Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Think Think, Judge Judge, Grasp Grasp

SimplifySimplify Veteran
edited February 2010 in Buddhism Basics
?

What about the nature of mind, or straight up questions on morality?

Comments

  • upekkaupekka Veteran
    edited February 2010
    thinking is judging and grasping?
  • SimplifySimplify Veteran
    edited February 2010
    I don't know. But these three things are rampant in this forum (and the internet in general).
  • jinzangjinzang Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Even Longchenpa wrote seven books. Nothing new about intellectual activity in Buddhism.
  • edited February 2010
    mind thinks, grasping and judging optional?
  • NiosNios Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Thinking + ego = grasping and/or judging.

    :)
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited February 2010
    Simplify, could you clarify what your point is, exactly?
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Oh, I thought it was about judgment.

    Palzang
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited February 2010
    I'm just a bit confused as to where he exactly expects everyone to go with this.... what are we actually trying to discuss here?

    Thinking?

    Judging?
    Grasping?
    Habits of internet posting?

    Tendencies?

    The nature of Mind, or

    Questions of morality?

    What?
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited February 2010
    What I meant was I thought he(?) was criticizing people who criticize others or who think too much or who are attached to their opinions. Not true?

    Palzang
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Now dont add cup of sugar directly to the mix or it will clump. Slowly sift it in, then put the mix aside. Next its time to whip the egg whites. For this you'll need a.......Hold on .........isnt this the baking forum?
  • edited February 2010
    Now dont add cup of sugar directly to the mix or it will clump. Slowly sift it in, then put the mix aside. Next its time to whip the egg whites. For this you'll need a.......Hold on .........isnt this the baking forum?
    :lol:

    What about the salt. . .
  • edited February 2010
    Simplify wrote: »
    I don't know. But these three things are rampant in this forum (and the internet in general).
    Don^t become what you fight :p.
  • BaileyDBaileyD Explorer
    edited February 2010
    You all think too much. Just live. :)
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited February 2010
    BaileyD wrote: »
    You all think too much. Just live. :)
    Thats what you think.:D
  • RenGalskapRenGalskap Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Ya think?
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Doh!!!
  • edited February 2010
    You soo funny!! :lol:
  • edited February 2010
    Ha Palzang... "Oh, I thought it was about judgment".

    You are wise. period. And usually with such short and clear answers.

    All in good fun, think-y thinker!

    A :)
  • SimplifySimplify Veteran
    edited February 2010
    poke poke, shriek shriek :)

    Sorry for the vagueness I was just poking

    sure its bad form to disapear only to come back and complain, but

    I was just looking at the new posts since I left and saw a lot what seems to be ego based ideation, defense, holding on to thoughts and ideas, you know stuff that seems irrelevant to the practice.
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited February 2010
    acceptance wrote: »
    Ha Palzang... "Oh, I thought it was about judgment".

    You are wise. period. And usually with such short and clear answers.

    All in good fun, think-y thinker!

    A :)

    I don't think so! Or, I don't think, so... :D

    Palzang
  • edited February 2010
    Simplify wrote: »
    poke poke, shriek shriek :)

    Sorry for the vagueness I was just poking

    sure its bad form to disapear only to come back and complain, but

    I was just looking at the new posts since I left and saw a lot what seems to be ego based ideation, defense, holding on to thoughts and ideas, you know stuff that seems irrelevant to the practice.



    I started to get all defensive about being a noob and still learning. But then I thought about it.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited February 2010
    Simplify wrote: »
    poke poke, shriek shriek :)

    Sorry for the vagueness I was just poking

    sure its bad form to disapear only to come back and complain, but

    I was just looking at the new posts since I left and saw a lot what seems to be ego based ideation, defense, holding on to thoughts and ideas, you know stuff that seems irrelevant to the practice.

    Name one post above that is ego-based, (what is 'ideation'...?) defensive and 'holding on to thoughts and ideas'.

    The fact is, we all made it up as we went along and had fun with it, because nobody had a clue what you were going on about.
    In a medium such as this - where the only means of communication is the written word - then it's important to clarify precisely what your intention is within your post, what it is you seek by way of responses, and what kind of interaction you're looking for.
    Otherwise, we could just as easily clump your original post into one of your own categories, and call it "Ego-based and defensive".

    Say what you mean, mean what you say.

    Now.
    Would you like to start again, or shall we leave it here? :)
  • SimplifySimplify Veteran
    edited February 2010
    The post on immunization is a good one. Probably best are the posts on rebirth.

    Ideation is idea making. It seems plainly obvious that the ideation machines in our minds are often driven by ego, especially obvious on the internet.

    I find it both funny and sad that people on a 'Buddhist' forum chose to engage their ego grasping with the ideation machine.
  • NamelessRiverNamelessRiver Veteran
    edited February 2010
    The post on immunization is a good one. Probably best are the posts on rebirth.
    So what you are saying is that the content of such posts (which are somewhat like 'I believe in this' or 'rebirth is like this' or 'no you are wrong it is like that') are offensive? I don't think it has necessarily to do with ego-grasping. In my case I find it somewhat amusing, just inoffensive chit-chat. In fact this thread is somewhat like "You should talk like this, and not like that".

    You can see that sometimes people start escalating it and getting a bit mad. It is just part of being human, there is NOTHING offensive about that. :) Maybe what really annoys you is how repetitive it gets?
  • SimplifySimplify Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Not offensive.

    Attachment to 'knowledge'.

    What is knowledge? Examining incomplete conceptual information for patterns that fit your fears and desires? Faith in a particular interpretation or aspect of something that was rumored to have been said 2000 years ago?
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Simplify wrote: »
    Not offensive.

    Attachment to 'knowledge'.

    What is knowledge? Examining incomplete conceptual information for patterns that fit your fears and desires? Faith in a particular interpretation or aspect of something that was rumored to have been said 2000 years ago?
    You do see the ironic humour in this post.... eh? ;)
  • edited February 2010
    Simplify wrote: »
    Not offensive.

    Attachment to 'knowledge'.

    What is knowledge? Examining incomplete conceptual information for patterns that fit your fears and desires? Faith in a particular interpretation or aspect of something that was rumored to have been said 2000 years ago?

    This whole thread is about as vague as vague gets. Quite psychoanalyzing every single word people say. Say what you mean! :rolleyes:
  • edited February 2010
    Seeker
  • SimplifySimplify Veteran
    edited February 2010
    This whole thread is about as vague as vague gets. Quite psychoanalyzing every single word people say. Say what you mean! :rolleyes:


    either you see it or you don't
  • edited February 2010
    Simplify wrote: »
    either you see it or you don't

    If you say so, Neo. ;) I live in a world of paint, hammers, and nails. This intellectual dabbling is a bit too much for my knuckle-dragging self. :lol:
  • DeshyDeshy Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Well Simplicity has a point here guys. I think most of us display our ego in the forums sometimes (including me). Aren't we all attached to our ideas and knowledge to which most of us do not have solid direct meditative realizations? We just hold on to them and debate on them over and over sometimes without even considering the other possibilities.
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Yeah, I have to agree, Deshy.

    I'm constantly fighting with my sense of 'self' and the 'identity' I'm trying to present and shore up on here. Not that others are like this, but I tend to be inflexible in my beliefs (although I'm better than I was) because I'm afraid to not have what I think are concrete answers to spiritual questions. About ten years ago I was called opinionated and arrogant by someone I respected and they were so right. If I was posting here with my old attitude I'd be pretty insufferable. I really held on to my views tightly and was threatened easily when someone disagreed or criticized me.

    I still struggle with those old habits of clinging to my beliefs and I actually blush with embarrassment when I think back to some of the things I said in those days. But this forum has helped me SO much it's astonishing. I think it has a lot to do with the fact that bulletin boards like this one with its relative anonymity make it easy to be arrogant and unbending and they also lend themselves to feelings of self-importance because our posts are 'published'. So it presents the perfect opportunity to solidify one's sense of 'self' and because I've had to work so hard at resisting that temptation I've been forced to make changes in myself. It's slow going but I'm improving which has lessened my suffering considerably. I hope it's mitigated the suffering of those who read what I write too. :D
  • DeshyDeshy Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Brigid wrote: »

    I think it has a lot to do with the fact that bulletin boards like this one with its relative anonymity make it easy to be arrogant and unbending and they also lend themselves to feelings of self-importance because our posts are 'published'. So it presents the perfect opportunity to solidify one's sense of 'self' and because I've had to work so hard at resisting that temptation I've been forced to make changes in myself. It's slow going but I'm improving which has lessened my suffering considerably.

    So ditto. The more I let go of this ego (although temporarily) the happier I feel. Maybe it's because of my anxiety but I have always been some sort of a laid back person anyway. But that doesn't mean I have no ego. Usually the quiet ones are those who keep it all bottled in ;)
  • GlowGlow Veteran
    edited February 2010
    Deshy and Brigid, you both bring up good points. I am quite guilty of this myself. It's difficult not to attach to what you post on the forum because there is an element of "permanence" about written communication; it's stored for others to see and form an idea of what you are like through.
  • Quiet_witnessQuiet_witness Veteran
    edited February 2010
    I agree Glow. I have read over things I have written in the past and some of them are completely different from what I think now. What we all need to realize is that we are changing beings (hopefully for the better) and we need to allow that change to take place and forgive past errors or misconceptions. I find it a useful tool to read my old posts and see the progression or digression I have made since then.
  • BrigidBrigid Veteran
    edited February 2010
    I've seen the same thing with my old posts too, QW. Sometimes I feel embarrassed about what I wrote back then. *sigh* Lol! It's a good thing we do change, that's all I can say! :D My lack of self forgiveness shows me I still have an unbalanced ego though and that in itself is important to see.

    Glow,

    That's how I see it too. Writing down our opinions and publishing them for all to see is an exercise in solidifying the ego in itself, even if we're not particularly clinging to those opinions. It's a challenge but a great one.

    Deshy,

    I'm SO with you on that. I can see, intellectually, how the understanding of not-self will completely eradicate my panic disorder because the little progress I've made in that area has already made a difference with the anxiety. I really do think of it as the antidote to the disorder for me.

    Ever since my first panic attack when I was 9 or 10 I've been a virtual slave to fear. I've done relatively okay socially but it's always been there at my heels just waiting to strike and take me down. When I was a kid I assumed that I was going to end up in an institution and not be able to function in normal society.

    But studying and contemplating the not-self teachings, among other teachings, has changed everything. Now I can actually look at fear and believe that I may conquer it, or at least it's pathological aspects, in this lifetime. And when I think of it like that I think, "How totally amazing is that?? I could conquer fear! I may not have to live constantly trying to keep it at bay." It makes me feel free for the first time since I was a young child.

    Oooops! I'm babbling and off topic. I'll shut up now. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.