Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Eating of meat - Where is the line drawn?
Comments
all of the women in my family are plagued with horrible menstruation cramps until they have kids, so i guess i never really thought about it too much. my gyno has just suggested i could be put on birth control, but it is not a possibility that i would become pregnant so i don't wish to do that. and like i said, i used to have them when i was younger but a veg diet makes these sort of periods quite rare for me. i would think if it was a result of a thyroid problem it would stay the same. i'm kind of a hypochondriac so i did research the thyroid thing and atm, i do think i have several of the symptoms (which may or may not be me just being a hypochondriac), but i will probably suggest this to my doctor at my next visit and see what he thinks. thanks for your input!
How did you find us, cur?
As far as I know according to the Pali Canon Buddha explicitly refuted Devadatta's insistence that all those who followed the Buddha to go vegetarian. Simply because it would not be practical, especially for those monks who still go on alms rounds for their daily meal. What if someone decided to offer meat? If you throw it away then it would be a downfall. As a former monk sure you know this.
May I enquire why you returned your monk's vow, if I may be so daring?
This probably depends on the person, if you think its morally questionable to eat meat than you probably shouldn't.
I probably would be a vegetarian if i was brought up that way - my knowledge of vegetarian cooking is still limited and therefore i don't know if i'd eat enough of vitamins and such if i only cut meat out of my diet.
I also don't think its any more moral to just buy meat but not kill animals, since the butcher could have the same reasons - he's a vegetarian, but doesn't want to loose his job since he doesn't know how else he'll pay his rent next month..
Besides, take another example - most people agree that killing jews or putting them in concentration camps is not ethical; but what if you only payed someone to regularily supply you with bones of jews that you knew he killed?
True, we need to kill living beings to survive, be it plants or animals. But i don't think that just pretending that we are not taking their lives because they are such or our belief is such that it makes any different. Therefore i also find intention very important. I don't think we should stop eating now (since that is not really a sensible option), but we should make very sure that we do not waste our food (that is, not throw it away or let it go bad), regardelss of its kind.
why did I quit?
as is traditional for every male in southeast asia a devout buddhist becomes a monk for usually 3 months and 3 days or longer up to a lifetime if they so choose, my inspiration was a married man that regreted not doing it and became a monk for three days only, in therevada there is no time set or lifetime commitment for being a monk. I fully set out to try and do the 3 months but i have an illness that makes it very difficult for me to sleep without food in my stomach, the buddha strictly states that an exemption should be made for sick people to eat after 12Pm but the monks didnt understand this well enough as it was a higher teaching. i only broke the no food after 12 rule twice in three weeks but they knew about it, and i was chastized, they let you eat ice cream after 12 so thats how i did it, they were not at all happy that i wanted to quit as i was setting a very good example of a monk for a westerner, everyone else
being asian, i had memorized several pages of the basic pali prayers, ironically i wasnt a full vegetarian myself when i lived at this(cambodian temple in Southern california)temple, they didnt have any vegetarians or much vege food to my chagrin, i ate a lot of donuts...... and yes of course the Buddha would makes some allowances for eskimos to eat meat, the buddha was practical, thats why he didnt call for a complete ban on meat, he knew the people wouldn't all be able to do it
And I still don't understand why you returned your vows.
For what it's worth, only the Mahayana Sutras talked about encouraging everyone to be vegetarian, but there's still no imposition. In the Pali Canon Buddha even admonished against institutionalized vegetarianism. How can a monk practice gratitude if he is not able to be thankful for the food he is offered for the day, even if it is meat?
And if you know where Tibet actually is, you would know that agriculture is near impossible, because of the terrain and climate. How can the Tibetans originally be vegetarian when all they are able to successfully cultivate naturally from the soil were barley, tea, and a few other plants? They couldn't grow a myriad of vegetables, everything had to be traded and brought in from passing caravans plying the Silk Route. The native nomads herded cattle and sheep and horses for a reason: they were food and clothing and shelter and transport. They did what they had to do in order to survive. So either you are lying or you have your history mixed up.
In the "Have you lied...." thread, you refuse to find links and references to where the Buddha said it was OK to lie. You said the Dhammapada contains references. I read the dhammapada every day. I have posted several quotations from the Dhammapada to back my comments and refuting your statements. You present nothing to anyone, as mitigating evidence, proof or foundation for your comments.
You for all your hundreds of books read, can find no creditable source or link to back anything you say.
Straight over your head....
Over-zealous would be right, especially as you are completely unable to back anything you say, up.
as a 'Monk' (former, even so) you should have chapter and verse at your fingertips. You should be able to quote and give reference.
I seem to understand Theravada a darn sight more than you do. You seem to have muddied the waters with a good deal of inflexible and christian doctrine....
There is no "long-standing tradition" of vegetarianism in Buddhism. There may be in some traditions, but certainly not all. The Monastery I attend has monks who eat meat. It's a theravada Monastery, by the way....
so tell me where to find this link about the deer and the Buddha.
There was a thread on here some time ago about the hunter chasing the rabbit, and the Buddha seeing which way it went, and responding to the hunter's question on where the rabbit was. I think it's a Koan designed to elicit responses on what we think the Buddha would reply, and I think it was hypothetical.
is that what you're referring to?
I did a search and .found a link
it's really quite easy when you put your mind to it.
it comes from a book called "What would the Buddha do?" I recommend reading the first post.
unless, of course, you were only a monk for 10 minutes...
As for the rest of your post, you're just rambling and I have no idea what you're going on about, it's unintelligible, unpunctuated and frankly, you stopped making any coherent sense a long time ago.
Unnecessary cruelty is certainly a moral no-no. However, there are many Buddhists who eat meat, and as such, you must respect their opinion and reasoning for doing so. Even if it grates against your own sensibilities. Stand by what you believe. Adhere to your principles, but have an open mind, and relax.