Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Hi ,
I am a painter and recently have been painting some inspired Buddhist art. For example I did a painting of white Tara but trying a contemporary approach or did some lino cuts of deities. I gave as gift to some people in the sangha prints of the deities I know they do their practice. Dispite the working being "well done" I was very criticized for not using the sacred proportion used for thangkas.
the style of a thangka is a mix of chinese and indian style for what I can see (forgive me if wrong).
My question is: If I do my art work using Da Vinci's proportion or any contemporary approach and/or technique to represent Buddhist deities or symbols does it invalidate the "spirituality" or sacredness of my work?
Thanks in advance if you took the time to read my question.
love,
"Oceano de Sabedoria"
0
Comments
Your art is a blend of worship and self-expression.
You think Michaelangelo was criticised for portraying Jesus and the Madonna as western idealised beings rather than the Middle Eastern people they purportedly were?
Go the way your artistic leanings take you.
Picasso had no problem putting a person's eyes both on one side of the face.
I would suggest you feel equally relaxed within your personal interpretations, also.
Thank you so much for reading my question and answering so quickly. I think in the same way you did and now feel quite relieved that a buddhist person told me that I was kinda thinking it was a Buddhist thing to criticize everything was not a thangka lol. I was almost feeling like if I had painted a Mohamed portrait and offered to a muslim. thanks a lot for your parallels with famous painters it really helped me to understand that these situations are not particular to our religion. best wishes.
Nothing can invalidate the spirituality of your artwork, because it's created directly from the spirit within you. Keep making artwork and be sure to take some pictures and upload for us to see!
Criticism is in my opinion, shallow and petty, and reactively narrow-minded.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dlPzLGuWfA4/SehB7B3_lBI/AAAAAAAAAkA/W-Lv7GWNYO4/s1600-h/Flowers+bloom.+best+shot.jpg
Richard, you rock, your work is breath taking, very inspiring. When I will be a grown one I want to paint like you (don't tell anyone I am 30 next year lol).
...but don't feel pressured.
It is a little blur though ...
Painting on the subject of our practice, our spiritual aspiration can be daunting I think. For me, after being settled into a landscape genre, it seemed almost too personally exposing to paint about the sacred. The Sacred is not ...sacred in the contemporary scene, unless it has an ironic twist. It is also so easy to fall into the kitschy conventions of new age representation.
My own solution was to just embrace the whole thing right down to those wonderfully kitschy pop Buddhist images coming out of Taiwanese Chan.
The result is pretty dignified.
It will be interesting to see where you go with this.
Thanks for your answer and for taking the time to look my artwork . Posting my question here was much more helpful than I could ever expect.
Love,
Palzang