Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

A question on Enlightenment...

johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
edited June 2010 in Buddhism Basics
I was folding laundry and mulling over Buddhist stuff in my head and I came to start wondering; Did Buddha grow to see everything clearly which resulted in his Enlightenment or did he see just about everything clearly, enough so that suddenly enlightenment hit and then everything else became clear?

Comments

  • edited June 2010
    I'll let you know once I get there..........
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited June 2010
    I believe, based on his determination to not move until it all became clear, probably the latter.
    But it's a bit 'chicken and egg'.....
  • johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
    edited June 2010
    Yeah, what came first? the chicken or the egg? Is exactly what I was thinking... I was just thinking about some of the "discussions/arguments" around issues like: to reach enlightenment one must believe in Karma or one must believe in Reincarnation, etc, etc...

    Is it possible that one might reach "enlightenment not "seeing the truth of" certain aspects of Buddhism and at the point of enlightenment "see the truth" and know that what they thought was false is actually true...

    And if it is the other way around then perhaps they will eventually see the truth of things in its time, not now simply because other Buddhists say it is necessary to believe it to reach enlightenment... But when more of the puzzle is solved, with only a few pieces remaining it is easier to see the whole picture and thus easier to place those last few pieces...

    I don't know, I guess I've just read to many threads lately that sound like absolutism and fear mongering (if you don't believe this about Buddhism you'll never reach Enlightenment" type stuff...
  • edited June 2010
    Hi again, Johnathan -

    Two things - First, the chicken/egg question is too easy: Dinosaurs were laying eggs long before chickens came to be.

    Second, after 29 years, in my experience Buddhism is not nearly as much about what you know, as it is about what you do (practice). It doesn't even seem to matter hugely what practice you do, so long as you do your practice. This is my own opinion, of course; YMMV.
  • edited June 2010
    johnathan wrote: »
    Did Buddha grow to see everything clearly which resulted in his Enlightenment or did he see just about everything clearly, enough so that suddenly enlightenment hit and then everything else became clear?

    If you can explain the difference between these two states of mind then you've answered your own question. And you will also have reached Enlightenment yourself.

    It is my understanding of Zen that, in the Soto Zen tradition, you'd be answered by a shrug or just silence by the Master until you figured it out yourself. In the Rinzai Zen tradition, you'd be pushed into a water puddle or have some other similarly abrupt and rather bizarre response- something like the question "Does the person working in the factory that made that piece of clothing you were folding have Buddha-nature?" Or if you were folding the clothing with a Master the answer would be something like: "Hand me that hanger, will you?".

    So much intellectualizing over such small and obscure points. :)
  • johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
    edited June 2010
    SherabDorji... I think my point (at least from my second post in this thread and the reason for the question in the first place) was to point out that some of the "discussions" others are having in various threads are somewhat pointless. One cannot say for certain if one need believe in this or that in order to reach enlightenment because it might just very well be that their enlightenment will show them the truths they do not yet see... whether that is at the moment of enlightenment or when one is very close to enlightenment (almost all the pieces of the puzzle are on the board) when they can more easily "see" what should be where there are not yet puzzle pieces.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited June 2010
    Well you never need to force yourself to see a truth. You need to have a light touch. Thats my advice.
  • edited June 2010
    johnathan wrote: »
    ...some of the "discussions" others are having in various threads are somewhat pointless.

    Be that as it may, my response to your original question stands. If the shoe fits, wear it. If it doesn't, don't.

    I suggest that you use your original question as posted as your own personal koan until you yourself reach enlightenment.

    And I myself am just some jerk on an internet bulletin board. No big thing.
  • johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
    edited June 2010
    And I myself am just some jerk on an internet bulletin board. No big thing.

    At least you know who you are... :D
  • johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
    edited June 2010
    Also, I'm not shooting for enlightenment... If enlightenment happens, it happen, if it doesn't it doesn't... A little less dukkha would be nice though...
  • edited June 2010
    johnathan wrote: »
    At least you know who you are... :D


    I resemble that!

    Howard_Curly.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.