Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Does Anapanasati mean mindfulness OF breathing or WITH breathing. I ask simply because if it means with, then certain aspects of the suttas become clearer. The word sati can retain its real meaning of recollection/awareness. If you read the following sutta and replace the words "of breathing" with "with breathing" and the English translation "mindfull/mindully/mindfulness" with the the word "recollection/awareness" then the sutta makes sense and the commentaries explanation of Sariputta's "mistake" can be discarded. Any sati/recollection can be undertaken WITH breathing:-
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.062.than.html
Just an idea
:scratch:
0
Comments
You might find this helpful
The primary purpose of mindfulness in Buddhism is to deliver wisdom & other skilful dhammas to the mind. Mindfulness is recollection, remembering, non-forgetting.
Of mindfulness, the Buddha spoke as follows: Here,we can see how mindfulness is something active. It has the role of a 'supervisor', to 'run & circle' around all aspects of practice. Mindfulness is like an instructor or coach.
How sad. How sinful. The Buddha said:
:smilec:
Well cited friend. In this sutta, it is reported Rahula did not know what Anapanasati was. The Venerable Rahula was admonished by the Buddha for his 'self-view' and thus sat "setting mindfulness to the fore".
Here, the Venerable maintained wisdom in his mind, after being admonished by the Buddha, the wisdom that "this is not I, this is not mine, this is not myself".
Mindfulness does mean to 'be aware' of what one is doing, in the sense of being circumspect, vigilant or heedful.
But mindfulness does not mean 'awareness' in the sense of being consciousness of something, as in the sense of knowing or experiencing a sense object.
For example, being aware of the object of meditation is not mindfulness. Here, the object of meditation is simply an object of consciousness, a sense object.
Mindfulness is that supervisory quality looking over the mind, keeping it awake, keeping it free from discursive thought, keeping it in a state of awareness, keeping it free from liking & disliking & judging, keeping it free from craving, keeping it free from attachment, keeping it within the bounds & framework of right view.
Whilst what I am discussing here may appear to be semantics, I disagree. Knowing what mindfulness is shows we are understanding how our mind works. It shows we have clarity in practise.
Kind regards
DD
When being aware of the meditation object, the Anapanasati Sutta uses the words "paṭisaṃvedī" (experiencing) and also "ānupassī" (directly seeing).
sabba kāya paṭisaṃvedī = experiencing all bodies
citta saṅkhāra paṭisaṃvedī = experiencing the mind conditioner
Citta paṭisaṃvedī = experiencing the mind
Aniccānupassī = directly seeing impermanence
A simple examination of the Pali and the sutta shows Thich Nhat Hanh and your friends at dhammawheel.com are incorrect in both their translation and understanding of the mechanisms of practise.
Ajahn Buddhadasa makes the following comments:
For more detailed analysis, there is Part II. The Use of Dhamma and An Exposition of Right Mindfulness
Kind regards
DD
Thanks for the feedback. The most important thing I do know, is that my meditation has progressed with the simple change of a word. Now I am not trying to fix on a breath, but using it to assist my sati. I am finding it is all about approach. I can be mindful of the "five contemplations"
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an05/an05.057.than.html
With breathing.
The following sutta also suggests that you can contemplate/sati your way into jhana (probably with the assistance of anapana) :-
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an08/an08.030.than.html
What do you think?
Regards
Widfola
I have never read this sutta before but it demonstrates what I have been saying.
Mindfulness recollects right view and this right mindfulness sets the mind in right concentration.
The breathing in & out are merely the sign (nimitta) of right view, right mindfulness & right concentation.
At one place in the SN, the Buddha described right concentration as the mind with release (relinquishment) as its sole object.
When the mind is established by right mindfulness in right view, it is empty & alert.
It follows, the breathing in & out arise naturally as the object of meditation because, for the empty & alert mind, the breathing in & out is the grossest sense object.
There is no need to direct the mind towards the breathing in & breathing out.
When the mind is established in right mindfulness, the mind & the breathing will by nature (eventually) converge with eachother.
To direct the mind towards the breathing in & breathing out is a gross method; it is lacking in subtlely & fluidity. Being so, it is limited.
To direct the mind towards the breathing in & breathing out is to practise with craving & attachment.
Kind regards
DD
Thanks
I was about to thank them for their input and the censors descended.
:mad:
:smilec:
Yes, I was in the middle of reading that discussion with great interest - when woosh....the wind of change blew in .....and then all was gone before I'd finished
.
So you are the naughty person in question.
In a lot of the suttas that I have read, the Buddha would always welcome debate with people, however much their views were at odds with his own. It seems unreasonable that censorship of Dhamma dialogue is so widely practised. If people remain calm, then vigorous discussion should be welcomed - not closed down.
It seemed a very valid question I asked in that forum but in no time at all, the dhamma police moved in.
Regards
Widfola