Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

A Brief History lesson:

federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky...Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
edited September 2009 in General Banter
Railroad tracks.

This is fascinating.

....Be sure to read right to the end.... your understanding of it will depend on the earlier part of the content.

The US standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number. Why was that gauge used?

Because that's the way they built them in England, and
English expatriates built the US railroads.

Why did the English build them like that?
Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used.

Why did 'they' use that gauge then?
Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing.

Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing?
Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads in England, because that's the spacing of the wheel ruts.

Who built those old rutted roads? Imperial Romans built the first long distance roads in Europe (and England ) for their legions. The roads have been used ever since.

And the ruts in the roads?
Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels.
Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing.
Therefore the United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot.

Bureaucracies live forever.
So the next time you are handed a specification/procedure/process and wonder 'What horse's ass came up with it?', you may be exactly right.
Imperial Roman army chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the rear ends of two war horses. (Two horse's asses.)

Now, the twist to the story:

When you see a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRB's. The SRB's are made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah . The engineers who designed the SRB's would have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRB's had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site.

The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains, and the SRB's had to fit through that tunnel.
The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses' behinds.
So, a major Space Shuttle design feature of what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse's ass.
And you thought being a horse's ass wasn't important?

Ancient horse's asses control almost everything...

and CURRENT horses Asses are controlling everything else. :lol:

Comments

  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited April 2009
    I think you're in a rut, Fede.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited April 2009
    Ah yes... but it an ancient rut, excavated on long-held tradition, so there! :D

    Roman-rut fede, that's me!! :crazy: :tongue2:
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited April 2009
    Fede, I think this is absolutely marvelous!! I laughed so hard I swallowed my gum.

    So is it all true? Can fact really be that much stranger than fiction? Sounds true to me. Where on earth did you find this? I'd love to print out a copy for the Units. (Parental Units.)
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited April 2009
    Remember though that in metric terms, 4 feet, 8-and-a-half inches, is (approximately) 1metre 20cms.
    Although Romans did not use metric measurements (they used body measurements, initially) the measurements are as follows:
    One 'step' was the equivalent of .74cm.
    Chariot 'Cabins' were therefore 1 metre wide to permit the charioteer to stand braced with his feet apart.... and the dimensions of the outer frame, including the wheels, was 1 metre 20cm...

    Boo, a friend of mine from the UK sent it to me... print it off by all means!
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited April 2009
    Thanks, Fede! My sister and brother-in-law would love it too, I'm sure.
  • LincLinc Site owner Detroit Moderator
    edited April 2009
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited April 2009
    You never liked me, did you Lincoln....? :lol:

    You know, I know that in such a short piece of text (in comparison to an actual thesis or dissertation investigating transport origins) the piece I posted probably skimmed glibly over more salient and relevant information...
    I had no doubts that actually it was so full of holes, draining spaghetti comes to mind...
    but I'm an idiot, so whaddya expect - ?! :p
    Just a bit of fun.....:D
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited April 2009
    federica wrote: »
    You never liked me, did you Lincoln....? :lol:
    Lol!!

    Having read the Snopes article I now know far more about 19th century transportation than I ever wanted to.

    Oh, well. Even if it's not true, kudos to the person who had too much time on their hands for collating all the info (false or not) and organizing it in such a clever way. That's pretty good fiction writing, if you ask me. :)
  • LincLinc Site owner Detroit Moderator
    edited April 2009
    I'm like a moth to the light when someone posts something that's on Snopes.com. :D I can't help myself.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited April 2009
    I really can equate.... grammar and spelling are my "Snopes"....

    I make myself cross when reading something and I see the likes of 'confectionary'.... or 'persue'....:mad: :D
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited May 2009
    Is there something wrong with confectionary? Oh, I see. It's the "a". It should be an "e". My spell check caught it but my dictionary had it spelled with an "a".

    I used to waste a lot of time on Snopes. Got bored after a while.
  • edited May 2009
    makes me wonder where it will lead to. what path will those rockets carve that the next generation have to adhere to?

    now i understand the saying "stuck in a rut"
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited May 2009
    Hello Ellion, welcome!! :D
  • NirvanaNirvana aka BUBBA   `     `   South Carolina, USA Veteran
    edited September 2009
    Thanks, Lincoln for the Snopes.com link. I got an e-mail about another subject and you and Snopes set me straight. It's just that these imagined historical connexions are so interesting.

    Here's the Snopes correction and here's the bag of hot air I received:

    
Subject: FW: "FUN" HISTORY LESSON





    
HISTORY FACTS
    They used to use urine to tan animal skins, so families used to all pee in a pot & then once a day it was taken &**sold to the tannery.......if you had to do this to survive you were "Piss**Poor"
But**worse than that were the really**poor**folk who couldn't even afford to buy a pot...........they "didnt have a pot to piss in"**and were the lowest of the low.

The next time you are washing your hands and complain because the water temperature isn't just how you like it, think about how things used to be.

Here are some facts about the 1500s:
*
    Most* *people got married in June because they took their yearly bath in May, and they still smelled pretty good by June. However, since they were starting to smell . .. . brides carried a bouquet of flowers to hide the body odor. Hence the custom today of carrying a bouquet when getting married.

Baths* *consisted of a big tub filled with hot water. The man of the house had the privilege of the nice clean water, then all the other sons and men, then the women and finally the children. Last of all the babies. By then the water was so dirty you could actually lose someone in it. Hence the saying, "Don't throw the baby out with the bath water!"
    *
    My uncle Hilary (born 1936) adds, “I was the youngest so I know about the last one to take a bath, believe me. I got more beatings cause I did not want to go in that tub after all the others, then we got running water when I was older.

Houses had thatched roofs-thick straw-piled high, with no wood underneath. It was the only place for animals to get warm, so all the cats and other small animals (mice, bugs) lived in the roof. When it rained it became slippery and sometimes the animals would slip and fall off the roof. Hence the saying "It's raining cats and dogs."
*
    *There was nothing to stop things from falling into the house. This posed a real problem in the bedroom where bugs and other droppings could mess up your nice clean bed. Hence, a bed with big posts and a sheet hung over the top afforded some protection. That's how canopy beds came into existence.

The* *floor was dirt. Only the wealthy had something other than dirt. Hence the saying, "Dirt poor." The wealthy had slate floors that would get slippery in the winter when wet, so they spread thresh (straw) on floor to help keep their footing. As the winter wore on, they added more thresh until, when you opened the door, it would all start slipping outside. A piece of wood was placed in the entrance-way. Hence: a thresh hold.
*

In those old days, they cooked in the kitchen with a big kettle that always hung over the fire. Every day they lit the fire and added things to the pot. They ate mostly vegetables and did not get much meat. They would eat the stew for dinner, leaving leftovers in the pot to get cold overnight and then start over the next day. Sometimes stew had food in it that had been there for quite a while. Hence the rhyme: Peas porridge hot, peas porridge cold, peas porridge in the pot nine days old.

Sometimes they could obtain pork, which made them feel quite special. When visitors came over, they would hang up their bacon to show off. It was a sign of wealth that a man could, "bring home the bacon." They would cut off a little to share with guests and would all sit around* *and chew the fat.*
    *
    Those with money had plates made of pewter. Food with high acid content caused some of the lead to leach onto the food, causing lead poisoning death. This happened most often with tomatoes, so for the next 400 years or so, tomatoes were considered poisonous.*
    
Bread was divided according to status. Workers got the burnt bottom of the loaf, the family got the middle, and guests got the top, or the upper crust.

Lead cups were used to drink ale or whiskey. The combination would sometimes knock the imbibers out for a couple of days. Someone walking along the road would take them for dead and prepare them for burial. They were laid out on the kitchen table for a couple of days and the family* *would gather around and eat and drink and wait and see if*they would wake up. Hence the custom of holding a* *wake.

England* *is old and small and the local folks started running out of places to bury people. So they would dig up*coffins and would take the bones to a bone-house, and reuse the grave. When reopening these coffins, 1 out of 25 coffins were found to have scratch marks on the inside and they realized they had been burying* *people alive. So they would tie a string on the wrist of the corpse, lead it through the coffin and up through the ground and tie it to a bell. Someone would have to sit out in the graveyard all night (the graveyard shift.) to listen for the bell; thus, someone could be, saved by the bell or was considered a dead ringer...
*
Sign In or Register to comment.