Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
For something to have come into existence, it must have changed from something it was not; until something is what it is, it is something it is not; so something is always not what it is not except for the moment when it is; thus everything either is or isn't what it is, but there is a what it is for each moment as there is a number for each hour of the day; so something can never be what it has been, and it is always what it is; this is what we call impermanence.
0
Comments
Seriously though, your eyes appear to be open to the true nature of reality. Congratulations!:bigclap:
It makes me happy that you say that, thus I realize they are not.
Feeling a little conceptually posh?
Can you try saying that again, but making it more clear as I don't get what you mean:)
namaste
your propositional statement is out of parameters UPON THE CONTINGENCY of NEGLECT inside the ocean of reasON that ..... uh,.,,,,, WHAT? LOL!!!! um OH yeah ok uhhhh, well FIRST , loll why must it have changed from something it is not? is non-existence (that which preceded existence) something that does not belong to a thing's nature?
that was fun to read though it had the puzzle slap effect of reading a koan good job