Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

What Is The Difference Between Compassion and Pity?

AllbuddhaBoundAllbuddhaBound Veteran
edited May 2010 in Buddhism Basics
And how does compassion make things better, whereas pity does not?

Comments

  • edited May 2010
    And how does compassion make things better, whereas pity does not?
    Compassion is based on equanimity, genuine caring, and resolve to help.
    Pity is a contemptuous sorrow or empathy. It completely lacks equanimity and action.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited May 2010
    And how does compassion make things better, whereas pity does not?

    To me, I would say, "compassion" involves a sense of oneness and intention to action, "pity" does not.

    Maybe "Compassion" is a simple dharmic concept, in that we can see why compassion is wholesome, we can explain it and it explains other dharmic ideas. "Pity" doesn't seem to have this property. Is it a higher defilement? I guess so but don't know.


    One day soon we will have artificially intelligent computers, but I can't imagine we will ever have artificially compassionate computers.

    namaste
  • edited May 2010
    I actually think the word compassion falls very short of the actually dharmic meaning.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited May 2010
    I actually think the word compassion falls very short of the actually dharmic meaning.

    Sorry, I don't understand your sentence?

    Words have many ways to have their meanings expressed, none better than the other. Buddhism captures this well with its ability to teach the same truths to such diverse cultures.
  • edited May 2010
    thickpaper wrote: »
    Sorry, I don't understand your sentence?

    Words have many ways to have their meanings expressed, none better than the other. Buddhism captures this well with its ability to teach the same truths to such diverse cultures.

    We often use "compassion" as a reference to bodhicitta, at least in the Mahayana context. All I was saying is that I feel it is an insufficient translation.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited May 2010
    We often use "compassion" as a reference to bodhicitta, at least in the Mahayana context. All I was saying is that I feel it is an insufficient translation.

    That is one of the properties of dharmic terms, they have lots of ways to define them, and no way is supreamly right. So we should expect all attempts at definition to be insufficient. For example, we see this with "Dukka" as a translation/definition.

    Hows about this for another attempt:

    We could walk away from the wounded stranger with pity, but never with compassion.

    any good?

    namaste
  • upekkaupekka Veteran
    edited May 2010
    Lord Buddha saw the truth of life namely, beings live in a dream-like world without knowing they are in such a state

    feeling arise after seen such a truth is the compassion for the beings who are ignorance to the truth and wanting to help them to awake

    that is the meaning of Great Compassion of Lord Buddha
  • edited May 2010
    .

    The Four Sublime States

    Contemplations on Love, Compassion, Sympathetic Joy and Equanimity


    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nyanaponika/wheel006.html


    Buddha said :

    " Here, monks, a disciple dwells pervading one direction with his heart filled with loving-kindness, likewise the second, the third, and the fourth direction; so above, below and around; he dwells pervading the entire world everywhere and equally with his heart filled with loving-kindness, abundant, grown great, measureless, free from enmity and free from distress.

    Here, monks, a disciple dwells pervading one direction with his heart filled with compassion, likewise the second, the third and the fourth direction; so above, below and around; he dwells pervading the entire world everywhere and equally with his heart filled with compassion, abundant, grown great, measureless, free from enmity and free from distress.

    Here, monks, a disciple dwells pervading one direction with his heart filled with sympathetic joy, likewise the second, the third and the fourth direction; so above, below and around; he dwells pervading the entire world everywhere and equally with his heart filled with sympathetic joy, abundant, grown great, measureless, free from enmity and free from distress.

    Here, monks, a disciple dwells pervading one direction with his heart filled with equanimity, likewise the second, the third and the fourth direction; so above, below and around; he dwells pervading the entire world everywhere and equally with his heart filled with equanimity, abundant, grown great, measureless, free from enmity and free from distress."


    — Digha Nikaya 13





    .
  • edited May 2010
    I personally see pity as something fake and false, compassion comes from the heart and is real.
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited May 2010
    And how does compassion make things better, whereas pity does not?

    I think it all depends on how you define each term, but I'd say that to have compassion for someone is to have the desire to relieve their suffering whereas to have pity on someone is simply to feel bad about their suffering. So, in this case, I'd say that compassion is a more active emotion whereas pity is a predominately passive one.
  • ansannaansanna Veteran
    edited May 2010
    I actually think the word compassion falls very short of the actually dharmic meaning.
    true, hence many used the term Kurana or Buddhist compassion, it means active sympathy or a willingness to bear the pain of others or to take away others suffering
  • GlowGlow Veteran
    edited May 2010
    "May all beings be free from suffering" is the traditional aspiration for compassion. It's helpful to keep in mind the distinction between pain and suffering. Pain is inevitable; suffering is the result of aversion towards that pain. In this sense, the English word "compassion" is somewhat misleading as a translation of "karuna." Compassion comes from the Greek "com" (together) + "pati" (to suffer). Thus, compassion = "to suffer with." In Buddhism, whereas mindfulness is nonjudgmental awareness of the nature of suffering (as the result of resistance to pain), compassion is the nonjudgmental acceptance of ourselves or another while experiencing pain. In this way, compassion actually alleviates much of our unnecessary suffering.

    Compassion does not seek to eliminate another's pain, merely to acknowledge the legitimacy of life's painful qualities and to acknowledge our shared human capacity to register that pain. In fact, oftentimes our attempts to alleviate another's pain is a form of aversion. In such cases, we try to make the other person feel better because their pain makes us uncomfortable. This is ignorance. We are working off the misguided assumption that there's something wrong with pain. The compassionate approach, instead, will first and foremost allow the pain to be as it is (thus eliminating the unnecessary suffering associated with blaming ourselves or another or life itself for feeling pain). Then, if the pain is the result of something action can resolve, we can take appropriate action. If we cannot resolve it through action (say, in the case of the death of a loved one, for instance), we accept the fact that we are hurting.

    In some schools of Buddhism, the near-enemy of compassion is pity. Pity is the result of operating under the ignorant assumption that pain is unacceptable. On one level, it's a form of conceit. Thus, when we pity someone, we mistakenly believe that their pain is something that should not be and we feel glad we aren't them. There's a layer of separation there that isn't the case with compassion. There's also a layer of denial. The reality is that, when we pity someone, we are averse to their pain, and thus averse to the idea of pain. This will manifest itself in unskillful action (trying to make the pain go away, thus stigmatizing pain in ourselves and others, thus attempting to ignore, avoid or repress pain rather than our aversion to it) which will perpetuate our own and others' suffering.
  • edited May 2010
    Pity is referring to regretful :banghead:that one's is not in the earliest possible time to know of such an "amazing" teachings on one's intrinsic Buddha nature on compassion:wow:.
Sign In or Register to comment.