Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
17th Karmapa : who is the real one???
Hello here I am again with a question that really has been disturbing my peace for a while.
I have absolutely read everything on the internet and on the books available about the subject and what I just could see was lots and lots of opinions, lots of blind-faith traps, gossip, wrong speech etc etc etc
What if a individual has a choice between two groups to follow and one of them the head is the karmapa appointed by HH Dalai lama and the other by the Karmapa appointed by HH the Shamar Rinpoche:
a) Go for HH Dalai Lama's one,HH is Chenrezig and there is no way he could be wrong and by the way he is the spiritual leader of Tibet, and dispite all the accusations of blind faith and letter forgery be content and reassured that your choice represent the majority of the kagyu and the support of the other schools;
b) Go for Shamar Rinpoche's one, it has always been Shamarpas who appointed Karmapas before, since before the 1st Dalai lam and face the misery of being told that your leader is a fake and have 75% of the vajrayana world treating your teachers and lineage as a joke;
c) Run Away from the Kagyu tradition and save yourself this excruciating decision, there are other schools with an unanimous accepted leader;
d) Look for a theravadan centre and forget tulkus etc etc because these issues can take you far away from the path to lasting happiness;
e) buy a bible and convert yourself the Jesus Christ.
Exaggerations and humour apart, what do you, folks, have to say about this issue?
Thuje Che
0
Comments
It also says in the same Wikipedia article that there may in fact be two emanations of the Karmapa this time around, that that is possible.
I myself have no particular stake in this either way, as long as it does not obstruct Dharma teachings. I think history will tell which, if either, is the correct Karmapa.
Partial quote from Wikipedia:
"Of the two 17th Karmapas, Ogyen Trinley Dorje has been recognized by Situ Rinpoche and Gyaltsab Rinpoche. In July 1992, both asked the Office of the Dalai Lama in Dharamsala to confirm their recognition. The 14th Dalai Lama confirmed the recognition of Ogyen Trinley Dorje."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karmapa_Controversy
People have suggested that the karmapas may actually be both the same as the previous one so if people hold this view no matter whom they receive teachings from they are definatly receiving teachings from a Buddha.
[link]http://www.shamarpa.org/index.php?id=6&tx_ttnews[pointer]=5&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=11&tx_ttnews[backPid]=1&cHash=490e99528b[/link]
but nobody knows since 2007 what was discussed. for nobody I mean us because of course they know what they've discussed. If someone has some light on the subject would be great.
If the answer of the first question is no, then why even bother with the whole issue?
Examine the teachings that they give, and I would have to say that if you ever get the chance to be in the presence of Karmapa, then it may be easier to make up your own mind about these things through the experience. When you are around a highly realized teacher, "you just know." No other way to explain it.
I am not the type of person who would enter in a house where there is smoking going off the windows, although I feel like I am in the street looking to this house and thinking "what a beautiful house" but then in case I enter this house I just don't know if I go to the side of the house where the fireman are parked or to the other side where the fireman said it is dangerous to be. the intention is just not create one more web speculation about this issue.
I wish there were more info available on Shamar's candidate; I haven't been able to find anything.
Here's what I think may have been the reasoning behind the scenes;
Tai Situ found a gifted child in China. Somehow he and those surrounding the child managed to maneuver in such a way as to get the Chinese to approve the choice. Eventually this candidate escaped to India. Bear in mind that the Panchen Lama has been kidnapped and held hostage by the Chinese, so he's not available to approve the next candidate for Dalai Lama (if there will be one). So they need the Karmapa to be available to make that decision. So they managed to get a Karmapa who has been approved by the Chinese, meaning that if/when the karmapa approves the next Dalai Lama incarnation, theoretically, the Chinese can't complain, because it'll be THEIR GUY who makes the approval! Astute move. That's how I see it. But according to reports, Tai Situ forged the document indicating the next Karmapa reincarnation. Too bad the 16th didn't leave a letter, or at least, not where it could be found. Strange. I'm not taking sides in this, I'm just saying that there are probably political reasons for the choice that was made.
Guru Rinpoche is a historical figure that did not reincarnate, so he would be the same for all lineages (in terms of historical fact, at least).
Basicly I am saying that they are both good karmapas. Well maybe both are bad and that would be unfortunate. But they have had every opportunity to learn the dharma from a young age.