Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
http://www.bibleprobe.com/buddhatoldofjesus.htm
It's a scanned book claiming that Buddha prophesied that way to Nirvana was to Jesus Christ.
It was a debate on "truths" on a conservative forum. I told them I was studding Buddhism trying to find my own "truth." I told them I do not believe people should be forced upon a "truth" that people should find their own way.
What do they say? I'm sorry, but Christianity is the right and only "truth" in order to prove it I found a book that nobody heard of saying that Buddha told his students that the "Holy One" (it MUST be Jesus) needed to be followed, so that is why Christianity is the right truth.
0
Comments
I say this because of personal experience. Many was the time I had met a christian who rattled off the same sort of gibberish such as:
"A good friend of mine who repented from his evil life of witchcraft told me that witches and warlocks go out at midnight and sacrifice babies to the devil before dancing around naked and having sex orgies until dawn."
The idea being that his "friend" was a christian and therefore would not lie thus making all of what was said "gospel" truth. It was comical if unnerving. Needless to say, when I could keep a straight face at the utter ignorance of the individual and the "supposed" testimony of his "friend", the most I would usually be able to get away with asking without getting an evangelical sermon in response is "So how long was your 'friend' a witch?" This typically got me a lot of hemming and hawing suggesting the individual knew he had been caught in a lie.
This passage suggests the very same sort of thing, an ignorant christian who took perhaps an hour's worth of buddhist studying, and happened on something that fit in with his notion of religion. So, in typical fashion with those I have encountered, he took what he read completely out of context and perverted it to serve his ends. The style seems about the same even though the passage looks in a convoluted way that the buddha might have been referring to Maitreya, the future buddha rather than Jesus --not that this christian would be aware of that fact.
As to your failed attempt at open reason with the "conservative forum", babylon5crusade, I'm sorry to hear of the results, but I can't say I'm surprised at what results you did get. You already had a mark against you when you tried to argue against what they perceived to be their religious beliefs. Dogma can be as hard to crack as reinforced concrete sometimes.
nanimo
The sex orgies are true of course, but most of the time they don't last until dawn.
:-)
If I feel particularly spiteful, I explain to them how the snake is actually the good guy in Genesis. Ask them how many times God lied to Adam and Eve in Genesis, then how many times the snake did, etc.
sincerely John
On an aside, some of those who had spouted that sort of thing would believe my replied "gibberish" in it's entirety and begin repeating it to others. As such, I felt like I was just throwing gasoline on an already out-of-control wildfire :rolleyes: and promptly stopped adding to the problem even in jest. That however is all in the past for me. I am no longer wiccan, so there is no point in championing a cause that was resisted in the first place.
As to responding with the snake and what all, the people I dealt with were not the most worldly wise(or even biblically wise for that matter) so even if I had tried that I would likely have gotten confused looks, and then perhaps a full-on fire and brimstone sermon about the infallibility of god.
I agree with you, former monk John. Christianity, in retrospect, is woefully inferior to buddhism IMHO. It's a pity more of buddhism hasn't "filtered down" into it, but as babylon5crusade discovered, dogma will accept no equal. Thus, the suffering goes on.
Oh, boy, it's Christianity again :facepalm:! Those fundamentalists, or those who really believe in some words in a really weird fairy-tells' book will do anything to prove that Christianity is the greatest religion, and that other religious leaders/founders actually spread the message of Jesus/God either unintentionally , either under God's supervision. This thing makes me really sick, when fundamental religions do such things , just for propaganda.
About Buddha, he didn't ( my opinion...or what I understood from Dhammapada) preach about the existence of a god or a would-be super human that will restore balance on Earth.
A quick google pointed me to this website that covers this bit of wishful thinking on the Christian's part: http://dhammaprotector.blogspot.com/2009/09/did-buddha-prophesize-coming-of-jesus.html
Besides, who of us is enlightened anyway? Not me.
This falls under the heading of "cognitive mind-games". Fun as they are, they really have nothing to do with the task of Buddhism, which is to work towards enlightenment.
I think if more people were like Jesus, and took only what was good from the world religions, we'd find that they have a lot more in common than appears at first glance.
If Jesus can't be attributed to what they are saying (that's the case most of the time BTW) I just nicely re-direct the conversation again.
Between you and me my point is I assume historical Jesus was influenced by Buddhism so I'm very interested in Jesus because of that. From my experience I advise you: don't let them know of that assumption if you decide to make it too.