Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Nirvana for all?

JetsFan366JetsFan366 Explorer
edited October 2010 in Buddhism Basics
Did the Buddha believe that everyone could attain Nirvana? If so, based on what logic? (I am asking in all sincerity) It would seem that for some people, certain states of mind would be extremely difficult if not impossible to attain. Someone who is mentally handicapped, as a relatively extreme example, might not be able to grasp some of the counter intuitiveness of Buddhist teachings/practices.

Comments

  • ShiftPlusOneShiftPlusOne Veteran
    edited October 2010
    I don't remember the exact quote. He likened Dharma to medicine... there are cases where a person will recover without any medicine, there are cases where a person will recover only with medicine and there are cases where a person will just not recover despite any medicine. Same with Dharma... for that reason I think not everybody can attain Nirvana... some ignorance is just too strong.
  • edited October 2010
    The so-called mentally handicapped are already in nirvana, and they're your teachers.
  • JetsFan366JetsFan366 Explorer
    edited October 2010
    The so-called mentally handicapped are already in nirvana, and they're your teachers.

    So-called? Like my cousin who had brain damage at birth? I can assure you, he is not in nirvana. He suffers a great deal, and is attached to many things, just like I am.
  • ToshTosh Veteran
    edited October 2010
    twaitsfan wrote: »
    So-called? Like my cousin who had brain damage at birth? I can assure you, he is not in nirvana. He suffers a great deal, and is attached to many things, just like I am.

    I believe you, but I also have the understanding that by 'imagining' that mentally handicapped people are 'Buddhas in disguise', that this will help you to maintain the correct attitude when interacting with them.

    It's a bit like me pretending that everyone has been my Mother in a previous life. Whether they actually were, or whether I believe they were is separate from the reality which is by doing this, it helps me deflate my ego and treat people in a better and more kind manner.
  • edited October 2010
    The short answer is that you either have to believe in rebirth or you have to believe some people can't get to nirvana.

    I worked with mentally handicapped people my whole life. I know how it is. But you can't necessarily judge another's state of consciousness. It's an imponderable unless you believe in rebirth.
  • edited October 2010
    The short answer is that you either have to believe in rebirth or you have to believe some people can't get to nirvana.

    I worked with mentally handicapped people my whole life. I know how it is. But you can't necessarily judge another's state of consciousness. It's an imponderable unless you believe in rebirth.

    I think most buddhists believe in rebirth. maybe not.
  • upekkaupekka Veteran
    edited October 2010
    twaitsfan wrote: »
    He suffers a great deal, and is attached to many things, just like I am.
    how can you say 'he suffers'
    it is you think that 'he suffers'
    may be/may be not you suffer thinking he suffers
  • edited October 2010
    TheJourney wrote: »
    I think most buddhists believe in rebirth. maybe not.

    Here is a fun exercise to try:

    After a period of meditation consider how much you know and how much you believe. Which group is larger?
  • MountainsMountains Veteran
    edited October 2010
    The so-called mentally handicapped are already in nirvana, and they're your teachers.

    Spend some time in a group home or an acute treatment facility if you believe that... It may be true for some, but certainly not for all. I've worked with a lot who are in constant torture.
  • edited October 2010
    It was meant somewhat ironically. I've been a RN for 30 years, sonny. 17+ years in DD.
  • edited October 2010
    oops, double...
  • edited October 2010
    Do you think maybe the Buddha was the only one that could attain Nirvana? He sorta is like the Dreamer? And he's out there somewhere right now... because I'm sure still here. :D
  • JetsFan366JetsFan366 Explorer
    edited October 2010
    Thanks all - thats good feedback. Just one more thing about buddhism that makes sense.
  • edited October 2010
    i have no idea what the devil the buddha really thought.... if he would have changed his opinion over time.... there are definitely sentences in the tripitaka where he says stuff like, "oh , well the world is blind, but some people only gotst a lil dust on their eyesies", so he is definitely not always portrayed as optimistic. but if you look at later buddhism, there are expressions like, "until all beings reach buddhahood", & " the eventual enlightenment of all sentient beings"... who knows... nirvana was always here.
  • edited October 2010
    Twaitsfan,

    T: Did the Buddha believe that everyone could attain Nirvana?

    S9: The Buddha said that, "Absolutely everyone is completely ‘Enlightened’ (aka in Nirvana), right here and right now, but their knowing of this is simply clouded over (aka covered over) by ignorance (aka confusion or wrongful thoughts and conceptions)."


    T: It would seem that for some people, certain states of mind would be extremely difficult if not impossible to attain.

    S9: Of course, this would be quite true if ‘Enlightenment’ (aka Nirvana) were a mental attainment.

    However, since we are all aware of our own ‘Buddha Nature’ continuously at a subtle level, all of the time, than we can simply ‘Wake Up’ at any given moment to this fact. It doesn’t call for some kind of genius to do so.

    T: Someone who is mentally handicapped, as a relatively extreme example, might not be able to grasp some of the counter intuitiveness of Buddhist teachings/practices.

    S9: Zen says, “Don’t look at the finger pointing (the words). Look where the finger is pointing.”

    In other words, Enlightenment is not accomplished by collecting words and concepts (aka knowledge), but rather is an intimate experience outside or beyond such doings on our part. We are rather cautioned to drop such things (conceptual knowledge) and become naked of them.

    Man is an arrogant animal and believes that he is capable of doing Enlightenment much in the same way as he learned to dance or write books. Enlightenment is not just one more thing, same old/same old. Even the little animals that we feel quite superior to are 100 % Enlightened.

    Peace and love,
    S9/Leslie
  • JetsFan366JetsFan366 Explorer
    edited October 2010
    Thanks S9, that's great info.
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited October 2010
    Right, S9. All sentient beings have exactly the same Buddhanature. Therefore all sentient beings are capable of attaining enlightenment, or realizing their owned enlightened nature, to be more correct. But maybe not in this life as most sentient beings (such as animals) do not have the capability of self-examination that is necessary to do that.

    Palzang
  • nanadhajananadhaja Veteran
    edited October 2010
    Palzang wrote: »
    Right, S9. All sentient beings have exactly the same Buddhanature. Therefore all sentient beings are capable of attaining enlightenment, or realizing their owned enlightened nature, to be more correct. But maybe not in this life as most sentient beings (such as animals) do not have the capability of self-examination that is necessary to do that.

    Palzang
    Well spoken Palzang.As you say maybe not in this life,but definately attainable.
  • edited October 2010
    Palzang wrote: »
    Right, S9. All sentient beings have exactly the same Buddhanature. Therefore all sentient beings are capable of attaining enlightenment, or realizing their owned enlightened nature, to be more correct. But maybe not in this life as most sentient beings (such as animals) do not have the capability of self-examination that is necessary to do that.

    Palzang

    But definitely possible in this life. I feel like people think of enlightenment as this impossible to achieve thing, and while it's certainly not easy it is definitely doable. imo. not saying you disagree with that just wanted to say it.
  • edited October 2010
    Always nice to hear from you, Palzang,

    I have a quite a wise friend who said to me just yesterday that, he saw mankind as the only animal who was capable of thinking himself to be un-Enlightened.

    You might very well have asked him, as I did, why do you say this? So let me share his answer with you. Smile!

    He went on to say that, “Because of our mental capacity (as humans) to self reflect and identify ourselves through this capacity to most any concept that we can dream up, we can also dance off into error as to our actual identity. We think that who we are is a story line (ego self) that we are constantly writing. Because of this gift of self-reflection, which can easily be misused, we can also think up how very ‘UN’ we are (aka UN- Enlightened).”

    Now this is not to say that we humans should simply go back to being just animals and throw off our self-reflective capacity, as it affords us a real opportunity to contemplate our Buddha Nature, which is our excellence. But, I do believe that we should come to see through deep investigation, or “Mindfulness,” that our human and mental lives go on quite automatically.

    And:

    Further as is said by the very wise among us, “That (Aka mind and body, and all of their doings and thinking) is not me,”

    What think you on this?

    Peace and love,
    S9/Leslie
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2010
    What doesn't have the same Buddha nature? There is nothing but Buddha Nature. There is nothing other than Buddha Nature against which to take its measure. It has no value. What is the difference between a cat that has no head, no tail, no legs, and no body, ....and a dog that has no head, no tail, no legs, and no body?

    Buddha Nature is going cheap. Who wouldn't buy it? :D


    ed. .... this isn't a critique of "Buddha Nature".
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited October 2010
    I'll take the buddha nature wrap with a bowl of buddha nature soup. Buddha nature ice tea to wash it down.

    Just being silly :o
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2010
    Jeffrey wrote: »
    I'll take the buddha nature wrap with a bowl of buddha nature soup. Buddha nature ice tea to wash it down.

    Just being silly :o
    A Buddha Nature wrap is tasteless,... but a Buddha Nature wrap with avacado and wasabi mayo, tastes just like an avacado wrap with wasabi mayo. Such is the miraculous quality of Buddha nature!:lol:
  • edited October 2010
    Jeffrey,

    I hope that you didn’t understand me to be saying that ‘Buddha Nature’ is just the dualistic nature, or just a dualistic manifestation of finitude.

    What I did mean to say, rather, is that the cat is dreaming he is a cat, as you are dreaming that you are a Jeffrey. When this dream either stops, or is over, or in someway is seen through, we all ‘Wake Up’ to our Buddha Nature much as the Buddha did.

    The cat however does not tie itself up with labels like we humans seem to do. He just automatically goes about doing cat stuff, unattached to his memory traces of identity. He just does what his latest urge directs him to do, and lets go of it much like what the Taoists call, "Being in the "Flow." (Aka sitting beside the river of activities and not falling in.) Because of this lack in his activities of writing stories about his identity, and carrying baggage from his past, he could very well be seen as being ego-less.

    I see it this way. The Buddha was ‘Awake’ in the dream.

    This however doesn’t mean that you will be an all-new and improved Jeffrey when you get Enlightened. You will, in fact, see that you never were a Jeffrey thing.

    Enlightenment will not be freedom of Jeffery, but rather freedom from Jeffery.

    Peace and love,
    S9/Leslie
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2010
    Enlightenment will not be freedom of Jeffery, but rather freedom from Jeffery.
    What is free from Jeffery?
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited October 2010
    All must obey! No freedom from Jeffrey allowed!

    Seriously thanks S. I understand buddha nature to be the same as unconditional awareness or bodhicitta.
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited October 2010
    No eye, no ear, no nose, no tongue...

    Palzang
  • edited October 2010
    Richard,

    R: What is free from Jeffery?

    S9: Everyone and everything (including Buddha Nature) is free of being labeled as Jeffrey. Only Jeffery may feel that he is still within the prison he calls Jeffery. Smile!

    But stop crying for him, and take this moment to pay attention to your own problem, that of being in the conceptual prison that you call Richard. : ^ (

    But, my dear Richard, don’t expect me to fall into the trap, or the error, of saying what the “Buddha Nature” is as in either word or concept. I think we both know that ‘Buddha Nature’ is not a mental thingy, but rather an intimate experience.

    Peace and love,
    S9/Leslie
  • edited October 2010
    Your welcome, Jeffrey,

    J: I understand buddha nature to be the same as unconditional awareness, or bodhicitta.

    S9: Yes, I have been reading and enjoying your posts right along, for quite a while now. The only complaint I can voice about your posts is that, I always wish that you would say more. Smile!

    But this is coming from a person that doesn’t always know when to shut up. ; ^ )

    Peace and love,
    S9/Leslie
  • upekkaupekka Veteran
    edited October 2010


    But this is coming from a person that doesn’t always know when to shut up. ; ^ )
    :):D:p
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2010
    But stop crying for him, and take this moment to pay attention to your own problem, that of being in the conceptual prison that you call Richard. : ^ (
    Moi????!!! Imprisoned!!??? Never!!!!! That blowhard Richard has no hold on me!!!!


    ........doh!!! .... me is Richard :eek:.


    ooooh this is bad.




    Well Leslie if you are "free from" "the conceptual prison" of personhood, if you have no attachment to personhood, could you pleeeeez pm me your personal bank account number? I'll just take enough for a new set of snow tires , promise. Thankyou in advance, because so far these online Buddhas who say they are liberated from personal identity seem to be fiercely protective of that very illusory personhood.

    Thanks again Leslie:D
  • edited October 2010
    Richard H wrote: »
    Moi????!!! Imprisoned!!??? Never!!!!! That blowhard Richard has no hold on me!!!!


    ........doh!!! .... me is Richard :eek:.


    ooooh this is bad.




    Well Leslie if you are "free from" "the conceptual prison" of personhood, if you have no attachment to personhood, could you pleeeeez pm me your personal bank account number? I'll just take enough for a new set of snow tires , promise. Thankyou in advance, because so far these online Buddhas who say they are liberated from personal identity seem to be fiercely protective of that very illusory personhood.

    Thanks again Leslie:D

    protecting "yourself" is still being benevolent, no? so long as it doesn't get in the way of being benevolent to others. Do you think an enlightened being would just go around letting people steal his livelihood, and overall allow bad things to happen to him for no real purpose other than letting other people act wrongly? just curious :)
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2010
    TheJourney wrote: »
    protecting "yourself" is still being benevolent, no? so long as it doesn't get in the way of being benevolent to others. Do you think an enlightened being would just go around letting people steal his livelihood, and overall allow bad things to happen to him for no real purpose other than letting other people act wrongly? just curious :)
    Other people can speak to what an "Enlightened being" would do. All I can point to are people who have "practiced well". These people are beautifully full personalities. When you call their name they turn to look who is calling them. If they slip on a step they reach out to grab the railing, to protect their wellbeing. They do not regard being so-and-so, with so-and-so's idiosyncrasies as a "conceptual prison" and recognize the practical reality of that. They acknowledge their personhood. They include that in their awakeness.

    I was was just ribbing Leslie. ...... but ....I do need to get new snow tires and thought it was worth a shot.:D
  • edited October 2010
    Upekka,

    Q: But this is coming from a person that doesn’t always know when to shut up. ; ^ )

    I always love it when you show up and agree with me, old friend. It makes me all tingly. ; ^ )


    Peace and love,
    S9/Leslie
  • edited October 2010
    Richard,

    R: Well Leslie if you are "free from" "the conceptual prison" of personhood, if you have no attachment to personhood, could you pleeeeez pm me your personal bank account number?

    S9: Being Enlightened doesn’t mean that you are automatically made stupid within this dream, anymore than the Buddha stuck sharp sticks in his dream eyes, just because he “Woke up,” to the fact that this was a dream world. I think too you will notice that Buddha continued to eat, etc.

    R: These online Buddhas who say they are liberated from personal identity seem to be fiercely protective of that very illusory personhood.

    S9: I think that this is a basic misunderstanding on your part. The dream continues, and the dream is self correcting. The only major thing that changes is that…you now realize that you are not that dream character, and the dream character's actions and thoughts are not yours.

    I bet if the Buddha were alive today and posted right here on this sight, you would probably take exception with his claiming to be "Awake."

    You would probably say he should throw off his robes and roll in the snow, if it is only a dream robe and dream snow. Grin!

    I read once that people seem to prefer their deities far away, and great leaders to be dead…this gives them the convenience to interpret their words any way they wanted too, and more to their liking. Don’t let the ego trap you in this bias, too.

    There are those among us who are actually ‘Enlightened,” if not at the very least quite clear-sighted, as well as being able and willing to share their insights. However, if we fear being one-upped, or even fear (because of a lack of trust in our own abilities) that we could be thrown off course, and so we close our ears, we (ourselves) will end up being the losers.

    No need to thank me, Richard. I love this stuff.

    Peace and love,
    S9/Leslie
  • edited October 2010
    Journey,

    J: Do you think an enlightened being would just go around letting people steal his livelihood, and overall allow bad things to happen to him for no real purpose other than letting other people act wrongly? just curious

    S9: I quite agree with what I believe you are getting at here.

    Setting a person up to create bad karma would certainly be an act of cruelty on your part. It would be a little like standing back, fully realizing what will happen next, and letting a little kid run in front of an oncoming car.

    Even if it is a dream kid, and a dream car, I bet within the dream it would really dream hurt. ; ^ )

    Within the dream we live and act as/if it were real, even while at the same time an Enlightened person can get the big picture and dis-identify. I see it a bit like Lucid Dreaming.

    Peace and love,
    S9/Leslie
  • edited October 2010
    Journey,

    J: Do you think an enlightened being would just go around letting people steal his livelihood, and overall allow bad things to happen to him for no real purpose other than letting other people act wrongly? just curious

    S9: I quite agree with what I believe you are getting at here.

    Setting a person up to create bad karma would certainly be an act of cruelty on your part. It would be a little like standing back, fully realizing what will happen next, and letting a little kid run in front of an oncoming car.

    Even if it is a dream kid, and a dream car, I bet within the dream it would really dream hurt. ; ^ )

    Within the dream we live and act as/if it were real, even while at the same time an Enlightened person can get the big picture and dis-identify. I see it a bit like Lucid Dreaming.

    Peace and love,
    S9/Leslie

    good point. I sometimes think of it like a game. We know that we're just playing a game, but we have to play along for the sake of everyone that doesn't know.
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2010
    R: These online Buddhas who say they are liberated from personal identity seem to be fiercely protective of that very illusory personhood.

    S9: I think that this is a basic misunderstanding on your part. The dream continues, and the dream is self correcting. The only major thing that changes is that…you now realize that you are not that dream character, and the dream character's actions and thoughts are not yours.

    I bet if the Buddha were alive today and posted right here on this sight, you would probably take exception with his claiming to be "Awake."
    . I agree to a point, but a fully enlightened being wouldn't freak if his person was truly threatened. I don't doubt your enlightenment, if that is how you wish to conceive your way of being, but I do doubt that you are beyond breaking to a cold sweat given the right (wrong) circumstances. Your posting history, like mine, betrays a certain not-quite-fully-enlightened quality. If we are to talk about being awake, enlightened and so forth, then I would refer you (if you are interested) to the teachings of Chinul. That is the measure of practice that has guided me. One great thing about practicing in sangha is that you realize your great "Enlightenment" is utterly ordinary in the context of lineage. I could just imagine going to the Zen folks I'm practicing with and declaring my Enlightenment. They would shrug. When youre alone on a farm or whatever you can be Special. There is always someone coming on here who has just seen his true nature, realized emptiness, (no doubt for real), but then he starts to think he is elect, "spiritual". He's a Buddha.

    So sure there are those among us who are clear sighted. Big deal. you still have to eat, shit, pay the bills, and listen to the doctor say "cancer". Online talk of Enlightenment is cheap.
  • edited October 2010
    I have a hard time not thinking i'm special. As you say, I think it wouldn't be such a problem if I was in a group of other people who were in the same boat as me. As it is now the people I have contact with(not many) definitely don't understand, to varying degrees, and it's hard to not feel special.
  • edited October 2010
    Journey,

    J: I have a hard time not thinking i'm special.

    S9: Yes, we are all victims of our old thought habits. Thinking ourselves special is something we all must confess to doing at times, that is if we are as honest and brave as you are in doing so. : ^ )

    In this culture where we all grew up, we were taught to think in terms like getting ahead (ahead of others), and being winners (as apposed to being losers like others). These roads are laid down, heavily, when they often went unquestioned in our early years, and went on with over use to become much, traveled roads and even ruts (engrams in our brains).

    So now, until we can reprogram our thinking brains (much like organic computers), we have our work ahead of us. We must continue towards thinking differently by investigating into better ways of thinking. But we must also refuse to continue thinking and acting upon them, or we must un-think these erroneous old ways of thinking, which then will fade from lack of use.

    If we continue sleep walking in these old ruts of thought, they will only become progressively deeper and harder to climb out of. These are actually ruts of suffering. Rethinking thorough investigation (aka Mindfulness) IS a form of reprogramming.

    I bet what you (anyone), yes I will really feel after investigation more closely, more deeply, will not be so much “special,” but rather “fortunate.” Because yes, you are very “Fortunate” to know that you are not simply what you were original taught to believe. Being a Buddha isn’t special, like unusual, since actually everyone IS a Buddha. Yet at the same time, it is certainly good fortune to know you are a Buddha, and not just a victim of the finite body/mind.

    J: As you say, I think it wouldn't be such a problem if I was in a group of other people who were in the same boat as me. As it is now the people I have contact with (not many) definitely don't understand, to varying degrees, and it's hard to not feel special.

    S9: I think too, that if opinions are changed into weapons by the people we are speaking with on any one subject, but particularly if these are subjects that we rely upon to create meaning and safety within our lives, well, we will all too easily drift into fight mode.

    We will then go on to protect (defend) ourselves by proving these others to be less than we are, and use pejorative terms like stupid, weak, or even crazy against them to explain them away, and to make them seem less dangerous to us.

    But isn’t this is the very definition of elitism?

    And:

    If you think about it, elitism is a bit like throwing lighter fluid on the flames of contention.

    Of course we all do this in a “Knee jerk” fashion, most times. It is just one more thing we must rethink ourselves away from, thereby protecting ourselves and others away from the flames of contention.

    If there is a savior in this world, something that can stop some of the suffering, it has to be wisdom.

    In my way of thinking: Wisdom is the “Yellow Brick Road, which leads straight and true towards Transcendence.

    Peace and love,
    S9/Leslie
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited October 2010
    TheJourney wrote: »
    I have a hard time not thinking i'm special. As you say, I think it wouldn't be such a problem if I was in a group of other people who were in the same boat as me. As it is now the people I have contact with(not many) definitely don't understand, to varying degrees, and it's hard to not feel special.
    Even thinking about the kind of issues discussed in this forum is uncommon in mainstream conversation. Having experiential insights into these issues is even less common. But the history of Buddha Dharma goes back 2500 years and includes millions of people who have these same insights. There are few Arahants around to be sure, and we are very fortunate if we encounter such people. Even so, most practicing Buddhists come to know "emptiness" "not-self", a taste of Nibbana, "true nature", "a clear eye", and so forth at some point if they are diligent in practice. It is normal. Thinking we are special or uniquely insightful is unsustainable when we connect with the Sangha at large. It is harder when there is no sangha nearby as you have mentioned, but for now there is this medium, and there is also plenty of access to teachers online in every tradition.
  • edited October 2010
    twaitsfan wrote: »
    Did the Buddha believe that everyone could attain Nirvana? If so, based on what logic? (I am asking in all sincerity) It would seem that for some people, certain states of mind would be extremely difficult if not impossible to attain. Someone who is mentally handicapped, as a relatively extreme example, might not be able to grasp some of the counter intuitiveness of Buddhist teachings/practices.

    There are three kinds of people who cannot attain Nirvana as long as they have this traits( in this life and next)

    1. Those with mental illnesses ( mental illnesses which renders the sufferer unable to control their mind)
    2. Those too lazy to practice
    3. Those who are ignorant of the Triple-Gem
Sign In or Register to comment.