Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Lovingkindness and fools

edited November 2010 in Buddhism Basics
We are supposed to extend lovingkindness to everyone, but the Buddha teaches that we shouldn't associate with fools. Is there a conflict here? I can see having compassion for those who have much suffering. But wouldn't associating with such people present a danger especially for us who are beginners? Can lovingkindness be an intent that doesn't require personal association?

Comments

  • edited November 2010
    Can lovingkindness be an intent that doesn't require personal association?

    Yes. In fact, lovingkindness is supposed to be universal, and therefore extends to all sentient beings, much more so than just the ones we associate with.
  • edited November 2010
    Yes. In fact, lovingkindness is supposed to be universal, and therefore extends to all sentient beings, much more so than just the ones we associate with.
    So it's o.k. to avoid associating with certain people while still thinking of them in loving and kind ways?
  • edited November 2010
    Yes.

    To clarify, lovingkindness is extended to all sentient beings regardless of relationship. In the practice of tonglen, loving kindness is extended to those felt to be most remote from the person practice as much as those close to them. That's actually the whole point of lovingkindness practice- to generate the motivation towards all. If it were only toward people we liked or wanted to associate with, it would be far too easy.

    Lovingkindness as described above is fundamental to both Vajrayana and Mahayana.
  • edited November 2010
    Yes.

    To clarify, lovingkindness is extended to all sentient beings regardless of relationship. In the practice of tonglen, loving kindness is extended to those felt to be most remote from the person practice as much as those close to them. That's actually the whole point of lovingkindness practice- to generate the motivation towards all. If it were only toward people we liked or wanted to associate with, it would be far too easy.

    Lovingkindness as described above is fundamental to both Vajrayana and Mahayana.

    Thanks. That's a big help.:)
  • MountainsMountains Veteran
    edited November 2010
    To paraphrase a stand up comic I once heard (he was talking about families):

    You gotta love 'em, but you don't gotta like 'em. :)
  • edited November 2010
    ............ ........... .............
    Lovingkindness as described above is fundamental to both Vajrayana and Mahayana.

    Isn't loving-kindness (metta) also fundamental to the Theravada tradition?
  • edited November 2010
    sukhita wrote: »
    Isn't loving-kindness (metta) also fundamental to the Theravada tradition?

    Oops. That's what I meant to write. Sorry.
  • edited November 2010
    Oops. That's what I meant to write. Sorry.
    No sweat... small stuff :)
  • edited November 2010
    When I would look down on others I think that it could have been a protective mechanism. Perhaps in some way shielding my identity, a feeling based on insecurity, or some way to appear more awesome to myself.

    Sometimes people can be hard to accept, although we can relate on a human level knowing that we all undergo the same basic trials and ultimately we all expire.

    I think it's worth remembering that we want happiness for others. If anything it improves state of mind, and at the most the world becomes a better place for acting it out and cultivating action that reflects a simple wish for happiness and wellbeing.
  • edited November 2010
    So it's o.k. to avoid associating with certain people while still thinking of them in loving and kind ways?

    No! You've got that all wrong.

    Its not ok to "avoid" people. That is an expression of aversion. If you are specifically trying to avoid someone, in what way is that showing loving-kindness towards them?

    You don't want people whom you consider to be "fools" to rub off on you the wrong way. You don't want them to corrupt you and make you give into heedless desires. Well, OK...don't let that person make you behave that way! Hold true to your own path, but don't seek to avoid any body!

    Just calling them a fool and avoiding them is ignorant. To show them true compassion, be good humored about it. It actually IS kind of funny the stuff people will say and do, but don't put them down for it. Instead help them up by compassionately pointing out their foolish ways. :)
  • CloudCloud Veteran
    edited November 2010
    Yep. It's not about avoiding fools, it's about not getting drawn into unskillful actions by them. Generally I take it to mean don't surround yourself purposely with fools, thus having them as "friends" that influence you negatively and affect your practice. Be "friendly" with fools, show as great of loving-kindness/compassion as you can muster, but surround yourself with wise and compassionate friends; people who support your lifestyle, that you can learn from and count on.

    Or something. I have no friends anymore so don't listen to me. :)
  • edited November 2010
    In the Buddhist context, fools are people who will never, ever, learn even from the wise; consider this verse from the Dhammapadda:

    A fool associating with a sage,
    Even for a lifetime,
    Will no more perceive the Dharma
    Than a spoon will perceive the taste of soup. [64]
  • edited November 2010
    We are supposed to extend lovingkindness to everyone, but the Buddha teaches that we shouldn't associate with fools. Is there a conflict here? I can see having compassion for those who have much suffering. But wouldn't associating with such people present a danger especially for us who are beginners?

    This is where skillful means come in. Being skillfully compassionate, you might be kind to foolish people without getting involved, or over-involved. So I'm agreeing with Cloud.
  • edited November 2010
    I take the word "avoid" to mean "not go out of our way to associate with". Or maybe even exchange sincere pleasantries with and then go elsewhere. I think it's important for beginners to choose their company wisely and maintain some separation, and that this proceeds on a continuum as people become more experienced in Dharma practice. I didn't mean "avoid" as in "cross the street to avoid exchanging greetings with", but I think it's important to choose company wisely and perhaps not underestimate the negative effects unwholesome company can have on us.
  • edited November 2010
    Hmm
    I sit opposite someone at work that I perceive to be a fool... a guy who is bright, but is too caught up in his own world to see the views of others clearly. He has an unskillfull mind.

    Such circumstances test our path, our compassion and loving kindness. Sometimes I react with frustration...which makes me unhappy. But, knowing life as I do, he will help me to become more skillfull so its not a bad thing :)
  • edited November 2010
    Detach from the frustration. Detach from him.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited November 2010
    We can't truly help until we are buddhas. But trying is the path to becoming imho. At the same time don't sink in someone elses problems if you aren't ready.

    In your heart if not in the world never give up on a friend. Thats the one thing I am convinced of.
  • edited November 2010
    Don't throw the buddha out with the bathwater?
Sign In or Register to comment.