Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

HHDL Taking A Leaf From The Pope!

ajani_mgoajani_mgo Veteran
edited November 2007 in Buddhism Today
Alright I just saw it on my local TV... I think it's amusing! HHDL is on some interfaith conference I think...

I found an article online on it: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5i6FXsaCp58kaPjnMBrSTyWaAn8gw

HHDL is thinking of allowing Tibetans to vote for their next Dalai Lama! China, of course, as usual, is against it, but I think it's really funny - HHDL is really one of the most progressive religious leaders around. It seems that he's learning from the Pope a little now... Elections!

Other alternatives he discussed for his succession are by seniority and the like - no more tulkus for the office of the Dalai Lama!

But I wonder, how will this affect the tradition of rebirth? Well, while HHDL may not necessarily be reborn again, and this 14th be the last of the rebirths, I still think it's worth a few chuckles and a little rethinking.

It might be political - to prevent any wish of China to appoint their own Dalai Lama after Tenzin Gyatzo's death. Indeed, we have a religious leader who doesn't fight the tides of history, and that is a rather Taoist/Eastern thought.

You know what? The Dalai Lama is a rather interesting chap. :)

Comments

  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited November 2007
    HHDL is a funambulist (tight-rope walker) of great ability. He is also, as we can judge from his writings and speeches, a religious leader who can think in modern political and economic terms.

    Whatever the outcome for Tibet, it has been clear since the 1950s that the old, feudal system that obtained there is no longer sustainable. It is no longer acceptable for such intimate confusion between 'church' and state. This is why HHDL is preparing a transition from theocracy (or lamaocracy if you prefer) to democracy.

    Historically, it is a relatively recent development that the Dalai Lama has also been Head of State, a mere 5 or 600 years. In the modern world, with democracy the present dominant political fashion, it seems to many Tibetans with whom I correspond that the system that puts one particular person at the head of the state by birth is anachronistic.

    HHDL is not suggesting that there be no further tulkus, nor that there be no further Dalai, Karmapa or Punchen Lamas. Rather he is saying that Tibet deserves a modern system of government, secular and independent. The leadership and governance of Buddhism of the Tibetan traditions would not be affected.

    It seems to me that he is, as ever, voicing a moderate, reflected and wise compromise.
  • MagwangMagwang Veteran
    edited November 2007
    I listened to HHDL speak in Toronto and am a great admirer, but I also believe strongly that theocracy is a bad idea. So this is good to hear from him.

    ::
  • ajani_mgoajani_mgo Veteran
    edited November 2007
    I did wonder, actually, what the Tibetans would say when they heard about HHDL's latest proclamation.

    Well, I've got to be kidding myself. I was expecting that they would be outraged, angry at him for abandoning centuries of age-old Tibetan wisdom and culture, but then well, they shouldn't be strangers to his modern views by now.

    I like the Buddha's saying of the raft to be abandoned after reaching the shore - it works for many occasions, not just Nirvana alone - perhaps Buddhism does embrace progressiveness and adaptation very much, as is practised by HHDL.
Sign In or Register to comment.