Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Anyone seen this documentary about the giant statues of buddha in and around Afghanistan that were destroyed?
Interesting ... and sad.
-bf
0
Comments
I suppose it's sad, but it's just another lesson in impermanence. I'm sure whoever built those Buddhas in the first place never expected them to last forever. Such is the nature of samsara. As for the Taliban who blew them up, I'd say their karma has already caught up with them.
Palzang
http://www.giant-buddhas.com/en/films/
http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2006/03/EC80D34E-84DA-4579-8863-83C1C44C7CA8.html
This documentary. Very sad.
Taliban... very hateful? Intolerant?
Sad.
I'm not so sad that the giant buddha were destroyed - they're just statues. But, the history involved with them, how old they were, the culture that created them.
All gone.
-bf
Palzang
have you read that there has been an object found that was secreted inside one of the statues that seems to hold a sutra with some balls of clay (representing buddhas bones?) and a lotus pattern on it? intriguing!
You're right Pally - no sense in crying over spilt buddhas...
-bf
http://www.photogrammetry.ethz.ch/research/bamiyan/buddha/index.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1214384.stm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhas_of_Bamiyan
Such an ignorant act of destruction. I'm afraid I've never seen the documentary though.
But I see a little bit of difference between carving faces on a mountain sacred to a certain native people versus just destroying an object of art.
To me - we would have needed to raze those sacred mountains to the ground and left the rubble lying there for no other purpose than to destroy - to equal the destruction of the giant buddhas.
But as Pally said, impermanence, impermanence, impermanence.
-bf
Both, I fear, are assertions of superiority: the statues are destroyed to demonstrate that Sharia ruled Afghanistan; giant heads of politicos assert the dominance of another system. Both seek to change the purpose of the site and make it supportive of a new regime. As you say, impermanence and, I would add, overwheening pride which precedes a fall.
There is, of course, nothing new about this. Here in the UK, many of the early, pre-Christian sites have either been covered by churches, as at Glastonbury, or destroyed as was attempted at Avebury.
A giant Buddha statute resting with his head supported by his left arm. And a quote displays - "All things change. Nothing is permanent. - Gautama Buddha"
And almost immediately the scene switches to the instant when the statues got blown up, as it was recorded via video.
Alas, indeed!