Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Influence of Lord Buddha's Teachings on Lord Jesus Christ

Were the teachings of Lord Jesus Christ influenced by the teachings of Lord Buddha? Did Jesus ever go to Tibet and study with the Buddhist monks of the Monastry? Comments I read in www.ithysaviour.blogspot.com

Comments

  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited October 2005
    Were the teachings of Lord Jesus Christ influenced by the teachings of Lord Buddha? Did Jesus ever go to Tibet and study with the Buddhist monks of the Monastry? Comments I read in www.ithysaviour.blogspot.com

    Hi there Ramani_subramani. It's a lovely idea, isn't it! And there's a Kasmiri legend of Jesus going there. Of course we, here, in the UK, know that Jesus came to England when he was a boy and that his uncle, Joseph of Arimathea, came back here, to Glastonbury after the first Easter.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited October 2005
    ....And let's not forget that Jesus also travelled to Japan and continued his ministry there....Here's where to learn more....!! Man, the guy sure did get around!

    http://www.ishipress.com/jesusjap.htm

    I laughed until my sides hurt.....!
  • buddhafootbuddhafoot Veteran
    edited October 2005
    Hi there Ramani_subramani. It's a lovely idea, isn't it! And there's a Kasmiri legend of Jesus going there. Of course we, here, in the UK, know that Jesus came to England when he was a boy and that his uncle, Joseph of Arimathea, came back here, to Glastonbury after the first Easter.

    Man... I bet Christmas was really bitchin' back then.

    They had it so good.

    -bf
  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited October 2005
    This is a good time to remember our ancient legends. It is Samhain: the Celtic New Year which appears to have grafted itself onto an even earlier tradition. This week, in the UK, bonfires are being lit and fireworks let off. People think it's about the attempt, 400 years ago, to blow up James I & VI and all his Parliament but I cannot help notice that it comes at this time of year when one year gives way to another.
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited November 2005
    Were the teachings of Lord Jesus Christ influenced by the teachings of Lord Buddha? Did Jesus ever go to Tibet and study with the Buddhist monks of the Monastry? Comments I read in www.ithysaviour.blogspot.com


    Well, it's an attractive idea, isn't it? Of course, it altogether ignores the fact that Buddhism didn't arrive in Tibet until the 7th Century CE! I personally feel that enlightened mind is enlightened mind, so why wouldn't Jesus' teachings sound like Buddhism? If you actually read what Jesus is quoted as saying in the Bible, he comes across sounding much like a Buddhist master. It's just such a pity that the so-called Christians don't pay much attention to what he actually taught!

    Palzang
  • edited November 2005
    so you're saying chrisitianity has some buddhist themes and lessons within it?
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited November 2005
    Hmmm, not exactly. I think what I'm trying to say is that Truth is Truth no matter where you might find it. The fact that you can find the same teachings in both Buddhism and Christianity is not so surprising if you think about it. I mean, it would be as correct to say that Buddhism has some Christian teachings in it. See what I mean?

    Palzang
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited November 2005
    There again, there may be some truth in it... Buddha died 500 years before Christ was born... even given the fact that communication methods were not as sophisticated as they are today (!!) there is nothing to say that influences did not spread from the Far to the Middle east and become known elsewhere....How about the famous 'Silk Road' - ?

    http://library.thinkquest.org/13406/sr/

    "The 7000 mile route spanned China, Central Asia, Northern India, and the Parthian and Roman Empires. It connected the Yellow River Valley to the Mediterranean Sea and passed through places such as Chinese cities Kansu and Sinkiang and present-day countries Iran, Iraq and Syria....

    Social Consequences of the Silk Road
    While the Chinese silk trade played a minor role in the Chinese economy, it did increase the number of foreign merchants present in China under the Han Dynasty, exposing both the Chinese and visitors to their country to different cultures and religions. In fact, Buddhism spread from India to China* because of trade along the Silk Route, similar to the way Islam spread along trans-Saharan routes in medieval West Africa.....

    The Silk Road's Decline

    By 760 AD, during the T'ang Dynasty, trade along the Silk Road had declined. It revived tremendously under the Sung Dynasty in the eleventh and twelfth centuries when China became largely dependent on its silk trade. In addition, trade to Central and Western Asia as well as Europe recovered for a period of time from 1276-1368 under the Yuan Dynasty when the Mongols controlled China. The Chinese traded silk for medicines, perfumes, and slaves in addition to precious stones. As overland trade became increasingly dangerous, and overseas trade became more popular, trade along the Silk Road declined. While the Chinese did maintain a silk-fur trade with the Russians north of the original Silk Route, by the end of the fourteenth century, trade and travel along the road had decreased. "

    So there is a possibility that it was not only mercantile trade and precious objects that passed this way.... the cultural, social and religious & spiritual may well also have spread and expanded...
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited November 2005
    Oh, c'mon! They didn't even have Amazon then! :hrm:

    Palzang
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited November 2005
    I know!! It's so poooh!!

    2.gif
  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited November 2005
    It is an aspect of our cultural arrogance that we think that world travel belongs only to our age.

    Great trading fleets moved across the Arabian Sea, using the prevailing winds which switch twice a year. Representatives from Britain were present at Alexander the Great's coronation as Great King of Persia. Human beings have always been great travellers.

    The Great Library at Alexandria attracted scholars from far and wide. In the light of the well-known wanderings of Buddhist monks eastwards and North from India, why imagine they didn't go West?
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited November 2005
    Actually I've read that some of the Jataka Tales (stories of the Buddha's previous existences) ended up in the Bible after traveling down the Silk Road. If I remember correctly, the story of the Three Wise Men is derived from the Jataka Tales. So yeah, there was plenty of cross cultural exchange.

    One thing I learned when I was in Mongolia is that Buddhism arrived there very early on, much earlier, in fact, than in Tibet, due to the fact that the Silk Road went through it and the contacts the Mongols had with the great Central Asian Buddhist empires, such as Khotan and Kushana, which were later obliterated by conquering armies. However, Buddhism didn't really stick with the Mongolians at that time. It didn't really take hold until the Mongols conquered Tibet in the 13th Century and encountered Tibetan Buddhism.

    Palzang
  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited November 2005
    It does appear that the first generation or two after the Resurrection or the Parinibbana were great travellers, wanderers, spreaders of the message. Thomas the Twin ended up in India. Who can say how far the Buddha's immediate followers went. I wouldn't be surprised to find they travelled a long way West as well as East. The problem is that Europe has gone through periods of dark barbarism and much of our history has been lost.
  • buddhafootbuddhafoot Veteran
    edited November 2005
    Palzang wrote:
    Actually I've read that some of the Jataka Tales (stories of the Buddha's previous existences) ended up in the Bible after traveling down the Silk Road. If I remember correctly, the story of the Three Wise Men is derived from the Jataka Tales. So yeah, there was plenty of cross cultural exchange.
    Palzang

    Wow... that is really interesting.

    The more I have learned about Buddhism, the more I have heard how ficticious Christianity may be.

    I wish I knew the truth about everything. Or could watch history on a big screen somewhere.

    -bf
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited November 2005
    Well, I'm not so sure that borrowing a story from a different tradition necessarily means that Christianity is fictitious. I think all religions borrow from earlier traditions. Certainly early Buddhism borrowed heavily from Hinduism and other ancient Indian traditions. Of course, Christianity has done that a lot, much more than most Christians would like to believe. Easter, for instance, was a pagan fertility celebration originally. In fact, many of the so-called Christian holidays can trace their roots to ancient Roman holidays. That doesn't, however, invalidate the essential meaning being conveyed. Would you agree?

    Palzang
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited November 2005
    Palzang wrote:
    Easter, for instance, was a pagan fertility celebration originally. In fact, many of the so-called Christian holidays can trace their roots to ancient Roman holidays. That doesn't, however, invalidate the essential meaning being conveyed. Would you agree?
    Palzang

    If I might actually jump in and quantify that observation....,
    The early Christians saw it as their Mission to convert all they met - Pagans, Romans, whoever..... to Christianity, and in order to emphasise the importance of their message, superimposed particular Christian Celebrations onto these 'Ungodly' Rituals. This is why Easter (derived from the word OEstros, which is where we get our word Oestrogen...) heralds the Beginning of the Christian New Year - the Awakening, the Born Anew, the Emergence of the Living form the Dead.... this is why we have Easter Eggs.....
    In Italy and France (and other European countries) where Christianity was first established, the word for Easter, is, respectively, Pasqua or Paques. This is derived from the Hebrew word for 'Passover'..... hence our reference to the 'Paschal Lamb'.... all the pretty chicks and lambs frollicking and gambolling together, in a field full of Spring flowers, are therefore a mix of ancient Pagan and ancient Hebrew symbols....!
    So Christians borrowed already established festivals and overlaid them with significant Christian milestones. The same goes for Christmas.... When the first missionaries began converting the Germanic peoples to Christianity, they found it easier to simply provide a Christian reinterpretation for popular feasts such as Yule and allow the celebrations themselves to go on largely unchanged, rather than trying to suppress them....

    "Yule is the winter solstice Blót (celebration) in Ásatrú, the pagan practices of the Germanic peoples prior to the arrival of Christianity. Today, it is also one of the eight solar holidays, or sabbats, of Neopaganism. In modern Neopaganism, Yule is celebrated on the winter solstice: in the northern hemisphere, circa December 21, and in the southern hemisphere, circa June 21.
    "Yule" and "Yuletide" are also archaic terms for Christmas, sometimes invoked in songs to provide atmosphere. Indeed, this is the only meaning of "Yule" accepted by either the full Oxford English Dictionary or the Concise Oxford Dictionary, and people unfamiliar with ancient pagan traditions will not distinguish between Yule and Christmas. This usage survives in the term "Yule log".


    'January' is named after the God 'Janus' who had two faces - one looking forward, and one looking back..... So even if Christians would like to think that all things pagan and ungodly are no longer relevant, you've only got to look at the names of the months - and even week-days to know that.....

    *.......They're still here..........!*

    Sorry Palzang... I hope you don't mind if I added my two cents' worth....
    My point is that if we attempt to dissect everything to the Nth degree, there will always be distortions, contradictions, enigmas and distractions..... sometimes we just have to take a step back and say.... "what does it do for me?"
  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited November 2005
    Let me add that 25 December is the traditional date of the birth of the god Mithras, who was born in a cave, from a virgin!

    Mithraism, although now long forgotten (perhaps it's practised on the Net), was the prevailing cult in the Roman army and a serious competitor for state religion under Constantine.
  • buddhafootbuddhafoot Veteran
    edited November 2005
    Palzang wrote:
    Well, I'm not so sure that borrowing a story from a different tradition necessarily means that Christianity is fictitious. I think all religions borrow from earlier traditions. Certainly early Buddhism borrowed heavily from Hinduism and other ancient Indian traditions. Of course, Christianity has done that a lot, much more than most Christians would like to believe. Easter, for instance, was a pagan fertility celebration originally. In fact, many of the so-called Christian holidays can trace their roots to ancient Roman holidays. That doesn't, however, invalidate the essential meaning being conveyed. Would you agree?

    Palzang

    Well, yeah, I would think it invalidates them in a way.

    If the celebration is thought to be for one thing, but has it's history based upon something else, doesn't that make the act somewhat of a sham?

    Almost like a person having a Cancer Walk - but spending the donations on a Tailgate Party.

    I don't think that Buddhism would have a problem with this because Buddhism isn't a religion of strict "this or that" - in most cases. Christianity, on the other hand, is a very strict religion especially in regards to worshipping a single god, knowing the truth, and not worshipping other idols or gods. "Earth" celebrations are deifying something other than a single god.

    My point, ultimately was, that it is interesting to find out more about Christianity what what it has done, and changed and evolved into throughout the centuries. I also didn't mean to say that Christianity was completely fictitious - just that certain elements of it may be and the causes of why that happened over 2,000 years is interesting.

    -bf
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited November 2005
    buddhafoot wrote:
    Almost like a person having a Cancer Walk - but spending the donations on a Tailgate Party.
    -bf

    And is that a bad thing or a good thing? :)

    It's interesting that the main Buddhist holidays, such as the enlightenment of Shakyamuni, the parinirvana, and so forth, are celebrated on different dates depending on what flavor of Buddhism you follow. Yet I don't see anyone pointing fingers or making accusations because of that. It's more of a cultural thing. Nobody really knows anyway. It's more to commemorate what the event means rather than some particular calendar day. I'd say the same applies to the Christian holidays, like Christmas. Who really cares if it was in December or June? It's the significance of the event itself that's important. Not that anyone, at least in America, really thinks about it anymore... HO HO HO!

    Palzang
  • edited November 2005
    I am neither a Buddhist nor a Christian. In fact I am not religious. My simple question wasn't implied to raise any cynicism or any rivalry. All I did was to read a simple book that I came across written by an unknown author, ---- the story of a simple Man Whose mind agonised since His boyhood on what He was supposed to do and how, in order to fulfil the expectation of His people who had been suffering for centuries and had placed their hope of obtaining deliverance on His shoulder. The book made me ponder for quite a while and I felt peaceful. May be that was my own simple little spiritualism.
    Are volumes of scholarly treatise and discourse and interpretations necessary to understand and feel the simple message of love and peace?
    I quote a comment from the portal: "FOR THOSE WHO DARE TO HEAR THE TRUTH!" ( www.awkwardsocks.blogspot.com ) under the topic 'Leonardo Da Vinci': "Why His simple teachings have been made complicated? Why are all these hierarchies, rituals and rules, sectarian empire building and rivalries, conversions, etc. etc.?
    ?"
  • PalzangPalzang Veteran
    edited November 2005
    I am neither a Buddhist nor a Christian. In fact I am not religious. My simple question wasn't implied to raise any cynicism or any rivalry. All I did was to read a simple book that I came across written by an unknown author, ---- the story of a simple Man Whose mind agonised since His boyhood on what He was supposed to do and how, in order to fulfil the expectation of His people who had been suffering for centuries and had placed their hope of obtaining deliverance on His shoulder. The book made me ponder for quite a while and I felt peaceful. May be that was my own simple little spiritualism.
    Are volumes of scholarly treatise and discourse and interpretations necessary to understand and feel the simple message of love and peace?
    I quote a comment from the portal: "FOR THOSE WHO DARE TO HEAR THE TRUTH!" ( www.awkwardsocks.blogspot.com ) under the topic 'Leonardo Da Vinci': "Why His simple teachings have been made complicated? Why are all these hierarchies, rituals and rules, sectarian empire building and rivalries, conversions, etc. etc.?
    ?"

    I'm afraid I don't understand where your comment is coming from, Mr. Subramani. I didn't seen any cynicism or rivalry reflected in any of the comments, nor do I know what hierarchies, rituals, rules, sectarian empire building, etc. you're referring to. All I see are comments from people who wished to share their viewpoints on this interesting subject. Are you opposed to that? If so, why did you post it in the first place?

    Palzang
  • ECMECM
    edited November 2005
    Well-- there have been comments in these posts about how holidays have "pagan" roots and how this would "invalidate" the religion, etc. This makes me think of some folks I know who say that Marco Polo brought noodles back to Italy, so noodles are really Chinese in origin. But I think that it is easy to have things pop up independently, and probably the Italians already had noodles to begin with. Must there be only one inventor? Why not many inventors? And even more so with Truth. We all have True Nature, the Buddha within, God's presence in the Christian vocabulary, abiding. Different cultures and languages express it differently.

    I can see Mr. S's point. What he read brought him to the very interesting point that love and peace -- and let me add forgiveness, understanding, kindness, gentleness, and all the rest of what constitutes what I would like to call Truth, sometimes gets entangled in rules and regulations. Some people need them. And some people love them. And some people love to use rules and regulations to bash other people on the head -- what we might call fundamentalism? In reality, the truth is very simple, and regulations can get in the way, and opinions and attachments.

    I recently visited a beautiful pagoda and temple site to the southwest of Xian called the Daqin Temple, where Nestorian Christianity arrived in China in the 6-700s. I forget the exact date. It was beautiful. I wish I could post a picture for you but I don't know how. The Nestorians had temples in most of the major cities soon after. There are some interesting websites on this. Just google Nestorian Christianity China. You will see lots of sites.

    There is a very interesting book called "The Original Jesus" by two German authors that talks -- for many pages -- about the connections between Buddhism and Christianity, including archeological evidence -- the presence of Buddhist statues in the mediterannean, or pottery fragments from temples, etc. There is another book called the Original Jesus by some other authors, so don't get confused. The authors of the one on Buddhism and Christianity both have very German names.

    The truth is like a luminous pearl shining for all of us.

    EM
  • edited November 2005
    Dear ECM,
    I do thank you for your sensitivity. I realize that that I had reacted in the wrong way too soon and I am sorry for that. May be I shall learn more from this site. I suggest that you read the ebook I, THY SAVIOUR. You will never regret. Thank you again. By the way I am not a Mr. but a Ms.
    Ramani
  • ajani_mgoajani_mgo Veteran
    edited December 2005
    Christmas was actually known from the start, by the Romes who started it, that it wasn't meant to be the birthday of Jesus, it was actually an occasion to rather, remember his birth. They put it on the birthday of the Sun God or something similar. Somehow or other from the rememberance of Christ it became seen by most to be the birth of Christ instead.
  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited December 2005
    ajani_mgo wrote:
    Christmas was actually known from the start, by the Romes who started it, that it wasn't meant to be the birthday of Jesus, it was actually an occasion to rather, remember his birth. They put it on the birthday of the Sun God or something similar. Somehow or other from the rememberance of Christ it became seen by most to be the birth of Christ instead.

    The god born on 25 December was Mithras, Ajani. He was a favourite in the Roman army. We have a beautiful temple of Mithras in Roman London. This might interest you:
    The Temple of Mithras

    Discovery of the Temple. Discovered accidentally during construction work beside the Walbrook, London, this temple to the Persian god of light and the sun was moved to its present site in Temple Court, Queen Victoria Street, so the workers could get on with the job. Don't be fooled by its present elevated condition; mithraea (mithraic temples) were generally built partly or completely underground, representing the cave in which Mithras was said to have slain the primordial bull, thereby unleashing the powers of creativity and life into the world.

    Mithraism rose to prominence in the 3rd century A.D., though its roots extend much further back. It emphasized courage, integrity, and moral behaviour, and became very popular with soldiers of the Roman army. With its focus on a saviour, sacrifice, and rebirth, it was also a serious threat to early Christianity. It was exclusive to males, who rose through its seven levels by means of fearsome initiation ceremonies.

    Mithraic practices. Mithraic observances differed from traditional paganism in that services were held communally, followers sitting on benches either side of a narrow nave leading to an altar. As befits a religion springing from the slaying of a bull, sacrifices were common in mithraic observance, as were shared meals of wine and bread, particularly on the festival of the 25th of December. These latter two observances smacked of mockery to early Christians, who may well have sensed in Mithraism a serious rival. When Constantine the Great legitimized Christianity in 312 A.D. the Christians spent a good deal of energy knocking down everything mithraic in sight.

    The Temple of Mithras was built some time in the middle of the 3rd century A.D. Within the temple were found likenesses of Minerva, Bacchus, and Serapis, imported from Italy. These are now to be seen at the Museum of London. One final note; the form of temple used by mithraism is the fore-runner of the traditional Christian church, with aisles flanking a long nave leading to an altar and an apse. The Christians may have been horrified, but architecturally, at least, they owed a debt of thanks to mithraism.


    This is a beautiful bust of Mithras from the Walbrook site.
  • ajani_mgoajani_mgo Veteran
    edited December 2005
    Wow, thanks, Simon!
  • SimonthepilgrimSimonthepilgrim Veteran
    edited December 2005
    You're welcome, jani. You may amuse yourself (in your 'religion' lessons) by pointing out that Mithraism was more significant in the army than Christianity and that the Wallbrook temple dates from the third century of our Common Era, 300 years after the Jesus events. This is not some pre-Christian stuff but contemporary with it.
  • edited December 2005
    Yes that is what I think too....and I think the resurrection was just a brief visit prior to going, doing, being, something else. I love Jesus and Buddha and all devine mind.
  • edited December 2005
    I like what the Dahli Lama says..he says Christians shouldn't try to be Buddhist it is too difficult to comprehend.....I think of myself as all religions that recognize the divine mind...I am not hooked into a label.
  • edited January 2006
    Dear Ms. Ramani Subramani,
    I had not seen your thread before. If you are still continuing your interest, I invite you to peruse my thread under Judaism and Christianity.
    Thank you,
    Steven Feldman
Sign In or Register to comment.