Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Buddhism is a lie.

edited January 2010 in Buddhism Basics
Aha! You looked! I'm just kidding. Sorry guys, to be honest I just couldn't think of a name for this thread so I thought I'd play a little joke on you. :D

I hope you're not too upset with me, but I'll understand if I get a few death threat PM's.

Anyways, to my question:
Lately I've been practicing observing without images. By images I mean words, labels, memories, opinions, etc. For example, when you see a bird you say "Oh, there's a bird", and there is an immediate reaction of recalling memories and the images you have. Now, we can put that reaction aside so that there is just the observation of the bird, the color of it, it's movement, and grace. For the most part, it's pretty easy to observe birds without images, but not so much with your family, spouse, etc.

I think I might be upsetting my family by doing this. I think they're worried that I'm changing or becoming depressed. I think they want me to have images of them, because they're used to it.

I don't think I've become cold or callous or anything, I've just dropped my images of them and of myself. I still smile, hug them, tell them I love them, talk and interact with them, but I guess I've been a little more honest with myself about it. I smile when I'm happy, and I laugh when I think something is truly funny, and when I'm talking with someone I say what's on my mind. I still try to be gentle and considerate with people, but I guess I don't really worry about impressing them as much anymore? When I drop the images, I don't worry what people think, I don't compliment or criticize unless it's what I'm really feeling.

I don't want parents to think I'm depressed or anything, but I also find life is a lot easier/more enjoyable when I look at things from this perspective.

Any thoughts/advice/words of ancient buddhist wisdom? ;)

Comments

  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited January 2010
    This is how I try to practice walking meditation. Just let the sights and sounds contact me directly. Dropping the mental chatter.
  • DeshyDeshy Veteran
    edited January 2010
    Marmalade wrote: »
    I don't want parents to think I'm depressed or anything, but I also find life is a lot easier/more enjoyable when I look at things from this perspective.

    I have been doing this too and it's so comfortable when you stop analyzing things. So drop the thought that maybe your parents think you are depressed just like you dropped other kinds of thoughts and rationalizations. If they have any worry they will ask you and when they do you can tell them you are not depressed.

    The more you let go the brighter and happier you feel so it is the opposite of depression and they will notice that you are not depressed but happier than normal. I think you are on the right path so keep at it ;)
  • pegembarapegembara Veteran
    edited January 2010
    Try this simple experiment. Listen for one second to the thoughts in your head. Turn your attention inward. What is it you hear? perhaps you may see or hear that there is nothing there at all. You see by looking for the thoughts, for the noise, for the incessant spinning, it all seems to disappear. Of course, one second later it starts again and our attention is blindly attracted to the thoughts.

    Perhaps, through your busy day, if you can take a second here and there to once again look inside and see this inner dialogue, you will again and again be amazed that by attending to it and simply being aware of it - it just disappears. Rest there in that point of disappearance. And resting there brings with it a great sigh of relief and peace. You have found your true identity: the pure silence, your true self and home.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited January 2010
    Marmalade, do you perhaps think that in fact you might have tightened your guitar string, a little too tightly....
    perhaps, in an effort to not carry such things around with you, you've dropped them too much?
    The whole point is to understand that even if these things are impermanent, ephemeral and illusory - they're still "a happening thing".

    This is the joy of understanding the Duality that is existence.
    That beautiful things are there for us to enjoy, be blissful in, and be glad of. to love and find joy in.
    precisely because of their impermanence.
    So the thing is, to fully be aware and present, and immerse yourself fully in these images, but be equally able to release and let them go.
    'Dropping' the images can be disconcerting.
    Letting them go, is gentler.
    On us, and on them.....

    I think you meant Buddhism is a-liVe.... didn't you? ;)
  • DeshyDeshy Veteran
    edited January 2010
    pegembara wrote: »
    Try this simple experiment. Listen for one second to the thoughts in your head. Turn your attention inward. What is it you hear? perhaps you may see or hear that there is nothing there at all. You see by looking for the thoughts, for the noise, for the incessant spinning, it all seems to disappear. Of course, one second later it starts again and our attention is blindly attracted to the thoughts.

    Perhaps, through your busy day, if you can take a second here and there to once again look inside and see this inner dialogue, you will again and again be amazed that by attending to it and simply being aware of it - it just disappears. Rest there in that point of disappearance. And resting there brings with it a great sigh of relief and peace. You have found your true identity: the pure silence, your true self and home.

    Wonderful advice
  • edited January 2010
    This is good, the power of now says to be in the PRESENT so that you turn off your mind, but I always SEE things in the veil of the past due to labels and my mind recognizing things. You have reached true presence if you can see things without the veil of the mind, you've obtained an "unconditioned mind"

    EDIT: @pegembara, yeah when you LOOK at different parts of your mind functioning, you drain energy from them and they eventually cease to exist. Well atleast that's how I explain it.
  • FoibleFullFoibleFull Canada Veteran
    edited January 2010
    Sometimes those outside of us, Buddhists or not, can see what we are missing. If you think you might be upsetting your family, this could be a very important indication that some aspect of what you are doing is off-key.

    I would suggest you find a qualified, long-time monk-teacher who really knows his stuff to discuss where you are at and see what might need tweaking.
  • edited January 2010
    Thank you guys very much for the advice. When I read your responses, I don't feel alone. :)
    federica wrote: »
    do you perhaps think that in fact you might have tightened your guitar string, a little too tightly....
    perhaps, in an effort to not carry such things around with you, you've dropped them too much?

    I think this is very possible. Maybe I'm making an effort to not make an effort, which is why I feel worried about hurting my family in the first place?
    Deshy wrote: »
    The more you let go the brighter and happier you feel so it is the opposite of depression and they will notice that you are not depressed but happier than normal. I think you are on the right path so keep at it ;)

    I think it's also very possible that I'm not letting go enough. They haven't confronted me about this in any way, but I also feel like I might be holding back because I don't want to worry them so much that they feel they have to. Maybe I'm worrying about my family needlessly...

    I guess life is always about trying to find that balance, that middle between holding on too much and letting go too much. Maybe when you do it without thinking about it, without any effort, without even realizing it, that's when you've found the middle?
    FoibleFull wrote: »
    I would suggest you find a qualified, long-time monk-teacher who really knows his stuff to discuss where you are at and see what might need tweaking.

    If I ever met such a person, I'd enjoy that, but I don't think I'd ever go seek one out. Maybe you all can be my monk-teachers?
    federica wrote: »
    I think you meant Buddhism is a-liVe.... didn't you? ;)

    Hahah, definitely. :D
  • edited January 2010
    Marmalade,

    Whenever we change our behavior, even in a small way, the people closest to us are going to notice, and may even fear that we are moving on or leaving them behind. Perhaps this is because, all of our life, most everyone that comes into our lives then drifts away, that is except for a very precious few.

    Not sharing your new ideas and the reasons for your new behavior with these people, may be why they feel left out and even left behind in some way?

    Also, how you believe you are acting (subjectively) may not even come close to how it appears from the outside. Being pensive and withdrawn may appear to your fearful folks as being stand-offish, or even a sad lack of good humor.

    Just a thought,
    S9
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited January 2010
    I wonder if you are feeling a little lonely because of the difficulty in sharing matters of faith. A feeling that you are somehow 'different'. That can be a painful feeling. I think if you notice the warmth and compassion of your family, the human need for hapiness it would remind you that you have much in common although the material concepts you are thinking about lately are different?

    The cake is a lie.
  • FoibleFullFoibleFull Canada Veteran
    edited January 2010
    Marmalade wrote: »

    If I ever met such a person, I'd enjoy that, but I don't think I'd ever go seek one out. Maybe you all can be my monk-teachers?

    You mean like the blind leading the blind? Now there is a recipe for disaster!
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited January 2010
    I think what you're doing is great, Marmalade, but it's only part of the story. The heart of practice is compassion. Everything comes from that. You said you're trying to not upset anybody in your family, and that is good, but I think I would try to go a little deeper even. Try to develop the type of compassion that views all sentient beings as exactly the same as yourself, no difference at all. Start by trying to see all people as being the same, whether they're old, young, beautiful, ugly, fat, thin, muscular, nerdy, whatever. View them as not separate from yourself. Not only will that develop compassion, but it will also develop equanimity.

    I think that may round out the picture a little for you. What do you think?

    BTW, do you take your name from the Scottish band of the same name? Just curious.

    Palzang
  • edited January 2010
    I think this is extremely well put and just deserves repeating.
    federica wrote: »

    The whole point is to understand that even if these things are impermanent, ephemeral and illusory - they're still "a happening thing".

    This is the joy of understanding the Duality that is existence.

    That beautiful things are there for us to enjoy, be blissful in, and be glad of. to love and find joy in.

    precisely because of their impermanence.

    So the thing is, to fully be aware and present, and immerse yourself fully in these images, but be equally able to release and let them go.

    'Dropping' the images can be disconcerting.
    Letting them go, is gentler.
    On us, and on them.....
  • DeshyDeshy Veteran
    edited January 2010
    Marmalade wrote: »

    I guess life is always about trying to find that balance, that middle between holding on too much and letting go too much. Maybe when you do it without thinking about it, without any effort, without even realizing it, that's when you've found the middle?

    Well letting go doesn't mean getting rid of your possessions, stop caring about the things that should be cared for like your family or abandoning anything. So what do you mean by letting go too much?

    In my opinion, there is nothing in Buddhism that is "letting go too much". For an example, you still love and care for your family, you help your mum when she is sick but you are not attached to them to the point that when someone dies you cry pools of tears but see the impermanence of our existence and accept it as a part of life. You still use your car to work but if one day you lose it then you are perfectly fine with taking the bus. You don't sit and worry why you lost the car and how inconvenient it is to take the bus. These are just two simple examples.

    So letting go is not about abandoning things or becoming a totally mute, unfeeling person but about not getting endlessly attached to anything or craving for things. That kind of letting go is the ultimate happiness as far as I see it.

    I have read that arahaths have a loving compassion for all beings but they are not like "I love him/her and hope he/she will be mine forever", they praise it when they see a beautiful thing but they won't say "wow i want to see this scenery again tomorrow as well". They enjoy tasty food but they won't keep on asking for the same dish again and again. Do you see the difference here?

    But I agree that letting go should be a perfectly natural and comfortable process where you abandon the craving for something little by little through understanding and most importantly through deep meditative realizations. Forced letting go is just another delusion which won't last long. We can't do it all at once and we are all still attached to one thing or the other. But it is important to know what letting go is all about and practicing it little by little gives you an immense sense of happiness even at this initial level.
  • edited January 2010
    I like imagining being with the other in the most exquisitely tender embrace - a super gentle Hug - and really paying close attention to - what their saying or not saying, their breathing, their heartbeat, their expressions - whatever their appearance in this precious moment. For me that's enough that's letting-go.

    Shalom and Hugs!
  • edited January 2010
    Deshy wrote: »
    So what do you mean by letting go too much?

    I guess what I mean is that I'm afraid of maintaining that "imageless" viewpoint constantly.

    Deep down I think It would make me happy to just stay in that viewpoint forever. When I'm in it, everything is okay just the way it is. Eventually though, there's a slip in my confidence. I might see my mother, and feel that if I don't act like myself I'll worry her, even if "myself" is more anxious/stressed. Then, I start falling out of it, and all the anxieties, fears, thoughts, images, and over-analysis slowly come back to me.

    We lost my sister when she was just a baby and my mother never really got over it. I also gave her quite a few gray hairs when I was younger and suffering from depression and other psychological disorders. I guess I'm afraid that if I don't act like myself she'll think I've finally snapped (haha, maybe I have). I wouldn't put her through the pain of losing a child again for anything. I guess that's why I hold back, I almost feel like I'm abandoning her by letting go of myself like that.

    In all other aspects of my life, I'm fine with being in that imageless perspective, just not with my mother. I guess I'm just a mama's boy :p
    Palzang wrote: »
    I think that may round out the picture a little for you. What do you think?

    I think you're right. I think the compassion you're talking about comes about naturally when you're in that "perspective". I think I have a ways to go before I really develop that equanimity though. To be honest, I think my humor has developed a lot more than my compassion. I don't take things as seriously as before, now everything's just funny. I guess that's helpful in it's own way though...
    Palzang wrote: »
    BTW, do you take your name from the Scottish band of the same name? Just curious.

    Nope, I actually took it from the Beatles song "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds". Remember the verse about "tangerine trees and marmalade skies"? I do love their song "Rainbow" though!
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited January 2010
    Marmalade wrote: »
    Nope, I actually took it from the Beatles song "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds". Remember the verse about "tangerine trees and marmalade skies"? I do love their song "Rainbow" though!

    Ah, thanks.

    And I think developing your humor is also a good thing. I never trust anyone who can't laugh at their own craziness.

    Palzang
  • edited January 2010
    Marmalade-

    Do you have any evidence at all that this has actually affected your mother and your family in the way you fear? In earlier posts, you seem to say that your behavior toward them is virtually unchanged, and/or that it is still quite open and affectionate.

    It's impossible to maintain this position of "imagelessness" forever- it may be impossible to maintain this long enough to cause real problems, or for them to even notice. At some point the reality has to be accepted that one's mother is one's mother in this lifetime, and there is a proper way to approach that relationship.

    I'm not even sure that maintaining this position of "imagelessness" has anything to do with Buddhism. IMHO, Buddhism tells us that although it's all very relative and impermanent, the point is to recognize the impermanence and approach relationships in that way rather than not approach relationships at all. For purposes of existing in this world, one's mother is one's mother and one's family is one's family, and that should be dealt with realistically in that context. Come to think of it, I guess I will have to go back and read your posts again to figure out what you mean by "imagelessness" and see if I understand whether or not that really has anything to do with Buddhist practice.
  • DeshyDeshy Veteran
    edited January 2010
    Marmalade wrote: »
    I guess what I mean is that I'm afraid of maintaining that "imageless" viewpoint constantly.

    Deep down I think It would make me happy to just stay in that viewpoint forever. When I'm in it, everything is okay just the way it is. Eventually though, there's a slip in my confidence. I might see my mother, and feel that if I don't act like myself I'll worry her, even if "myself" is more anxious/stressed. Then, I start falling out of it, and all the anxieties, fears, thoughts, images, and over-analysis slowly come back to me.

    We lost my sister when she was just a baby and my mother never really got over it. I also gave her quite a few gray hairs when I was younger and suffering from depression and other psychological disorders. I guess I'm afraid that if I don't act like myself she'll think I've finally snapped (haha, maybe I have). I wouldn't put her through the pain of losing a child again for anything. I guess that's why I hold back, I almost feel like I'm abandoning her by letting go of myself like that.

    In all other aspects of my life, I'm fine with being in that imageless perspective, just not with my mother. I guess I'm just a mama's boy :p

    I can relate :D However I don't think your mum will be worried with a happier you if you let the changes happen naturally and comfortably so that your mum won't see a drastic change in you all at once?
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
  • edited January 2010
    I think I get it at least partially. If I understand what you're saying correctly, you're trying to relate in a "lighter" way, in a way that does not have all the apparently negative associations- that your present "image" of your mother and family is more fresh and new and present-oriented rather than carrying all those associations. It seems that you're allowing your previously reflexive concept of your mother and others some "space", sort of "stepping back" from those reflexive concepts and allowing the incorrect ones to dissipate so that you can see the reality of your mother in the here and now and relate to her in a lighter and fresher way than previously. Am I even close with that?

    And again, do you have any evidence at all yet that your family have even noticed any changes in your behavior, or become distressed by them?
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited January 2010
    Marmalade-

    Do you have any evidence at all that this has actually affected your mother and your family in the way you fear? In earlier posts, you seem to say that your behavior toward them is virtually unchanged, and/or that it is still quite open and affectionate.

    It's impossible to maintain this position of "imagelessness" forever- it may be impossible to maintain this long enough to cause real problems, or for them to even notice. At some point the reality has to be accepted that one's mother is one's mother in this lifetime, and there is a proper way to approach that relationship.

    I'm not even sure that maintaining this position of "imagelessness" has anything to do with Buddhism. IMHO, Buddhism tells us that although it's all very relative and impermanent, the point is to recognize the impermanence and approach relationships in that way rather than not approach relationships at all. For purposes of existing in this world, one's mother is one's mother and one's family is one's family, and that should be dealt with realistically in that context. Come to think of it, I guess I will have to go back and read your posts again to figure out what you mean by "imagelessness" and see if I understand whether or not that really has anything to do with Buddhist practice.

    Not to speak for Marmalade, but what I got out of what he said is that he's trying to get past all the conditioned responses we have to everything we see and hear and just allow the unfiltered sensations to come through. Of course, easier said than done, but I don't think it's a bad thing to try to experience that as it would help develop equanimity and even pure awareness. I think it would not be wrong to label that "Buddhist" if putting a label on it seems important.

    Palzang
Sign In or Register to comment.