Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
The Six Commandments
Magwang
Veteran
Gregg Easterbrook 's point is that Jesus endorsed only 6 of the 10 Commandments, and leaving the other 4 off of public displays in the U.S. would satisfy the Establishment Clause of the Constitution regarding endorsement of religion.
Irony!
Here's the link to author's post: http://www.beliefnet.com/story/11/story_1110_1.html
::
Hang Six
Christians should talk about the Six Commandments, not Ten. Just post those and constitutional contraints fade away.
By Gregg Easterbrook
The Ten Commandments are back. Indiana’s state legislature has voted to allow them to be posted in schools and other public buildings. Several other states are considering similar bills, all but assuring that the Ten Commandments issue will continue to surface from time to time in the 2000 presidential campaign.Civil libertarians say the Ten Commandments must not be displayed in public places because this constitutes state endorsement of religion. Proponents counter that reminding citizens of divine law will help rebuild the nation’s character.
What’s intriguing is that, in theological terms, Christianity should have Six Commandments, not Ten. Jesus deliberately snipped out four of the commandments, endorsing only six. The six he favored are moral standards that could readily be posted in any public structure, without violating the line between church and state. It is the Six Commandments, not the Ten, that ought to be central to this debate.
First the political background. A 1980 Supreme Court decision barred most displays of the Ten Commandments in public buildings, on the grounds that this violates the Establishment Clause of the Constitution, which mandates, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”
Since 1980, proponents have been looking for a way around the ruling, as part of a movement that calls itself Hang Ten. The Indiana statute seeks to satisfy legal concerns by saying that the Ten Commandments should be displayed along with other historical documents such as the Magna Carta. If displayed in conjunction with secular documents, the Hang Ten movement maintains, then the Ten Commandments would be received as primarily historical, not explicitly Judeo-Christian.
It is unknown whether the Supreme Court would allow an Indiana-type commandments statute to stand. In recent years, federal judges have warmed somewhat toward faith in the public square. William Rehnquist, chief justice of the Supreme Court, maintains that the Constitution prohibits government only from endorsing religion or restricting free expression by minority faiths: “The Establishment Clause does not require that the public sector be insulated from all things which may have a religious significance.”
But even if courts were sympathetic to the Indiana law, test cases and years of litigation would be required. Then, even if a Hang Ten statute were upheld, a backlash would surely result, on the part of those who would rightly fear that what was being hung was really a promotional device for evangelical Christianity.
That’s the political rundown. What about the theology?
One irony is that if the Ten Commandments commend to the public a religion, the faith being touted is Judaism, not Christianity. The Ten Commandments are found in the Hebrew Bible--what Christians call the Old Testament--which forms the core of Jewish holy writ.
Christianity honors the Old Testament, but views it as amended by the New--and in the New Testament, Jesus consciously rejects the Ten Commandments, replacing them with the Six Commandments.
The story of the Six Commandments comes when a young man asks Jesus what a person must do to obtain entry to heaven. Jesus replies, “If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Christ often simply said “life” to mean “eternal life,” implying that the spirit world is the reality and the physical world is the veil.) Instructed to “keep the commandments,” the young man then inquires, “Which ones?”
Which ones? Aren’t there a famously invariant Ten Commandments? Debating which laws mean more than others was a favorite exercise of the rabbinical tradition in which Jesus was educated. Still, Talmudic commentators did not take it upon themselves to pick and choose among the Commandments that God gave to humanity etched in stone. Jesus, on the other hand, in Christian thinking holds a divine license to amend the scripture. And here’s what he says:
“And Jesus said, ‘You shall not murder; you shall not commit adultery; you shall not steal; you shall not bear false witness. Honor your father and mother. Also, you shall love your neighbor as yourself.’” (Matthew 19:17-19, New Revised Standard Version. A parallel telling of the Six Commandments exchange is found at Mark 10:17-23.)
Six count ‘em Six Commandments, not Ten. Can you name the missing four? These are the Commandments that Christ leaves off his inventory: “You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make yourself an idol. You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the Lord your God. Remember the Sabbath Day, and keep it holy.” (Compression of Exodus 20:3-8, NRSV. The Ten Commandments are given several times in the Old Testament in slightly different wordings, and the Catholic, Jewish, and Protestant traditions make different choices regarding which wordings to emphasize.)
Because what is significant about the Six Commandments verses is what Christ does not say, the grandeur and import of the passage is routinely missed.
Jesus, the child of God, carefully and consciously discards four of the Ten Commandments, basic precepts of a thousand years of relations between Maker and made. It turns out that the four Commandments Jesus deletes are the ones concurring formal religious practice. The Six Commandments that Jesus endorses are the ones concerning morality, love, and good character.
Jesus, bear in mind, is considered by Christian theology to be voicing the thoughts of the divine. When proclaiming the Ten Commandments, God placed at the top of the list formal religious obligation, exactly what the Establishment Clause of the Constitution forbids government from taking any stand on.
A thousand years later--Moses is believe to have lived about nine centuries before Christ--the Maker, speaking through Jesus, drops the ancient commandments regarding formal religious affiliation, and chooses to emphasize moral behavior and good character, exactly what schools and courts can emphasize without legal constraints.
The Christian denominations have a long history of averting their eyes from the Six Commandments passage, for a self-interested reason--these verses seem to say that denominations are not particularly important, and what denomination wants to call attention to that? Through the course of the Gospels, Jesus makes a number of statements suggesting that God’s interest in religious formality has declined, replaced by a divine emphasis on morality and love.
Christianity, as an institution, pays close heed to Jesus’s admonitions regarding morality and love, but tries to change the subject away from his anti-religious sayings.
For the purposes of the current Hang Ten political debate, what matters is that the Six Commandments could readily be posted in any school or public structure, because they do not advocate any particular faith, or even advocate religion at all.
Rather, the Six Commandments advocate ethical precepts we all ought to follow and teach, rules that define a life of good character. The teachings of the Six Commandments are timeless, too: even "You shall not commit adultery" does not mean no fun, it means no breaking the vows of marital fidelity. (The original Greek word translated as "adultery,", moicheuo, refers to monogamy, not sex generally.)
The precepts of the Six Commandments are ones embraced by every leading religion: Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, and every minor one that comes to mind.
Let's reprise the Six Commandments again, and imagine the good that could be accomplished by posting them in schools and public buildings, attributed to the radiant rabbi Jesus:
You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness.
Honor your father and mother.
Also, you shall love your neighbor as yourself.
In these words are everything we need to ground a revival of public character, without the slightest worry of Constitutional challenge.
So--Hang Six!
Irony!
Here's the link to author's post: http://www.beliefnet.com/story/11/story_1110_1.html
::
Hang Six
Christians should talk about the Six Commandments, not Ten. Just post those and constitutional contraints fade away.
By Gregg Easterbrook
The Ten Commandments are back. Indiana’s state legislature has voted to allow them to be posted in schools and other public buildings. Several other states are considering similar bills, all but assuring that the Ten Commandments issue will continue to surface from time to time in the 2000 presidential campaign.Civil libertarians say the Ten Commandments must not be displayed in public places because this constitutes state endorsement of religion. Proponents counter that reminding citizens of divine law will help rebuild the nation’s character.
What’s intriguing is that, in theological terms, Christianity should have Six Commandments, not Ten. Jesus deliberately snipped out four of the commandments, endorsing only six. The six he favored are moral standards that could readily be posted in any public structure, without violating the line between church and state. It is the Six Commandments, not the Ten, that ought to be central to this debate.
First the political background. A 1980 Supreme Court decision barred most displays of the Ten Commandments in public buildings, on the grounds that this violates the Establishment Clause of the Constitution, which mandates, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”
Since 1980, proponents have been looking for a way around the ruling, as part of a movement that calls itself Hang Ten. The Indiana statute seeks to satisfy legal concerns by saying that the Ten Commandments should be displayed along with other historical documents such as the Magna Carta. If displayed in conjunction with secular documents, the Hang Ten movement maintains, then the Ten Commandments would be received as primarily historical, not explicitly Judeo-Christian.
It is unknown whether the Supreme Court would allow an Indiana-type commandments statute to stand. In recent years, federal judges have warmed somewhat toward faith in the public square. William Rehnquist, chief justice of the Supreme Court, maintains that the Constitution prohibits government only from endorsing religion or restricting free expression by minority faiths: “The Establishment Clause does not require that the public sector be insulated from all things which may have a religious significance.”
But even if courts were sympathetic to the Indiana law, test cases and years of litigation would be required. Then, even if a Hang Ten statute were upheld, a backlash would surely result, on the part of those who would rightly fear that what was being hung was really a promotional device for evangelical Christianity.
That’s the political rundown. What about the theology?
One irony is that if the Ten Commandments commend to the public a religion, the faith being touted is Judaism, not Christianity. The Ten Commandments are found in the Hebrew Bible--what Christians call the Old Testament--which forms the core of Jewish holy writ.
Christianity honors the Old Testament, but views it as amended by the New--and in the New Testament, Jesus consciously rejects the Ten Commandments, replacing them with the Six Commandments.
The story of the Six Commandments comes when a young man asks Jesus what a person must do to obtain entry to heaven. Jesus replies, “If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Christ often simply said “life” to mean “eternal life,” implying that the spirit world is the reality and the physical world is the veil.) Instructed to “keep the commandments,” the young man then inquires, “Which ones?”
Which ones? Aren’t there a famously invariant Ten Commandments? Debating which laws mean more than others was a favorite exercise of the rabbinical tradition in which Jesus was educated. Still, Talmudic commentators did not take it upon themselves to pick and choose among the Commandments that God gave to humanity etched in stone. Jesus, on the other hand, in Christian thinking holds a divine license to amend the scripture. And here’s what he says:
“And Jesus said, ‘You shall not murder; you shall not commit adultery; you shall not steal; you shall not bear false witness. Honor your father and mother. Also, you shall love your neighbor as yourself.’” (Matthew 19:17-19, New Revised Standard Version. A parallel telling of the Six Commandments exchange is found at Mark 10:17-23.)
Six count ‘em Six Commandments, not Ten. Can you name the missing four? These are the Commandments that Christ leaves off his inventory: “You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make yourself an idol. You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the Lord your God. Remember the Sabbath Day, and keep it holy.” (Compression of Exodus 20:3-8, NRSV. The Ten Commandments are given several times in the Old Testament in slightly different wordings, and the Catholic, Jewish, and Protestant traditions make different choices regarding which wordings to emphasize.)
Because what is significant about the Six Commandments verses is what Christ does not say, the grandeur and import of the passage is routinely missed.
Jesus, the child of God, carefully and consciously discards four of the Ten Commandments, basic precepts of a thousand years of relations between Maker and made. It turns out that the four Commandments Jesus deletes are the ones concurring formal religious practice. The Six Commandments that Jesus endorses are the ones concerning morality, love, and good character.
Jesus, bear in mind, is considered by Christian theology to be voicing the thoughts of the divine. When proclaiming the Ten Commandments, God placed at the top of the list formal religious obligation, exactly what the Establishment Clause of the Constitution forbids government from taking any stand on.
A thousand years later--Moses is believe to have lived about nine centuries before Christ--the Maker, speaking through Jesus, drops the ancient commandments regarding formal religious affiliation, and chooses to emphasize moral behavior and good character, exactly what schools and courts can emphasize without legal constraints.
The Christian denominations have a long history of averting their eyes from the Six Commandments passage, for a self-interested reason--these verses seem to say that denominations are not particularly important, and what denomination wants to call attention to that? Through the course of the Gospels, Jesus makes a number of statements suggesting that God’s interest in religious formality has declined, replaced by a divine emphasis on morality and love.
Christianity, as an institution, pays close heed to Jesus’s admonitions regarding morality and love, but tries to change the subject away from his anti-religious sayings.
For the purposes of the current Hang Ten political debate, what matters is that the Six Commandments could readily be posted in any school or public structure, because they do not advocate any particular faith, or even advocate religion at all.
Rather, the Six Commandments advocate ethical precepts we all ought to follow and teach, rules that define a life of good character. The teachings of the Six Commandments are timeless, too: even "You shall not commit adultery" does not mean no fun, it means no breaking the vows of marital fidelity. (The original Greek word translated as "adultery,", moicheuo, refers to monogamy, not sex generally.)
The precepts of the Six Commandments are ones embraced by every leading religion: Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, and every minor one that comes to mind.
Let's reprise the Six Commandments again, and imagine the good that could be accomplished by posting them in schools and public buildings, attributed to the radiant rabbi Jesus:
You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness.
Honor your father and mother.
Also, you shall love your neighbor as yourself.
In these words are everything we need to ground a revival of public character, without the slightest worry of Constitutional challenge.
So--Hang Six!
0
Comments
Thanks for sharing!
Funny, isn't it? I find the Jesus story and message very credible until we get the magic. Maybe he did turn water to wine and cure lepers but it is irrelevant to the message. In the same way, we have magic in the stories of lamas from Tibet. Jolly good fun but what has it to do with escape from samsara?
http://www.break.com/index/colbert10com.html
-bf
That's exactly why they don't engage in such stuff anymore, Simon. They used to do it to create faith in the students. Now they don't do it to create faith in the students. There's too much doubt and chicanery in the world. No one would really believe they could do it.
Palzang
Six commandment's PAaaahhh! Jesus was approached by a lawyer and asked, " Master, which is the greatest commandment." To which Jesus responded, " Thou shalt love the Lord your G-d with all your heart, mind, and spirit, and Love your neighbor as yourself." Do these two things and one fullfills the demands of the commandments.
Moses brought forth the ten commandments, and over the years the Jews came two dicatate more that 200 other laws that must be abided by. Jesus like the Budha came along and attempted to free the people from their concepts. It's too bad that his message got so distorted.
There's a spin for all seasons.
http://seekingthelight.blogspot.com/2006/03/freke-and-gandy.html
The problem with the history of the actual Jesus figure is if he was actually a Rabbi why did he not have any scribes? It's a well known fact that the Jesus story originated during a Messianic period where the Jews were under extreme opression, speculation to a real Jesus is as fruiative as a discussion on metaphyisics IMO.
Cheers!
The same is true of even more historical figures than Jesus, Moses or Gautama, who have ceased to be people and have been transformed into symbols. This urge is ever-present in humanity. Any serious study of history demonstrates that we can't say: "This is exactly how things were and who this person was". Deconstruction and revisionism are endemic today: we really do seem to dislike figures of heroic goodness. We have to find flaws and objections. I have no real problem with that but I cannot go along with the next step which rubbishes such a clay-footed hero's real achievements. The late Mother Teresa is a good, near-contemporary example: she is now either perfect or perfectly awful, but she was more than both of those and her work with the poorest in Calcutta remains a great good work.