Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
In tech age of blogs/sites, what constitutes original thought? Legalities.
I would like to learn about web design. Buddhism or psychology or both is my first thought. So of course I will research these. But when I put together a resource what are my responsibilities as far as legalities? I imagine I should give citations.
I am in the United States, though I don't know if there is an international law on the net.
In particular suppose I 'digest' some knowledge from my readings. At what point does it become my independent thought?
0
Comments
Every piece of work he submitted must have consisted of at least two pages of footnotes citing references and original sources/authors.
In detail.
This was compulsory, and compiling these footnotes alone probably took a good hour of his time.
In law, plagiarism is a serious topic.
This is another reason why members here are urged to offer citations, references original links or quotation details, in order to ensure that their understanding comes from a separate source.