Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Theravada sub-schools?

johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
edited June 2010 in Buddhism Basics
Just wondering if there is a more comprehensive list of Theravadin sub-schools than what the wiki has to offer:

More specifically any that deal with Vipasana Meditation... Most of the above listed have no information about them...

Also, an someone direct me to a better online site or downloadable pdf. to get info on Thai Forest Tradition than the Wiki...

Comments

  • edited June 2010
    Johnathan, you might also include the Santi Asoke movement, which although not recognized by the Supreme Sangha Council, is a vigorous movement of monks, nuns and laypeople in several centres throughout Thailand, especially the Central, Northern and Northeastern provinces. Santi Asoke is quite strict, very much given to self-sufficiency. Monastics and lay followers eat only one vegetarian meal a day, and donations are not accepted until the donors have made seven visits to Dhamma talks at the centre. (See Wikipedia: Santi Asoke)
  • edited June 2010
    johnathan wrote: »
    More specifically any that deal with Vipasana Meditation... Most of the above listed have no information about them...

    It's my understanding that Vipasana is so basic to Theravada (and all forms of Buddhism) that the question of Vipasana is just assumed rather than explicitly mentioned. Practitioners eat, sleep, and practice Vipasana (among other things). The eating and sleeping are not mentioned because they're so basic. I would think it's the same with Vipasana. It's so basic as to be presumed, and therefore not mentioned.
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited June 2010
    JFYI, Ajahn Chah, while consider part of the Thai Forest tradition, was technically part of the Maha Nikaya ordination lineage. The Thai Forest tradition is mostly associated with the Dhammayut Nikaya because it's founders (Ajahn Mun and Ajahn Sao) and most of their students were already a part of, or re-ordained in, the Dhammayut Nikaya ordination lineage. However, they also had students, like Ajahn Chah, who were never ordained in the Dhammayut Nikaya.
  • edited June 2010
    If I am reading this question right, you are looking for school which teach Theravada...

    I commenting on questions at the moment because I only have a week of knowledge so forgive me if I am wrong.

    Dhammaloka Buddhist centre in Australia where Ajahn Brah teaches is a Theravada school, so couldn't that be added!

    With love

    Richard
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited June 2010
    mikaakim wrote: »
    If I am reading this question right, you are looking for school which teach Theravada...

    I commenting on questions at the moment because I only have a week of knowledge so forgive me if I am wrong.

    Dhammaloka Buddhist centre in Australia where Ajahn Brah teaches is a Theravada school, so couldn't that be added!

    With love

    Richard

    Ajahn Brahm is a student of Ajahn Chah's. He's part of the same ordination linegae.
  • johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
    edited June 2010
    krungthep49 and mikaakim : I guess I was unclear... I am not looking to expand the list for the sake of expanding the list but to attempt to determine which school of Buddhism is the best fit for me. So far I have narrowed it to Theravada (with that perhaps being as far as I need to go) but am interested in sub-schools in case there is something even closer to a fit that I just don't know about...

    Currently I am leaning towards Thai Forest Tradition as it seems to have a close connection to nature which would fit well with my previous (and current) appreciation for Taoism.

    from what I found on Dhammaloka Buddhism, it is of the Thai Forest Tradition of the Ajahn Chah lineage... It's current Spiritual Director is Ven. Ajahn Brahmavamso...

    I was looking for something a little more universal and accessible however (I live in Nova Scotia, Canada).

    I have located a Theravada Center (not a temple) that meets once a month and on Vesak which I plan to contact (it is a 40km drive but that's not really an issue)...

    Does anyone currently in the Thai Forest Tradition know anything about Taoism and their possible comparability? Also, other than their prefered location of meditation (ie. the forest) is there much variance from the practices of general Theravada?
  • johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
    edited June 2010
    SherabDorie : Thanks for that clarrification... I kind of guessed that but since the wiki had Vipassana as a Theravadin sub-school I was a little confused...
  • johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
    edited June 2010
    Also, I guess I wonder... can one state they are a follower of a certain tradition (say Thai Forest) without an official ceremony or ever having been to a Thai Forest temple, etc...

    Would one simple be a Theravadin Buddhist until such time that they can attend a Thai Forest Temple and be "welcomed" into the tradition as it were?

    Also, I apologize for the multiple consecutive posts... That is often frowned apon but I find this a very forgiving lot :D
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited June 2010
    johnathan wrote: »
    Also, I guess I wonder... can one state they are a follower of a certain tradition (say Thai Forest) without an official ceremony or ever having been to a Thai Forest temple, etc...

    Yes, of course. There's no Thai Forest tradition "baptism" if that's what you mean. The Kammatthana tradition (also known as the Thai Forest tradition) itself is based on the importance of meditation as part of the practice, hence its name, which literally means "basis/place of work." For more information, you can check out this list of selected teachers in the Thai Forest tradition.
  • johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
    edited June 2010
    Thanks Jason for clearing up that misconception :-)
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited June 2010
    Jason wrote: »
    Ajahn Brahm is a student of Ajahn Chah's. He's part of the same ordination linegae.
    Ajahn Brahm was expelled from the Ajahn Chah tradition because of his love of various forms of superstition.

    :smilec:
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited June 2010
    johnathan wrote: »
    Currently I am leaning towards Thai Forest Tradition as it seems to have a close connection to nature which would fit well with my previous (and current) appreciation for Taoism.

    I was looking for something a little more universal and accessible however (I live in Nova Scotia, Canada).

    Does anyone currently in the Thai Forest Tradition know anything about Taoism and their possible comparability? Also, other than their prefered location of meditation (ie. the forest) is there much variance from the practices of general Theravada?
    Hi

    Thai Forest Tradition emphasises here & now enlightenment. It has little interest in matters such as rebirth.

    Many Thai forest teachers teach non-duality similar to Taoism. Many Thai forest teachers teach the 'death' of self like the Tao. Ajahn Amaro (Ajahn Chah disciple) and Ajahn Buddhadasa often teach close to Tao.

    Ajahn Amaro established a forest monastery in northern California.

    Some things you can study include:

    Video: Ajahn Chah - Mindful Way

    Samatha and Vipassaná in Harmony

    No Religion

    Forest Wat Wild Monks

    You can browse this website: http://www.what-buddha-taught.net/

    Kind regards

    :smilec:
  • DhammaDhatuDhammaDhatu Veteran
    edited June 2010
    johnathan wrote: »
    the wiki had Vipassana as a Theravadin sub-school I was a little confused...
    Hi

    Some Burmese schools have hijacked the term 'vipassana' and used it to name various techniques they have developed. The term vipassana means 'to see clearly'. It is not a technique but instead insight into the true nature of reality.

    :)
    When we say "samatha-vipassana for the nuclear age," we ought to realize the significance of joining the words samatha (tranquility) and vipassana (insight) together. Samatha-vipassana is one thing, not two separate things. If they were two things, we would have to do two things and that would be too slow. When tranquility and insight are united as one thing, there is only a single thing to do. Both samatha and vipassana are developed at one and the same time.

    We can describe this as simultaneously seeing with tranquility (samatha), seeing an object and fixing the mind upon it and seeing with insight (vipassana), seeing the characteristics, conditions, and truth of the thing. These two kinds of seeing happen together.

    We can say that samadhi (concentration) is added to panna (wisdom). Samadhi is the mind steadfastly focusing on the object; panna is seeing what the thing is all about, what characteristics it has and what its truth is.

    For example, to look at and fix on a stone is samadhi, then to see that this stone is flowing continuously in change is panna. You don't have to do it many times, you don't need to do it twice, once is enough. Watch the stone and bring concentration and wisdom together in that watching.

    Samatha-Vipassana for the Nuclear Age
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited June 2010
    Ajahn Brahm was expelled from the Ajahn Chah tradition because of his love of various forms of superstition.

    :smilec:

    If by "his love of various forms of superstition" you mean his support for the bhikkhuni ordination that took place at Bodhinyana Monastery and his refusal to "acknowledging the invalidity of the ordination ceremony," then yes, you're right; Bodhinyana Monastery has been officially "delisted" as an affiliate from the so-called "Ajahn Chah Sangha":
    At the November 1st meeting at Wat Pah Pong, Ajahn Brahmavamso was given the opportunity to reconcile himself with the Sangha of Wat Pah Pong, and by extension the Thai Sangha at large, by acknowledging the invalidity of the ordination ceremony. Having been formally presented with the option three times, he still felt unable to do so. The Sangha felt in turn that it had no alternative but to delist his monastery.

    Nevertheless, Ajahn Brahm is still in robes and a part of the Maha Nikaya ordination lineage, and he's still a student of Ajahn Chah's. Nobody can take that away from him.
  • edited June 2010
    This is a history of Theravada from the time of Gautama to 1990's CE
  • johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
    edited June 2010
    Hey guys...

    I'd like to refocus this thread on the OP...

    I know how side topics can creep in and would like further discussion about believing in rebirth or trying to "sway" any towards a certain line of thinking to another thread, I'm sure there are plenty already in full swing on this...

    I am simply interested in sub-schools of Theravada Buddhism and how they differ from Basic Theravada...

    More information on Thai Forest would be welcome as well, as that is the dirrection I am currently leaning...

    Thanks

    :D
  • JasonJason God Emperor Arrakis Moderator
    edited June 2010
    johnathan wrote: »
    I am simply interested in sub-schools of Theravada Buddhism and how they differ from Basic Theravada...

    More information on Thai Forest would be welcome as well, as that is the dirrection I am currently leaning...

    The main difference between the Thai Forest tradition and other Theravada traditions, at least historical, was their focus on meditation and their belief that awakening was still a possibility and open to all.

    There was a time not that long ago in Theravada when it was generally believed that it's no longer possible to become an arahant — that we're living in a "degenerate age" — therefore monks usually spent most of their time studying the texts. Both monastics and non-monastics alike thought it was better to study the texts and to make merit than to practice meditation.

    But thanks to monks like Ajahn Sao and Ajahn Mun (co-founders of the Kammatthana tradition) in Thailand, Mingun Jetavana Sayadaw in Burma, etc., who decided to start putting the Buddha's teachings on meditation back into practice, meditation has gained in popularity once again.

    It's true that there are still some who hold this view — especially those who consider the Pali commentaries to be authoritative — but in general, I think you'll find that a lot of Theravadin teachers now stress the importance of meditation, although the Thai Forest tradition is especially well-known for this.
  • johnathanjohnathan Canada Veteran
    edited June 2010
    Thanks Jason
Sign In or Register to comment.