Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

A fresh look at mindfulness

In Buddhism, mindfulness is vital - to be aware of breathing, and when distracted to gently bring it back.

But a great man (his name isn't important) had a different view on this: "To be attentive means to be attentive to inattention, not to cultivate attention."

Does this seem like a better way to approach mindfulness?

Comments

  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited December 2012
    Just attention. To both.

    But yeah you are not giving yourself lidless eyelids where you are *bad* if you drift off. Just attention with a light touch rejoicing each time you drift off and then come back.

    Have you ever seen clockwork orange where they hold his eyelids open and force him to recondition from a criminal by watching brainwashing tv?

    music
  • In case anyone else is interested, the "great man" in question appears to be Jiddu Krishnamurthi.

    It's a fine idea, how is it working out for you?

    From a theoretical perspective, I would expect it to be quite a difficult approach without some kind of supplemental stabilizing practice, because most of the things you aren't attending to, you're ignoring because they cause you some kind of disturbance.
    FullCircle
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited December 2012
    Yeah I'd use a stabilizing approach to add. In part. This is kinda like Trungpa's meditation. You don't focus on the inbreath so as to allow the mind to diffuse. And then on the outbreath you note it and feel the spaciousness of your experience. So you alternate between non-mandatory attention and a stabilizing support.
Sign In or Register to comment.