Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Has the concept of Karma been corrupted?
Comments
So I hear people discussing kamma in incorrect or "ignorant" ways, referring to somebody else's come-uppance, or why is their kamma not biting them on their @ss - and I point out that they too have kamma - and it takes them completely by surprise.
They then protest that they were the victim, and they were "abused, vilified, insulted" by this other person, they've done nothing wrong!
There begins the long and tedious process of explaining it in simple-to-handle terms.....!:D
This is how badly those who have no concept or knowledge of Buddhism or kamma, react.
Kamma is widely viewed, by many who have no idea, as something that carries some form of penalty, judgement or asskicking ability.
Putting them straight is occasionally a long process.
And let me tell you, not everybody takes to it kindly....
I participated in a hteread where the OP spoke of Kamma in these terms, and I managed, over a 'page or 2' of the thread, to explain the more conventional and correct concept.
One other poster came back, and said (I kid you not!)
"Yes, but Fede, we're not talking about your kind of karma, we're talking about our kind...." :wtf: :screwy:
Oh, I replied, trying to suppress my much-amused astonishment..."You're talking about revenge, or come-uppance....yes?"
"Yeah, that's right!"
"Well, in that case, " I replied "It isn't kamma - so don't call it that!"
In fairness, the OP did come back and apologise, and said she'd learnt a lot and hadn't meant to be dismissive or offensive....
I had no problem with her.
but really....some folks.....!
So much to do in the world. So much samsara. So little time. *sighhh*