Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Why do I need a teacher?

edited September 2010 in Buddhism Basics
I was introduced to Buddhism through the works of Alan Watts, which admittedly, are more along the lines of spiritual entertainment (his words) than a true representation of Buddhist psychology, philosophy, and practices.

I am now taking my practice a bit more "seriously," and have run into countless people on this forum and elsewhere saying that I must have a teacher.

Why?

If every individual must ultimately find their own way, and if a teacher's authority is dependent upon validation from their students, what makes having a teacher so valuable?
«1

Comments

  • edited August 2010
    Thus wrote: »
    I was introduced to Buddhism through the works of Alan Watts, which admittedly, are more along the lines of spiritual entertainment (his words) than a true representation of Buddhist psychology, philosophy, and practices.

    I am now taking my practice a bit more "seriously," and have run into countless people on this forum and elsewhere saying that I must have a teacher.

    Why?

    If every individual must ultimately find their own way, and if a teacher's authority is dependent upon validation from their students, what makes having a teacher so valuable?

    Would you study medicine without a teacher?
    Can you teach yourself jiu jitsu?
    Of course not.
    Buddhism is no different.
  • edited August 2010
    It is always useful to have an objective and outside perspective to help provide you with insights about yourself. We all have blind spots.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Would you study medicine without a teacher?
    Can you teach yourself jiu jitsu?
    Of course not.
    Buddhism is no different.


    I disagree. I have had no teacher (I tried one once) and have been happily and successful living as a Buddhist for nearly a decade, as have many others.

    If you think you need a teacher, great. That doesn't mean that all Buddhists need teachers.


    namaste
  • edited August 2010
    Does anyone know of a teacher that works online or via Skype? I'm in Central PA and there aren't any Zen teachers within a reasonable distance. I would like to talk to one and see for myself.
  • edited August 2010
    thickpaper wrote: »
    I disagree. I have had no teacher (I tried one once) and have been happily and successful living as a Buddhist for nearly a decade, as have many others.

    If you think you need a teacher, great. That doesn't mean that all Buddhists need teachers.


    namaste
    You can disagree if you like.
    To bad you dont have someone to inform your disagreement.
  • edited August 2010
    Thus wrote: »
    Does anyone know of a teacher that works online or via Skype? I'm in Central PA and there aren't any Zen teachers within a reasonable distance. I would like to talk to one and see for myself.
    Im not sure about Zen teachers but there are teachers who teach via the internet.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Since you dont have a teacher to inform your disagreement on the subject I dont really think you have the appropriate context to voice it.


    Sure... But for the benefit of those who don't have your certainty in the necessity of a teacher, a few points to ponder.

    "Teacher" isn't one of the triple gems.

    Dharma is understanding The Four Noble Truths and all they contain, it is a personal journey, not a lesson plan.

    People who insist on the necessity of a teacher might not be able to say what it is a teacher provides that we cannot be unto ourselves or each other.

    If you do have a teacher make sure you question them as to why they can teach you but you cannot teach yourself.

    The Buddha invites us to challenge and doubt his teachings, your teacher should be at least as open as he was.

    namaste
  • edited August 2010
    thickpaper wrote: »
    Sure... But for the benefit of those who don't have your certainty in the necessity of a teacher, a few points to ponder.

    "Teacher" isn't one of the triple gems.

    Dharma is understanding The Four Noble Truths and all they contain, it is a personal journey, not a lesson plan.

    People who insist on the necessity of a teacher might not be able to say what it is a teacher provides that we cannot be unto ourselves or each other.

    If you do have a teacher make sure you question them as to why they can teach you but you cannot teach yourself.

    The Buddha invites us to challenge and doubt his teachings, your teacher should be at least as open as he was.

    namaste

    Its not my "certainty" its the nature of Buddhism as a living tradition that requires guidance and communication just like the examples I gave before.

    Teacher is most certainly one of the three jewels, Buddha was a teacher and he is represented and embodied by the many great spiritual guides we have available to us today. The teacher also falls into the sangha jewel.
    You cant fully understand the four noble truths without the experience of others, just like you cant perform brain surgery without the necessary instructions and tools.
    Every authentic Buddhist teacher will easily give you these answers.
    Buddhism is a living tradition that is passed from person to person, not book to person. The teachings and teachers should be questioned and examined.
    If you dont need a teacher you must be some kind of savant.
  • edited August 2010
    Hi Thus,

    This is a question that's been much on my mind as well.

    I think we're talking about a personal teacher here, someone who you will have at least a few personal conversations with. An adept who will be able to guide you on the path in the way that you personally need.

    I tend to be an "I can do it myself" sort and it's hard for me to trust the motives and wisdom of authorities. So I have contented myself thus far that my teachers are the authors of the books on dharma that I collect and read, or the givers of talks at various dharma centers, or the world itself, or the blue sky, or whatever comes my way.

    And that has value. Gaining some familiarity with various teachings and schools of Buddhist thought, and seeing for myself that this is a path that I want to follow; I think this is a good first step. It's a broadening step, it's opening up to the dharma, (feasting on it, almost).

    Now I feel the need to narrow and refine my focus. I know that there is truth in every buddhist tradition but I don't have the time or mental capacity to follow all of them, and I know I don't have the wisdom to synthesize my own tradition.

    When I meditate or think about buddhism now, so many words and ways of seeing the dharma swirl about my minds. I hear the voices of Joseph Goldstein, Thich Nhat Hanh, Ajahn Sumedho, Dzogchen Ponlop Rinpoche, and so many others, and they are wonderful voices, but I know that I need to focus to make progress.

    I guess a good analogy is cooking. If I'm going to make a Pecan Pie, I could read every recipe I can set my hands on, consult my neighbors and facebook friends, and then cobble together my best understanding of what a Pecan Pie is. But the chances are that I would have better results if I picked one recipe, (say from my favorite cookbook) and followed it closely.

    Now, how much better would it be to have someone with me, who had actually cooked that recipe himself or herself and taught others to cook it?!? A guide whose only goal for me was baking success; someone who knew the likely mistakes a new cook like me would make and who was committed to helping me navigate the process.

    The Buddha placed such importance on teaching. He himself was a teacher, he chose to devote the rest of his life after achieving enlightenment to teaching others how to do the same, and he encouraged those he taught to teach as well. http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an03/an03.060.than.html I believe that teaching is the activity at the heart of the Boddhisattva Vow.

    For me, I think I'm seeing that the thought of seeking a teacher is arising when I am ready for a teacher. I needed to develop a bit of knowledge and wisdom under my own steam before realizing the value that a teacher can have in my spiritual life.

    I'll let you know how it goes. I have not entered into a teacher/student relationship yet, but I feel close to approaching a local teacher. First, or course, I want to do my due diligence: listen to him teach some more, read his writings, participate in his sangha, and feel sure in my heart.

    Thanks for asking this question, Thus.

    _ _ /|\ _ _
    Namkha
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Its not my "certainty" its the nature of Buddhism as a living tradition that requires guidance and communication just like the examples I gave before.

    I agree with that. But I think I differ in that I dont see a sanga as needing a teacher. I see a Sanga more as a community of travellers helping each other on the path, rather than the idea of a singular teacher who has some secret sauce - te Buddha himself says he has nothing up his sleeve.

    Let us keep on track here, the OP asked about the necessity of a teacher to study Buddhism.
    Teacher is most certainly one of the three jewels, Buddha was a teacher and he is represented and embodied by the many great spiritual guides we have available to us today.

    I don't think it is in the sense the OP meant or that you emphatically stipulated that you cannot study Buddhism without a teacher.

    You cant fully understand the four noble truths without the experience of others, just like you cant perform brain surgery without the necessary instructions and tools.

    That analogy, like your medicin and ju jitsu analogy is simply not the case, IMHO.

    Every authentic Buddhist teacher will easily give you these answers.

    Authentic? I dont believe there can be such a thing regarding Dharma, at least not today.

    If you dont need a teacher you must be some kind of savant.

    Very far from that. Luckily for me, Dharma isnt that hard to get without a teacher.
  • edited August 2010
    thickpaper wrote: »

    That analogy, like your medicin and ju jitsu analogy is simply not the case, IMHO.

    So, to you, the path to liberation requires less guidance than martial arts or medicine?
    thats unfortunate and is an extraordinarily simplistic view of the dharma.
    A view that you most certainly would not have if you had a teacher.
  • edited August 2010
    thickpaper wrote: »



    Very far from that. Luckily for me, Dharma isnt that hard to get without a teacher.
    Complete Dharma is impossible for anyone to get without a teacher.
    Sorry.
  • zombiegirlzombiegirl beating the drum of the lifeless in a dry wasteland Veteran
    edited August 2010
    hello all, i am confused on this topic as well, haha.

    what i'm wondering is, what about books and videos on the internet and contact via forums, etc? i'm not teaching myself here, are authors not considered appropriate teachers?
    i read a lot. i watch a lot of teacher's lectures via the internet. and i ask a lot of questions on this forum, in addition to reading other member's questions.

    is this wrong?

    as it turns out, i have tons and tons of buddhist centers close to me, one literally a block away, haha. trouble is, i can't figure out what type of buddhism appeals to me and since i have such a myriad of choices, i've decided i need to figure this out before i walk into one of these centers. plus, quite a few of them ask that you are familiar with the teachings before showing up. so i figure, fair enough. i have gone this route once before and so have knocked out one sect, but there's still a lot to choose from.
  • edited August 2010
    zombiegirl wrote: »
    hello all, i am confused on this topic as well, haha.

    what i'm wondering is, what about books and videos on the internet and contact via forums, etc? i'm not teaching myself here, are authors not considered appropriate teachers?
    i read a lot. i watch a lot of teacher's lectures via the internet. and i ask a lot of questions on this forum, in addition to reading other member's questions.

    is this wrong?

    as it turns out, i have tons and tons of buddhist centers close to me, one literally a block away, haha. trouble is, i can't figure out what type of buddhism appeals to me and since i have such a myriad of choices, i've decided i need to figure this out before i walk into one of these centers. plus, quite a few of them ask that you are familiar with the teachings before showing up. so i figure, fair enough. i have gone this route once before and so have knocked out one sect, but there's still a lot to choose from.

    You dont have to choose a lineage or teacher right away.
    Take your time and read until you are comfortable.
    What we get from books etc. is usually a great source of information and study. But, the teacher student relationship is incredibly rewarding and brings what we find in books to life. This relationship is also the doorway to what cant be found in books but is hugely important for serious dharma practitioners.
    Receiving dharma transmission from a living person who embodies the three jewels is unlike any other experience and can not be replicated through books etc.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited August 2010
    In tibetan buddhism the guru embodies the dharma, buddha, and sangha. That being said there is no point in pushing people to find a teacher. If they dont see the use then theres no point in pushing it.

    The Jewel Ornament of liberation says there are five families of buddhas and one of those families is people who learn the teachings on their own.

    By the way when I hit apostraphe my computer is doing find which should be control F. Do you guys have any idea why this is happening?
  • edited August 2010
    I have been contemplating working with a teacher for awhile. I think that 2 benefits I would likely derive from seeing a teacher at least periodically would be someone to observe the errors I am making without realizing it. For example, when I sit to meditate I think I have worked out all the posture issues that lead to slumping or what have you, but I bet if someone were to observe me while I meditate they would find ways to improve my posture.

    The second way I think a teacher *could* be of benefit would require more than a casual visit once in awhile. That would be informing me of my blind spots. The hardest person to see clearly is the one in the mirror. There is just no getting around the fact that it's much easier to spot flaws in others than it is in oneself.
  • edited August 2010
    Jeffrey wrote: »
    The Jewel Ornament of liberation says there are five families of buddhas and one of those families is people who learn the teachings on their own.
    What are the other four, out of curiousity?

    The apostrophe should only bring up the search box (in Firefox) if your cursor's focus is not already in a text field.
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Jeffrey wrote: »
    In tibetan Buddhism the guru embodies the dharma, Buddha, and sangha. That being said there is no point in pushing people to find a teacher. If they dont see the use then theres no point in pushing it.?
    Have to agree here.
    Jeffrey wrote: »
    The Jewel Ornament of liberation says there are five families of buddhas and one of those families is people who learn the teachings on their own..?
    Don't we all learn the teachings on our own before and during Sangha participation? Its the practice, and the company of those who demonstrate it in their lives that counts for so much wordless teaching. I think it is technically true that we can practice through to liberation without this, but practically it's very very rare.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited August 2010
    According to JoL the five families are:

    solitary learner,

    unteachable (my words these are those people who really struggle and don't care if they do wrong things and don't want to learn anything, but the JoL says they can become buddhas),

    mahayana (note this is not tibetan versus therevadan. the qualities of mahayana and hinayana are defined in the JoL text. Therefore a tibetan may be hinayana and a therevadan mahayana depending on these qualities),

    hinayana (see mahayana), and

    indeterminate (these people take on the qualities of the sangha that they study with)....
  • ValtielValtiel Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Thus wrote: »
    Does anyohttp://newbuddhist.com/forum/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=126195ne know of a teacher that works online or via Skype? I'm in Central PA and there aren't any Zen teachers within a reasonable distance. I would like to talk to one and see for myself.

    Zen is one of the traditions I would say that an actual teacher is probably more necessary.

    But of course you need a teacher. Whether that teacher is your own life experiences which reveal the 4NTs to you, books, or a wise old man with a long grey stroking beard who floats in lotus position, or a combination of many things... doesn't matter. Having a "real" teacher who is further along in the path and can guide you and redirect you , can make progress much faster, though, although I really don't see it as necessary...

    For online Zen sanghas:

    http://www.treeleaf.org/

    and http://www.plumline.org/ which is supposed to be in the tradition of Thich Nhat Hanh although in my experience, while the people were very kind, it was more just an online chat session where someone would recite the 5 Precepts and instruct everyone when to start meditating... and other than that, general discussions about whatever was on others' minds.
  • shadowleavershadowleaver Veteran
    edited August 2010
    I'm struggling with the issue myself.

    I think the answer to the question depends on how deep one wants to go. It seems like some forms of meditation, when practiced enough, introduce altered states of consciousness, like visions, out of body experiences, unusual sensations of energy etc. I would never want to go there without a teacher-- the likeliest destination would be the funny farm. I got a tiny glimpse of some of these phenomena before I got into Buddhism and all I can say is that I was completely unprepared to face them, I hadn't the tiniest clue.

    But then for many people, Buddhism is more of a guide to saner living. Learn to let go a bit, be good to others and self, focus on the present, etc. That's what it is for me, call it "watered down" but there it is, the only thing that makes sense to me at this point. I do think it'd be great to have people to talk to who share my worldview and approach to life. However,I'm not sure what a teacher would do for me. Especially, someone from a "lineage", tracing its roots to a culture very different from mine and permeated by the influences of that culture.
  • edited August 2010
    What Namkha said.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Complete Dharma is impossible for anyone to get without a teacher.
    Sorry.

    Don't be sorry, but do try not to be dogmatic;)
  • jinzangjinzang Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Thus wrote: »
    I'm in Central PA and there aren't any Zen teachers within a reasonable distance. I would like to talk to one and see for myself.

    The Mount Equity Zendo is in Williamsport PA.
  • edited August 2010
    Would you agree that rigorous checks and balances with the "words" of a teacher can be a guiding force. This is what i believe dharma of transmission is taught to monks. I mean they hear it through words and then those words are further expounded and ultimately a realization takes place at least on the first 2 turnings. However if one is talking about full enlightenment i agree, Tantra requires empowerments and a teacher. ( which i will find soon)
  • edited August 2010
    Dogmatism is a prerequisite for arguement. Oppionions exclude other oppinons to the contrary, FYI
  • edited August 2010
    Complete Dharma is impossible for anyone to get without a teacher.
    Sorry.

    Did Siddharta Gautama have a teacher in the sense being discussed?
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited August 2010
    He studied with several teachers during that lifetime. They told him that he had realized enlightenment. But he knew that he hadn't.

    There are also stories of his previous lifetimes I believe.
  • edited August 2010
    Jeffrey wrote: »
    He studied with several teachers during that lifetime. They told him that he had realized enlightenment. But he knew that he hadn't.

    There are also stories of his previous lifetimes I believe.

    My understanding is that he realised "complete Dharma" through the tutelage of his own experience rather than that of a "teacher" in the sense of the word used in the OP.
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited August 2010
    He cut the path, and almost died in the process. Since then others have walked the path right through to the end behind him. In fact the path is now a well worn and thoroughly explored road with many people at different points along the way. There are Liberated people helping us along. So there is no need to reinvent the Dharma wheel, the work has already been done for us. Teachers and Sangha are there to help.
  • edited August 2010
    Richard H wrote: »
    He cut the path, and almost died in the process. Since then others have walked the path right through to the end behind him. In fact the path is now a well worn and thoroughly explored road with many people at different points along the way. There are Liberated people helping us along. So there is no need to reinvent the Dharma wheel, the work has already been done for us. Teachers and Sangha are there to help.
    Interesting. I'm curious, does anyone else here who studies with a teacher feel this way?
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Thus wrote: »
    Interesting. I'm curious, does anyone else here who studies with a teacher feel this way?

    Probably most everyone. If you are going on a long trip, why not consult with someone who has already traveled that path? Why try to go it alone? Much less of a chance of getting lost that way. And if you do get lost, which you most likely will at some point or another, they are there to guide you back.
    If every individual must ultimately find their own way, and if a teacher's authority is dependent upon validation from their students, what makes having a teacher so valuable?
    It's not about finding one's own way, the way has already been found. It's about walking the way and many people have already walked it. Why not consult with them?
  • edited August 2010
    i would love to have a teacher but there are none that i know of around where i live
  • edited August 2010
    He cut the path, and almost died in the process. Since then others have walked the path right through to the end behind him. In fact the path is now a well worn and thoroughly explored road with many people at different points along the way. There are Liberated people helping us along. So there is no need to reinvent the Dharma wheel, the work has already been done for us. Teachers and Sangha are there to help.

    You sounded like joeseph campbell there
    "Furthermore, we have not even to risk the adventure alone; for the heroes of all time have one before us, the labyrinth is fully known; we have only to follow the thread of the hero-path. And where we had thought to find an abomination, we shall find a god; where we had thought to slay another, we shall slay ourselves; where we had thought to travel outward, we shall come to the center of our own existence; where we had thought to be alone, we shall be with all the world."

    This quote makes me feel something !
  • ansannaansanna Veteran
    edited August 2010
    Hi, I think the arguement here is due to we tend to generalize the Buddha Dharma, but infact it contain different type of teaching methods for different group of audiences, example there are the two main group of teaching such as exoteric teaching and esoteric teaching, and a large number that fall in between them.

    Nikaya teaching is exoteric and direct, more suitable for self study
    but Tibetan Buddhism is esoteric and required a personal teacher ,
    some Mahayana do have central teacher for their schools, but personal teacher is not required , etc
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited August 2010
    You sounded like joeseph campbell there
    I'm not sure know how to respond to that. The historical Buddha through his own effort realized liberation and taught the Dharma. He devised the The Eightfold Path that has since been walked by many over the centuries. It has evolved and widened as it encountered new cultures and conditions, developing new skilfull means. There are very mature practitioners on the path as well as those who are liberated and honored as such showing the way. This is basic stuff, not Campellesque heroic myth. Whether it makes you feel something or not is your business.
  • edited August 2010
    This is basic stuff, not Campellesque heroic myth. Whether it makes you feel something or not is your business.

    I was merely saying that i apprechiate your well rounded view. It wasn't intended to depreciate Buddha's path at all , i was just pointing to your similarity with one of my favorite Campbell quote.
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited August 2010
    I was merely saying that i apprechiate your well rounded view. It wasn't intended to depreciate Buddha's path at all , i was just pointing to your similarity with one of my favorite Campbell quote.
    oh... Then I got my knickers in a twist for nothing. ...again.
  • FoibleFullFoibleFull Canada Veteran
    edited August 2010
    The benefit of a teacher ...

    I have learned much from recorded teachings and books, and it has been invaluable. But there is one thing I cannot learn from these impersonal sources ... it must be learned through modeling:

    My teacher models how a skillful Buddhist practitioner lives ...
    - through facial expression (such gentleness and patience)
    - through constant and keen awareness of others' needs and responding accordingly (even just the way he will rush in to steady someone with a hand on the elbow)
    - through loving patience when one of us is being thoroughly ... uh, annoying or ignorant or even having a hissy-fit
    - by the way he allows us to disagree with his teaching (even though you know he's gotta believe it, he never argues with us)
    - by how calmly he can sit and observe (say at a potluck), not needing to hear the sound of his own voice or force our awareness onto him
    - by how easily laughter ripples out of his mouth, how thoroughly in-the-moment he lives
    - by how he never ever talks about his skill or knowledge or mastery, and how he acts out his attitude of being of service to all.

    You cannot pick this up from a book, or a tape, or a vid. This is where WE are heading with our practice, and the value of seeing it lived out live is ... incredibly precious. This is also why we do not have to have a teacher who lives in the same city as us ... a little exposure lasts a long time.

    For those who want to find a centre near you, try:
    http://www.dharmanet.org/listings/
  • FoibleFullFoibleFull Canada Veteran
    edited August 2010
    zombiegirl wrote: »
    hello all, i am confused on this topic as well, haha.

    what i'm wondering is, what about books and videos on the internet and contact via forums, etc? i'm not teaching myself here, are authors not considered appropriate teachers?
    i read a lot. i watch a lot of teacher's lectures via the internet. and i ask a lot of questions on this forum, in addition to reading other member's questions.

    is this wrong?

    as it turns out, i have tons and tons of buddhist centers close to me, one literally a block away, haha. trouble is, i can't figure out what type of buddhism appeals to me and since i have such a myriad of choices, i've decided i need to figure this out before i walk into one of these centers. plus, quite a few of them ask that you are familiar with the teachings before showing up. so i figure, fair enough. i have gone this route once before and so have knocked out one sect, but there's still a lot to choose from.

    Sweetie, I learned a lot off of tapes by Pema Chodron (available for purchase online), and from various books too. A good teacher (emphasis on good) can help you accelerate your own practice, but is not essential to move down the path.

    You do not need to figure out ahead of time what type of buddhism appeals to you ... you will figure that out by encountering it firsthand, and you will know. Remember, too, that all the schools of Buddhism will move you down the path. Go to the first one that takes in beginners (how strange that there are centers that don't take in beginners!). Don't be too quick to judge ... go for 3 to 6 months. And if it doesn't "do it" for you, try another center. You only have the rest of your lives to figure it out, so there's no rush.
  • edited September 2010
    Must confess that I've found this entire thread to be fascinating reading.
    For the record, I'm not really a True Blue Buddhist (please see my introduction in the new member's thread) but I've never had an official human teacher. Rather, I've always regarded the Universe in its entirety as my Teacher, good, bad or indifferent.
    Many faiths/traditions have utilized the teacher/student dynamic, but in all honesty I'm somewhat mistrustful of that entire dynamic having seen it be mis-used and abused in many instances and I've formed the opinion that such a dynamic, whilst possibly essential in by-gone days is maybe irrelevant in todays world.
    Many years ago, I undertook a serious study of the Jewish Kabbalah, despite not being Jewish myself. Due to a set of fortuitous circumstances I met a genuine teacher of the discipline and asked him if he would be my teacher. For reasons he didn't expand upon, he declined my request.
    It may have been something as simple as the fact that I was not Jewish (he was of the Luria school - a most fundamentalist and conservative branch of Kabbalah) or the reasons may well have been far more complex.
    Whatever, I later realised that this branch was probably not for me anyway, but at the time I was somewhat abashed and hurt. Many years later I realised that he had in fact done me a great service and I remember him today with great affection -
    Because he declined to be my teacher!
    Just my thoughts. :)
  • Mr_SerenityMr_Serenity Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Lots of replies for this thread. I would say that in martial arts you need a teacher or someone you can spar/fight with to become good. But in Buddhism you learn mostly from Dharma. Good Dharma is available online, lots of it! So go look and find a teacher you like.

    I highly recommend Ajahn Brahm
    http://www.youtube.com/user/BuddhistSocietyWA
  • edited September 2010
    Does enlightenment only come if you have a teacher?

    Thickpaper, would you ever consider being a teacher? What books did you read? Any suggestions for a newcomer?
  • GlowGlow Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Here in the West, when we think of "teacher" we tend to think of the lecture or classroom model of learning: an authority figure sits in front of a large group of people pontificating at his own leisure. If you look at many Asian schools of Buddhism and if you look at the suttas themselves, you'll see a very different thing: the model of teaching is more akin to conversation. There's a reason the Sutta Nikaya is called the collection of discourses -- it wasn't (usually) simply the Buddha pontification on the dharma. He was engaged in living conversation with those who came for his teaching. They came to him with questions. Sometimes he answered those questions straight up and sometimes he asked them questions in return so that they could figure it our for themselves. In all cases, he tailored the teachings to his audience. This is what we can get from a teacher.

    These days, we are living more and more of our lives online. While it is certainly a wonderful thing to have such unprecedented access to so much information and so many other people from disparate parts of the world, there's something to be said for face-to-face contact. I don't know about you, but when I spend an inordinate amount of time online, I lose touch with mindfulness. I feel sometimes washed out, disconnected from reality and my life and (especially) from other people. Finding a sangha has the benefit of allowing you to stay mindful, stay engaged and stay connected while you integrate the dharma teachings in a way reading books or online material or even posting/reading on a forum cannot really replicate.

    All that said, I don't think you necessarily need a sangha.
  • edited September 2010
    the best way I've heard it explained is this:

    You can put together a car from scratch having all the parts. that would take a long time. if you had a book, you could do it a little bit faster, but it would be very frustrating. if you had someone there in person to show you what goes where and answer your questions, the process would be much, much easier and smoother.

    that being said, some people are fine with books. and some people are fine figuring it out for themselves.
  • Floating_AbuFloating_Abu Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Thus wrote: »
    I was introduced to Buddhism through the works of Alan Watts, which admittedly, are more along the lines of spiritual entertainment (his words) than a true representation of Buddhist psychology, philosophy, and practices.

    I am now taking my practice a bit more "seriously," and have run into countless people on this forum and elsewhere saying that I must have a teacher.

    Why?

    If every individual must ultimately find their own way, and if a teacher's authority is dependent upon validation from their students, what makes having a teacher so valuable?

    I can't speak to every person, but I spent years understanding, learning, and did I mention COMPLETELY understanding every bit of Buddhist theory. It was not until I met and practiced with, a real life Zen master (and genuine,which is my own luck fortunately for me) that something changed. And it was experiential, and magical almost. But that is just my own mileage. As I had 'learnt' so much over internet forums, and 'understood' so much from debate and reading books, and other peoples' awakenings/understandings, I had always thought I could get away with it. That, plus I found it really hard to find a genuine living master in this day and age. So I was lucky. But that is just my story.
  • zombiegirlzombiegirl beating the drum of the lifeless in a dry wasteland Veteran
    edited September 2010
    FoibleFull wrote: »
    You do not need to figure out ahead of time what type of buddhism appeals to you ... you will figure that out by encountering it firsthand, and you will know. Remember, too, that all the schools of Buddhism will move you down the path. Go to the first one that takes in beginners (how strange that there are centers that don't take in beginners!). Don't be too quick to judge ... go for 3 to 6 months. And if it doesn't "do it" for you, try another center. You only have the rest of your lives to figure it out, so there's no rush.

    you are right, i shouldn't feel like i have to be a long time practitioner to attend. it was somewhat difficult to detach from my last sangha, so perhaps i'm being more cautious than i should be. i went back through the top ones on my list and found a few i'd really like to check out. i found one that is about 15 mins away and has a beginners class once a month. i think this would make me feel less nervous about the experience.

    what do you think about attending two at the same time? does this seem silly? based upon their websites and the dharma talks i read online, i like what i've read about the one that is 15 minutes away. but in all honesty, there is one literally a block away from me that i could walk to and i feel odd not giving this one first priority. their website isn't as informative, but they might just not have a very good programmer...
  • andyrobynandyrobyn Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Hi Thus, This article may be of interest for you to read http://www.unfetteredmind.com/articles/mandalamag.php

    warmest wishes
  • edited September 2010
    Hi Thus,

    Be very careful about teachers and don't rush into anything just because others say so, or tell you such and such a person is an 'enlightened master' and so on. Check very carefully before making any commitments.

    First of all you should carefully investigate the core teachings of the historical Buddha. You don't need a teacher to do that. Have a look at the 'What -Buddha- Taught.net' and 'Buddhanet, sites.

    After that, if you're looking for a teacher, remember there are Theravada traditions as well as Mahayana. The Theravada Thai Forest tradition has some excellent teachers, for example.


    Kind regards,

    Dazzle



    .
  • edited September 2010
    Glow wrote: »
    Here in the West, when we think of "teacher" we tend to think of the lecture or classroom model of learning: an authority figure sits in front of a large group of people pontificating at his own leisure. If you look at many Asian schools of Buddhism and if you look at the suttas themselves, you'll see a very different thing: the model of teaching is more akin to conversation. There's a reason the Sutta Nikaya is called the collection of discourses -- it wasn't (usually) simply the Buddha pontification on the dharma. He was engaged in living conversation with those who came for his teaching. They came to him with questions. Sometimes he answered those questions straight up and sometimes he asked them questions in return so that they could figure it our for themselves. In all cases, he tailored the teachings to his audience. This is what we can get from a teacher.

    These days, we are living more and more of our lives online. While it is certainly a wonderful thing to have such unprecedented access to so much information and so many other people from disparate parts of the world, there's something to be said for face-to-face contact. I don't know about you, but when I spend an inordinate amount of time online, I lose touch with mindfulness. I feel sometimes washed out, disconnected from reality and my life and (especially) from other people. Finding a sangha has the benefit of allowing you to stay mindful, stay engaged and stay connected while you integrate the dharma teachings in a way reading books or online material or even posting/reading on a forum cannot really replicate.

    All that said, I don't think you necessarily need a sangha.

    Now, here is wisdom!
    Thank you Glow!
    You have earned my respect with the flick of a key-board.

    In the Work.
    Dog Star
Sign In or Register to comment.