    on my path to address.
  • Heart Sutra

    The great Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara, in the deep course of wisdom beyond wisdom, seeing that the five aggregates are also empty of inherent nature, overcame all suffering and distress.

    Shariputra, form is emptiness, emptiness is form. Form is not other than emptiness. Emptiness is not other than form. The same is true of feelings, perceptions, formations, and consciousness.

    All phenomena are marked with emptiness. They are neither produced nor destroyed, neither defiled nor pure, neither increasing nor decreasing.

    Therefore in emptiness there is no form, no feelings, no perceptions, no formations, no consciousness; no eye, no ear, no nose, no tongue, no body, no mind; no form, no sound, no smell, no taste, no touch, no object of mind; no realm of eye, no realm of mind-consciousness, nor anything in between. There is no ignorance, no extinction of ignorance, no old-age-and-death, no extinction of old-age-and-death, nor any of the twelve links.

    Likewise there is no suffering, no origination, no cessation, and no path; no understanding, no attainment, and no non-attainment.

    With nothing to attain the bodhisattva relies on wisdom beyond wisdom and the mind is no hindrance. Without any hindrance, there is no fear. Passing beyond every upside-down view, the bodhisattva abides in Nirvana.

    All Buddhas in the past, present and future, relying on wisdom beyond wisdom, realize unsurpassed, complete, perfect enlightenment.

    Therefore this is the mantra of wisdom beyond wisdom, the mantra of great knowledge, the mantra that is unsurpassed, the mantra that is equal to the unequalled, the mantra that pacifies all suffering. Free from deception, it is the simple truth:

    Gate Gate Paragate Parasamgate Bodhi Svaha!
  • howhow Veteran Veteran
    edited June 2012
    So many different translations & flavours.
    One of my favourites is by Roshi Jiyu Kennett of Shasta Abbey


    When one with deepest wisdom of the heart
    that is beyond discriminative thought,
    The holy lord great Kanzeon Bosatsu,
    knew that the skandas five were,
    as they are,
    in there self nature,
    void, unstained and pure.
    O' Shariputra, form is only pure,
    Pure is all form; there is, then, nothing more than this,
    for what is form is pure and what is pure is form.
    O' Shariputra, here all things are pure, for they are neither born
    nor do they wholly die.
    They are not stained nor yet immaculate;
    increasing not, decreasing not.
    O Shariputra, in this pure there is no form,
    sensation, thought, activity or consciousnes;
    No eye, ear, nose, tonque, body, mind;
    no form, no tastes, sound, colour, touch or objects;
    Vison none; no consciousness; no knowledge and no sign of ignorance.
    Until we come to where old age and death have ceased,
    and so has all extinction of old age and death.
    for here there is no suffering, nor yet again accumulation,
    nor again annihilation, nor an eight fold path,
    no knowledge, no attainment.
    In the mind of the Bosatsu who is truly one
    with Wisdom Great the obstacles dissolve
    and going on beyond this human mind,
    he is Nirvana.
    All the Buddhas True of present, past and future they ARE all.
    because upon Great wisdom they rely,
    the perfect and most high enlightenment.
    The prajnapararamita one should know
    to be the greatest mantra of them all,
    the highest and most peerless Mantra too;
    allayer of all pain Great Wisdom is,
    it is the very truth, no falsehood here.
    This is the Mantra of great Wisdom, hear;
    O Buddha, going, going, always going on beyond,
    always becoming Buddha.
    Hail! Hail! Hail!
  • Wow, the differences are really illuminating, thanks for them both.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    Both beautiful translations, I think.
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    edited June 2012
    My readings/study are primarily Theravada. But I do like reading other traditions.

    The Heart Sutra may be short, but it's a tough one to understand. For example, in all the things that are negated in that sutra, it seems to me that it also negates the Four Noble Truths and the Eight-fold Path.

    This line is giving me problems:

    There is no suffering, no cause of suffering,
    no end to suffering, no path to follow.


    Can someone either explain how this is not negating the 4 Truths and The Path, or perhaps point me to some reading material explaining this sutra?

    TIA
    I would say it's not negating these thing, but rather simply a description of after one has reached the other shore and no longer has a need for the boat, the teachings, the path, Buddhism, etc. because the job is done. A Buddha no longer has any need for Buddhism.
  • BonsaiDougBonsaiDoug Simply, on the path. Veteran
    I would say it's not negating these thing, but rather simply a description of after one has reached the other shore and no longer has a need for the boat, the teachings, the path, Buddhism, etc. because the job is done. A Buddha no longer has any need for Buddhism.
    Hmm... an interesting take, which I had not considered. Thanx.

  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    It's definitely reaching the point of attaining bodhisattva status. Well I should say 'I think'. But I would suppose there is still the path of the paramitas. Seeing the wisdom paramita in all things not just in meditation. And the other five paramitas such as ethics is to become a more attractive dharma representative. The removal of veils on the true nature which is the ten bhumis of the bodhisattva path.
  • These are the words from enlightened people. Any attempt to explain the meaning of these words to you is fruitless. The only way to understand the true meaning of these words is to experience what they mean and not just understand what they mean. In other words, when you truly understand the meaning behind this phrase, you are or will become enlightened.

    Good luck.
  • ToshTosh Veteran
    edited June 2012
    These are the words from enlightened people. Any attempt to explain the meaning of these words to you is fruitless. The only way to understand the true meaning of these words is to experience what they mean and not just understand what they mean. In other words, when you truly understand the meaning behind this phrase, you are or will become enlightened.

    Good luck.
    I don't think that any attempt to understand the meaning of these words to be fruitless. I was taught that we start by understanding the concepts and then deepen that understanding by various methods to gain realisations.

    "Chewing on the sutras with toothless gums" springs to mind from this particular lesson. I've notes somewhere, but I'm too lazy to dig 'em out. But understanding the concepts contained in the Heart Sutra is more than possible, because I've done it.

    I just haven't done the realising of them though!

    :p
  • howhow Veteran Veteran
    edited June 2012
    There are as many understandings of the prajnaparimita as there are folks who have heard it. I approach it as a meditation guide or mirror but I think it is equally applicable to what ever Buddhist path one chooses.
    The only limit to our understanding of the heart sutra comes from what ever we hold to be more important than it.
    Every loosening of attachments hold, simply illuminates a bit more of the heart sutra's truth.
  • BonsaiDougBonsaiDoug Simply, on the path. Veteran
    After some further reading, I came across a commentary and translation by the Nalanda Translation Committee.

    This brief commentary kind of clears things up a bit for me:

    The emptiness described refers to things as they really are - empty of all the concepts by which we grasp them and fit them into our world - empty of all we project upon them.
  • PrairieGhostPrairieGhost Veteran
    edited June 2012
    I speak only for its effect on myself; but from my point of view all of Buddhism, the heart sutra especially and most plainly, is simply a skillfully convoluted way of teaching damaged, egotistical people how to love.
Sign In or Register to comment.