Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
what about the people who say 'buddhism goes over their head coz its all too deep for them..)
I've come across some people who (mainly friends and family) etc
Who just don't like philosophy or any religions FULL STOP!
They say its all too deep and they just prefere to live life as it is..
So what's your opinions on these people?
Do you really believe they are 'missing' something in their life if they are not into Buddhism????
0
Comments
If they don't want or need religion/philosophy, what's the problem? There is no problem.
There are people who don't want to try new foods. Are they missing out? Well of course... there's always something to miss out on. That doesn't mean anything though, they're living their lives according to their own preferences.
I think people who choose not to jump off of cliffs are missing out on a helluva lot of adrenaline, fear and sudden death. Why don't they do that? People are attracted to religions and philosophies when they have reason to be... just like people are attracted to Buddhism because they suffer.
Seriously, don't worry about what others think. Just meditate regularly and enjoy the journey.
I've read somewhere in zen that we should question 'everything'
I have thousands of questions in my head..
I guess I'm just interested in peoples opinions and thoughts.
Not everyone 'has' to be buddhists to know 'suffering is optional.
Even other philosophies and ideas have stated the same things for thousand of years.
Take "stoicism" for example, according to stoics they say; there are some things in life that are beyond our control, but we can accept whatever happens calmly and dispassionately. Individuals, however, are responsible for their own actions, which they can examine and control through rigorous self-discipline.
Suffering arises from trying to control what is uncontrollable, or from neglecting what is within our power. As part of the universal city that is the universe, human beings have a duty to care for all fellow humans. The person who follows these precepts will achieve happiness and peace of mind.
((Sounds simular to buddhism to me ! ))
What could a stoic learn from buddhism then if buddhism is 'the only way' to inner peace.
Stoics think they know the 'way'
But ive heard buddhist say that buddhism is the only way to 'true' peace.
Is that true?
Or could stoics be right aswell?
I think there are truths in alot of different religions/philosophies..
I dont believe for a minute that Buddhism is the ONLY path to happiness.
It might be the 'only' path to get to where 'buddhism thinks happiness is'' but happiness can mean different things to different people, therefore in terms of 'inner happiness' i dont believe there is only ONE way..
im a fan of buddhism aswell as taoism, zen, stoicism, vinism, my father-ism, etc etc.. (list can go on)
They are all inspirational and all help me along my way to finding 'my' own path to happiness.
(not Zen Buddhism)
Just ZEN
However i disagree.
I dont believe just because they are not 'buddhists' then they are in deep samsara..
Some are yes, but there are a few who are just SO CONTENT that they dont suffer.
How? i dont know.
Perhaps they are bodhisattva's
youve just cleared up so much about 'buddhism' that i was having trouble with for ages.
Thanks!
The first time I really learned anything about any religions other than what I was raised with, was in college. At that time I was 22 years old, and I found many eastern religions interesting, but upon trying to read more about them, I couldn't grasp many of the topics. I wasn't at a place in my life where I wanted to be calm and meditate and study. I loved the frenzied pace of live and slowing down on a moment by moment basis was the last thing I wanted to do. So, I learned a little about it and left it be. Several years later, my life was more settled and I remembered the things I had learned, so I went back to learning more about various religions. I took a couple year side trip into Pagan religions, and while I enjoyed (and still enjoy) parts of them, it wasn't for me. I found I could easily use the things about Paganism that I liked, within Buddhism. Anyhow, just because I find Buddhism to be "for me" doesn't mean I assume everyone else in the world is missing out by not having found it to be "for them."
I think the world as a whole could use more people who are peaceful and mindful of their words and actions. That doesn't mean Buddhism is the only way to do it.
zenmyste: Your disagreement is really with the Pali canon. I would advise you to buy a copy of Peter Masefield's book, Divine Revelation in Pali Buddhism. In it you will learn the proper distinction between puthujjana and ariyasavaka.