Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
what is our relation to the historical buddha?
0
Comments
We have very little evidence at all that he lived.
We have no evidence that he lived from the time he lived.
The textual evidence we do have has travelled a very long and forking path through the millenia.
So in this sense the relation is perhaps more like that with Adam or Herculese.
But there is a profound thing we can know for sure, and this is that some Supreme spiritual, moral, mental and philosophical genius discovered and taught The Dharma.
And to my mind, that's what's really relevant to the kind of question asked:)
namaste
that's how i feel too. Once you understand the dharma of the historical buddha, you move past the need to relate to the historical buddha but instead your true awoken nature within.
His name is Siddartha, and he became known as Gautama Buddha. He is the transcendent Buddha of our age, and he 'discovered' the Dharma principles and taught, thus starting the tradition and lineages that exist as we live.
There is also the quote from the Diamond Sutra:
"Whoever seeks me in form
Or in sound
Walks the heterodox path
And cannot perceive the Tathagata"
Blessings,
Abu
Amazing quote. I feel like it cleared some things up for me.
Yes I have a vague recollection of this tale but I think the earliest archaeological earliest evidence is from King Ashoka's a hundred years or so later.
In Sri Lanka I have been to one of the many places in Asia the Buddha is said to have visited, but I am not sure how accurate this claim is!;)
namaste