Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

lioncity_esangha_crashed or hacked?

edited October 2009 in General Banter
Hello! I am sorry to start so directly, but any of you is a member of e-sangha (lioncity.net)? Do you know what is happening with the site?

It seems like it crashed or maybe attacked by hackers....just hope that it was a normal crash, but when i try to acess, explorer will say that its dangerous to enter on lioncity main domain...:confused:

Comments

  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited October 2009
    Don't know and don't care. Sorry.
  • fivebellsfivebells Veteran
    edited October 2009
    They don't like my kind over there, so I do them a favor and stay away. :)
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2009
    I was on the "Buddhist Community" network site, and met alot of good folks but it became a Zoo. Lots of sock puppets with vendettas. It got ugly. The fellow who runs both sites said the idea (for the Buddhist-community site) was little or no moderation. Anonymity + no moderation = lowest common denominator.
  • edited October 2009
    Looks like a corrupted database. Obviously the idea of no moderation includes no server administration as well. I'm a member over there, but I've only posted an introduction. Looks very cliquish, though, so I think I'm going to stay away.

    ~nomad
  • fivebellsfivebells Veteran
    edited October 2009
    I was on the "Buddhist Community" network site, and met alot of good folks but it became a Zoo. Lots of sock puppets with vendettas. It got ugly. The fellow who runs both sites said the idea (for the Buddhist-community site) was little or no moderation. Anonymity + no moderation = lowest common denominator.

    Wait, you said no moderation? When was this? Last I heard the moderation there was extremely heavy-handed. Getting banned there was practially a badge of respect on BuddhaChat. I'll have to check this out...
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2009
    Not Esangha but the social network site owned and administated by the same person. Maybe he went to the other extreme with the new site because has been heavy handed on Esangha. There was some nasty behavior going on, really crazy. I just dont get it.
  • RenGalskapRenGalskap Veteran
    edited October 2009
    There was some nasty behavior going on, really crazy. I just dont get it.
    I've never used a social networking site and I'm not exactly sure what behavior you're referring to, but generally, if you don't moderate, you end up with USENET.

    It took me a long time to realize that my posts were having an effect on the forums I was participating in. Many people are similarly unaware, and also don't know how to disagree without also offending. Put them in an environment with no moderation, and after a while they have the place to themselves.
  • edited October 2009
    e-sangha.com was hacked. Google says so:
    Malicious software includes 20 scripting exploit(s).
    http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?client=Firefox&hl=en-US&site=http://e-sangha.com/

    If you visited it during the hack, you may want to scan your computer for viruses. The e-sangha forum on lioncity.net looks like it just has a nasty database error and not any malicious code as far as I can tell, which could be related to the hack, or it could be unrelated.
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2009
    RenGalskap wrote: »
    It took me a long time to realize that my posts were having an effect on the forums I was participating in. Many people are similarly unaware, and also don't know how to disagree without also offending. Put them in an environment with no moderation, and after a while they have the place to themselves.
    I'm new to social networking as well. Disagreement and civil debate can be great. If everyone agreed with me I would learn nothing. This was different, I can only speculate about where it was coming from. It seemed to be some person or persons who had an intent to go after people. There was some very fundamentalist views being expressed, very absolutist, which was a bit of a shock since I have never encountered that kind of thing in my home Sangha. ...... Anyway its in the past. Hope those folks over there work things out.
  • edited October 2009
    I goolged esangha to find out why esangha was down, It was then that I discovered that there was a lot of hostility towards esangha arising from their tough moderating policies which has resulted in many ppl getting banned. There are even dedicated websites warning people about esangha. I have been a member of esangha for many years and I appreciate their policies. As one anti-website said, esangha is the only site that has a large critical mass membership. The reason to me is quite clear. The tough moderating policies keep the discussions civil and controlled. I have received warnings when my post strayed across the border and I appreciate that.

    Other forums pride themselves as "any discussion is ok" but soon emotions are aroused , discussions degenerate into ugliness and people leave. I understand that not everyone agrees with tough moderating policies. But if that is the case, one is free to go to another forum or start your own. There is no need to create hostile websites which to me is clearly an unskilful action. Clearly if you don't like Thai food, go to another restaurant, there is no need to run thru the street telling people to beware of Thai food.
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2009
    That sounds like a reasonable explanation. I was not active on esangha, only their social network site where these problems arose. Perhaps some people banned from esangha acted out their beef on that one.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited October 2009
    pj.pilgrim wrote: »
    The tough moderating policies keep the discussions civil and controlled. I have received warnings when my post strayed across the border and I appreciate that.
    .....Other forums pride themselves as "any discussion is ok" but soon emotions are aroused , discussions degenerate into ugliness and people leave.

    I'd like to think we've succeeded in finding a middle ground..... :)
  • edited October 2009
    The Dhamma Wheel forums has a thread related to this very thing. A few of the moderators for E-Sangha are also members of DM, so they’ve been trying to share as much information as possible. Unfortunately, it looks like the servers have been hacked and are now flagged as malicious by Lord Google. In addition, Buddhist Community has also been affected by whatever is going on at E-Sangha. Thank goodness that New Buddhist is still online. :)

    ~nomad
  • fivebellsfivebells Veteran
    edited October 2009
    pj.pilgrim wrote: »
    The tough moderating policies keep the discussions civil and controlled. I have received warnings when my post strayed across the border and I appreciate that.

    Based on what I've heard of the site, this is lying by ommission. The "tough moderating policies" include suppressing views which the forum moderators don't agree with. About 30% of New Buddhist posts would get deleted or edited because they imply or promulgate nontraditional views of Buddhist teachings..
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited October 2009
    We're all heretics!
  • edited October 2009
    I don't know much about esangha but I do believe they did get hacked. I had just discovered the site last Wednesday (10/14) and when I went back on Thursday, the errors were up and little angles blowing trumpets were scrolling down the page. They had the system restored for awhile but I found it crashed again on Friday.

    Hope the bad luck didn't follow me here.smiley-laughing002.gif
  • RenGalskapRenGalskap Veteran
    edited October 2009
    I've posted at E-sangha on and off for a number of years. My observation is that over that time, moderation has been very slack when it comes to things like harassment, and very strict in other areas. I'm not being critical, I'm just making an observation. I'm also aware that what the moderators think they're doing and what the people being moderated think the moderators are doing are often very different things.

    I've always appreciated the extremely knowledgeable people who post at E-sangha. I've learned a lot from the discussions. At the moment, some of the people I used to admire are no longer posting there, and the ratio of interesting posts to posts about whether or not Brad Warner is a real Buddhist is too low.
  • edited October 2009
    I joined e-sangha after BuddhaChat closed down and I never really liked it. Many of the responses I received from people were vague, open-ended, and full of jargon. So that's when I started hunting again and found this place! I'm quite happy here, too.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited October 2009
    That would explain your sensitivity to possible 'trolls'...after those two websites, it's hardly surprising you're on your guard.....













    Did I say that out loud....?:eek: :D
  • edited October 2009
    Jason wrote:
    Don't know and don't care. Sorry.


    Haha. Good answer. E-sangha is creepy! Either it's monks, in the ochre robe, who spend 24hrs a day on the internet - that just ain't right! Or it's curmudgeonly self-appointed elder statesmen with some particular esoteric knowledge about which only THEY could ever know and surely no-one could have anything to add. Or, the moderators are dyed-in-the-wool Theravadins who have a heart attack if you say the word "Hinayana" and consider it the most grievous of personal insults, or even worse, insist that any Mahayana teaching is not a teaching of the Buddha. Or, they are seemingly frustrated and pompous Western men with aggressive and self-aggrandising agendas.
    Suffice to say, it's largely a waste of time, and highly unpleasant. That's been my experience of it.
    All that negativity and bad karma probably caused the site to crash.
    Shame for the 10,000 or so who probably need a fix of it everyday, but let's hope they come here instead! Where it's much more open, sincere, down to earth, real and welcoming.
  • edited October 2009
    lalavajra wrote: »
    Haha. Good answer. E-sangha is creepy! Either it's monks, in the ochre robe, who spend 24hrs a day on the internet - that just ain't right! Or it's curmudgeonly self-appointed elder statesmen with some particular esoteric knowledge about which only THEY could ever know and surely no-one could have anything to add. Or, the moderators are dyed-in-the-wool Theravadins who have a heart attack if you say the word "Hinayana" and consider it the most grievous of personal insults, or even worse, insist that any Mahayana teaching is not a teaching of the Buddha. Or, they are seemingly frustrated and pompous Western men with aggressive and self-aggrandising agendas.
    Suffice to say, it's largely a waste of time, and highly unpleasant. That's been my experience of it.
    All that negativity and bad karma probably caused the site to crash.
    Shame for the 10,000 or so who probably need a fix of it everyday, but let's hope they come here instead! Where it's much more open, sincere, down to earth, real and welcoming.

    I'll second that... even though I'm one of those naughty Theravadins! ;)
  • specialkaymespecialkayme Veteran
    edited October 2009
    fivebells wrote: »
    Based on what I've heard of the site, this is lying by ommission. The "tough moderating policies" include suppressing views which the forum moderators don't agree with. About 30% of New Buddhist posts would get deleted or edited because they imply or promulgate nontraditional views of Buddhist teachings..

    There is a difference between moderators omitting posts because they do not conform to their own beliefs, and omitting offensive or slanderous posts that would draw the community in an opposite direction. I'm not declaring which one was more common on E-sangha, but I thought the moderators were doing a good job with the latter, and often avoided the former. But, you can make your own conclusions, and you are more than welcome to do so.
    lalavajra wrote: »
    Haha. Good answer. E-sangha is creepy! Either it's monks, in the ochre robe, who spend 24hrs a day on the internet - that just ain't right! Or it's curmudgeonly self-appointed elder statesmen with some particular esoteric knowledge about which only THEY could ever know and surely no-one could have anything to add. Or, the moderators are dyed-in-the-wool Theravadins who have a heart attack if you say the word "Hinayana" and consider it the most grievous of personal insults, or even worse, insist that any Mahayana teaching is not a teaching of the Buddha. Or, they are seemingly frustrated and pompous Western men with aggressive and self-aggrandising agendas.

    Right Speech?

    I'm hardly one to pass judgment, and I'm not trying to. However, this probably falls into a most obvious category of slanderous, harmful, offensive, and un-true statement if I've ever seen it. I've never met the people from E-sangha in person, nor can I say I've ever met the people from here in person. Until I do, personally I won't fantasize about what a person wears, what their political views are, or what their beliefs are until I know that it's true.

    My views though, take them or leave them.

    Namaste
  • LincLinc Site owner Detroit Moderator
    edited October 2009
    Can we please avoid this inter-site gossip? I don't really give a damn what E-Sangha is or isn't doing.

    Discussing the current state of that site for others' benefit is welcome; having a free-wheeling debate of their moderation practices and the content of their members' character will have little such benefit.
  • edited October 2009
    Yup, e-sangha was hacked. Here is a notice from the owner:


    <div style="width:500px;"><p style="border-left: 5px solid #000;margin-left:10px;padding-left:5px;">We need your help to restore E-Sangha site. Any member who are expert in security, php and mysql database, please do email me at esangha@gmail.com Iframes and scripts are being inserted into our 3 sites and I am at a loss of how to prevent it.</p></div>
  • LincLinc Site owner Detroit Moderator
    edited October 2009
    "Any member who is a security expert"? Oh man, they are screwed. How can you be running your own web server without knowing anyone who's competent at server administration? :zombie:
  • edited October 2009
    Lincoln... I think we should take this opportunity to ensure that a) vBulletin is up to date and b) you have member who are security expert. ;)

    Someone set us up the bomb....... Oh the lulz. Nevermind my geeky Internet humour.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited October 2009
    Lincoln wrote: »
    "Any member who is a security expert"? Oh man, they are screwed. How can you be running your own web server without knowing anyone who's competent at server administration? :zombie:

    I know. I laughed so much I nearly did myself an injury.

    I'm sorry, I know I shouldn't, but really - dare I say it out loud?

    I do.

    'Server' them right.
  • edited October 2009
    I honestly wonder if it was a bitter ex-member who started the attack.
  • BhanteLuckyBhanteLucky Alternative lifestyle person in the South Island of New Zealand New Zealand Veteran
    edited October 2009
    Somebody speculated it might have been the Chinese Government Cyber-warfare division that hacked it as punishment for having lots of discussions about Tibet.
    Sounds reasonable to me.
    But just speculation of course.
  • edited October 2009
    Somebody speculated it might have been the Chinese Government Cyber-warfare division that hacked it as punishment for having lots of discussions about Tibet.
    Sounds reasonable to me.
    But just speculation of course.
    tin-foil-cat.jpg
  • BhanteLuckyBhanteLucky Alternative lifestyle person in the South Island of New Zealand New Zealand Veteran
    edited October 2009
    I take your conspiracy cat and raise you one
    funny-pictures-cats-computer-blue-screen-death.jpg
  • edited October 2009
    Vangelis wrote: »
    I'll second that... even though I'm one of those naughty Theravadins! ;)

    That's fine if you're Theravadin, but please don't be like Cooran - yes, Cooran - and have a heart attack and accuse one of hatred whenever someone utters the word "Hinayana", or insist that Mahayana Buddhism is not Buddhism and is not Buddhist doctrie. Please.
  • edited October 2009
    Lincoln wrote: »
    Can we please avoid this inter-site gossip? I don't really give a damn what E-Sangha is or isn't doing.

    Just because you don't give a "damn" about something doesn't surely mean no-one else should talk about it or give a damn. There's many threads that many members may or may not give a damn about, but they don't say so like that, they just don't subscribe to that particular thread.
    Discussing the current state of that site for others' benefit is welcome; having a free-wheeling debate of their moderation practices and the content of their members' character will have little such benefit.
    And why not? They are the most prominent Buddhist forum in the entire world by far and away, nothing else is even close. And since they run a reign of terror, misinformation, paranoia and almost facistic iron-fistedness, you expect people not to comment on it?
    Well sorry but it is ripe for discussion whether you like it or not.
  • BhanteLuckyBhanteLucky Alternative lifestyle person in the South Island of New Zealand New Zealand Veteran
    edited October 2009
    lalavajra wrote: »
    And since they run a reign of terror, misinformation, paranoia and almost facistic iron-fistedness, you expect people not to comment on it?

    ooh Godwin's Law is invoked! :lol:

    That means you lose. :p
  • edited October 2009
    ooh Godwin's Law is invoked! :lol:

    That means you lose. :p

    Ah! Touche!
    Not. Who cares about Godwit's [f]Law? Oh, happy day! some geek with too much spare time and too few good ideas made up a cute,mildy amusing, mildly diverting internet rule which is ever so delightfully, nay, gleefully, pointed out - or should I say, in keeping with the prevailing vernacular, invoked - by certain people, complete with [annoying and childish] smileys of various kind.
    And, and - somehow - that means I lose.

    Also, finally - the NAZIS weren't FACIST they were NATIONAL SOCIALISTS = NAZIS.
    The ITALIANS were FACISTS.
    So Godwin's Rule doesn't even apply, even if one was to be nerd enough to care about it.

    Or, James, if you mean to say that Godwin's Rule applies to every general use of the term facist, which has come to be a common adjective meaning, well, facist, then this is ridiculous.
    Ridiculous? Nay, it's bordering on facist. Ahh, but the irony is too delicious.
    What are you trying to say no-one should use the word "facist"? And does it ONLY apply on the internet, or does it apply in verbal conversation and in hard copy print as well?
    And how about TV, films or radio? Well, why only on the internet then? Why, because the so-called Rule is bogus and great fun only for those nerd enough to get excited about it.
    Which is why I say Ah! Giant James! Touche! A hit, a very palpable hit!
    But not.

    Also, I am considering inventing Lala's Rule, which is something to do with people who desultorily browse forums looking to invoke Godwit's Rule.
    Now that's touche.
    And - Look Mum! No smileys!
  • edited October 2009
    Jason wrote: »
    Don't know and don't care. Sorry.

    To be honest I was VERY disappointed by it. I didn't like taking part in the site myself because I found a lot of hypocrisy and irrationality BUT there was also an infinite amount of invaluable information within that forum as well.

    If anyone is wishing to access that information, you can go to web.archive.org/ and type in the forum URL and choose a date from months back. That'll give you access to a lot of it. :]
  • edited October 2009
    It's unfortunate that the website was hacked, but that obviously reveals holes in their security.

    I had a series of negative experiences with them but I never would have wished this on them.
  • edited October 2009
    sambodhi wrote: »
    It's unfortunate that the website was hacked, but that obviously reveals holes in their security.

    I had a series of negative experiences with them but I never would have wished this on them.

    Not that I would wish it on them, but as the Buddha said:
    "Karma works fair". It's difficult not to view this as karma for them for years and years of being - whoops, I'll stop now, in fear of invoking Godwin's, or anyone else's, Law.
    You get the gist. It's their karma. Because karma works fair.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited October 2009
    Karma isn't a form of punishment.
    It's merely a process of Cause and Effect.
    Unless you have insider knowledge of this incident being a direct result of any previous action on *their* part, you are jumping to erroneous conclusions, and making things up as you go along.

    I think they got what they deserved.
    But I wouldn't go as far as calling it Karma.
    According to the Buddha, only a Buddha can fully comprehend the intricate laws of Karma.

    Is there something you'd like to share...or are we just living in Lala-land? *Insert laughing smiley here*.
  • edited October 2009
    A simple google search will quickly reveal how to stop iframe hacking. I am quite surprised that after so long, they still can't sort out what is a very common problem with lots of information on the web on how to prevent it. Kamma? More like lack of administrator knowledge.
  • edited October 2009
    federica wrote: »
    are we just living in Lala-land?

    From Sanskrit dictionary
    <TABLE cellSpacing=3><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top align=right>1
    </TD><TD vAlign=top>lala</TD><TD vAlign=top>mfn. sporting , playful W. ; lolling , wagging ib. ; wishing , desirous ib. ; m. a partic. fragrant substance Gal. ; n. a shoot , sprout L. ; a garden L. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

    So you can delight yourself by making jokes about it but it's a bit childish really.
  • BhanteLuckyBhanteLucky Alternative lifestyle person in the South Island of New Zealand New Zealand Veteran
    edited October 2009
    lalavajra wrote: »
    ...some geek with too much spare time and too few good ideas...
    ...complete with [annoying and childish] smileys of various kind.
    ... even if one was to be nerd enough to care about it.
    ... it's a bit childish really.
    ...A hit, a very palpable hit! But not.
    ... people who desultorily browse forums looking to invoke Godwit's Rule.
    ...And - Look Mum! No smileys!

    :confused:
    Gosh, sorry, I didn't mean to upset you, I was just joking around.
    Sending some metta your way!
  • edited October 2009
    Lol...

    someone needs a laxative methinks.
  • edited October 2009
    Gosh, sorry, I didn't mean to upset you, I was just joking around.
    Sending some metta your way!

    Upset? Moi? Far from it, friend. However, while you were joking around, also you said "Haha, you lose, nana na na na!" or words to that effect. Consequently, I most eloquently and thoroughly explained how your invocation of the Godwin Law was not sound in this case, on account of Hitler being, strictly speaking, Nazi as opposed to the Fascism of Mussolini, so that the Godwin Rule doesn't apply here; furthermore, the term "fascist" has entered the English language as a general term to describe anything heavy handed, so it is unfair to say that everytime someone uses the word "fascist", which as I have explained is a bonafide English word that does not necessarily relate to Hitler, even if he were in fact Fascist, like Mussolini, as opposed to Nazi, one invokes the Godwin Law.
  • edited October 2009
    Somnilocus wrote: »
    someone needs a laxative methinks.

    Why, hullo friend!
    No, not a bit of it; a sensible, controlled vegan diet will most efficaciously obviate the need for any such; but I thank you for your concern.
    Oftentimes, it is the consumption of large amounts of red meat which will lead to digestive problems and so forth, because red meat is not readily digested by the human body and tends to clog up the colon and lower intestine, leading to not only the need for laxatives but also colon cancer, bowel and prostate cancers. There is plenty of medical evidence for this.
  • edited October 2009
    However, while you were joking around, also you said "Haha, you lose, nana na na na!" or words to that effect.

    He was joking and made a lighthearted comment. As other people have to you, which seems to always result in the most absurd rantings peppered with personal and quite frankly nasty insults. Sometimes it's good to be childish. It makes us smile, relax, lowers blood pressure and the like. Calm down.
    Oftentimes, it is the consumption of large amounts of red meat which will lead to digestive problems and so forth, because red meat is not readily digested by the human body and tends to clog up the colon and lower intestine, leading to not only the need for laxatives but also colon cancer, bowel and prostate cancers. There is plenty of medical evidence for this.

    My grandma died as a result of NOT eating ANY red meat and becoming severly anemic through iron deficiency. She then suffered a stroke. The two didn't go well together. I left the other Thread to escape your preachings. Kindly give it a rest now, thank you.<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
  • BrianBrian Detroit, MI Moderator
    edited October 2009
    See, this is what I was afraid of.

    Please, stop answering each other. This "I need to get the last word in" stuff is the death of peace in web-based communities.

    Newbuddhist is a very different animal from other buddhist websites. Our culture is different, our behaviour is different, and our expectations are different.

    We're a fun bunch, a lighthearted group of good people who take things easy and who get really awkward and uncomfortable around bickering. Please. Respect our house.

    E-sangha got hacked-- that sucks, and I'm sorry, and believe me I can relate, as I was a member of a gigantic web community that got hacked back in 2003, and it hurt. It hurt bad. I KNOW what you guys are going through.

    We can be a new site for all of you, but you have to respect our culture.

    relax! have fun! enjoy yourselves.
  • BhanteLuckyBhanteLucky Alternative lifestyle person in the South Island of New Zealand New Zealand Veteran
    edited October 2009
    Back on topic!
    This was posted over at Dhamma Wheel:
    IPB is working on the problem - it was an I-frame attack from a Russian IP. Leo has posted the following message and request for assistance on E-sangha.com
    Currently our forum is down due to technical difficulties. I hope to get the forum up and running again in the shortest possible time. In the meantime, get your fix at http://www.buddhist-community.com !
    We need your help to restore E-Sangha site. Any member who are expert in security, php and mysql database, please do email me at esangha@gmail.com Iframes and scripts are being inserted into our 3 sites and I am getting all help I can to restore E-Sangha. We'll upgrade to the latest version of all our softwares to prevent future attacks! If you like to help us, you may donate to us thruogh Paypal. Sorry for all inconveniences caused
This discussion has been closed.