Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
NASA finds new type of life form.
B5C
Veteran
Looks like the Biology books will have to be re-written.
At their conference today, NASA scientist Felisa Wolfe Simon will announce that they have found a bacteria whose DNA is completely alien to what we know today. Instead of using phosphorus, the bacteria uses arsenic. All life on Earth is made of six components: carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and sulfur. Every being, from the smallest amoeba to the largest whale, share the same life stream. Our DNA blocks are all the same.
But not this one. This one is completely different. Discovered in the poisonous Mono Lake, California, this bacteria is made of arsenic, something that was thought to be completely impossible. While she and other scientists theorized that this could be possible, this is the first discovery. The implications of this discovery are enormous to our understanding of life itself and the possibility of finding beings in other planets that don't have to be like planet Earth.
http://gizmodo.com/5704158/nasa-finds-new-life
0
Comments
They also claim 3 men landed on the moon in '69.....
I still don't buy it.
So what's your point?
However, they've been finding life on EARTH that is unlike life we've known. Simple bacteria living in situations that were thought to be quite impossible for life to survive.
Point is, scientists have been discovering that life is actually quite adaptable. So, it HINTS that simple organisms could be living on planets even inside our very own solar system.
Simple bacteria life on other planets may be a bit profound... But not exactly what humans are looking for, yeah?
Are you guys being serious?
I second that.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/12/02/mono-lake-bacteria-build-their-dna-using-arsenic-and-no-this-isnt-about-aliens/
They are still carbon base, and still would thrive better on phosphorus. But they have adapted to their conditions, showing life has countless ways of thriving!
But I think if we are to ever find extraterrestrial life, it will most likely be carbon based. Its the most energy favorable.
I wonder if we might find a solar system where there is more silicon than carbon.
I think it was Stephen Hawking who said that the aliens we'd be most likely to meet, or to visit us, would be mechanical - robotic.
yes, has anybody seen the documentary Alien Planet?
A floating intelligent life form.
Are robots a form of life?
If we amend our definition of what life itself is, then sure, the realm of possibility would be vast.
Mars might be "alive".
Indeed. We have carbon-based bias.
The story is on http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/, so it's not BS. Specific link is http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/articles/thriving-on-arsenic/ for the full thing.
NASA has pulled this kind of shit before. I won't believe it until there's independent confirmation.
Sad to say the media, most of who do not understand basic science and want a splashy headline are very unclear in the way it is reported.
a good example of this are the Mars rocks that do show some microscopic features that resemble those features produced by microbes. Although that was the report the headlines would have you think that life had been found on Mars and the quotes from the reseachers were so twisted as to be of no use.
Or how Ida was paraded around as some type of missing link at the expense of its importance as a very well preserved tranisisional fossel from long before Humans were here.
I for one am looking forward to reading the actual research paper to see what was found.
Also http://mythbustersresults.com/nasa-moon-landing.
I wouldn't bring it up if no one had said anything, but it made me smile. Despite all of this, people will still believe what they choose to believe, as the MythBusters team put it themselves:
Namaste.
Having said that, that doesn't mean I think that the moon landing was real. Both sides have great points, and are great at debunking each other.
Much more interested in this new form of life!
for those that don't know, that's Buzz Aldrin punching a moon-landing denier.
Harrison Schmitt, the pilot of the lunar lander during the last Apollo mission and later a United States senator, said in an interview that the poor state of the nation’s schools has had predictable results. "If people decide they're going to deny the facts of history and the facts of science and technology, there's not much you can do with them," he said.
"For most of them, I just feel sorry that we failed in their education."
No it's not.
Majority of scientists believed that life can not live in a arsenic environment since 99.9% chance that everything organic that goes into dies. We found a life form on Earth that can live in it and also use arsenic as an option source to work with DNA and other biochemical processes.
The best thing about this discovery is that It creates the idea that life is very common in our universe. If a life form can live in a area that is deadly too most organisms. There is a great chance that life can be created in not so perfect conditions.
Also Obama gave NASA a budget raise.
Until they can come up with a better response to an in-depth and much respected, serious, scientific BBC programme, picking their claims to pieces bit by bit, with something more than "Damn well did, so there!" I'm still sceptical. Call it an 'Ehi Passika thing....!
yeah, liars hate exposure.....:poke:
http://www.newscientist.com/gallery/apollo-site-images/2
LOL
Yes.
Can you prove definitively, otherwise, where NASA have been unable to do so?
Oh yeah, three extremely long shots of the moon's surface covered in big white arrows showing tiny specks does it for me, yup, I'm fully convinced.:rolleyes:
Photos of 'landers in space' they may be....
Photos of definitive proof that a man actually strode onto the surface of the moon - they ain't.
Do you have any idea how insulting all of this is?
My father was one of the most honest people you would have ever met. Unlike Buzz, he would have just smiled and kept walking. However he didn't risk his life like Buzz did.
I grew up in the Johnson Space Center community and most of my friends and family have worked for NASA. That includes those who died on the space shuttle etc.
During Apollo 13 my parent's apartment across from the space center turned into a flop-house for those working 24 straight hour shifts in mission control. (my mom was pregnant with me at the time). They slept on their floor to get some rest as they tried to get the crew back to Earth.
My father died less than two years ago, he was everything to me so this gets me a little riled up. I watched the Discovery Channel's "When we Left Earth" HD documentary series with him the hospital across from JSC as he was dying of cancer. His Apollo 11 awards are the first thing you see when you walk into my mom's home. And he was a much better person than you will ever be. You should be ashamed.
Take it from me, we landed on the moon.
That Discovery Channel show was great too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_We_Left_Earth:_The_NASA_Missions
The Moon landing is a historical Fact
Not only do people who deny the Moon landing insult the brave men and women who risked, and continue to risk thier lives. to continue the exploration of the universe , it is also a denial of the great benifits to medical science and other areas that this venture has bought.
Many of the cardiac and other medical sensors that save thousands of lives today were first used to moniter the Asronauts on thier trip. Much of the other tech that was developed during this time, computers and other electonic breakthoughs has been used to help people all over the world.
And our understanding of who and what we are and how the Universe and planet that we live on work have taken a vast leap due to the efforts of the people who worked at NASA and other places during this time.
Its like stateing that Watson and Crick did not really discover the Stucture of DNA in 1953, dispite all that this discovery has lead to.
Rocket, I salute your parents and all of the others they worked with for the effert that they put in to make the world a better place. I am sorry for the loss of your father not so long ago. I know this does not really help, but he was part of one of the great leaps in human history.
All the Best.
Thanks. It's funny that you bring this up. My dad worked on the medical sensor telemetry from space during Apollo. There is a funny/true scene in the Apollo 13 movie where the crew gets sick of wearing them and tears them off.
That is because in the US Constitution.
A president must:
- be a natural born citizen of the United States;<sup id="cite_ref-25" class="reference"></sup>
- be at least thirty-five years old;
- have been a permanent resident in the United States for at least fourteen years.
As a governor of a state, you don't have to be a natural born citizen of the United States. Unless it states in the state's constitution.Obama father was a Kenyan and his mother was a American. They claim he was born in Kenya and that Obama's birth certificate is faked even though Obama released a copy of his Hawaiian birth certificate. They also believe Obama is a closet Muslim.