Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

The End of Rebirth?

laughing_statuelaughing_statue Explorer
edited November 2010 in Buddhism Basics
I heard about the ending of the cycle of rebirth or reincarnation. I'm a little uncertain about how literal this should be taken. What is supposed to happen to you after rebirth ends anyway? Do you have to believe rebirth can end? Are there any sects that do not believe that? I am a strong believer in reincarnation or rebirth, but I don't know if I believe it can end. What are your thoughts on the matter? Thanks a lot!

Comments

  • HumbleHumble Explorer
    edited November 2010
    The Buddha did not answer many questions that he felt were not conducive to achieving the goal. The question of "What happens to a Buddha (or enlightened person) when he dies?" was one of the questions which he believed the answer to would not be conducive to helping people achieve the goal. Ending the cycle of rebirth in samsara is to be taken literally. The Buddha taught the four noble truths as a guide for people wishing to cease rebirth in the realms of suffering.


    Breaking free

    "Bhikkhus, it is through not realizing, through not penetrating the Four Noble Truths that this long course of birth and death has been passed through and undergone by me as well as by you. What are these four? They are the noble truth of dukkha; the noble truth of the origin of dukkha; the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha; and the noble truth of the way to the cessation of dukkha. But now, bhikkhus, that these have been realized and penetrated, cut off is the craving for existence, destroyed is that which leads to renewed becoming, and there is no fresh becoming."
    DN 16 (with dukkha left untranslated)


    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/sacca/index.html


    MN 63 PTS: M i 426

    Cula-Malunkyovada Sutta: The Shorter Instructions to Malunkya
    translated from the Pali by
    Thanissaro Bhikkhu
    © 1998–2010

    I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Savatthi at Jeta's Grove, Anathapindika's monastery. Then, as Ven. Malunkyaputta was alone in seclusion, this train of thought arose in his awareness: "These positions that are undeclared, set aside, discarded by the Blessed One — 'The cosmos is eternal,' 'The cosmos is not eternal,' 'The cosmos is finite,' 'The cosmos is infinite,' 'The soul & the body are the same,' 'The soul is one thing and the body another,' 'After death a Tathagata exists,' 'After death a Tathagata does not exist,' 'After death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist,' 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist' — I don't approve, I don't accept that the Blessed One has not declared them to me. I'll go ask the Blessed One about this matter. If he declares to me that 'The cosmos is eternal,' that 'The cosmos is not eternal,' that 'The cosmos is finite,' that 'The cosmos is infinite,' that 'The soul & the body are the same,' that 'The soul is one thing and the body another,' that 'After death a Tathagata exists,' that 'After death a Tathagata does not exist,' that 'After death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist,' or that 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist,' then I will live the holy life under him. If he does not declare to me that 'The cosmos is eternal,'... or that 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist,' then I will renounce the training and return to the lower life."

    Then, when it was evening, Ven. Malunkyaputta arose from seclusion and went to the Blessed One. On arrival, having bowed down, he sat to one side. As he was sitting there he said to the Blessed One, "Lord, just now, as I was alone in seclusion, this train of thought arose in my awareness: 'These positions that are undeclared, set aside, discarded by the Blessed One... I don't approve, I don't accept that the Blessed One has not declared them to me. I'll go ask the Blessed One about this matter. If he declares to me that "The cosmos is eternal,"... or that "After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist," then I will live the holy life under him. If he does not declare to me that "The cosmos is eternal,"... or that "After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist," then I will renounce the training and return to the lower life.'

    "Lord, if the Blessed One knows that 'The cosmos is eternal,' then may he declare to me that 'The cosmos is eternal.' If he knows that 'The cosmos is not eternal,' then may he declare to me that 'The cosmos is not eternal.' But if he doesn't know or see whether the cosmos is eternal or not eternal, then, in one who is unknowing & unseeing, the straightforward thing is to admit, 'I don't know. I don't see.'... If he doesn't know or see whether after death a Tathagata exists... does not exist... both exists & does not exist... neither exists nor does not exist,' then, in one who is unknowing & unseeing, the straightforward thing is to admit, 'I don't know. I don't see.'"
    "Malunkyaputta, did I ever say to you, 'Come, Malunkyaputta, live the holy life under me, and I will declare to you that 'The cosmos is eternal,' or 'The cosmos is not eternal,' or 'The cosmos is finite,' or 'The cosmos is infinite,' or 'The soul & the body are the same,' or 'The soul is one thing and the body another,' or 'After death a Tathagata exists,' or 'After death a Tathagata does not exist,' or 'After death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist,' or 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist'?"

    "No, lord."

    "And did you ever say to me, 'Lord, I will live the holy life under the Blessed One and [in return] he will declare to me that 'The cosmos is eternal,' or 'The cosmos is not eternal,' or 'The cosmos is finite,' or 'The cosmos is infinite,' or 'The soul & the body are the same,' or 'The soul is one thing and the body another,' or 'After death a Tathagata exists,' or 'After death a Tathagata does not exist,' or 'After death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist,' or 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist'?"

    "No, lord."

    "Then that being the case, foolish man, who are you to be claiming grievances/making demands of anyone?
    "Malunkyaputta, if anyone were to say, 'I won't live the holy life under the Blessed One as long as he does not declare to me that "The cosmos is eternal,"... or that "After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist,"' the man would die and those things would still remain undeclared by the Tathagata.
    "It's just as if a man were wounded with an arrow thickly smeared with poison. His friends & companions, kinsmen & relatives would provide him with a surgeon, and the man would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know whether the man who wounded me was a noble warrior, a priest, a merchant, or a worker.' He would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know the given name & clan name of the man who wounded me... until I know whether he was tall, medium, or short... until I know whether he was dark, ruddy-brown, or golden-colored... until I know his home village, town, or city... until I know whether the bow with which I was wounded was a long bow or a crossbow... until I know whether the bowstring with which I was wounded was fiber, bamboo threads, sinew, hemp, or bark... until I know whether the shaft with which I was wounded was wild or cultivated... until I know whether the feathers of the shaft with which I was wounded were those of a vulture, a stork, a hawk, a peacock, or another bird... until I know whether the shaft with which I was wounded was bound with the sinew of an ox, a water buffalo, a langur, or a monkey.' He would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know whether the shaft with which I was wounded was that of a common arrow, a curved arrow, a barbed, a calf-toothed, or an oleander arrow.' The man would die and those things would still remain unknown to him.
    "In the same way, if anyone were to say, 'I won't live the holy life under the Blessed One as long as he does not declare to me that 'The cosmos is eternal,'... or that 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist,' the man would die and those things would still remain undeclared by the Tathagata.

    "Malunkyaputta, it's not the case that when there is the view, 'The cosmos is eternal,' there is the living of the holy life. And it's not the case that when there is the view, 'The cosmos is not eternal,' there is the living of the holy life. When there is the view, 'The cosmos is eternal,' and when there is the view, 'The cosmos is not eternal,' there is still the birth, there is the aging, there is the death, there is the sorrow, lamentation, pain, despair, & distress whose destruction I make known right in the here & now.

    "It's not the case that when there is the view, 'The cosmos is finite,' there is the living of the holy life. And it's not the case that when there is the view, 'The cosmos is infinite,' there is the living of the holy life. When there is the view, 'The cosmos is finite,' and when there is the view, 'The cosmos is infinite,' there is still the birth, there is the aging, there is the death, there is the sorrow, lamentation, pain, despair, & distress whose destruction I make known right in the here & now.
    "It's not the case that when there is the view, 'The soul & the body are the same,' there is the living of the holy life. And it's not the case that when there is the view, 'The soul is one thing and the body another,' there is the living of the holy life. When there is the view, 'The soul & the body are the same,' and when there is the view, 'The soul is one thing and the body another,' there is still the birth, there is the aging, there is the death, there is the sorrow, lamentation, pain, despair, & distress whose destruction I make known right in the here & now.

    "It's not the case that when there is the view, 'After death a Tathagata exists,' there is the living of the holy life. And it's not the case that when there is the view, 'After death a Tathagata does not exist,' there is the living of the holy life. And it's not the case that when there is the view, 'After death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist,' there is the living of the holy life. And it's not the case that when there is the view, 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist' there is the living of the holy life. When there is the view, 'After death a Tathagata exists'... 'After death a Tathagata does not exist'... 'After death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist'... 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist,' there is still the birth, there is the aging, there is the death, there is the sorrow, lamentation, pain, despair, & distress whose destruction I make known right in the here & now.
    "So, Malunkyaputta, remember what is undeclared by me as undeclared, and what is declared by me as declared. And what is undeclared by me? 'The cosmos is eternal,' is undeclared by me. 'The cosmos is not eternal,' is undeclared by me. 'The cosmos is finite'... 'The cosmos is infinite'... 'The soul & the body are the same'... 'The soul is one thing and the body another'... 'After death a Tathagata exists'... 'After death a Tathagata does not exist'... 'After death a Tathagata both exists & does not exist'... 'After death a Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist,' is undeclared by me.

    "And why are they undeclared by me? Because they are not connected with the goal, are not fundamental to the holy life. They do not lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation, calming, direct knowledge, self-awakening, Unbinding. That's why they are undeclared by me.
    "And what is declared by me? 'This is stress,' is declared by me. 'This is the origination of stress,' is declared by me. 'This is the cessation of stress,' is declared by me. 'This is the path of practice leading to the cessation of stress,' is declared by me. And why are they declared by me? Because they are connected with the goal, are fundamental to the holy life. They lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation, calming, direct knowledge, self-awakening, Unbinding. That's why they are declared by me.
    "So, Malunkyaputta, remember what is undeclared by me as undeclared, and what is declared by me as declared."

    That is what the Blessed One said. Gratified, Ven. Malunkyaputta delighted in the Blessed One's words.

    See also: AN 4.24.


    http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.063.than.html
  • laughing_statuelaughing_statue Explorer
    edited November 2010
    Thanks! That was fairly helpful. But, do you think there are very many Buddhists that believe most everything else about Buddhism except that you can end the cycle of rebirth this way? After all, Buddhism offers happiness and a nice way of living (with many other benefits backed up by science). I would think the cycle thing doesn't have to be believed or considered that important as long as this life is lived out well.
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    edited November 2010
    To believe that rebirth can end is to believe that the 3rd noble truth is actually true. To believe that it can't is to not trust the Buddha as an enlightened being and great teacher. I have never heard of a sect of Buddhism that believes nirvana is not possible.
  • laughing_statuelaughing_statue Explorer
    edited November 2010
    Well, it never occurred to me that Nirvana and ending the cycle of rebirth could be the same thing. Nirvana is ending suffering, but that doesn't include ending the cycle of rebirth, does it? Ending suffering? Ending rebirth? Do I have something backwards?
  • Ficus_religiosaFicus_religiosa Veteran
    edited November 2010
    Nirvana also ends rebirth :) practice --> nirvana --> end of samsara --> eternal bliss
  • laughing_statuelaughing_statue Explorer
    edited November 2010
    Hm... I understand 100% what you guys are telling me now. I really do. I just can't except that one part of it (ending rebirth). It seems to me that that is something that we just can't have any part in, having reached Nirvana or not. But is that okay if I am also an atheist? I have heard of other Atheistic Buddhists before. Then there are other religious people that are also Buddhists, but they don't change any of their other beliefs (like if they are a Catholic, they don't suddenly believe in reincarnation). Does this make sense? Sorry. I'm really trying to figure this all out. Thanks a lot guys!
  • edited November 2010
    Well, it never occurred to me that Nirvana and ending the cycle of rebirth could be the same thing. Nirvana is ending suffering, but that doesn't include ending the cycle of rebirth, does it? Ending suffering? Ending rebirth? Do I have something backwards?

    birth leads to suffering. It's one of the noble truths. If you live in this world, you will suffer. If you believe in an end of suffering, you must believe in an end of birth.
  • federicafederica Seeker of the clear blue sky... Its better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt Moderator
    edited November 2010
    Not necessarily.
    A Boddhisattva vows to be reborn (once enlightened) to help all other beings attain enlightenment.
    End of suffering need not mean end of re-birth - for some traditions.
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    edited November 2010
    I guess it depends on which Buddhist tradition you are coming from. According to Theravada teaching, becoming a fully enlightened being puts an end to ignorance and because the chain of cause and effect (simple version) is ignorance--->birth---> suffering, when ignorance ends, everything following it also ends. However, the in Mahayana a fully enlightened being has put an end to suffering but can deliberately chose to be reborn. So technically, one could say that in all cases, involuntary rebirth is ended but not necessarily all rebirth, as federica has already said. :)
  • Ficus_religiosaFicus_religiosa Veteran
    edited November 2010
    You could find "good question, good answer.pdf" on google (it's from buddhanet). I think it's a fine little book. In it S. Dhammika writes that Buddhists do not believe in gods.
    I think it's more accurate to say that Buddhists generally do not believe in or do not care about gods (atheist or agnostic).

    You are your own savior through practice :)
  • laughing_statuelaughing_statue Explorer
    edited November 2010
    Thanks so much! You guys have helped me so much! :)
Sign In or Register to comment.