Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

if you are a vegeterian this will disturb you

yuriythebestyuriythebest Veteran
edited September 2010 in Buddhism Basics
I am a vegetarian, so I assumed I did not part take in the killing of animals or contribute to it in any way- I was dead wrong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRETz2F-heQ&feature=sub

Even if you are a vegan animals will still die (indirectly) because of you - this was just a small example. Imagine all the other stuff we have no idea about.

Comments

  • ToshTosh Veteran
    edited September 2010
    It's next to impossible to lead a life that's free from contributing to harming animals in some way. Even tyres on the lorry that transports your carrots to the supermarket has animal products in them.

    I do try to minimise my use of animal products by not eating them (where this is possible; sometimes I guess I don't fully know what I'm eating), and I try to buy free-range eggs.

    I should really use soya milk, but even then the destruction of forested areas - which indirectly harms wildlife - to produce soya products isn't great either.

    Good post, but it's tough to lead a life without harming animals in some way. I look forward to further replies.
  • edited September 2010
    I was vaguely aware that animals are used in more ways than readily meats ;) the eye, but this video really showed me far more than I was aware of. Thanks!
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Fascinating.
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Which is why I like to refer to the original definition of vegan according to the people who invented the word vegan, with regards to the practice of it:

    The word "veganism" denotes a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude — as far as is possible and practical — all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose.

    It's simply not possible to cause no harm at all to any and all animals.
  • edited September 2010
    Seeker,

    Your post and the video the OP linked to got me to wondering something. If every person on the planet stopped eating meat today, would that actually stop the meat industry?

    I am not looking for an answer as I suspect there may be no way to know, but I wonder if it would perhaps shrink a bit, but still remain alive and well given how far and wide animal based products are used. Or perhaps the uses for animal products are due to animal products being cheap since the cost is subsidized by those who eat meat?

    Hmmmm.... I dunno.
  • edited September 2010
    username_5 wrote: »
    Seeker,

    Your post and the video the OP linked to got me to wondering something. If every person on the planet stopped eating meat today, would that actually stop the meat industry?

    I am not looking for an answer as I suspect there may be no way to know, but I wonder if it would perhaps shrink a bit, but still remain alive and well given how far and wide animal based products are used. Or perhaps the uses for animal products are due to animal products being cheap since the cost is subsidized by those who eat meat?

    Hmmmm.... I dunno.

    I dunno too.... but "if every person on the planet stopped eating meat today", a lot of eskimos will starve to death. ;)
  • ChrysalidChrysalid Veteran
    edited September 2010
    I think this is great! I'm not a vegetarian, I'm a person who doesn't buy meat, but I'm very happy that when an animal is killed to supply meat for other people that no part of it is wasted.
    Tosh wrote: »
    I should really use soya milk, but even then the destruction of forested areas - which indirectly harms wildlife - to produce soya products isn't great either.
    Plus soy milk tastes like cardboard.
    username_5 wrote:
    If every person on the planet stopped eating meat today, would that actually stop the meat industry?
    Well the meat industry would be stopped, but I doubt we'd stop killing animals to use their parts, at least until someone invents the replicator. What I don't think many people realise is how devastating it would be if everyone went vegan, we'd lose a great many unique animal species and breeds to extinction simply because many domesticated animals wouldn't be able to survive in the wild.
  • yuriythebestyuriythebest Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Chrysalid wrote: »

    Well the meat industry would be stopped, but I doubt we'd stop killing animals to use their parts, at least until someone invents the replicator. What I don't think many people realise is how devastating it would be if everyone went vegan, we'd lose a great many unique animal species and breeds to extinction simply because many domesticated animals wouldn't be able to survive in the wild.

    I'm sure there will be places in zoos for cows/chickens - they are not that exotic/hard to care for :)
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    edited September 2010
    username_5 wrote: »
    Seeker,

    Your post and the video the OP linked to got me to wondering something. If every person on the planet stopped eating meat today, would that actually stop the meat industry?

    I am not looking for an answer as I suspect there may be no way to know, but I wonder if it would perhaps shrink a bit, but still remain alive and well given how far and wide animal based products are used. Or perhaps the uses for animal products are due to animal products being cheap since the cost is subsidized by those who eat meat?

    Hmmmm.... I dunno.


    I would think probably eventually because of economic factors, who knows. But then again, a bit irrelevant since it would never happen. :)


    Chrysalid wrote: »

    Plus soy milk tastes like cardboard.

    The is a HUGE taste difference between different brands. You probably got the crappy ones. :) For example, Soymoo is totally nasty but others are quite good IMO.
  • ChrysalidChrysalid Veteran
    edited September 2010
    I'm sure there will be places in zoos for cows/chickens - they are not that exotic/hard to care for :)
    I think you might be underestimating how many different breeds there are. ;)
    seeker242 wrote:
    The is a HUGE taste difference between different brands. You probably got the crappy ones. :) For example, Soymoo is totally nasty but others are quite good IMO.
    Meh, I really considered giving up dairy. But I decided against it for two reasons, firstly that my intent in buying milk is not to cause suffering (something you can't avoid if you buy meat) but to buy a product that can be produced without animals suffering. How a farmer chooses to treat their animals is his/her decision, some farmers are very good others are bad, I can't know which milk I'm buying I can only know my intent when buying.
    Secondly was the practicality, milk products are in far more things than we realise, some of them very unexpected, so that the undertaking of a strict dairy-free diet would border on obsession and certainly stubbornness, not something that is beneficial to mindfulness in my opinion.
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Chrysalid wrote: »
    milk products are in far more things than we realise, some of them very unexpected, so that the undertaking of a strict dairy-free diet would border on obsession and certainly stubbornness, not something that is beneficial to mindfulness in my opinion.

    I guess that depends on where you live. Where I live it is quite easy to get food that does not have dairy products in it, so much so that it does not really require any extra effort.
  • MountainsMountains Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Tosh wrote: »
    It's next to impossible to lead a life that's free from contributing to harming animals in some way. Even tyres on the lorry that transports your carrots to the supermarket has animal products in them.

    Not to mention the countless animals whose body fat and the very cell walls of their cells (made up of lipids) that decomposed to make the crude oil that's refined into the motor fuel for the truck to carry the vegetables to the market.

    It's impossible...

    Mtns
  • MountainsMountains Veteran
    edited September 2010
    I'm sure there will be places in zoos for cows/chickens - they are not that exotic/hard to care for :)

    And most of them were created by man anyway. And let's not even get into the genetically modified ones that *were* created by man. Just reading about a new GM salmon that they're trying to flog on us...

    Mtns
  • edited September 2010
    Hmm. I can't say anything surprises me. I read an article a long time ago about how the polish on apples, and the coloring in certain red food dye are both made from insects. One has a chemical that makes it's shell waxy and sheen so they're shells are crushed to make food polishes (also on things like jelly beans). Also, those red insects used for red dye are just crushed whole into a red paste. There is little one can do to avoid consuming something in which humans have killed an animal to make. I can only think of some vegetables.

    I personally don't completely avoid meat (it's impossible on a college campus dining plan), but if the option is there I'll always eat a mix of beans for my complete proteins.
  • edited September 2010
    >a lot of eskimos will starve to death

    Not just eskimos. Many parts of Canada which cannot recieve delivered food on cold months(road closures, power outages) as I'm sure it is in Russia and any other very cold climate that ends up relying on wild meat as the only source of livelihood during the really bad winter months when you can't get anywhere and no one can get to you.

    Although it has civilization, much of the land is still hard to live in. You still stock food in the warmer months and only certain foods stock without becoming rampant with weavels and other animals that are also starving with no grain in sight, covered in snow, rotted from the ground up because of the moisture or just unobtainable.

    I've lived there. I never even knew what a vegetarian was let alone heard the word before I was 27.

    Most of my family that still remain there only ever read about vegetarians and the concept still stumps them.

    For us, it was considered very luxurious to live as a vegetarian to be able to choose among readily made foods to suit a specific diet. You don't get choices like that out there unless you can live on canned vegetables that didn't freeze.
    I suppose that would be a lot of canned vegetables.
    Porridge and maybe rice is the closest I could think of.. but then again, you have lots of rats, weavels mice and voles that eat that stuff on you and if you're being animal friendly, you'd end up having to share or let them freeze and starve to death.
  • mugzymugzy Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Azikil wrote: »
    Most of my family that still remain there only ever read about vegetarians and the concept still stumps them.

    Eating meat for survival and lack of other options is different from eating meat for pleasure, when there are many options.
  • edited September 2010
    This didn't really suprise me. Humans continually think of countless ways to use the flesh and bones of other sentient beings. I do my best to avoid things with animal products, but I have no control things like the cement that my car drives on.
  • edited September 2010
    "Many parts of Canada which cannot recieve delivered food on cold months(road closures, power outages) as I'm sure it is in Russia and any other very cold climate that ends up relying on wild meat as the only source of livelihood during the really bad winter months when you can't get anywhere and no one can get to you.

    Although it has civilization, much of the land is still hard to live in. You still stock food in the warmer months and only certain foods stock without becoming rampant with weavels and other animals that are also starving with no grain in sight, covered in snow, rotted from the ground up because of the moisture or just unobtainable.

    I've lived there. I never even knew what a vegetarian was let alone heard the word before I was 27.

    Most of my family that still remain there only ever read about vegetarians and the concept still stumps them.

    For us, it was considered very luxurious to live as a vegetarian to be able to choose among readily made foods to suit a specific diet. You don't get choices like that out there unless you can live on canned vegetables that didn't freeze.
    I suppose that would be a lot of canned vegetables.
    Porridge and maybe rice is the closest I could think of.. but then again, you have lots of rats, weavels mice and voles that eat that stuff on you and if you're being animal friendly, you'd end up having to share or let them freeze and starve to death. "<!-- / message -->




    I agree that it would be harder to be vegetarian in a colder climate. Harder does not mean impossible though. What are the herbivores eating in these cold climates? There are usually choices. I would exhaust all options before killing and eating the carcass of non human animals. If it really is that inhospitable for humans to live in these areas then perhaps that is a sign that humans just aren't meant to live in such harsh climates.
  • ChrysalidChrysalid Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Earthling wrote: »
    This didn't really suprise me. Humans continually think of countless ways to use the flesh and bones of other sentient beings. I do my best to avoid things with animal products, but I have no control things like the cement that my car drives on.
    Why? Would you rather they went to landfill?
  • edited September 2010
    Chrysalid wrote: »
    Why? Would you rather they went to landfill?
    I would rather they were not used at all for their bodies and were allowed to continue living. I would not view it as a "waste" however if we didn't use every last piece of them any more than I think the dead human animals being buried intact is a waste because we don't get to use their corpses. I don't see dead animals not being used by humans as a "waste" at all...just becuase we can't benefit from something doesn't mean it's wasted. I simply do not view animals bodies as products to be exploited from for human purposes.

    edited to add : I do not mean to come across snarky Chrysalid, the topic of animal exploitation hits a nerve and that is where my anger is directed, not at your question which was a legitamate one.
  • ChrysalidChrysalid Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Earthling wrote: »
    I would rather they were not used at all for their bodies and were allowed to continue living. I would not view it as a "waste" however if we didn't use every last piece of them any more than I think the dead human animals being buried intact is a waste because we don't get to use their corpses. I don't see dead animals not being used by humans as a "waste" at all...just becuase we can't benefit from something doesn't mean it's wasted. I simply do not view animals bodies as products to be exploited from for human purposes.

    edited to add : I do not mean to come across snarky Chrysalid, the topic of animal exploitation hits a nerve and that is where my anger is directed, not at your question which was a legitamate one.
    Heh, I didn't sense any snarkyness, no worries ;).

    I have a different viewpoint to you, although I can understand yours quite well as I used to share it.

    I don't buy meat because, like you, I don't believe in slaughtering animals for our personal pleasure (that usually being the taste of meat). But once an animal has been stripped of it's flesh, I do find the casual discarding of the corpse, like some tattered old bit of clothing, to be disrespectful. What really brought it home to me was sharkfin soup, where fishermen actually kill a shark just for it's dorsal fin and throw the rest back into the sea. I was disgusted by the killing, but somehow the fact that they did it just for the fin, that made the act that much more despicable in my eyes.
    To me, using up every last ounce of a carcass is almost akin to postmortem compassion, to take what meat-eaters have discarded as worthless and give it back it's inherent worth.
    Similar reasoning lies behind my decision to have every part of my body used for organ donation when I die, although it's different in that it's my choice whereas farm animals don't have that choice.
  • MountainsMountains Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Imagine how much less methane there would be in the atmosphere (a major greenhouse gas) if we didn't have to breed cows and pigs for food. How many cows and pigs would there be if we just left them to be cows and pigs? Not nearly as many as there are now. And then there's all the resources used to raise, care for, and process (kill) them.

    It boggles the mind.
  • edited September 2010
    Chrysalid wrote: »
    Why? Would you rather they went to landfill?
    Chrysalid wrote: »
    Heh, I didn't sense any snarkyness, no worries ;).

    I have a different viewpoint to you, although I can understand yours quite well as I used to share it.

    I don't buy meat because, like you, I don't believe in slaughtering animals for our personal pleasure (that usually being the taste of meat). But once an animal has been stripped of it's flesh, I do find the casual discarding of the corpse, like some tattered old bit of clothing, to be disrespectful. What really brought it home to me was sharkfin soup, where fishermen actually kill a shark just for it's dorsal fin and throw the rest back into the sea. I was disgusted by the killing, but somehow the fact that they did it just for the fin, that made the act that much more despicable in my eyes.
    To me, using up every last ounce of a carcass is almost akin to postmortem compassion, to take what meat-eaters have discarded as worthless and give it back it's inherent worth.
    Similar reasoning lies behind my decision to have every part of my body used for organ donation when I die, although it's different in that it's my choice whereas farm animals don't have that choice.
    I certainly understand your perspective. I try to buy from companies that don't use animals in anyway. I suppose for me there is also an "icky" factor, in that the though of rubbing pig fat on my body makes me queezy...so I get soap with no tallow. My point of view is that humans don't need to use animals period. I just choose to focus my energies on supporting companies that share that philosophy.
    Killing sharks for their fins disgusts me. From what I've heard it doesn't really add anything to the taste of the soup....it's just a status thing...sad . I will also be donating my body/organs after death but as you said that is our choice.
Sign In or Register to comment.