Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

My news fast

edited July 2009 in Buddhism Today
Given the level of my past anxiety, I have taken a news fast. I will not return to paying any more than "accidental" attention to the news until I feel compelled to do so. I just find it distraction that takes away from any kind of focus of betterment that I can muster. I will vote in local elections, etc... but I will do so by voting by party as opposed to the normal hypervigilant research that I do.

What is the Buddhist belief on this sort of thing?

Comments

  • edited July 2009
    The Dude wrote: »
    Given the level of my past anxiety, I have taken a news fast. I will not return to paying any more than "accidental" attention to the news until I feel compelled to do so. I just find it distraction that takes away from any kind of focus of betterment that I can muster. I will vote in local elections, etc... but I will do so by voting by party as opposed to the normal hypervigilant research that I do.

    What is the Buddhist belief on this sort of thing?

    It's not a bad idea dude. I find that news bulletins can be hyped up and just cause for more anger and adrenalin.

    There's not much we can do about the "Mall mass-murderer who was released "accidently" on bail by the brother of a corrupt official who happened to owe the murderer's sister some money, who was also involved in selling fake medication to old folks which he funded through stealing public funds because the folks who should have noticed what was happening were either lining their pockets or asleep"

    But it makes a great story and can sure get you shouting at the television in rage.
  • edited July 2009
    it just seems that a lot of the stories are exactly as you mentioned. so beyond the beyond what can be done? If we want it to stop, we don't need more awareness, it seems like we need more people to act decently to one another. I am pretty sure we all know that this stuff is going on. What difference does it make if it is in Quincy or Portland?

    It just makes me angry, sad and depressed. None of which leads to enlightenment.
  • edited July 2009
    Hi The Dude,

    I only view the news channel for the main headlines once daily, if even that sometimes. There's always going to be a lot of excessive 'news' coverage in the media in general. Its how some people make a living. However its up to us to filter out the unnecessary in our lives and do the best we can, both on a local community level and in terms of personal practice.
    If we can improve our own understanding and outlook , that's also going to be of benefit to others.

    Kind wishes,

    Dazzle _/\_
  • edited July 2009
    interesting. thank you for weighing in Dazzle.
  • NirvanaNirvana aka BUBBA   `     `   South Carolina, USA Veteran
    edited July 2009
    Hey Dude!

    I watch the News Hour with Jim Lehrer on PBS. You don't have to hear/watch people yelling at each other (unless Barney Frank is on)!

    I'm with you on this. I can't stand it when people are shouting past each other. They're not listening and in many cases are painting the person they are presumably addressing as contemptible, stupid, or villainous. You know, Fox News, MSNBC, and the radio shows.

    The monks I have known do not follow the news, believing if anything is important or of earth-shaking significance they'll find out in plenty of time. In the old days in monasteries one monk was assigned the duty of reading the newspaper and reporting anything of significance to the monks. He was allotted probably no more than 10 to 15 minutes per day to scour the paper and then it was on to other chores. If the news contained nothing that affected the monastery or the nation's well-being or pride it was not considered worthy of being passed on to the other monks in the refectory.
  • BrianBrian Detroit, MI Moderator
    edited July 2009
    I've been on a complete news/tv/advertising fast for about 12 years now. I have absolutely NO regrets.
  • edited July 2009
    I was a newspaper addict until this recession when I realised what an industry it is. Information is so precious and although I read the Guardian which I love for it's superb writing and wit, I can't help thinking that there a far too many words bandies around, repeated and distorted and to me that wrong.

    Now I check in for the essential - and I've realised that the news is not about life - it's more like a theatrical representation of it.
  • edited July 2009
    Brian wrote: »
    I've been on a complete news/tv/advertising fast for about 12 years now. I have absolutely NO regrets.

    I wish I had your strength. My most recent news fast only lasted for about two years, but it was a wonderful experience. I’ve tried several times to start over, but I always find myself creeping back onto MSNBC or CNN or some other crap that makes me depressed.

    ~nomad
  • edited July 2009
    Well... I do believe quite strongly that one should still listen to the news regularly, just for 10 minutes and to get the gist.

    That's because I'm interested (1) but also (2) because I hate the idea of being this aloof buddhist-type who's contemplation goes only as far as their own naval! ;)
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited July 2009
    That's a good point, Sara.

    I'm often conflicted about reading and/or seeing the harsh things in this world, especially animal abuse. I can usually handle a lot of bad news in the media so I do try to keep up with things.

    But when it comes to animal abuse I seem to go a little crazy inside. I don't quite have the right balance to be able to deal with it emotionally. For years I would avert my eyes to the horrors. I couldn't watch the hidden camera video footage sent to me by PETA. I just couldn't take it. Well, to be honest, I still can't. But I'm feeling more and more that turning my back and refusing to be a witness to their suffering because I can't handle my own discomfort of seeing it not only makes me a coward but a collaborator.

    So I'm working on it. I'm only at the beginning but that's better than nothing. I just have to keep reminding myself that my perception of their suffering is extremely distorted and go from there. I'll get there some day.
  • gracklegrackle Veteran
    edited July 2009
    Dear Brigid,
    To feel for all living things is a blessing. Sometimes those horrific images we see can really disturb us. But you have a good heart. That is a real gift.

    grackle
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited July 2009
    Thank you, grackle. Your friendship is also a real gift. :)
  • gracklegrackle Veteran
    edited July 2009
    Brigid,
    Thank you for your kinds words. Now I'm off to take care of the parrot who seems to believe his very prescence is the best gift any humanoid could have.

    grackle
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited July 2009
    I feel it is vital to keep abreast of the news. Maybe not so much the latest sex scandal with a politician or the latest debacle of some celebrity, but to make myself aware of the constant suffering that abounds in the world so that I don't become complacent and forget my purpose. If we shut ourselves off from the world, we just start to dull out and forget. Humans are really good at forgetting.

    Palzang
  • edited July 2009
    all I see is suffering. homeless people. animals who are abused. people with illnesses that are surrounded in stigma and fear. The Koreans and their missiles. War. Greed. I see a country that has every material convience and possession and yet, they still want more.

    That's the worst mental illness going... the disease of wanting more.
  • LincLinc Site owner Detroit Moderator
    edited July 2009
    A middle path, maybe? :o

    Brian and I don't have TV, so we're spared the talking heads. I do, however, selectively read Google News (being selective about the sources I'll pursue) and read TIME magazine weekly. TIME is a great "catchup" and thoughtful, so I feel less inclined to waste time perusing a multitude of sources when I have my 2 hours with TIME every week. :)
  • edited July 2009
    No television service here, thank goodness. I think that the way information is presented to us can be just as important as the information itself. If you are having trouble seeing past the incendiary way the news is presented to you, perhaps you should try a different source. Personally, I'm all about NPR. They have a wide variety of shows and opinions. I don't listen at a regular time, so I hear all sorts of different stories. It's always calmly presented and I find it relatively intelligent.

    It would be nice to be able to see through the b.s. in any given perspective, but sometimes it's better to give ourselves a break from a source of pain to gain some perspective of our own.
  • edited July 2009
    oh wait... I have been listening to NPR. I like the fact that they take the time to give you the entire story, rather than just some purposely misleading headline.
  • NirvanaNirvana aka BUBBA   `     `   South Carolina, USA Veteran
    edited July 2009
    NPR RULES! Lately I've just needed to listen to Mahler's Fifth every time I drive, and so I'm really getting to miss NPR. That art-form transports one to a different sphere. All the programs are excellent, every one!

    If the Republicans had their way, I'm afraid they'd probably pull the plug and no longer help with funding. That would be tragic. Commercial television and radio are just too noisy for someone who really wants to live a calm and quiet life. (HEY, turn down the volume on that sales-pitch, bud! It is not an emergency situation whether I buy a car from you or not...).

    Another nice resource is C-SPAN. Where I live we also have some fairly good reporting done on a local news alternative-style commercial TV channel, largely funded by the owners' hometown-oriented philanthropic resources.

    A lot of people are just interested in keeping up with the news and do so out of compassion and seeking to understand others. There's no harm in that, unless one gets too immersed.

    I, for one, want to follow this situation in Iran as closely as I can. Also, I think the eyes of the whole world should be on the supreme leader and on what he says and does. We live in history and should have some idea of what's going on.
  • bushinokibushinoki Veteran
    edited July 2009
    eh, if you don't want to watch the news, try living it sometime. Definitely gives you an interesting perspective. I already see myself 10+ years from now as one of those guys on the History channel or something saying my piece on "America's 2nd Forgotten War".
  • NirvanaNirvana aka BUBBA   `     `   South Carolina, USA Veteran
    edited July 2009
    bushinoki wrote: »
    eh, if you don't want to watch the news, try living it sometime. Definitely gives you an interesting perspective. I already see myself 10+ years from now as one of those guys on the History channel or something saying my piece on "America's 2nd Forgotten War".

    Hey There, Captain! Good to hear from you again, Bushinoki!

    Hope you get your breaks from the summer heat. Our summer here has been very mild and endearing.

    Please say more on the "forgotten war," as you call it. We're all so proud of all our military and wish them every success.

    Fondly,

    Nirvy
  • edited July 2009
    Hate to be the one to break it to you guys and gals, but, seriously, Michael Jackson died ...
  • edited July 2009
    Just had a thought Dude.

    If everyone spent the half hour it takes to read the rubbish in the newspaper, on a daily basis, exchanging kindness, compassion and joy with others - or even communicating their sadness and helping themselves to heal through others - then the world would be an even finer place to live.
  • edited July 2009
    Hey Dude,

    I confess I did not read this thread, just your starting post. I can say that this is an excellent idea. I did it once (which in my case almost solely pertained to newspapers, printed and online, since I do not watch TV or listen to Radio), for some months, and I can tell you: I felt happier and more focussed than ever.

    Media are a kind of poison, if you are sensitive to that stuff, which I assume you are.

    And it will leave you more time for posting in this forum, which is a good thing... :D

    Cheers, Norbu
  • edited July 2009
    sara wrote: »
    Just had a thought Dude.

    If everyone spent the half hour it takes to read the rubbish in the newspaper, on a daily basis, exchanging kindness, compassion and joy with others - or even communicating their sadness and helping themselves to heal through others - then the world would be an even finer place to live.

    Well said. I tend to believe that there is a lot of kindness going on in the world, and I see it every day in my own neighborhood. Personally, I think that there should be more of a balance in what is broadcast as “news”. Not everything bad that happens is newsworthy and not everything good that happens isn’t. I would love to see more coverage of the good things that people do. Shows on TLC and A&E that remodel houses get great ratings. I’m sure that CNN or MSNBC could find some way to make a Habitat for Humanity or soup kitchen story exciting for the general population.

    And, thank you, ragyaba, for informing us about Michael Jackson. I was beginning to think that NewBuddhist would be the last place on Earth to not mention his passing. ;)

    ~nomad
  • bushinokibushinoki Veteran
    edited July 2009
    you guys have made me proud. Talking about all the serious stuff on the news, with only brief mention of Michael Jackson's passing, enough to give him the honor he deserved as a human being. I was quite pissed off the last several days, considering that all you ever saw on the news was his face, while several canadians, brits, americans, french, dutch, danish, etc. (there are a lot of countries in NATO) paid the ultimate price here in afghanistan, and didn't even get a mention in the news.

    Sara, I love that thought. Would go a long way to making "Living the news" not so bad. Perhaps someday.
Sign In or Register to comment.