Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Buddhism, The Path or just more BS?
Comments
I love history, and here in the States make a point of visiting historical locations related to the Civil War, the Revolution, and now the American West. But I've never fooled myself that even in those relatively well-documented historical periods that I could fully understand what life was like then...and those times were only 100-300 years ago. In over 30 years of traveling to and around Thailand and readings lots about the history of Sukhothai and Ayutthaya and the other kingdoms that eventually became Siam, I never fooled myself that I could fully understand what life was like in those periods beginning about 800 years ago.
But you want to tell me that you have any confident information about Siddhartha's knowledge level about martial arts in a time period some 2,500 years ago. Believe what you like, that's your right, but I think you're being preposterous.
There are some interesting artistic depictions of Gautama as a martial artists/sportsman.
An 8th c. Japanese silk print depicting Gautama wrestling:
This is one of several 2-3 c. Gandharan schists showing an archery contest:
The Christie's lot description for this piece reads "Carved with Siddhartha drawing a bow on his steed Kanthaka in full gallop, flanked by two attendant figures, separated from a large column at left."
And from Java:
The Buddha competes in an Archery Contest. Java, 700-800 AD. Museum no. IM 172-1926
The blog Gandharan Archives Kurita has, among many other fine entries, a nice series on pieces showing Siddartha competing in wrestling and archery.
How would (us) judging this action "right" or "wrong" change anything for Quan Duc or anyone else? It is done.
I was too shocked to cry, too confused to take notes or ask questions, too bewildered to even think…. As he burned he never moved a muscle, never uttered a sound, his outward composure in sharp contrast to the wailing people around him.
http://blogs.cfr.org/lindsay/2012/06/11/twe-remembers-thich-quang-ducs-self-immolation/
To understand Quang Duc’s story it is essential to know the story of Ngo Dinh Diem, the U.S.-backed president of South Vietnam. He came to power in 1955 in the aftermath of the Geneva Accords, which ended French colonial rule and split Vietnam along the 17th parallel. He had gained national fame when he quit a critical job working for the French colonial government before World War II and then refused to cooperate with the Japanese occupiers during it. But he was hardly the ideal choice to lead the new South Vietnam. He was a French-educated Catholic in a Buddhist majority country, and he had spent much of the decade after World War II living in the United States rather than building a political organization in South Vietnam. And he was hardly a democrat. When he rain in a “national” referendum in October 1955, he arranged it so that he won more than 98 percent of the vote.