Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

the historical buddha

edited September 2010 in Buddhism Basics
what is our relation to the historical buddha?

Comments

  • edited September 2010
    About 2300+ years apart...........
  • edited September 2010
    He was my uncle. Haven't seen him in a long while though.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited September 2010
    TheJourney wrote: »
    what is our relation to the historical buddha?

    We have very little evidence at all that he lived.
    We have no evidence that he lived from the time he lived.
    The textual evidence we do have has travelled a very long and forking path through the millenia.

    So in this sense the relation is perhaps more like that with Adam or Herculese.

    But there is a profound thing we can know for sure, and this is that some Supreme spiritual, moral, mental and philosophical genius discovered and taught The Dharma.

    And to my mind, that's what's really relevant to the kind of question asked:)

    namaste
  • edited September 2010
    thickpaper wrote: »
    We have very little evidence at all that he lived.
    We have no evidence that he lived from the time he lived.
    The textual evidence we do have has travelled a very long and forking path through the millenia.

    So in this sense the relation is perhaps more like that with Adam or Herculese.

    But there is a profound thing we can know for sure, and this is that some Supreme spiritual, moral, mental and philosophical genius discovered and taught The Dharma.

    And to my mind, that's what's really relevant to the kind of question asked:)

    namaste

    that's how i feel too. Once you understand the dharma of the historical buddha, you move past the need to relate to the historical buddha but instead your true awoken nature within.
  • Floating_AbuFloating_Abu Veteran
    edited September 2010
    TheJourney wrote: »
    what is our relation to the historical buddha?

    His name is Siddartha, and he became known as Gautama Buddha. He is the transcendent Buddha of our age, and he 'discovered' the Dharma principles and taught, thus starting the tradition and lineages that exist as we live.

    There is also the quote from the Diamond Sutra:

    "Whoever seeks me in form
    Or in sound
    Walks the heterodox path
    And cannot perceive the Tathagata"


    Blessings,
    Abu
  • edited September 2010
    His name is Siddartha, and he became known as Gautama Buddha. He is the transcendent Buddha of our age, and he 'discovered' the Dharma principles and taught, thus starting the tradition and lineages that exist as we live.

    There is also the quote from the Diamond Sutra:

    "Whoever seeks me in form
    Or in sound
    Walks the heterodox path
    And cannot perceive the Tathagata"


    Blessings,
    Abu

    Amazing quote. I feel like it cleared some things up for me.
  • edited September 2010
    thickpaper wrote: »
    We have very little evidence at all that he lived.
    We have no evidence that he lived from the time he lived.
    The textual evidence we do have has travelled a very long and forking path through the millenia.
    I have been told, although not yet read for myself, that Alexander the Great's chroniclers recorded meeting some elderly folk who had been children and seen the Buddha (some 60+ years previously). That is the most direct evidence that I am aware of to date.
  • thickpaperthickpaper Veteran
    edited September 2010
    Engyo wrote: »
    I have been told, although not yet read for myself, that Alexander the Great's chroniclers recorded meeting some elderly folk who had been children and seen the Buddha (some 60+ years previously). That is the most direct evidence that I am aware of to date.


    Yes I have a vague recollection of this tale but I think the earliest archaeological earliest evidence is from King Ashoka's a hundred years or so later.

    In Sri Lanka I have been to one of the many places in Asia the Buddha is said to have visited, but I am not sure how accurate this claim is!;)

    namaste
Sign In or Register to comment.